>>8375
>you read books listed on a /lit/-approved top 50 must-reads infographic cause that's what's supposed to work and bring results. Good for you, but there is no need for the shitposting.
except that i don't.
90% of what i read has no other purpose other than amuse me. and i have very little interest for things like "the western canon" and stuff like that.
you're the one that seems pissed.
i made a joke >>8321 and you istantly went defensive >>8354.
you want to read occult books? you like it?
by all means do! not joking.
is the supposed approval or disapproval of a stranger on the internet so important to you?