>>19042
>Of course, all the criticisms about not being stateless can be turned back on Ancap, with its silly polycentric chieftainships, but that's fine by me as I'm a filthy classical liberal state lover.
You are mixing police-military concerns with economic ones. Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism converge to basically the same model in the absence of violence or the threat thereof.
When police and military concerns are relevant, anarcho-capitalism (at least the Hoppean variety) doesn't HAVE to be polycentric. Natural aristocracy and leadership have their place, they just don't get a blank check of obedience for being who they are.