No.11532
Who /thirdpositionist/ here?
No.11538
There are Libertarians and Authoritarians, and both are mutually exclusive, i do not see a so-called "third position" there.
>>>/leftypol/
No.11539
No.11540
>>11538
Have you not heard of left and right
>>>/autism/
No.11542
>>11540
>left and right
>not a false dichotomy
Pick one
No.11544
>>11534
Is it just me, or do real punk bands actually put coherent arguments into their songs?
No.11545
>>11538
They are not welcome on /leftypol/.
No.11547
>>11542
Libertarian and authoritarian without left and right is "good and evil"
The right is defined by hierarchy, the left equality
You are an immene faggot
>>11545
We don't want back in on your SJW safe space anyway faglord
No.11554
>>11547
>the left is defined by equality, the right is defined by hierarchy
>LE HISTORICALLY ILLITERATE POST
I really love when people who have no idea what they're talking about pretend to be authorities on the subject.
The left right (false) dichotomy stems from the French Revolution. The left side of the aisle was the people who generally wanted greater change, a relatively liberal view, these would be your anti-Monarchists (such as Jacobins.) The right wanted incremental, limited change, no change or perhaps even a return to older practices. So left and right is really only useful in a relativist sense that the "left" in any point in history wants more dramatic change where as the "right" is relatively conservative, wanting to limit change if not to revert what changes have been made in relatively recent history.
The left is not synonymous with egalitarianism, or equality. But I can see why you would think that it is, because that's what modern leftists generally advocate.
No.11555
>>11554
>jacobins wanted a drastic change for equality
>they were left
>monarchists wanted to maintain powerful hierarchy
>they were right
I'm not seeing the issue here
No.11560
>>11555
>implying Jacobins weren't just advocating for a different kind of coercive hierarchy
uwot?
No.11561
>>11560
Far more equal than the king
The left =/= anarchy
also ancap =/= anarchy
No.11564
No.11565
>>11560
Abolishing the aristocracy and other hereditary privileges is pro-equality.
No.11571
>>11547
>right is defined by hierarchy, the left equality
The left disguises their hierarchy with equalities for the masses. They are both hierarchical, one side just doesn't lie about it.
No.11608
No.11610
>>11608
/leftypol/ pls go
>>>/sjw/
No.11635
>>11586
>GUYS, WE CAN BE ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE AND
>AND RACIST
ebin win
No.11663
No.11664
>>11635
They are not capitalists, though.
No.11672
>>11664
>Being Anti-Capitalist
>Not Economically Iliterate.
Choose one and only one
>imb4 some realcurrencies link and rants against moneeh powah
No.11675
>>11663
Fuck off SJW, go be triggered somewhere else dindu
>>11672
>>11635
Nice argument shit for brains
No.11678
>>11675
>Nice argument shit for brains
No.11986
No.12044
>>all those images
Image dumps are not arguments