[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / cafechan / doomer / ebon / fa / flutter / mental / vietnam ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Winner of the 72rd Attention-Hungry Games
/otter/ - The Church of Otter

February 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 16dcb7273c93b96⋯.jpg (3.62 MB, 3884x7735, 3884:7735, (((how it works))).jpg)

 No.96081

How can you be libertarian after this?

 No.96088

File: 707c711a9c5d5f8⋯.jpg (20.83 KB, 495x466, 495:466, thebattle.jpg)

>>96081

By not reading random charts/infographs that don't even provide sources. Explain it in 1 paragraph or less and expand from there you nigger.


 No.96089

>>96088

Jews control the world and capitalism and communism are the same side of the same shekel. Jews also promote degeneracy like homosexuality, taxes, race mixing etc. They also control all the banks (including the fed). They control 90% of the media (thanks to capitalism 6 Jewish owned companies own 90% of the media).


 No.96091

Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>96089

>thanks to capitalism


 No.96092

>>96091

What enables nepotism?

What enables internationalism?

What enables banks?

What enables unrestricted subversion?

What enables pornography?

What enables promotion of homosexuality and race mixing?


 No.96093

>>96092

>Double thread with pile of crap with a jewish star drawn over it

Fuck right off you little shit.


 No.96094

>>96092

>What enables pornography?

Is this that rabid christcuck /pol/edditor that blamed jooz for making him watch cuck porn?


 No.96095

>>96093

>>96094

Not all argument. You have no defense of free market capitalism you gay paleolibertarians


 No.96097

>>96092

>What enables nepotism?

>What enables internationalism?

Democracy.

>What enables banks?

Fiat money.

>What enables unrestricted subversion?

>What enables pornography?

>What enables promotion of homosexuality and race mixing?

Democracy but indirectly.

>>96095

You didn't provide any arguments yourself, don't expect others to put more effort into their posts than you are.


 No.96101

>>96081

Fuck off and eat a dick whitoid, antisemitism is against everything libertarians love and believe in


 No.96103

File: e1c4c27ff926928⋯.jpg (71.61 KB, 800x533, 800:533, 9I8dsgiXA7g.jpg)

>>96095

>Not all argument

AHAHAHA, LOOK AT THIS FAGGOT ASS. You've come here to shitpost without providing any actual arguments whatsoever and now try to whine something about arguments.

>inba4 y'all are dumb

>inb4 you don't get anything

>inb4 it's all about da jooz


 No.96106

>>96081

chery picking


 No.96109

>>96097

>Democracy

How? I don't see how no regulations on companies prevents pornography or the promotion of degeneracy.

>>96103

You treat the free market as a god and have da gubbamin as a bogeyman. I bet you blame pornography, internationalism, and race mixing on the state too even though in your dream country there are open borders and employers can hire as many poos from India as they want and pay them nothing.

>>96106

It's not cherry picking. Thanks to capitalism there are 6 companies that have a monopoly on the media allowing you to be brainwashed.


 No.96110

>>96109

>thanks to capitalism

thanks to corporatism*


 No.96111

>>96109

>How?

We've been acting in a market economy for multiple centuries now, degeneracy started getting promoted in earnest in the 1900s with the creation of universal suffrage. If nothing else you should at least be capable of seeing that lack of correlation. Those companies which promote degeneracy rather suddenly started doing so in the past 50 years, and continue doing so despite it costing them quite a bit and gaining them no profit. The reason for this is that they're paid shills for the DNC; they virtue signal as hard as they can, and in return the the bureaucrats give them regulatory favoritism, and regulate their competitors out of business instead of regulating them out of business.

<You treat the free market Uncle Adolph as a god and have da gubbamin Joos as a bogeyman. I bet you blame pornography, internationalism, and race mixing on the state Joos too

Pots shouldn't call kettles niggers.

>in your dream country there are open borders

>Anon McNEETSoc climbs over the wall of the gated community and drunkenly wanders onto private property

>"What the fuck are you doing here? Get off my property"

>"NAH MANG, YOU DON' GEDDIT. DIS IS ANCAPISTAN N SHEEIT, Y'ALL HAVE OPEN BORDERS MUHFUGGA"

>Anon McNEETSoc gets shot

>McDumpster takes care of his corpse in the morning

>nothing of value was lost

> employers can hire as many poos from India as they want and pay them nothing.

Let's pay no mind to the fact that no one wanted to hire shitskins until they passed the Civil Rights Act forcing them to do so.

>Thanks to capitalism there are 6 companies that have a monopoly

Well, then I'm sure you'll have no problem describing the process through which these companies acquired their oligopoly through market forces, and you'll successfully prove that they got to their position purely through market forces, and didn't use regulatory capture, lobbying, or anything similar to achieve their position, right?


 No.96114

>>96110

>everything bad about capitalism is corporatism


 No.96115

>>96111

>Let's pay no mind to the fact that no one wanted to hire shitskins until they passed the Civil Rights Act forcing them to do so

But all the movies and media nowadays pushes affirmative action and homosexuality and would still do it in your "Ancap paradise" with no gubbamin.

><You treat the Uncle Adolph as a god and have da Joos as a bogeyman. I bet you blame pornography, internationalism, and race mixing on the Joos too

>Pots shouldn't call kettles niggers

And what will prevent the Jews from getting to the top of ancapistan and gobbling up every company one by one turning them into neoliberal propaganda machines?

>Well, then I'm sure you'll have no problem describing the process through which these companies acquired their oligopoly through market forces, and you'll successfully prove that they got to their position purely through market forces, and didn't use regulatory capture, lobbying, or anything similar to achieve their position, right

<muh gubbamin

What will prevent an ==oligopoly== in an ancap society? Prove that a few big companies scheming together (like pic related, thanks to capitalism) from saying at the top? If they don't like competition, they just buy it out.


 No.96116

File: 0d46edf79252671⋯.jpg (2.01 MB, 3434x2959, 3434:2959, bilderberg.jpg)

>>96111

>We've been acting in a market economy for multiple centuries now, degeneracy started getting promoted in earnest in the 1900s with the creation of universal suffrage. If nothing else you should at least be capable of seeing that lack of correlation. Those companies which promote degeneracy rather suddenly started doing so in the past 50 years, and continue doing so despite it costing them quite a bit and gaining them no profit.

Don't even get me started how profitable pornography is. Pornography would be pushed regardless. There would still be movies, the companies would still push race mixing and homosexuality because people have their own personal agendas. It's not just shilling for the DNC to get favoritism. Also since you have open borders race mixing would be super simple, and people would do it. The Jews would still push it even without government. It would be easier for the the Jews to push race mixing and homosexuality and we all know they do. Their goal is to make everyone race mix and degrade everyone's IQ and enslave humanity. So don't blame the gubbamin for degeneracy it's the companies.

>>96115

Also pic related for that post is here.

https://www.businessinsider.com/this-chart-shows-the-bilderberg-groups-connection-to-everything-in-the-world-2012-6


 No.96117

>>96081

>a secret plot to indoctrinate STATE AUTHORITIES via infiltrating colleges that prepare FUTURE STATE AUTHORITIES for FUTURE STATE AUTHORITIES to use STATE VIOLENCE to FORCE DEGENERACY

>How can you be libertarian after this?

Indeed, how can anyone be against a violence machine that pushes degeneracy at gunpoint yet is easily hijacked by dedicated enough secret cabals for their nefarious goals. I don't know. Really.


 No.96119

File: 92391e1648c6ad0⋯.png (315.97 KB, 638x479, 638:479, ClipboardImage.png)

>>96115

No, they wouldn't. Before Civil Rights Act everyone hated niggers and anti-semitism was just common sense. The only reason it isn't now is because gubmint funded public schools tell all of the students that diversity is our strength and shitskins are good. Remove the public schools and remove the ballot box, and people stop being interested in being "woke" and there isn't an incentive to virtue-signal. If virtue-signaling isn't hip no one will pay to watch "woke" movies and the bolsheviks in Hollywood go out of business. Again, before WWII and before the Civil Rights Act no one gave a shit about progressivism and this was reflected in the market.

>And what will prevent the Jews from getting to the top of ancapistan

You're continuing to ignore the points about regulatory capture and state favoritism that allowed these people to get to the top. Without muh gubmint propping them up those Jews wouldn't be able to maintain their market power and would be out-competed by competent goyim.

>what will prevent an oligopoly

Game theory and prisoner's dilemma tells you all you need to know. Cartels and collusion are inherently unstable and can never be maintained for long in a market economy.

>If they don't like competition, they just buy it out.

You realize the competition can refuse to sell, right?

>>96116

>muh porn

Not being a degenerate is its own reward. If you use all your energy on masturbating and become a poor performer at work you're going to get fired, and if you leave spunk stains all over your apartment you'll get evicted. Without the welfare state to prop you up losing your job makes your life substantially more difficult. If you're unable to stop yourself from jerking it without Magic Mustache Man tut-tutting you from the corner that's your own problem, not anyone else's.

>Also since you have open borders

>Anon McNEETSoc climbs over the wall of the gated community and drunkenly wanders onto private property

>"What the fuck are you doing here? Get off my property"

>"NAH MANG, YOU DON' GEDDIT. DIS IS ANCAPISTAN N SHEEIT, Y'ALL HAVE OPEN BORDERS MUHFUGGA"

>Anon McNEETSoc gets shot

>McDumpster takes care of his corpse in the morning

>nothing of value was lost

How do you still not understand that private property is the most restrictive, selective closed border in existence? How do you not recognize how freedom of dissociation works? Here, I'll even give you a pretty picture of it in action.


 No.96120

>>96081

After what?


 No.96121

>>96119

>No, they wouldn't. Before Civil Rights Act everyone hated niggers and anti-semitism was just common sense. The only reason it isn't now is because gubmint funded public schools tell all of the students that diversity is our strength and shitskins are good. Remove the public schools and remove the ballot box, and people stop being interested in being "woke" and there isn't an incentive to virtue-signal. If virtue-signaling isn't hip no one will pay to watch "woke" movies and the bolsheviks in Hollywood go out of business. Again, before WWII and before the Civil Rights Act no one gave a shit about progressivism and this was reflected in the market

What will prevent private schools from teaching anything better? Then can do ANYTHING they want: political indoctrination, teach like shit, leave out facts etc.

>inb4 muh gubbamin whataboutism or muh public school whataboutism

Also you never answered my question: what will prevent the companies at the top from conspiring to enslave the population of your "ancap utopia" by force with their private militaries

>inb4 >dey violated da nap now I wipe out military with shotgun

>How do you still not understand that private property is the most restrictive, selective closed border in existence? How do you not recognize how freedom of dissociation works? Here, I'll even give you a pretty picture of it in action

Everyone in the community has to participate. Doesn't sound feasible.


 No.96123

File: d39ce45ebd8b441⋯.jpg (75.39 KB, 564x397, 564:397, Hoppe on immigration.jpg)

>>96121

>What will prevent private schools from teaching anything better?

Would you pay money to send your kids to a school that teaches them useless shit? No? Neither will anyone else.

<inb4 muh gubbamin whataboutism or muh public school whataboutism

>If I put inb4 in the post I invalidate the argument

>Also you never answered my question

I did. Game theory and Prisoner's Dilemma, if you're too small-brain to understand that it really isn't my problem.

>Everyone in the community has to participate

So in short, no, you don't understand how private property works.


 No.96124

>>96123

>Game theory and Prisoner's Dilemma

How do those have to do with economics?


 No.96125

File: b478d9330e37f9d⋯.webm (419.59 KB, 480x360, 4:3, serious.webm)

>>96124

>How do those have to do with economics?


 No.96126


 No.96127

>>96081

There is absolutely no contradiction between libertarianism and white nationalism.


 No.96131

>>96127

>open borders doesn't contradict white nationalism


 No.96133

File: ee53d0c2450924a⋯.jpg (78.13 KB, 612x792, 17:22, Debating jews.jpg)

>>96131

>private property is open borders

>continue saying this despite being shown it's objectively false multiple times

I'm reminded of the last part of this quote.


 No.96134

>>96131

>If i repeat a bullshit strawman ten more times i'll win

You are too dumb even for a nigger, you know that?


 No.96136

File: 41f08e310a2839e⋯.png (154.74 KB, 644x718, 322:359, 1488602924899.png)

>>96133

im not jewish and im not (((ancap))) im natsoc.

<hurr its not open borders

whos gonna buy all the property along your ancap utopia's border and build a giant wall? whos gonna agree to walling into your neighborhood? no one? who will pay the companies to build the border or even roads?

>>96134

no borders = open borders


 No.96141

File: a367a160f6f12d0⋯.jpg (297.5 KB, 665x350, 19:10, Ancapistan (artist's conce….jpg)

>>96136

>literally muh roads

You're in no position to be calling others brainlets.

>whos gonna buy all the property along your ancap utopia's border and build a giant wall

Why does one person need to own all the property, imbecile? Multiple small owners have just as much interest in protecting their property as a single large owner. In fact, multiple small owners is objectively better than a single large owner, because if that single large owner decides to go full multi-culti everyone is fucked, whereas if one small owner goes multi-culti he harms nobody except himself, because his neighbors to the east, west, and north haven't gone retarded and are still defending their property. And you're missing an even more fundamental point: why would mass migration even happen? The only reason shitskins cross over in droves is to get gibs from the rich white countries, and there are not gibs in ancapistan. There's no public school, no Medicare, no Medicaid, no Social Security, no Section 8 housing, no anti-discrimination laws to protect their homes or their jobs, so there's no reason for them to migrate in the first place.

>whos gonna agree to walling into your neighborhood? no one?

GATED COMMUNITIES ALREADY EXIST YOU DUMB FUCKING NEETSOC. THEY AREN'T CREATED BY THE STATE RETARD, WHERE DO YOU THINK THEY COME FROM? JESUS H CHRIST NOBODY CAN BE THIS RETARDED. HERE'S A FUCKING PICTURE OF ONE IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME


 No.96161

>>96092

government


 No.96163

>>96109

> Thanks to capitalism there are 6 companies that have a monopoly on the media allowing you to be brainwashed.

nope

there are more than 6 websites/newspapers/radiostations


 No.96214

File: d5707b7a959cd60⋯.jpg (67.17 KB, 392x435, 392:435, flat,550x550,075,f.jpg)

>>96141

fine you win


 No.96217

>>96141

What is there to stop some rich indian from moving in that gated community?

What is there to stop the dumb fuck whites in that gated community from hiring spics to trim their garden?

We need borders.


 No.96223

File: 06575755ead2c80⋯.png (154.78 KB, 500x605, 100:121, 06575755ead2c80c6a2a39bdb2….png)

>>96217

>What is there to stop some rich indian from moving in that gated community?

Gates. Are you stupid?

>What is there to stop the dumb fuck whites in that gated community from hiring spics to trim their garden?

Non-dumb whites that actually create such communities. Or are all whites dumb now and only you can save them?

>We need borders.

<OOGA BOOGA, CHIEFTAIN GOOD


 No.96224

>>96223

>Gates. Are you stupid?

What laws prevent them from buying a property within that community?

>Non-dumb whites that actually create such communities.

So you would agree with creating laws and order, because that's law and order.

><OOGA BOOGA, CHIEFTAIN GOOD

Funny, your gated community literally has borders.


 No.96227

File: e9f005f5288e40c⋯.png (939.88 KB, 1024x655, 1024:655, ClipboardImage.png)

>>96217

>What is there to stop some rich indian from moving in that gated community?

If you look very, very closely at this picture, you might get an idea. Do you understand what the phrase "freedom of dissociation" means?

>>96224

>So you would agree with creating laws and order, because that's law and order.

Yes. No rulers doesn't mean no rules, in fact the incentives created by the free market are more conducive to traditionalism than any state could hope to be.

>Funny, your gated community literally has borders.

Yes! That's exactly correct! GLORY BE, EVERYONE, AND REJOICE! THE NEETSOC HAS FINALLY LEARNED HOW PRIVATE PROPERTY WORKS!


 No.96228

>>96227

>If you look very, very closely at this picture, you might get an idea. Do you understand what the phrase "freedom of dissociation" means?

The neighborhood is a collective.

>Yes. No rulers doesn't mean no rules, in fact the incentives created by the free market are more conducive to traditionalism than any state could hope to be.

How exactly do you enforce this rule? Non-dumb whites hire mercenaries to keep the indians out or evict the dumb-white? What then if the dumb-white start to poison the well?

>Yes! That's exactly correct! GLORY BE, EVERYONE, AND REJOICE! THE NEETSOC HAS FINALLY LEARNED HOW PRIVATE PROPERTY WORKS!

So again, why are you against NATIONAL border?


 No.96229

>>96228

>The neighborhood is a collective.

And? You realize people can form collectives without Daddy gubmint forcing them to, right?

>How exactly do you enforce this rule?

There are countless ways. Have the home be owned by the neighborhood but leased out to the resident, with the lease being conditional on certain behaviors. If the resident violates the terms, he loses the lease and gets kicked out is an easy one to imagine. A more formalized system with insurance companies and blacklists could also work. It all depends on what will be most efficient in the market.

>So again, why are you against NATIONAL border?

No one said I am. Don't change the subject nigger, the reason this point was brought up was because you didn't believe that private property worked like a border.


 No.96231

>>96229

>And? You realize people can form collectives without Daddy gubmint forcing them to, right?

Yes I can, the problem is when that collective centralize, what you called a state is born.

>Have the home be owned by the neighborhood

So the neighborhood just becomes a state.

>A more formalized system with insurance companies and blacklists could also work. It all depends on what will be most efficient in the market.

Again, laws and orders, without actual guys with guns forcing these niggers out, blacklist means jackshit.

>No one said I am. Don't change the subject nigger, the reason this point was brought up was because you didn't believe that private property worked like a border.

If you aren't even against border, why are you even talking to me.

My whole point is that borders and rules and order (racial) ought to be reinforced with guns and violence.


 No.96234

>>96228

>>96231

Wow, actually retarded.

>Yes I can, the problem is when that collective centralize, what you called a state is born.

You don't even know what a state is.


 No.96236

>>96234

Define a state?


 No.96237

File: 1387abe5d40c7c3⋯.webm (1.07 MB, 640x480, 4:3, Faggot.webm)

>>96231

>anything that isn't individuals in autarky is a state

You don't know what states are. Lurk for three years then kill yourself.


 No.96238

>>96237

Please go ahead and define a state.


 No.96241

>>96238

A defined territory under the control of a government. And before you ask you illiterate chucklefuck: a government is an entity which maintains power through a compulsory monopoly on security, justice, and possibly other sectors.

Imagine being so retarded you assume any two people interacting together is a state.


 No.96245

>>96241

>a government is an entity which maintains power through a compulsory monopoly on security, justice, and possibly other sectors.

And what exactly does your neighborhood watch or neigborhood council does? Does they actually maintain the power? Does they use violence to maintain the security of the neighborhood?

>Imagine being so retarded you assume any two people interacting together is a state.

We are talking about your neighborhood, not any two people.


 No.96246

>>96245

>And what exactly does your neighborhood watch or neigborhood council do? Do they actually maintain the power? Do they use violence to maintain the security of the neighborhood?*


 No.96264

File: 63815a23392f5d2⋯.webm (1.34 MB, 640x272, 40:17, Laughing_Aryan.webm)

>>96231

>Yes I can, the problem is when that collective centralize, what you called a state is born.

Ah yes, who could forget the great and powerful state of the NFL.


 No.96269

Why do you bother discussing whit /pol/acks that skip the cause-effects in their reasonings?


 No.96273

>>96109

>I don't see how no regulations on companies

First of all, how is that in any way related to Democracy? Second, in what magical fantasy land are first world economies NOT regulated to Hell and back?

Confirmed troll.


 No.96276

If I was a Libertarian I frankly wouldn't care that much as why should the ethnic makeup of some authors that contributed to my ideology and other ideologies affect my opinion of that ideology

Also….

>1

<Fake Wikipedia page that Dosent exist and from checking the past edits of the Spartacist uprising page seemingly never existed

>3

<Fake quotes

<Author that received chemo therapy inside Muh evil gulag jail

<Stalin saying you can't be an Anti-Semite proves "Jewish Control" let's just ignore hatred towards Jews and Muslims was also illegal

Go no re


 No.96285

>>96276

So Stalin ignored his own laws?

Did anyone arrest Stalin for anti-semitism?

>>96264

The NFL is an organization existing inside a state that enjoys the protection of the police and lawyers.


 No.96291

>>96285

>So Stalin ignored his own laws?

>Did anyone arrest Stalin for anti-semitism?

Stalin really didn't like Jews. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin_and_antisemitism


 No.96292

>>96291

But anti-semitism is illegal in the USSR.

Who let the dirty anti-semite like Stalin rule?


 No.96295

>>96081

>>96089

>How can you be a libertarian after realizing Jews are bad?

>How can you be for maximizing personal freedom (and therefore security) after seeing that people don't give a shit about you or your people?

>How can you be for dismantling the apparatus which allows for banks and other institutions to negatively affect you?

How indeed. Maximizing freedom is a self-defense maneuver.


 No.96301

>>96291

>>96285

Stalin wasnt an Anti-Semite

The theories about the "Doctors plot" and "Stalins Jewish Gulags" were propagated wildly after his death

The doctors plot sprang from the fact that around the time of his death Stalin had begun to Target his minister of Security (Beria) for removal

Several hit pieces were put out in Soviet Media against him some of which played on the fact that Beria and his wife were both Jewish by birth (by showing their birth names in brackets next to their taken names etc) and over time the campaign against Beria morphed within some circles to a broader Anti-Semetic campaign

once stalin was alerted to some of these actions he ordered publications to stop it and went into a tirade about (If I may Paraphrase) "How does it matter what name a man chooses to take for himself or what faith he was born into"

After this Stalin intended to stop the Campaign against Beria altogether but the unfortunate time of his death and the fact that Beria and Malenkov immediately succeeded him (Coupled with other minor details like Stalins doctor being Jewish)

Ultimately led to the wild conspiracy that stalin was killed by his "JOOISH DOCTOR!!!!" Or "THAT JOO ( ( (BERIA) ) )!!)" or some variation of the two


 No.96302

>>96301

The doctor plot was a media campaign STARTED by Stalin, and now you are accusing Beria to start it up in order to accuse Stalin as anti-semite.

This is literally the communist playing word game.

It is quite likely that Stalin was correct in his assessment, and his Doctor Plot was what drove Beria to kill him.


 No.96341

File: 498c4e07722d7b4⋯.jpg (32.3 KB, 399x468, 133:156, 1350480965108.jpg)

>>96081

>How can you be libertarian after this?

nigger I ain't reading all that shit


 No.96468

>>96089

>Jews control the world and capitalism and communism are the same side of the same shekel

Does this make Jews bipolar or schizoid?


 No.96469

File: 1180d66250e2e12⋯.jpg (5.16 KB, 208x240, 13:15, c3611aa5.jpg)

>>96301

>Stalin wasnt an Anti-Semite

True, it just coincidental that the kulaks were predominately Jewish.


 No.96472

>>96468

They play both sides


 No.96480

File: 82aab2a1ad4713b⋯.png (220.35 KB, 2092x1270, 1046:635, who_controls_your_mind_upd….png)

>>96081

I like how this infograph was "improved" by adding le_happy_merchant.jpg, Stars of David and bunch of shit debunked and corrected on /pol/ 4 years ago.

>pic related

It's not like it's obvious at this point that the ultra obnoxious stormfaggotry is promulgated by outsiders.


 No.96488

File: b0a03c198c2a75f⋯.png (109.64 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, 1489746221210.png)

>>96089

>yfw Anarcho Capitalism would solve nepotism, homosexuality, taxes, the Fed, and many other problems that /pol/acks have.


 No.96516

File: 2469753da46481d⋯.jpg (49.02 KB, 500x650, 10:13, politely ask them to leave.jpg)

>>96488 (checked)

>mfw Anarcho-Capitalism would solve nepotism, homosexuality, taxes, the Fed, and /pol/acks themselves because none would pass their own standards of purity


 No.96524

>>96141

>The only reason shitskins cross over in droves is to get gibs from the rich white countries, and there are not gibs in ancapistan. There's no public school, no Medicare, no Medicaid, no Social Security, no Section 8 housing, no anti-discrimination laws to protect their homes or their jobs, so there's no reason for them to migrate in the first place

Nigger CEO's shill for immigration so they can pay them practically nothing for their labor


 No.96529

>>96524

>Nigger CEO's shill for immigration gibs so they can pay shitskins practically nothing for their labor


 No.96532

>>96524

What the mutualist said. When businesses want cheap labor, it's much easier for them to just open factories in other countries instead of trying to convince the labor force to move.


 No.96533

>>96532

But what if there are regulations in that country. So why wouldn't they open it in ancapistan


 No.96536

>>96533

How would a CEO "shill for immigration" in Ancapistan? Border control is up to each individual property owner and not a ruling body. There's no policy for him to influence, so there really isn't anything he can change by "shilling for immigration".


 No.96537

>>96536

They can fly in a bunch of cheap labor on a plane.

>inb4 the airline won't let them

The airline won't refuse customers like that

They can bring in as many Chinese or Africans as they want


 No.96538

>>96516

>>96488

How would it solve homosexuality and nepotism?


 No.96541

>>96537

Air fare, especially for an entire labor force, isn't exactly cheap. Even if they somehow get to ancapistan, who will rent to them? Who will feed them? Who will clothe them? Who will pay damages on their being a massive security liability? Shitskin labor is cheap because it's low quality, and the costs associated with babysitting shitskins to make sure they don't wreck your business are almost certainly higher than the small amount you save by hiring shitskins. Normally the gubmint subsidizes those costs (or forces them onto other people) through state police, Section 8 housing, and nondiscrimination laws. Without those subsidies in place, "cheap" labor becomes a lot more expensive.

>>96538

>homosexuality

It's a lot harder to be a fag if you can't get HIV tests at the free clinic, get Medicare to pay for your AIDS medicine, and none of the Christians will serve or rent to you. Your insurance rates will also skyrocket because you're a high time-preference degenerate and thus a yuge liability on any provider that covers you. To say nothing of the fact that any residence with children in it will probably forbid you from entering, because fags fuck kids.

>nepotism

Just the free market at work nigga. Businesses that hire based on favoritism instead of competence won't be as successful in the market, as the competent people become more concentrated in the meritocratic firms.


 No.96543

>>96541

>Just the free market at work nigga. Businesses that hire based on favoritism instead of competence won't be as successful in the market, as the competent people become more concentrated in the meritocratic firms

We have nepotism in our market now and those businesses aren't failing.

>It's a lot harder to be a fag if you can't get HIV tests at the free clinic, get Medicare to pay for your AIDS medicine, and none of the Christians will serve or rent to you. Your insurance rates will also skyrocket because you're a high time-preference degenerate and thus a yuge liability on any provider that covers you. To say nothing of the fact that any residence with children in it will probably forbid you from entering, because fags fuck kids

Fair enough

>Air fare, especially for an entire labor force, isn't exactly cheap. Even if they somehow get to ancapistan, who will rent to them? Who will feed them? Who will clothe them? Who will pay damages on their being a massive security liability? Shitskin labor is cheap because it's low quality, and the costs associated with babysitting shitskins to make sure they don't wreck your business are almost certainly higher than the small amount you save by hiring shitskins. Normally the gubmint subsidizes those costs (or forces them onto other people) through state police, Section 8 housing, and nondiscrimination laws. Without those subsidies in place, "cheap" labor becomes a lot more expensive.

Wouldn't it still be cheaper than hiring locals who are more used to higher wages? Or would they outsource labor to a 3rd world shithole? and if so explain how.


 No.96545

>>96543

A business doesn't need to fail to be less successful than the competition. Further, most nepotistic businesses are that in name only–even though control was passed on from father to son, in most cases the son is also qualified to run the business because the father raised him well and made sure he wasn't a spoiled brat.

>Wouldn't it still be cheaper than hiring locals who are more used to higher wages?

That depends on a lot of factors. For one, if you import people to ancapistan instead of outsourcing to whatever shithole they came from, the wage differential wouldn't be as significant. One of the reason domestic wages are higher is because domestic cost of living is higher, and you're going to have to account for that in the wages you pay if you want to convince workers to relocate. Also, many of the other "costs" associated with low quality shitskin workers aren't borne by you the employer, but by other people, and since those people don't care about your employment numbers they have no reason to shoulder that cost, and will simply refuse to do so. For instance, shitskins tend to destroy the property value of any place they live in (just look at Secion 8 housing) while also scaring away other tenants, which means landlords won't wnat to rent to them. Their high criminal tendency means that any security firm would either charge exorbitant rates on whatever locale they're in, or refuse to cover it entirely, which is another reason no one would want to rent to them. By the same token, insurance firms would tell the businesses they cover, "if you let this highly criminal demographic into your store, we'll double your monthly premiums for theft protection," which incentivizes businessowners not to serve these people and not to sell to them. Because of all these costs and disincentives, if whoever's hiring all these shitskins still wants them to move and live in a new place, he'll either promise the landlords and businessowners he'll take liability for the actions of his employees (basically covering their costs), or he'll have to build his own set of slum apartments for them, build stores for them to go to, and so on. Because of all this liability, what would have been "cheap labor" is now not just expensive, but a massive, time-consuming headache.

But let's step away from these specifics and get a little more broad. In general, if there's a reason you don't want group X to come into your community, it's usually also a reason everyone else doesn't want them to come in. The only reason leftists shill for immigration, remember, is because they don't have to deal with it–they're living in gated communities far away from the migrants, and it isn't their money that pays for dealing with migrants. Since there isn't any disconnect like that in ancapistan, there's no incentive to virtue-signal, because everyone who virtue-signals would have to pay out of pocket for it.


 No.96546

>>96545

Thanks really insightful


 No.96641

File: cf10d6cd06a926a⋯.jpg (9.5 KB, 1162x59, 1162:59, COINTELPRO - CLAIM CRIMES ….JPG)

File: 860e3b8649c790f⋯.jpg (24.38 KB, 1162x59, 1162:59, COINTELPRO - AVOIDANCE.JPG)

File: a7b6698fc4dc54e⋯.jpeg (1.84 MB, 1169x6371, 1169:6371, COINTEL PRO - ALL THE FUC….jpeg)

File: baf639da59adfe3⋯.png (34.69 KB, 376x282, 4:3, CIA NIGGER 04.png)

>>96088

Found the (((CIAnigger)))


 No.96642

File: 5b847af28c6c659⋯.png (13.14 KB, 642x591, 214:197, BOLSHEVIKS 01.png)

File: 14b6fda151a968d⋯.jpg (180.82 KB, 715x477, 715:477, BOLSHEVIKS 02.jpg)

File: 020e8a58a8b1885⋯.jpg (218.57 KB, 562x940, 281:470, BOLSHEVIKS 03.jpg)

File: 12ca856fd58f033⋯.jpg (1.81 MB, 3259x1922, 3259:1922, BOLSHEVIKS 04.jpg)

File: aaf0dcd03e20fc3⋯.gif (8.42 MB, 332x248, 83:62, MERCHANT - ROASTED.gif)


 No.96643

File: 121f6d63deb768b⋯.jpg (88.83 KB, 500x500, 1:1, PEPE flames of rage.jpg)

>>96276

>If I was a Libertarian

Should have KYS right there


 No.96644

>>96643

this tbh


 No.96654

>>96121

Do you have any idea how expensive it is to maintain a military? Even nowadays PMCs all operate under government contract. Large-scale armies with $70M Trident missiles and $100M F-35s can only exist under a state through the magic of taxation and fiat currency. If you do manage to pay for a missile defense system with your own money, it's probably for a reason that has to do with your own survival, because the amount of value you get from deciding to blow up the company next door (good luck trying to explain that to your customers) pales in comparison.

>now I wipe out military with shotgun

You'd be surprised. Let's just say for the sake of argumentation someone comes in with a conventional military force. Remember that time when the USSR tried to attack Finland? They were sending tanks up against bicycle companies and ski troopers. Soviet casualties were 8 to 1. Even though the Finns didn't have any tanks of their own, they just ran up to the tanks and shoved logs and crowbars into their treads before planting explosives and running away..




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / cafechan / doomer / ebon / fa / flutter / mental / vietnam ]