/logcabin/ - Right-Leaning Homosexual Males

>>595

prestigious math & science institutions

>>581

What brings you to the Berenstain universe, traveler?

>>581

I have no experience with gay bars

>>327

you're not addressing my argument. Did I trigger you? tell me how marrying the man you're having sex with instead of just having sex with him undermines the social order

>>329

It should be called a civil union, because words trigger me easily.

It should be called a Civil Union and Churches shouldn't be forced to "marry" gay couples.

If you were to get married would you want you or your partner's last name changed? Do you care?

>>602

Wow, I've actually never thought about this.

>>124

>I'm sure everyone – or most – here would agree that gay marriage, adoption of children, etc. is unacceptable.

I disagree.

White people are declining as a race, we have to do our part to get more white people into the world, because I genuinely believe we're dying out.

We used to be over 30% of world population and are approaching single digit and relative size does matter more than absolute size which is also decreasing.

I think demonizing getting a surrogate mother or a mock marriage with a woman just to bring kids into the world is just being too lazy to do your part to preserve ourselves.

behold: faggotry

>>594

That was entertaining. Is it wrong that a roommate spitting juice all over the wall/counter/window wouth bother me more than finding a dead flip in my tub?

>>596

would*

fat fingers today

>>594

>that vid

I guess i wont be calling myself a bear anymore.

>>76

>cure

I personally don't believe it's something that needs to be cured. However my strong belief in it not being a mental illness might be swaying my opinion.

>>77

I agree with this sentiment. I'm done trying to "cure" myself.

it depends on what you define a mental illness as. personally i don't think it is. or if it is, it is one so insubstantial that basically any other mental illness i can think of is more severe and detrimental. the case for it being one would primarily just be that men are biologically supposed to be attracted to women. to illustrate, something like "situs invertus" is when organs are inverted to the opposite side of the body, yet it apparently has a low statistical chance of actually being directly detrimental. assuming no ill effects are had, the only issue is that this is not biologically supposed to happen. as to why it occurs? not sure, and it may just be an anomaly.

honestly i would point towards people claiming to be "transgender" as something far more deserving of the term mental illness. after all, it generally goes along with wanting to heavily modify and mutilate ones body, along with apparent dysphoria. regardless of if it is just a pure mental disorder or a or one that goes further with actual hormonal imbalances, etc, it has definitive negative symptoms, and should be considered a mental illness accordingly. honestly i find it odd that its even put into the same "category" as being gay

>>48

As someone who always thought of himself as straight and only recently "discovered"/turned bi, but dominant, I never had any problems or insecurities about that.

But I guess they are going to come if I ever want to live it out.

>>522

Cuddling with someone you're in love with feels like pure bliss.

I wear bright colored clothing sometimes.

Also, I have a mustache, that's kinda gay.

But whatever.

>>386

I don't like to think there is anything effeminate about me.

>>293

Now you're putting words in my mouth. I never implied pederasty was akin to "slavery," all I ever implied was that homosexual encounters at a young age can turn straight people gay, and this isn't fringe psychology or whatever, it's pretty established. The idea that a 14 or 15 year old boy can consent to sucking off a 30 year old man, and that this is, in your words, "seen as healthy and natural" means fuck-all. It was healthy and natural for Canaanites to sacrifice their babies to a giant oven shaped like Moloch. It was healthy and natural for Aztecs to tear the still-beating heart out of whoever the fuck they declared to be that day's sacrifice.

Sorry, but your post reeks of moral relativism. The inherent difference in power between a young teenager and a grown man is huge, and the idea that this helped young boys in anyway is laughable. Being buttfucked or sucking an old man's dick is not some great gift, it's abuse, it's rape. That's my point of view. Sure, there may be instances of gays who loved it, and sure, society normalized this back then, so of course you're not going to hear from those who derided the practice (see: NAMBLA today being heard from in two thousand years).

But your basing an argument on a strawman sort of pissed me off, as did what seems to be a predisposition towards moral relativism. I don't really care what the fuck they thought of pederasty, there are millions of Americans who think circumcision is "hygenic" and in the baby's best interest. People can be fucked up, and these fucked up people go on to fuck more people up. The cyclical nature of child abuse is what allows for systems like pederasty to endure. I understand you're not supporting pederasty, but it seems to me a bit delusional to claim that one calling pederasty child rape to be an "extreme" point of view.

>>306

Absolutely.

>>314

Moral relativism? Personally I think pederasty is an immoral act – and nowhere did I say otherwise, I just explained the consensus of the societies which engaged in the practice.

>>6

What about Ian McKellen?

>>381

Degenerate

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/01/25/ian-mckellen-gay-people-also-disregarded-by-film-industry/

>>6

What about Alexander the Great and Ceasar?

>>512

internet.

>>513

I think I need to bulk up a bit. At my age (and a mostly shaved head) having a twinkish body doesn't seem right in the mirror anymore.

Well, if a guy is just generally handsome, then I won't be picky. But if he isn't, then certain things make up for that, mainly masculine traits. I wouldn't be able to date a guy who was into social media and queer news and watching TV. I like to have fun, so I'd like a guy into some activity/hobby, especially an /out/-tier sport, even if it just means climbing on rocks and shit. It's just boring to hear someone talk about fucking television or meme news (hurr did you see jimmy, you gotta see this vine..) maybe I'm picky, but I have no problem laughing people like this out the door.

As for physical traits, well again, perhaps I'm picky, but circumcised dicks sort of gross me out, so I can't say I've been too thrilled with the cut guys I've been with. It's sort of a drag, I don't know what to do with the thing. I also get a bit bored with hairless guys, I mean, the hairier the better. I'm a weirdo, but if a guy has a long beard and a hairy ass, he could be a 3/10 and I'd fawn over him, just no fatties. I don't like the bear scene because it seems to be filled with fatasses.

Okay, this post was kind of lame rambling, but I would reiterate that it's really effeminacy I'm turned off by, for whatever reason. Be it personality, or looks, the manlier- the better. I'd rather be with a tomboy than a flamer, not that I have anything wrong with ultra-queers, I've been friends with Beyonce-worshiping morons, but to imagine a relationship where I had to pretend to care about that shit is just asking too much. I want to be with someone I admire/respect.

>>439

boyish why not, but basically average, not too masculine

but definetly around my age >22, so that naturally excludes too masculine and old guys

Bump. This should be interesting

I ticked neo-reactionary. That way you can point and laugh at the "alt-right" more easily.

>>477

NRx =/= the Alt. Right you cockmongling faggot. There's a huge difference between the two.

Weird to see 3 socialists on a self-proclaimed "right-leaning" board. Not that I care, I'd just like to see the option I chose better represented ;__;

constitutional monarchism

AIDs proving once again that it is the most based disease ever.

I don't partake in beastiality so this is whatever for me. 1 in 12 for gays in general sounds about right considering the lifestyle of your avaerage fag.

>>266

AIDS isn't fast enough.

>>359

>AIDS isn't fast enough.

Which is why it's so effective at ruining lives, same with Islam.

People just think if it doesn't happen immediately, it didn't happen, but it did.

Well, I can't imagine many self-respecting whites dating niggers anyway.

This and Merrick Garland's nomination have really left my spirit defeated today.

>>534

>an amazing, beautiful press conference that had the exquisite bravery of a butterfly flying against the wind.

>>559

It shaved five seconds before this picture was taken.

I know its gay

Iceage is one of those groups you'll either love or hate.

Send me a man that can shred, and I'd worship his footsteps.

Love. I need more.

come come come on you've gotta fill me up

come come gotta let me inside of you

come come come on you're gotta fix me up

come come gotta let me inside of you

>>551

It's probably a joke. Girls are an unlikely encounter in this neck of the woods. But just in case it's a real tranny, feel free to mock and ridicule her.

>>500

>Whats the point in living if you can't love or make love with someone you love?

That's another can of worms on its own.

The point I'm making is purely semantic, and is only relevant if you want to shoehorn the term “choice” somewhere in the equation. I did that because OP is being purposely unclear. If the term “homosexual activities” only means “sex”, then yeah technically whether you have sex or not is a choice. However OP has a broader meaning to “homosexual activities”, implying that you can chose who you want to love (which is demonstrably wrong: you can choose to eat some food you dislike, but you cannot choose to enjoy it. Sure, you may pretend, but that's merely a facade, not an actual change in how you feel about it).

Similarly: if free will exists, then isn't homophobia a choice? If it is a choice, why do you choose to be hate gays? Why not restrain your disgust for someone else's sexual preferences through your will?

If you accept that it is a choice, then we can start an endless battle over what is morally right and wrong, and how authoritarian society should be (geez, I wonder if a polfag could be behind that post?)

The same way I don't recognize homosexuality as a choice, I do not recognize homophobia as a choice; while you can fool people around about how you feel, you cannot fool yourself

There are plenty of closeted gays who will marry because of social pressure, and force themselves into a relationship with someone they don't feel attracted to (spoiler: it usually ends badly). And there are also tons of people who will never get into a relationship with the person they love for various reasons: “cannot afford to blow my cover”, “that person is already engaged”, “this person is gay and I'm straight”, etc.

>>551

Oh, don't clutch your pearls, Percy. I just popped over from /pol/ to see what you guys were about. I've read your catalog now, so I'll be on my way.

Do look into what I said about the brainstem, though. I posted to say I agree with you that GID and homosexuality should not be lumped together, but you aren't going to get far with the argument that homosexuality is actually less deviant.

You're going into the oven with me, fool.

>>542

tbh that's mild.

I have a feeling seasoned homosexual /pol/acks are even more cruel. Born in hatred and moulded by it.

So /logcabin/ is a hugbox now?

What triggered you OP?

>>549

There's been no hugs dispensed in this thread.