751ee2 No.9
Speaking as a libertarian:
This is fucking stupid.
If you want actual political discussion that isn't dominated by Nazi fetishists, why not create a neutral board for political discussion? Splitting up into /pol/, /leftypol/, and /libertypol/ (and soon /anarchopol/ and /greenpol/) only splinters the discussion, and further solidifies Nazi dominance on /pol/.
7a603f No.10
Stormfags only shit up whatever they get into. I like this idea.
be835d No.11
Why not both? /libertypol/ for in depth discussion with the assumption of knowledge about liberty, and /pol/ for general debate.
4ea68d No.12
/pol/ was meant as the neutral discussion board. As was /new/ back at 4chan. So attempts at neutral boards have failed.
b71623 No.39
>>9>/anarchopol/You're way too late to the party:
>>>/anarcho/ c5d77b No.44
How about we stop splintering ourselves into smaller boards? Why is it bad that we might have to listen to a different perspective from our own on /pol/?
d6ba67 No.45
>>44Because you won't get posts like this on /pol/
http://www.8chan.co/libertypol/res/14.html#q42It's nice to have a refuge from /pol/ where you can discuss the intricacies of these subjects.
Btw, did /meadhall/ ever get shit for being NatSoc only?
64ad7e No.51
>>9>neutral political board>>>/midpol/ be0404 No.74
>>45We could just start making Libertarian/specific issue general threads on /pol/. What good is it having 15 of us here talking to the same people every day?
4815ed No.76
>>9/pol/ or "the discussion" are not my problems.
a1bf68 No.81
>>9>Speaking as a libertarian:>Splitting up…only splinters the discussion, and further solidifies Nazi dominance on /pol/.If the nationalists want /pol/, they're welcome to it. I'm not interested in playing capture-the-flag with stormfags and SJWs.
I'm also not interested in all the nasty pedo bullshit that /pol/ is attracting like an electromagnet. Why in
the hell would I want to deal with that when I can just post on the smaller subpol boards that don't have all that trash? If they want the rest of us to join the conversation, tell the NatSocs to do their damn job and purge the pedo posts from /pol/.
>>44>Why is it bad that we might have to listen to a different perspective from our own on /pol/?Different perspectives? Here's a rough summary of the current threads I see in the /pol/ catalog:
>THE JEWS>niggerniggerniggernigger>kebab>Hitler was an okay guy>SEKRUT EW EN AGENDA>WUN WARLD GOOBERMINT>3 pedo threads, one with what seems to be actual certified practitioner>[random NatSoc thread title goes here]>shillshillshillshillQuality stuff right there. Very relevant to libertarians, amirite? The only thing /pol/ is good for right now is news and sucking up all the shitposting so the rest of us don't have to deal with it.
4815ed No.82
>>81I agree. If they are not willing to keep a lid on paedoshit, we will stay here.
>>9Not my problem.
c03ecf No.121
File: 1420432612741.jpg (84.1 KB, 677x1179, 677:1179, kuro_chan_colored_by_erikz….jpg)
960cfe No.159
>>81Underrated post brimming with truthiness
3553fc No.160
>>159Not sure if implying accuracy or just using Colbert's definition…
2f4c6b No.169
I agree.
79c6fc No.171
Saging the pedo spam away.
79c6fc No.172
Saging the pedo spam away.
30a399 No.189
>/anarchypol/
Already exists, it's called /anarcho/ and it's filled with more hypocritical authoritarians.
>freedom! Anarchy! woo!
>private property is bad, fuck your means of production
475a4f No.191
>>189/anarcho/ is for the non-capitalist sort of anarchy from the looks of it. That's fine, it works out better for both us and them. That way we're not all confused as to what we're talking about.
a9d484 No.196
pol is now completely dominated by threads about Jews,degeneracy and the greatness of the white race. they've also driven off all the fun threads which they have labeled shitposting.
lefty pol is terrible and liberty pol is unfortunately very slow. Not sure were I should go now
6ea12b No.197
>>196>liberty pol is unfortunately very slow. Not sure were I should go nowStick around, post some, draw people here. It'll pick up. Always good to converse with like minds.
a0852a No.237
Here's a thought for my fellow libertarians:
We can all agree that competition is one of, if not the best, ways for good ideas to surface and take root.
If we all divide ourselves into our little boards, there won't be any real conflict.
If there's no conflict, we get stagnant and our beliefs won't be challenged and either be refuted or reinforced.
tl;dr splitting into hugbox boards will only weaken our minds
0e5f8b No.239
Guys the whole point of Hotwheels making it to where we can make our own boards is the fact if we don't like it on one board, we can make another. I never browsed /pol/ because the most serious discussion you could get was "Lol kikes did 9/11" so if anything its a good thing we're splintering from /pol/.
bd86a5 No.250
>>197This. I'm not sure how I can help, I've always been more of a lurker, but I'll do my best.
5f0e28 No.252
>>9I agree, i feel like converting to judaism because of seeing how horrible nazis are. As a lolbertarian I have to go against a hive of nazis when commenting on /pol/. they are worse than SJW'S I tell you.