[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1454898098457-0.gif (202.33 KB, 251x348, 251:348, Best_Meido.gif)

File: 1454898098458-1.png (1.79 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, CZ_waifubot.png)

File: 1454898098458-2.jpg (67.99 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Dimension_W.jpg)

 No.17231

In honor of the /n/ waifubot thread, lets discuss the pros and cons of waifubots.

Pros:

>Artificial wombs

>Lower sexual assault rates

>Lower violence rates

>pacifies autists

>Sex Bots, mane

>Technically not banned by scripture if there's an artificial womb

>Could potentially end/seriously reduce Prostitution and Sex Trafficking

>People with strange fetishes like Pedos and Furries will have an outlet instead of becoming predators

>Waifubots will inevitably be able to perform other tasks like making sandwiches and helping you fix your car (third pic related)

>Waifubots with advanced AIs can perform many tasks that mothers could

>Women become obsolete

Cons:

>Early experimentation before artificial wombs could lead to the collapse of civilization

>In practice, it's against scripture because people will end up idolizing sex bots

>Could result in an all-male society

>Someone's waifu is shit

>Don't understand the long-term implications of single-parent male households (but knowing single-parent female households, we can assume it would be bad)

>Robomoms could result in all sorts of human psyche fuckery

>Robowaifus go berserk and lead to a revolution/mass genocide event

>Government uses waifubots to spy on you/keep you complacent

>People use sex bots like drugs, turning it into an addiction

>Advanced AI causes robot activists to ban their use

>Ethics board disallows it, making us rely strictly on business because of science douche bags

>Waifubots sent off to war

>Women become obsolete

 No.17238

>>17231

I'd also like to point folks to

>>>/n/295296

>>>/n/295343

Where this topic was conceived from.


 No.17243

>>17231

I think the real question is if women will recognize their coming obsolescence and return to values which are more desired by men in order to kill market demand for such technology.


 No.17247

This topic was old before it even came up.

>Lower sexual assault rates

>Lower violence rates

Most violent assaults are triggered by a behavior of the victim. These behaviors will still be present when waifubots are around, and the attitudes underlying the assault will also be present, so assaults will still happen. Truly random assaults, where the victim did nothing to trigger the assault in any way, are much more seldom. The closest I can think of are a) robberies, and waifubots will not be targeted by robbers as they are mostly at home and not on the street, b) some hate crimes, the targets of which have to be humans, and c) true sickfuckery, committed by sadists who specifically want to hurt human beings.

As for sexual assault: It's a naive assumption that rape happens just because someone is horny and has no girlfriend. It can happen in the spur of the moment, when you have a large group of guys who goad each other until they rape someone. In that case, they won't look for another kind of release, because their rationality is essentially put on hold. Then you have rapes that are committed to punish someone, to assert control over someone or out of sheer sadism. The entire point of these is that you dominate another human being. Then you have hypersexual or otherwise completely deranged personalities. With these, predicting a certain behavior is a guessing game, at least when looking at their entire (fairly small) population.

>Could potentially end/seriously reduce Prostitution and Sex Trafficking

No, because sex is more than a purely physical act. Also, read above.

>Early experimentation before artificial wombs could lead to the collapse of civilization

Not realy, as most children these days are planned, anyway. At least in the first world.

>Someone's waifu is shit

This.

>Government uses waifubots to spy on you/keep you complacent

This, too.

>People use sex bots like drugs, turning it into an addiction

Drugs don't work that way. Don't believe everything school tells you.


 No.17248

>>17247

By the way: Yes, I know that female-on-male-rape absolutely does happen. There's preciously little literature on it, though, and I don't know yet what causes it. My educated guess: It happens much less often, as women in general commit fewer streetcrimes, and sickfuckery is more often the cause of it, for cultural and biological reasons (women generally being less aggressive, and not seeing sex as much as a status symbol).

Just so no one comes up and tells me I'm presenting rape as something only done by males.


 No.17314

File: 1455263114965.jpg (1.2 MB, 1926x2894, 963:1447, Natalie Alyn Lind 02.jpg)

It's not about the pros and cons, this is /liberty/, so it's about the question of why should it be banned.

A libertarian or anarchist basically believes that nothing should be banned either at all or at least unless it is unequivocally abhorrent. If I were to build a waifubot completely independently on my own property and then enjoy her pleasures then I am not infringing on anyone else's rights and I am entitled to that pleasure.

Any opposition to the widespread commercialisation of waifubots can only be made through the lens of statism. A government would have to say that they know what's best for society and step in to ban waifubots, and no anarchist or libertarian could or should support that any more than they should support the banning of guns or manually driven cars.

If we did want to do a cost/benefit analysis for the entirety of society, as an anarchist or libertarian there can be no conclusion other than that the harm from banning something which does not concern or disturb others is greater than any societal harm. Even if you were to say that society could collapse, that is irrelevant. Libertarianism and anarchism give you the right to preserve your society on your land, not to force it on other people who might prefer waifubots over being part of society.

Pic related, what will be my first waifubot purchase.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]