>>231I personally believe no, but just to make this thread more interesting I'll try to argue the other side. See how well you can argue back against me you LOLbertarians.
>YESOf course it should be required! Each vaccinated child is one less individual that can contract and carry the disease. Some of these diseases can be fatal, and by preventing the spread we're saving precious lives. There's no practical reason not to vaccinate besides "muh liberty" and some deranged ramblings about how vaccines cause autism. This is not a slippery slope, this is a reasonable step!