[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1457311129112.jpeg (20.88 KB, 255x155, 51:31, image.jpeg)

 No.18875

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) plans to force senators to vote on the State Department’s approval of $700 million worth of fighter jets to Pakistan using an obscure Senate rule that hasn’t been invoked in decades.

>The Obama administration cleared the sale of eight F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan last month. But Paul is invoking the obscure Arms Export Control Act of 1976 in a bid to shoot down the sale with a resolution of disapproval.

>"Over the last few years we have seen that Pakistan is an uncertain ally when it comes to cooperating with the United States,” Paul said in a statement. “As I travel in Kentucky, I meet countless individuals who are struggling to survive in this economy, we have no business sending hundreds of millions of dollars overseas."

>The last time the Senate voted on such a resolution, according to Paul’s aides, was in 1986, when then-Sen. Alan Cranston (D-Calif.) forced a roll call on banning sales of certain missiles and defense services to Saudi Arabia.

>Paul introduced the resolution that would block the sale of the F-16 aircraft to Pakistan on Feb. 25, two weeks after the administration announced it had approved the potential sale.

>The junior Kentucky senator is using a little-known provision in the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 that allows any member of the Senate to secure a floor vote to disapprove an arms sale. Under the law, the senator must introduce a resolution of disapproval, and then wait 10 days for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to act on the measure, according to the Congressional Research Service.

>If the committee doesn’t take up the measure after 10 days, the senator can move to discharge that resolution from the committee with a floor vote. That vote is primarily procedural, and not necessarily an up-or-down vote on the resolution’s merits.

>One senior Republican said it was likely that Paul would get such a vote on the floor sometime before the next recess, which begins the week of March 21, in between other Senate business.

 No.18878

heh, so much for the libertarian candidate.


 No.18879

>>18878

What's really sad is most people didn't know he was even running even tho he'd been at the debate prier to him dropping out


 No.18880

>>18878

He's not a Libertarian.

He supports a greatly increased military budget, use of military drones on civilians, flip flops on the drug war, has suggested putting people in prison for listening to individuals like Hitler and Mussolini, supports the billions in funding sent to Israel, etc.

He's a fucking conservative who happens to prefer state's rights, for fuck's sake.


 No.18895

>Screw dirty Pakis out of foreign aid using this one weird old rule


 No.18896

>>18880

>flip flops on the drug war, has suggested putting people in prison for listening to individuals like Hitler and Mussolini

sauce on this?


 No.18897

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18896

>Radical speeches

Vid related.

>weed

https://archive.is/gsouM

>“the main thing I’ve said is not to legalize them, but not to incarcerate people for extended periods of time.”

>"I don't want to encourage people to do it. I think even marijuana is a bad thing to do. I think it takes away your incentive to work and show up and do the things that you should be doing. I don't think it's a good idea."

tl;dr- He'd likely want to set up community service-style programs for drug offenders, but he certainly does not approve of legalization.


 No.18898

>>18897

I've got no problems calling him a small-government conservative or even an intelligent teabagger, but he's not a libertarian.


 No.18899

>>18897

Incrementalism you dumb nigger. Jefferson advocated the castration of homosexuals for example and retards gasp about that but in fact he was liberalizing the law from the death penalty for homosexuality. Society cannot go from hot to cold. Don't be a dumb nigger, look more than one move ahead.


 No.18901

File: 1457323714195.gif (498.47 KB, 255x235, 51:47, 1379904302806.gif)


 No.18903

>>18899

What does shifting the overton window have to do with anything I said you illiterate twit?

You're trying to make a justification for calling him Libertarian. He's not a Libertarian and he's said so repeatedly. I'm stating that when you look at his views, you can call him a small government conservative, but he is by no means a Libertarian.


 No.18909

>>18903

So honest question because I don't know

Was Ron Paul a libertarian?


 No.18917

>>18909

I don't know either.

I'd say on the scale, he's very Libertarian now, but it depends who you ask.

Ron Paul was a Gadsden Libertarian who attacked the war on drugs in the 80s/90s when no one else would. At the same time, if you follow the logic of folks like the pedos over at C4SS, he's borderline.

I'll say I legitimately think Ron Paul is a big L Libertarian, but I'm wary about using the small l label.

Ron has a much less ambiguous (and right-wing Libertarian) view on just about everything. His biggest issue people go after him for are "sexism" and his border opinions- namely he is not an idealist. Ron wants ambiguous borders, but he's convinced that open borders only work if everyone is on a level economic playing field in the first place.


 No.18971

>>18909

>Was Ron Paul a libertarian?

Yes. As a politician he was far more libertarian than your average Republican is conservative or your average Democrat is liberal. Which is to say he is an anti-statist.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]