/liberty/ - Liberty

Sounds like she's already redpilled, just get rid of the feminism and your good

>>5155

>Democratic

>Socialist

plz, go

>>5155

>being this bluepilled

>>5155

Commie lover.

>>5179

Haven't read any of his works yet, but I'm aware that I should. Now that you mention it, I could show her that essay by Benjamin Tucker where he completely demolished the idea that statism and socialism can go along.

>>5153

Half/b/ set me on the path of light and primed me for half/pol/. Without those two boards, I would be a euphoric whiteknight faggot.

>>5222

I'm not even ancap.

I just hate filth-mongering commie shitbags.

Real advice

If you can't even sway a chick to your point of view, you probably either don't know your shit, or you're socially retarded.

Give her a rough, dominant dicking. Choke her, call her a whore, smack her ass, and make her lick your cock clean when you're done. Feminists love that. After she falls in love with you, it's easy to make her agree with just about any political opinion you have.

>>5263

>Real advice

Actually, no. You're just being edgy as fuck. 0/10.

>>5275

>>5279

>giving women what they want is edgy

Beta as fuck.

Google feminist rape fantasies some time when you want to stop being a naive cuck.

>>5275

>>5279

Hi, tumblr.

>>5279

Fuck off.

>>5280

So? Fantasizing about rape =|= wanting to be raped.

>>5289

Nobody suggested raping anybody.

>>5291

In this case, 2/10, not 0/10. Do you fuck any chick you know just because she doesn't share your ideological views? In that case, you're a fucking retard.

>>5181

Link?

>>5330

Here: http://praxeology.net/BT-SSA.htm

>>5294

In your case, feel free to fuck any dudes you disagree with.

>>5176

>>5175

>>5156

If you have nothing intelligent to contribute, try to hold your tongue.

>>5600

>whiteknighting demsocs

plz, go

>>5600

Says the shitposting lefty.

>>5153

redpill her with your dick

OP here. I think she may have gotten worse, lately, or maybe I'm just more political than I used to be so she's retorting more often than she used to.

Fuck me.

>>7798

G

I

V

E

H

E

R

T

H

E

D

I

C

K

>>7806

For the last time, I don't want to! I want my first time to be special :^)

Seriously now, just no. No.

Gamergate posts. No, really, they have some of the best anti-feminist ammunition I've ever seen. They'll usually flip their fucking lid and call you a woman-hater. But keep it up. Enough slow pokes puts holes in their bullshit.

My wife was a rabid anti-gunner, and me and hard constitutionalist. 4 years of /k/ posting and collecting guns as well as libertarian red-pilling turned her around to where she comes shooting with me. It mostly starts with asking the following questions:

>Do you own your life?

>Do you own your liberty and labour? If not, does someone else own your liberty, and thus life?

>Do you own your property? Does another person have the right to take your shit from you?

Unless she's really deep in the red zone, she's likely still got a capitialist instinct of keeping her money/property hers, and will attempt mental gymnastics to justify why she's entitled to your money. Enjoy watching those gears grind, btw.

>>7809

>>>/cuteboys/

>>7820

Nice suggestions, m8. Can't wait to hear the ensuing mental gymnastics, though.

>>7825

>>>/leftypol/

>>5230

>"being btfo"

sauce on this i cant find it anywhere

>>8056

For starters, where has the demsoc gone? Where is the guy with the Jolly Roger? Why doesn't the communist post more often? That's at least three socialist posters, and not one of them stuck around. If they all had, this board would not have turned out to be a "libertarian hugbox". We also had a fascist once. Where is he now? I really can't blame ourselves for being a "hugbox" when a new asshole comes in once or twice a week, starts a thread on how we will prevent monopolies or racemixing in a free market and then leaves within a day or two.

>>7825

Nothing wrong with /cuteboys/ my favorite board besides /liberty/

>>8060

I'm a wageslave now don't really have time to shitpost here anymore

>>8093

Clearly, you still do.

>>5153

Don't you mean De-pill?

>>5222

Hugboxes ban those with differing opinions. To date, no one has been banned for their opinion.

>>5222

>>8736

In fact, we actively encourage outsiders to come join in on the discussion.

>>5604

I'm actually Ancap as fuck, and vehemently oppose collectivist ideologies.

OP here. Not sure whether I'll stay friends with the girl. A personal matter. She broke the heart of one of my friends. I could look over that.. Breakups happen. What I'm not sure I can deal with is how she has apparently been bullshitting me all this time about their first relationship (normie drama at its finest). She broke up with him the first time because she was depressed, she said, and because he was "clingy". Now she wasn't depressed, and he wasn't clingy, he was rather aloof in fact, and yet she broke up again. This makes me question her entire narrative of the first breakup.

TL;DR marxist-feminists again prove unable to have a functional relationship. What a twist.

>>8735

Not really. Don't want to turn her into a centrist, although I'd prefer that over a commie.

>>8738

Not sure why you objected, then. The DemSoc was contributing nothing of value to the board, other than a few cringe-filled chuckles at the very best, maybe with a sound, logical argumentation, but it's often futile.

>>8745

I'm sure it does exist, but when I see it being coupled with being a shitty girlfriend or being foreveralone.jpg, I get more than a bit suspicious. Awfully convenient that the people who will never get any good sex just don't want it, yeyh.

>>8746

Well, alot of depressed people lose their libido so I guess that could be called "asexuality". But I agree, most "asexuals" just want something to blame their betaness on.

>>8740

Not sure why I objected either, that comment is three months old.

>>8060

The reason is how shitty you've made this board

Of all the retards I've seen on 8chan, ancraps are by far the worst

>>8786

For some reason the flags save on all boards but this one

>>8797

There's absolutely nothing wrong with MGTOWs. Or pedophiles.

>>8797

Im with ya, those fuggen gommies wanna take away burger :DDDDDD

>>8809

MGTOWs are smug motherfuckers and complete losers who fap to Schopenhauer despite never having read any of his works.

>>8810

You're even dumber than I thought, and that's saying something.

>>5153

I'm a free-market libertarian by virtue of the simple belief in human rights, and that you shouldn't force people to do shit if they aren't directly hurting anyone.

So, for me, I'd be trying to get her on what human rights are.

Why shouldn't people be allowed to trade amongst themselves freely?

Why should females be treated better than their male counterparts just to get by physical limitations?

>>8834

This is how you would argue with a normal person, but leftists don't seem to work like that, I'm afraid. Seriously, Ayn Rand nailed it in Atlas Shrugged. Leftists like to follow consequentialist ethical systems, whereas they regard notions like justice as "impractical" or "utopian". Social justice is their way of telling themselves they are really just following a deontological morality. That could open a few possibilities, though.

>>8835

You sound like a cultist. Maybe try leaving your mom's basement sometimes and actually speak with people.

>>8852

And you sound like you don't even bother to personalize your insults. 3/10, you tried.

>>8853

Are you frustrated because I'm right?

>>8835

If that is the case (and it's a pretty big assumption), you just need to point out that their methods don't work. There are a great many examples throughout history of free markets outshining government intervention in just about every single industry, whereas communism hasn't produced a single success.

I mean, I'm a very strong proponent of personal liberties just from a moral standpoint, but at the end of the day, I support libertarianism so strongly because I believe that it will create the highest overall quality of life for the most people, and all the evidence I've seen has supported that belief. I think it works.

I've found people are fairly receptive to that line of thinking unless they've been 100% drowned in one brand of Kool-Aid or another: On a fundamental level, they're supporting what they think will work best. So when talking to a leftist, I first establish what their actual goal is in supporting those policies (almost without fail, they support welfare because they want to help the poor, socialized health care because they don't want people dying in the streets, etc.), then go about showing them exactly why and how those policies have proven themselves counter-productive.

If I manage to convince them that free markets are just plain old more efficient and have way more effective mechanisms for dealing with those issues, then I'll get into the ethics of it. At least, that's the method that's yielded the most success for me, personally.

>>8861

No.

>>8864

Might be hard, considering she has a very, very negative view on humans and preciously little experience with actual empiricism. Still, might be another very good way to go about it. Thanks, m8!

OP here, blatantly necroposting.

Me and my friend stopped talking a few months ago. She and another friend of mine got back together, after they had a relationship years ago. According to her, though, that was so they could end things on better terms, or something. Except they went swimming; you don't go swimming together with a person you're not into. I know this because my gymbro told me; I never got to hear her side of the story, as she never told me and soon after stopped messaging me. We fell out of contact years ago, also due to drama that I was only peripherally involved with, and frankly, I'm done running after her.

I'm especially done with it because I've heard some nice bits about her past that make me see her in a new light. Apparently, she's always been misanthropic, pretentious, edgy and opposed to people having fun in any way she didn't approve of. In short, perfect material for SJW'ism.

she needs a stable relationship and I suspect her family is a broken one too

leftism mostly comes from lack of family love, so people revert to demanding the state to provide that

>>14633

>she needs a stable relationship

She has no one to blame but herself. The friend I mentioned, my gymbro? He was too clingy for her, mere weeks into the relationship. If your partner can be too clingy during the first fucking weeks, during a time when normal people text each other for hours AFTER the date, then he's not the problem, you are. Funny thing is, half of OkCupid doesn't want to be messaged daily. What a twist.

>and I suspect her family is a broken one too

She doesn't like most of her family, hasn't seen her father in years, apparently has a very good relationship with her mother, but not enough to compensate for the fact that she has somehow managed to alienate two-thirds of her friends within months.

>>14635

she's trying to be edgy for the sake of it.

never works out.

Communism is cool.

>>14642

Oh, boy! And how she does. My sister told me she once said that she can't understand why people like to listen to love songs. Another time, she seriously asked the question whether it is a good thing to reduce child mortality. You know, "just asking questions". Found this out after our contact ceased; gotta say, it didn't exactly make me miss her.

>>14962

How the fuck can you still be in the dating-stage, not the relationship-stage yet?

Anyway, glad it turned out that way. I think some people are naturally drawn towards libertarianism, others towards leftism. I believe leftists are generally misanthropic, judgemental and have no belief in their own capabilities, or that of their peers. Then there are the people who just never heard of anything but leftism and crazy neoconservativism, who can reconcile libertarianism with their values once they stop being afraid of it.

>>14970

When I say dating I mean that we're a year into a relationship. Kind of vague I guess.