>>16918
I believe in anarchywillbepossiblewhentranshumanismgivesusthepowertosurviveasindividualswithoutsocietyandeveninspacebutillbeacenturydeadbythensoohwelltyrannyitistheresnothingicandoaboutthatism.
That's my ideology. Or just Anarcho-Transhumanism, but I don't think that's quite the same, since they are usually just anarchists who want the freedom to upgrade their bodies, and not people who think upgrading humans would be a necessary prerequisite for anarchy.
"He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle.
We're stuck in the middle right now, and so we have societies, which are inherently authoritarian, as opposed to fluid free association without dependency relationships, which can only exist if and when man becomes a more individually robust kind of entity.
>>16924
Though Tucker did believe that land should be used continually to avoid monopoly, and he opposed usury, he tended to believe that the things he found immoral would be destroyed through market forces, so yeah, not far off really.