>>16699
this is only possible by attributing every possible death over capital to capitalism. The idea is so retarded it needn't be refuted.
I really worry over how little plebs actually understand how shit of a system applied communism was
>the confiscation of land from established industrial farmers (first the kulaks) who actually knew what the fuck they were doing and placing said land in the hands of incompetent, illiterate proles entitled to it by their ability to grip a sickle and follow instructions
>the dogmatic application of discredited science such as neo-lamarckism in the form of lysenkoism, and the rejection of established science (mendelian inheritance and animal husbandry as "fascist science")
>the destruction of the free market of science – the freedom of individuals to test, adopt and invest in good science – the essence of capitalist innovation
>application of the idea that you can legislate prices (for, say, staple crops) and not begin the inexorable road to underprovision, rationing then famine
>the idea that you could "create" jobs up to "full employment" then pay proles at the arbitrary value of their labor: the principle cause of shit jobs, shit productivity and high emigration
Over five continents, for eight decades, millions of people died as a direct consequence of communist pseudo-scientific and pseudo-economic thinking. Either as a consequence of communist dogma or killed for daring to resist it. Everywhere this happened at the behest of a class of ex-criminals, failures and no-nothings whose jealousy only equalled their bigotry. Today the same falsehoods that made this shit possible the first time are coming back. Simply because westerners continue to approach the Cold War with this moral ambivalence, as though communism's lies and crimes are equivalent to anything ever witnessed in human history.