>>14309
No idea. I'd start by imagining modern society without vice laws like drug and prostitution restrictions. No taxes means people keep much more of their earnings. No election cycle, so the news isn't that big a deal. No state to declare wars, so that isn't in the headlines either.
You're more worried about getting sued than arrested for hurting somebody, and if somebody hurts you, the damages actually go to pay you. Then again, maybe your insurance company pays you up front, and then they go to sue the other guy. It's hard to say, exactly. You're never afraid of cops, since it'd be a huge waste of money to pay them to just beat you up and throw you in a cage, and nobody wants to pay for that shit.
There's always jobs. Maybe you can't get a position as a paper-pusher like you're used to, but you know you aren't going to starve 'cause somebody always needs some dishes cleaned or the lawn trimmed or a ride to the airport.
Saving money isn't a shitshow, since interest isn't being pinned down by regulators, and the currency you keep is offered by competing firms, trying to attract customers with the most stable, interchangeable currency.
Increased purchasing power means shorter working hours. Since you aren't losing 80% of your buying power to taxes, you can live just about as comfortably as you currently do with only 20% of your current working time. You'll probably work a bit more than that, though, so you can save up and retire before you're 40.
Infrastructure is maintained, and constantly updated by its private owners. If their infrastructure goes to shit, they lose customers.
Nobody wanders around wondering what "The Law" is, since it's just a matter of respecting other people's property. Don't mess with their shit, and they've got no basis for coming after you legally. If they try, you can counter-sue.
Court proceedings are as fast as possible; time in court costs money and nobody wants to have to pay for that shit. It cuts into profit margins, but a rush job means a loss in business.
Companies can't pay a regulator for the right to pollute people's homes; they cause damage, those folks can sue. No central regulatory agency to stop them. Pollution is expensive and negative externalities get internalized.
All in all, every problem, every need people encounter in their daily lives will have multiple solutions; some great, some terrible. You'll occasionally get a shit deal or the runaround, but on the whole things will generally get more cool and less shitty over time, and everyone will take it for granted until somebody tries to take it away. Give it a couple generations and you'll have the Jetsons: a bunch of people zipping around in phenomenal technology which satisfies their every whim and they'll spend most of their time bitching that they had to push the button five times today!
>>14338
Heh, that's pretty funny.
>implying dollars