[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1455749817531.jpg (139.42 KB, 964x637, 964:637, 1353630244210.jpg)

 No.17547

sup, /liberty/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchy

This sounds a lot like anarcho-capitalism. Is there any substantial difference? Is it a particular form of anarcho-capitalism.

I'm trying to rebrand ancap ideas with a less bait-worthy name.

Also,tell me alternative names for ancap.

 No.17556

File: 1455753516249.png (91.22 KB, 638x451, 58:41, snake of freedom.png)

>Alternative names for ancap

Voluntaryist

Libertarian Anarchist

Consistent advocate of the Non-Aggression Principle

Somalian

They who lack for Gods, Kings, and Roads


 No.17570

According to that Mussolini internet quote:

Baffled Dictator


 No.17598

>>17547

>I'm trying to rebrand ancap ideas with a less bait-worthy name.

I wanted to do the same thing once, but I changed my mind when I realized just how utterly fucking stupid the people who complain about "anarcho"-capitalism are.


 No.17599

>>17598

Who complains? what kind of people? Can you be more specific?


 No.17604

>>17599

Pretty much all left-anarchists. Because ancaps don't object to worker/boss-relationships, we're not against hierarchies, therefore we're not really anarchists. This is not only disproven by a simple look in the dictionary (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anarchy), it's also a blatant red herring. Here's an interesting article on the historical arguments many left-anarchists like to throw around: http://radgeek.com/gt/2007/12/01/benjamin_tucker/

Maybe my perception is skewed, but it seems to me that left-anarchists these days seem to be more sympathetic towards statist-socialism than towards ancapism. For what reason, I'm not sure. In "Markets not Capitalism" (read it if you haven't already), there were not one, but two essays on how marxism a shit, both from anarcho-oldfags, and one - Tucker himself - was quoting a poem ANOTHER anarchist has written on the topic. So really, it's not like left-anarchism and statist-socialism started out being fuckbuddies. The Anarchist FAQ acknowledges that too, but apparently, the only section /leftypol/ has ever read is the one on anarchocapitalism.


 No.17605

>>17604

Oh, yes, there's that. But I was thinking of minarchists, conservatives and people on the "alt-right", who are repelled by the word "anarchy" precisely because they associate it with the lefty anarchists. As a Hoppean ancap, I find more common ground with a minarchist or even some fascists than with the typical ancom.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]