I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, but not the NAP.
I prefer the Aggression Principle. It states that you can use aggression when you feel like it, and that people can use aggression to defend themselves from people using aggression to defend themselves from people using aggression on themselves. It's more realistic. War is the best market. Taking property by force is just a hostile take over.
I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, because I like the idea of class war and a bunch of shops getting smashed, and commies being sent to privatized death camps.
Personally, I'm also in favor of Anarcho-Communism. Anarcho-Capitalism is the best way to get to Anarcho-Communism, and vice versa, because both will create chaos and war, and a tribal Mad Max society.
Most anarchists are fags who say "A-anarchism d-doesn't mean chaos! It just means no rulers!", but they are wrong; anarchism does mean chaos, and that's the best thing about it. I can rape women and get away with it, and if the commune anarchist association come to arrest me, I can just hire a protection agency the mafia to smash their faces in.
I can't wait until we're all living in socialist communes run by major corporations. Fat people will live in the McDonald's commune. Strong lads will live in the bodybuilding.com commune. Smelly nerds will live in the /pol/ commune. /leftypol/ won't even have a commune, because you'll all die of a broken heart.
Personally, I think it's going to be great. I was involved in Occupy Wall Street London, and the G20 protests, and I took along an Anachro -Capitalist flag and shouted KILL THE PIGS! EAT THE RICH! I got with a hot girl but she ignored me.
So, basically, I'm in favor of WW3, and if you're not you are an idealistic humanist faggot. Fite me commies.