>>11996
Jesus fuck, this shitkicker.
>Financially compensating the people who provide me with goods and services means that I'm not free.
>If I don't hire a protection company, I'm literally guaranteed to be robbed and/or attacked.
>The fact that people in general have the physical ability to attack me constitutes a threat from the people who would sell me the services to mitigate that threat.
>I've never even heard of the concept of responsibility.
>AnCaps only support one particular model of private property protection to the exclusion of all others.
>Paying somebody to guard my house is the same as renting my house from them, nevermind that I can choose to stop or switch protectors and I still own the house.
>Everybody needs to be equal, because feelings.
>Lets have the police fund themselves entirely by extracting their operating costs from those they consider to be criminals. There's no way this could end badly.
>Lets empower an organization such that its funding doesn't depend upon how well they keep people safe but rather on how much they can take away from people they consider to be criminals.
>Lets have the damages extracted from criminals go to the police instead of the person who was harmed.
>The AnCap version of the prison system is this one thing I read about and not an open market in various prison alternatives.
I need to stop or I'm going to have an aneurysm.
At least he stumbles vaguely onto something like a notion represented in some AnCap models of the prison system; namely that prisoners are the clients. He's going about it all wrong, though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzYJYSm-MfI