>>17834
>Is non-violent collectivism natural?
I guess, man is still at some level a social animal, having spent the majority of the last 50,000 or so years living in small tribes where much was shared.
>Would collectivization still occur in a voluntary society?
No reason why small (less than ~150 people, Dunbar's number) collectives couldn't form in an AnCap society, but in order to remain competitive in such a society they would likely be based around some specialization rather than be self-sufficient.
Think a situation where a building company is owned by maybe two dozen families and the male heads of household are the people who work there, they raise their male children to be builders (with the exception of the guys who do the paperwork, given to the most intelligent of the group) and of course they go on to be the next generation of workers/owners. Because of this situation where the boys are raised from a young age to be builders they become incredibly skilled compared to other people in the trade which are outside of the group, giving them a strong competitive advantage when it comes to quality of work (which I feel would be in high demand in an AnCap society due to the abundance of wealth that the average family would have).