No.7820
So, /lit/?
https://philiaresearch.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/minor-attracted-figures-in-history/
>>inb4 "SAUCE!!!"
Google is your friend. The majority of these people admitted to being minor-attracted. For others, it's self-evident in their works.
Shakespeare wrote sonnets to an 11-year-old boy. Oscar Wilde refers to this during his trial.
Michelangelo had sexual and romantic relationships with boys, and dedicated his art to their beauty.
Da Vinci had a homeless little boy live with him for many years. Historians speculate they were lovers (this boy was one of many).
No.7821
>>7820
The Second Sex is full of pedophilia.
No.7825
File: 1449619058839.jpg (211.91 KB, 1082x1263, 1082:1263, MICHAEL-JACKSON-michael-ja….jpg)
No.7829
File: 1449619201182.jpg (544.18 KB, 1665x2200, 333:440, Annex - Monroe, Marilyn_06….jpg)
No.7833
File: 1449619435274.jpg (131.43 KB, 1180x841, 1180:841, nietzsche_1872.jpg.CROP.pr….jpg)
No.7835
>>7834
Didn't he fuck his daughter, Sally?
No.7836
No.7837
>>7834
Damn I used to read this guy all the time. Totally redpilled me on the Sabbatean-Frankist Jewminati.
No.7838
File: 1449619846834.jpg (130.28 KB, 898x1100, 449:550, tumblr_mz79wqS1Za1qgwmzso1….jpg)
No.7840
>>7833
Nietzsche was asexual you dumbfuck.
No.7842
>>7840
Several of his students claimed he fucked them. He was gay in the closet and liked adolescent boys.
No.7844
File: 1449620012734.jpg (206.03 KB, 815x900, 163:180, 1-frederick-william-rolfe-….jpg)
No.7845
File: 1449620032720.jpg (241.25 KB, 1370x1910, 137:191, Wilfred_Owen_plate_from_Po….jpg)
No.7846
File: 1449620205817.jpg (77.29 KB, 659x436, 659:436, autoportrait-ny_original_l….jpg)
No.7847
There is literally nothing wrong with loving boys and girls.
No.7849
>>7825
Stop it. He was NOT a pedo.
No.7850
No.7852
>>7820
>inb4 "SAUCE!!!"
>Historians speculate they were lovers (this boy was one of many).
>speculate
>sauce
ahaha queer
No.7853
No.7855
No.7856
>>7840
i wonder how he got syphilis then…
No.7859
I fucking hate pedos. This thread is pure propaganda. I'm not even talking about the content, I'm talking about how it's presented. I don't respect shit like that.
No.7870
>>7859
I fucking hate you.
No.7871
No.7875
File: 1449702711243.jpg (37.02 KB, 620x387, 620:387, 12088398_969028916495794_8….jpg)
No.7960
No.7968
I'm a pedo and I don't see why the fact that some famous people were pedos is so surprising. Someone's sexuality has little influence on their potential, on their talent and on their knowledge. There are a lot of ignorant pedophiles (just go check the pedo boards) in the same fashion as there are ignorant homosexuals and ignorant teleiophiles.
Anyways, that website seems to be well documented. I can only hope it can help people understand that we can do great things for society.
No.7969
So wait, are the people listed specifically attracted to kids or were they just not picky? And did they fiddle around with teens or kids (i.e. before or during puberty)?
>>7968
This. Not exactly a fan of the pedos, but it's inevitable that some historical figures will be kiddie fiddlers.
No.7999
>>7969
>So wait, are the people listed specifically attracted to kids or were they just not picky?
Both cases designate a pedophile, there is exclusive and non-exclusive pedophilia.
>And did they fiddle around with teens or kids (i.e. before or during puberty)?
The article gives sauce on why these figures can be considered pedophiles.
No.8036
>>7820
Leonardo da Vinci wasn't a pedophile you dumbfuck. We don't even know if he even had any sexpartners.
No.8072
>>8036
da Vinci was the man, dude. i'm reading stuff from his notebooks right now and he's basically a genius. why does Newton get all the credit?
No.8165
>>7820
>muh pedo rights
Posting pedo rights shit on 8chan is both preaching to the choir and circlejerking.
>>7870
>I fucking hate you.
You pedo rights shitposters seem to be really really thirsty considering you need to make a feel-good ideology to justify your pederasty.
>>7820
>Leonardo da Vinci fucked boys
Pretty sure Lionardo was too ascetic for that shit.