Liberals get in here

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 1453156702448.jpg (8.74 KB, 245x267, 245:267, 9a9469e2cf07c608330c5362b4….jpg)

Liberals get in here Anonymous 01/18/16 (Mon) 22:38:22 No.15764

Why do you not realise the innate problems within capitalism? How can you stick your hands in your ears as the system's contradictions lead to crisis upon crisis? How can you be satisfied with what if functionally a two hundred year old economic form, that's beginning to be overtaken by the likes of China's state-centric model?

Even if you want to quibble about capitalism's status as the end-point of human development, there seems to be no link between individual 'freedom' and capitalism. The most impressive capitalistic economic growth is coming from regimes that are autocratic and hierarchical in nature (the Asian tigers being perhaps the best examples).

Anonymous 01/18/16 (Mon) 22:48:48 No.15767

>>15764

I realise the correctness of what you say. I shall no longer be a retarded nigger Anarcho-Capitalist. Praise Lenin.

Anonymous 01/18/16 (Mon) 23:38:44 No.15771

File: 1453160324673.jpg (43.59 KB, 730x531, 730:531, 1452719634823.jpg)

>liberals

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 00:53:18 No.15772

File: 1453164798941.png (340.43 KB, 398x582, 199:291, 1451312865440.png)

>>15764

>system's contradictions lead to crisis upon crisis

Sure, of course governments supporting big business by setting favourable regulations, giving generous credit and hauling their asses out of every crisis have no relationship with this, and the solution is more government.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 03:17:21 No.15774

>>15764

>as the system's contradictions lead to crisis upon crisis?

The Federal Reserve, central banking, moral hazards created by regulation, socialized costs and privatized benefits, these things that lead to crises and disaster are not "innate contradictions" in capitalism.

fuggen gill yourself :DDD

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 11:03:30 No.15785

>>15774

>>15772

Capitalism necessitates a state Liberals. Arguing that capitalism has been corrupted by the state is delusional, given (as one of you pointed out) individual companies spent much of their time looking at the state as a tool of competition.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 11:10:00 No.15786

Seriously though, what if states are just like companies, but bigger and older?

Checkmate liberals.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 11:12:32 No.15787

>>15786

>What if

But they aren't

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 11:58:01 No.15788

>>15785

>Capitalism necessitates a state

what

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 12:59:51 No.15794

>>15788

You can't have capitalism without a state.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 13:01:22 No.15797

>>15764

>liberals

stopped reading there.

>>>/leftypol/

>>>/readabook/

>>>/facebook/

Orthobro 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:34:42 No.15806

File: 1453228482138.png (663.88 KB, 1267x1635, 1267:1635, 1439562641641.png)

>>15785

>People trading things voluntarily for-profit necessitates a state

Tell that to the old Somalis (before communism), early Iceland, 9,000 year Ireland, Zomia, Cospaia, etc.

Orthobro 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:37:14 No.15807

>>15786

It's squares and rectangles, man.

A corporation (square) can become a state (rectangle), but a state (rectangle) can not be a corporation (square).

A corporation can't exist in AnCapistan anyways because a corporation is an entity defined by and receiving special privileges and benefits from the government.

That's why we use the term business.

Orthobro 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:39:07 No.15808

File: 1453228748008.jpg (59.6 KB, 600x622, 300:311, 10639534_641257022679801_5….jpg)

>>15807

>>15786

Fuck, sorry. Been reading the word "corporation" so much that I just assumed you used it instead of company.

My first point still stands.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:39:54 No.15809

>>15806

>capitalism predates the middle ages

cool meme, too bad you are fucking wrong

Orthobro 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:43:43 No.15811

File: 1453229023124.jpg (52.49 KB, 480x480, 1:1, 10603463_1700416616845265_….jpg)

>>15809

And you're arguing semantics, but I'll respond anyways.

Yes, Classical Liberalist Capitalism came after the middle ages based around the ideas of John Locke.

Voluntaryism, commonly called "Anarcho Capitalism" because capitalism is the current word used to define such voluntary private transactions that are made for a profit (E.G. for capital). For profit (for capital) trade has existed for a very long time. The term Capitalism is completely correct in this context.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:49:04 No.15813

>>15811

I'm not arguing semantics. We all know what the fuck the commie was talking about, and it's not just people exchanging things for fun. You purposefully misunderstood him, and I'm the one arguing semantics? Go and fuck yourself you lying bastard.

Orthobro 01/19/16 (Tue) 18:56:04 No.15814

File: 1453229764746.jpg (58.93 KB, 600x349, 600:349, 1426268006684.jpg)

>>15813

>We all know what the fuck the commie was talking about, and it's not just people exchanging things for fun. You purposefully misunderstood him, and I'm the one arguing semantics?

You're right, and he knows what the fuck us Voluntarists are talking about, so he "purposefully misunderstands" our arguments in the first place, faggot. I'm simply responding in kind and you're too much of a slobbering idiot to even see that.

Also it's exchanging things for profit not for fun. Get ti right already.

Anonymous 01/19/16 (Tue) 19:07:07 No.15818

File: 1453230427529.jpg (97.12 KB, 850x748, 25:22, 1452743469665.jpg)

>>15814

It's still arguing semantics. Are you doing it because otherwise you would have to admit that anarcho-capitalism is either primitivist, or not anarchist at all?

Anonymous 01/20/16 (Wed) 01:23:19 No.15847

quality thread

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 01:19:42 No.16722

>>15818

It is not primitivist per se but it can have primitivist elements, but it is infidelity anarchistic.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 04:03:35 No.16733

>>15818

I want to pump my sperm into Cirno's qt belly.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 09:24:39 No.16747

>>16733

We all do.

Anonymous 01/31/16 (Sun) 11:50:58 No.16758