/logcabin/ - Right-Leaning Homosexual Males

>>615

I think that it's more of an issue of trust. Gays aren't trusted by the establishment to vote consistently anymore, so they're being phased out of the Oppressed Snowflake Club.

There may be a considerable pushback concerning "gay privilege" by LGBT communities, this may or may not be a test case for such a move on a larger scale.

I think that meme'ing "gays are out" might also play into the predictability of the outcome of this test. I'm not going to take any information-spreading action, personally.

>>616

Gays will still be lumped into the acronym by the average populace. We're still forced to be affiliated with it, but we won't have a say in the actions they take. Not like there was ever much of a say anyways.

>>622

That's pretty much it, we're guilty by association on both fronts.

>feminazis being feminazis

What else is new?

>>594

That was entertaining. Is it wrong that a roommate spitting juice all over the wall/counter/window wouth bother me more than finding a dead flip in my tub?

>>596

would*

fat fingers today

>>594

>that vid

I guess i wont be calling myself a bear anymore.

SM from /pol/ here, wandered in here to explore.

Most of us don't have a real problem with homosexuality. What we have a problem with is flamboyant nature of many effeminate men which has created a culture of degeneration.

When the day of rope comes

We're going after the fags, not the homosexuals

- Uncle /pol/

I ticked neo-reactionary. That way you can point and laugh at the "alt-right" more easily.

>>477

NRx =/= the Alt. Right you cockmongling faggot. There's a huge difference between the two.

Weird to see 3 socialists on a self-proclaimed "right-leaning" board. Not that I care, I'd just like to see the option I chose better represented ;__;

constitutional monarchism

5000 options and you leave out nationalist.

>>572

i did socialist this is my first time on this board

>>595

prestigious math & science institutions

>>581

What brings you to the Berenstain universe, traveler?

>>581

I have no experience with gay bars

>>329

It should be called a civil union, because words trigger me easily.

It should be called a Civil Union and Churches shouldn't be forced to "marry" gay couples.

If you were to get married would you want you or your partner's last name changed? Do you care?

>>602

Wow, I've actually never thought about this.

>>602

I wouldn't care. Are there incentives for changing your name? Does it make paperwork easier? I'd reconsider if there were practical benefits.

>>76

>cure

I personally don't believe it's something that needs to be cured. However my strong belief in it not being a mental illness might be swaying my opinion.

>>77

I agree with this sentiment. I'm done trying to "cure" myself.

it depends on what you define a mental illness as. personally i don't think it is. or if it is, it is one so insubstantial that basically any other mental illness i can think of is more severe and detrimental. the case for it being one would primarily just be that men are biologically supposed to be attracted to women. to illustrate, something like "situs invertus" is when organs are inverted to the opposite side of the body, yet it apparently has a low statistical chance of actually being directly detrimental. assuming no ill effects are had, the only issue is that this is not biologically supposed to happen. as to why it occurs? not sure, and it may just be an anomaly.

honestly i would point towards people claiming to be "transgender" as something far more deserving of the term mental illness. after all, it generally goes along with wanting to heavily modify and mutilate ones body, along with apparent dysphoria. regardless of if it is just a pure mental disorder or a or one that goes further with actual hormonal imbalances, etc, it has definitive negative symptoms, and should be considered a mental illness accordingly. honestly i find it odd that its even put into the same "category" as being gay

>>48

As someone who always thought of himself as straight and only recently "discovered"/turned bi, but dominant, I never had any problems or insecurities about that.

But I guess they are going to come if I ever want to live it out.

>>522

Cuddling with someone you're in love with feels like pure bliss.

I wear bright colored clothing sometimes.

Also, I have a mustache, that's kinda gay.

But whatever.

>>386

I don't like to think there is anything effeminate about me.

>>293

Now you're putting words in my mouth. I never implied pederasty was akin to "slavery," all I ever implied was that homosexual encounters at a young age can turn straight people gay, and this isn't fringe psychology or whatever, it's pretty established. The idea that a 14 or 15 year old boy can consent to sucking off a 30 year old man, and that this is, in your words, "seen as healthy and natural" means fuck-all. It was healthy and natural for Canaanites to sacrifice their babies to a giant oven shaped like Moloch. It was healthy and natural for Aztecs to tear the still-beating heart out of whoever the fuck they declared to be that day's sacrifice.

Sorry, but your post reeks of moral relativism. The inherent difference in power between a young teenager and a grown man is huge, and the idea that this helped young boys in anyway is laughable. Being buttfucked or sucking an old man's dick is not some great gift, it's abuse, it's rape. That's my point of view. Sure, there may be instances of gays who loved it, and sure, society normalized this back then, so of course you're not going to hear from those who derided the practice (see: NAMBLA today being heard from in two thousand years).

But your basing an argument on a strawman sort of pissed me off, as did what seems to be a predisposition towards moral relativism. I don't really care what the fuck they thought of pederasty, there are millions of Americans who think circumcision is "hygenic" and in the baby's best interest. People can be fucked up, and these fucked up people go on to fuck more people up. The cyclical nature of child abuse is what allows for systems like pederasty to endure. I understand you're not supporting pederasty, but it seems to me a bit delusional to claim that one calling pederasty child rape to be an "extreme" point of view.

>>306

Absolutely.

>>314

Moral relativism? Personally I think pederasty is an immoral act – and nowhere did I say otherwise, I just explained the consensus of the societies which engaged in the practice.

>>6

What about Ian McKellen?

>>381

Degenerate

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/01/25/ian-mckellen-gay-people-also-disregarded-by-film-industry/

>>6

What about Alexander the Great and Ceasar?

>>512

internet.

>>513

I think I need to bulk up a bit. At my age (and a mostly shaved head) having a twinkish body doesn't seem right in the mirror anymore.

Well, if a guy is just generally handsome, then I won't be picky. But if he isn't, then certain things make up for that, mainly masculine traits. I wouldn't be able to date a guy who was into social media and queer news and watching TV. I like to have fun, so I'd like a guy into some activity/hobby, especially an /out/-tier sport, even if it just means climbing on rocks and shit. It's just boring to hear someone talk about fucking television or meme news (hurr did you see jimmy, you gotta see this vine..) maybe I'm picky, but I have no problem laughing people like this out the door.

As for physical traits, well again, perhaps I'm picky, but circumcised dicks sort of gross me out, so I can't say I've been too thrilled with the cut guys I've been with. It's sort of a drag, I don't know what to do with the thing. I also get a bit bored with hairless guys, I mean, the hairier the better. I'm a weirdo, but if a guy has a long beard and a hairy ass, he could be a 3/10 and I'd fawn over him, just no fatties. I don't like the bear scene because it seems to be filled with fatasses.

Okay, this post was kind of lame rambling, but I would reiterate that it's really effeminacy I'm turned off by, for whatever reason. Be it personality, or looks, the manlier- the better. I'd rather be with a tomboy than a flamer, not that I have anything wrong with ultra-queers, I've been friends with Beyonce-worshiping morons, but to imagine a relationship where I had to pretend to care about that shit is just asking too much. I want to be with someone I admire/respect.

>>439

boyish why not, but basically average, not too masculine

but definetly around my age >22, so that naturally excludes too masculine and old guys

AIDs proving once again that it is the most based disease ever.

I don't partake in beastiality so this is whatever for me. 1 in 12 for gays in general sounds about right considering the lifestyle of your avaerage fag.

>>266

AIDS isn't fast enough.

>>359

>AIDS isn't fast enough.

Which is why it's so effective at ruining lives, same with Islam.

People just think if it doesn't happen immediately, it didn't happen, but it did.

Well, I can't imagine many self-respecting whites dating niggers anyway.

This and Merrick Garland's nomination have really left my spirit defeated today.

>>534

>an amazing, beautiful press conference that had the exquisite bravery of a butterfly flying against the wind.

>>559

It shaved five seconds before this picture was taken.

I know its gay

Iceage is one of those groups you'll either love or hate.

Send me a man that can shred, and I'd worship his footsteps.

Love. I need more.

come come come on you've gotta fill me up

come come gotta let me inside of you

come come come on you're gotta fix me up

come come gotta let me inside of you