/liberty/ - Liberty

>Because you're not being aggressive; you're just responding to American aggression.

That would be aggressive since the individual people in the building were not personally responsible for that aggression. Your mind seems to be clouded by that good ol' collectivism spook

>if I rape your mother, you can't hit me back.

So, destroying an entire building of innocent civilians because a bunch of Jews did some illegal shit is totally justified, but punishing someone for rape is aggression? Seems consistent m8.

>>16063

>collectivism

>spook

meme

>>16075

Were the people in the WTC building responsible for American imperialism? Oh sorry, you wouldn't want to answer a question that requires you to think, my leftist friend :^)

>>16077

you sound triggered

first of all, if you are going to use the spook meme, use it correctly

Aggression against the oppressor is always justified.

>>16101

this

If it's a fucking country, then the people there are responsible. If you ain't, better leave the country. Don't come cryin when shit goes south

>>16075

Collectivism is a social institution, so it really is a spook.

Stay triggered, faggot :^)

>>16130

> Collectivism is a social institution

No, it's not? It's a category of social structures.

>>16112

By that rationale we're totally justified in carpet bombing the middle east.

>>16242

It's called Nationalism, it was invented when the early capitalist class needed the help of the peasants to overthrow the aristocracy

>>16182

yep we are, because it's the aggressive state, and poses a threat to the US.

>>16242

not really, the people who live there are the people who are at war with us. You could try and reduce innocent casualties by being careful but innocents are still going to die, no matter what you do because this would be a very large-scale operation.

You should remmeber that in highly religious countries, most people are stupid. You're more likely to get a retarded allah-lovin 20 year old from a sweet 5 year old boy than a critical thinker. People who can think get stoned in those countries, and most people are nothing more than savages. Killing them is in the US' self-interest and key to its self-preservation.

But this is also a very risky operation, for the slightest malfunction, or half-assing it only leads to further, magnified problems.

>>16255

>It's called Nationalism, it was invented when the early capitalist class needed the help of the peasants to overthrow the aristocracy

I guess we're not needed any more, hence the push for one world government.

>>17648

> neocon

Not every hawkish position can be described as "neocon".

>>17648

A good film on neoconservatism, if you want to get a better idea of what it is, besides an excuse for foreign wars, is "The Power of Nightmares."