[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1457563355286.jpg (1.2 MB, 3200x2150, 64:43, 1383522665146.jpg)

 No.19049

http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/17-to-1-reproductive-success

If women's innate biological tendency, to seek resources for eggs, is allowed to "play out" in a society, you get harems, and if you have a democracy a welfare-warfare state.

Okay, actually, forget this, I have a fun game for you guys:

Step 1: Name as many empires as you can that enforced chastity/monogamy/pair-bonding on women while it was building up/advancing

Spoiler: this will be 99.99% of empires that have ever existed

Step 2: Name as many empires as you can that had sexual liberation for women while they were building up/just at their peak

Spoiler alert: this will be ~0% of empires

Step 3: Look at the empires from (1) and figure out how many of them had much more sexual liberation for women during their decadent decline/collapse

Spoiler alert: this will be a lot of them

Step 4: Try and find, among any empires, one that was declining, had sexual liberation for women, and reversed this process

you will fail, no such empire exists

Step 5: Affirm or deny this statement: "Sexual liberation for women is both a sign of and a causal contributor to the downfall of empires"

Affirm the statement because it's correct

Step 6: Existential dread?

 No.19051

muh empires muh hitler

fuck off cunt


 No.19052

>>19051

Although I think if they're having children they should be married or at least rich


 No.19054

File: 1457576200127.gif (Spoiler Image, 3.26 MB, 600x600, 1:1, LadyTrollface_full.gif)

I used to be Lolbertarian… then I realized that could only work in small groups, and people are interdependent if they want to live at all in a modern civilization, and that disputes can't all be won with NAP and social shunning.

In other words, vote Hitler!

Pic Related: There's Lolbertaricuck tears mixed in that glass of Libcuck tears…


 No.19057

>>19051

>>19054

>I used to be Lolbertarian… then I realized that could only work in small groups,

Worked just fine for the mostly libertarian early US society.


 No.19060

I do not care. If seventeen women want to share the same man, good luck to them. I am neither the women nor the man. I do not feel entitled to be a part of any of that nor do I feel the need to be.


 No.19064

>>19060

You can dislike something and agree it is harmful to a society in the long-term without violating the NAP you fucking cuck.


 No.19069

File: 1457600506413-0.jpg (61.12 KB, 596x596, 1:1, advocates.jpg)

File: 1457600506945-1.jpg (26.42 KB, 662x369, 662:369, 12662660_950200471732068_1….jpg)

File: 1457600506947-2.jpg (32.52 KB, 560x502, 280:251, 11145188_1091019034259098_….jpg)

File: 1457600507571-3.png (50.02 KB, 398x476, 199:238, 11745325_1054865684541100_….png)

File: 1457600507595-4.jpg (39.94 KB, 480x480, 1:1, 12728760_1675029732714512_….jpg)

>>19049

>Try and find, among any empires, one that was declining, had sexual liberation for women, and reversed this process

Didn't the USSR reverse this process temporarily by becoming puritanical?

I think it has less to do with women, and more to do with…

1) Empire grows

2) Empire reaches zenith

3) Citizens in the mainland Empire DC, East Coast. no longer have to worry about war, and are well-fed so long as they continue to practice their trades.

4) First generation of people still have kids as if they were farmers still, excess kids now can't compete in the fields their parents had, create new fields that wouldn't have as much value as the old ones did.

5) Fewer children are born, all of them want to go into the cushioney luxury fields that the excess children created. This is when your "sexual liberalization" takes place, by the way.

6) Suddenly realize that the core fields were necessary to survive and no one has those professions any more. This is where your "sexual liberalization" backfires because women don't want to have kids with the people holding up the entire fucking system- they want to have kids with the luxury guy, but it's not the women who are the issue here.

7) Either try to solve this by importing labor from the frontier, or subsidizing their lifestyle by taxing the shit out of the frontier. This would be the South and Great Plains + Silicon Valley for those following the America model here. Or Muslims and Chinks for labor if you follow the European model.

8) The frontier gets tired of listening to the mainland since the mainland no longer has a big army to back up their bullshit anyways.

9) Frontier says "fuck off" to the tax collectors, maybe fights a small war here and there to reclaim lost land/wealth.

10) Empire collapses in on itself as Frontiers reclaim what was theirs in the first place.

Really, sexual liberation of women is a symptom of the bigger problem- The founding lands of empires get fat and degenerate off of the cardinal sins founded on the backs of frontier slaves, and then become unable to protect themselves, leading to their subjects attacking the master. There were plenty of degenerate cultures that survived just fine because they knew better and left others alone instead of trying to prove a point by becoming #1.

This is one of the reasons we advocate anarchy- it breaks the cycle because the master no longer exists to anger the slave- everyone is a master of their own fate.


 No.19070

File: 1457604525907.gif (2.03 MB, 200x200, 1:1, poklonskaya hates your pos….gif)

>>19054

Epic trelling, m8!!!!1 xD


 No.19077

>>19064

I don't like it or dislike it. If you're the same guy crying about how necessary it is to accept merit and hierarchy in that other thread I don't see why you'd resent all these women bowing to the alpha male.


 No.19081

Wars only involve men, and tribal genocide usually involves killing all the men and taking the women.


 No.19120

>>19077

>crying about how necessary it is to accept merit and hierarchy in that other thread I don't see why you'd resent all these women bowing to the alpha male.

I'm not tho

1. It is not immoral for women to bow to the alpha male

2. It is immoral for the state to force betas to pay for women to slut it up with irresponsible alphas. Alpha providers? Fine, good luck with that, but it's not acceptable for women's irresponsible actions to be forcibly subsidized.

In a free society women would not choose an unreliable alpha provider when the costs of their actions are born by their own rotten cunts.


 No.19130

>>19120

>2. It is immoral for the state to force betas to pay for women to slut it up with irresponsible alphas. Alpha providers? Fine, good luck with that, but it's not acceptable for women's irresponsible actions to be forcibly subsidized.

Who the fuck do you imagine disagrees with that notion here? That's not what you were chimping out about and you know it.


 No.19137

>>19130

>Who the fuck do you imagine disagrees with that notion here? That's not what you were chimping out about and you know it.

Oh, no, it was. See, women won't form harems in a modern society if betas aren't forced to support their irresponsible behavior. Right now, the sexual market value of women is subsidized so they only look for status, aggressiveness, and physical attractiveness, instead of looking for those ON TOP of being a strong provider of resources and a good father and a non-abusive husband.

If women want to form harems in a free society and I'm free to call socially ostracize them and refuse to trade with them, sounds good to me. Although, if the majority of women form harems regardless of that ostracism said free society IS going to have trouble surviving. That's not a moral issue, just a major practical one.


 No.19142

Sexual "liberation" forces women to deny their nature. They are designed to be picky in their mates, to ensure the best offspring.


 No.19182

>>19142

what a retarded /pol/cuck

Women are programmed to trade up whenever they can. Hypergamy, you cucksoc.


 No.19186

>>19182

Humans are not rabbits, you retard.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]