[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next update (Jan 4 2016)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1453435900724.jpg (1.56 MB, 2008x1335, 2008:1335, gpw-20060917-UnitedStatesN….jpg)

 No.16084

I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, but not the NAP.

I prefer the Aggression Principle. It states that you can use aggression when you feel like it, and that people can use aggression to defend themselves from people using aggression to defend themselves from people using aggression on themselves. Fuck it. Basically, you can use aggression to defend capitalism. It's more realistic that way. War is the best market. Taking property by force is just a hostile take over.

I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, because I like the idea of class war and a bunch of shops getting smashed, and commies being sent to privatized death camps.

Most anarchists are fags who say "A-anarchism d-doesn't mean chaos! It just means no rulers!", but they are wrong; anarchism does mean chaos, and that's the best thing about it. I can rape women and get away with it, and if the commune anarchist association come to arrest me, I can just hire a protection agency the mafia to smash their faces in.

But back to privatized death camps. We can make commies pay us to go on rollercoasters that break off their heads and kill them, and there will be tea cup rides that pour boiling tea on them, and there will be a rifle stall where you can shoot a commie to get a bear, also redeemable for real world bitcoins made from gold.

When it's war time, all the big companies will join together to form a megacorp, like a capitalist voltron. Then, they will use their privatized nuke missiles to kill any town with communist contract law that violates the BE CAPITALIST OR DIE principle.

When the market is freed from people who hate capitalism (because they are dead), then we can finally have a true free market that's real this time. Also, I think we start genetically engineering the perfect capitalist man who only thinks in terms of marginal utility, leading to a perfect society in which every man is a genetically pure business owner, and each man employs the other men in his factory, and it works in rotation… and fuck, where are the chicks? A chick touched my arm once.

Anyway, I hate commies, so pro-aggression Anarcho-Capitalism is the final solution to the statist scum.

VOLUNTARIST KILL COMPANIES

MARKET MURDER MOBS

PRIVATIZED DEATH CAMPS

 No.16086

>I can rape women and get away with it

If this was your goal you'd be looking to get into power in a dictatorship where you can do that and have an army back you up, not a society wherein you would have no ideological or political backing in doing so.

Le obvious false flag.


 No.16089

>>16086

>Le obvious false flag.

False flag? Against what? Non-Aggression Ancap?

I told you - I'm a PRO-Aggression Ancap. We're different (better). With aggression you get to do more and enjoy more possibilities. The full experience of anarchy is opened up. Without aggression, the potential of anarchy is limited.


 No.16100

>I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, but not the NAP.

Seems contradictory

>Most anarchists are fags who say "A-anarchism d-doesn't mean chaos! It just means no rulers!", but they are wrong; anarchism does mean chaos, and that's the best thing about it.

Anarchy does mean "no rulers". It comes from the Greek word "anarchos" which literally means "one without rulers".

>I'm in favor of Anarcho-Capitalism, because I like the idea of class war and a bunch of shops getting smashed, and commies being sent to privatized death camps.

You do realize that by advocating the use of force against [arbitrary political group] that you're advocating the use of force against yourself too, right? If you're saying that we should be allowed to kill communists then you also have to agree that we should be allowed to kill capitalists. If you disagree, and you support an exclusive society in which only capitalists have rights, then you are a statist. Advocating the monopolization of force makes you a statist.

What you're proposing is the complete opposite of what anarchism is. Anarchism is when everything is private and the state does not exist. Statism is when some things (or everything) is public and the state is allowed to initiate force. What you're advocating is ultra-statism. You're saying that everyone is allowed to be their own state and use aggression on other people. That's statism taken to its total extreme.

Your idea would fail anyway. Almost nobody wants to take part in that kind of chaos and almost everybody wants to prevent it.


 No.16105

So practically you are a honest ancap?


 No.16106

>>16105

But isn't anarcho-capitalism based on the NAP which, by definition, opposes aggression?


 No.16116

>>16084

wat

You may need to check your head


 No.16119

File: 1453483120709.webm (6.42 MB, 1826x1080, 913:540, kairos coaster slower tha….webm)

>>16100

>You do realize that by advocating the use of force against [arbitrary political group] that you're advocating the use of force against yourself too, right? If you're saying that we should be allowed to kill communists then you also have to agree that we should be allowed to kill capitalists. If you disagree, and you support an exclusive society in which only capitalists have rights, then you are a statist. Advocating the monopolization of force makes you a statist.

I don't want the monopolization of force. I agree that commies are free to use force against me. I will just stop them and put them in a privatized death camp.

>Your idea would fail anyway. Almost nobody wants to take part in that kind of chaos and almost everybody wants to prevent it.

They want have a choice soon. Pro-aggression Ancaps like me and Christopher Cantwell will rise from the ashes of WW3 to conquer the planet (in a private capitalist way).


 No.16121

>>16106

That's just PR. It's all about the market of force.


 No.16154

best satire on this board




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]