[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/logcabin/ - Right-Leaning Homosexual Males

no trannies allowed

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 2 per post.


File: 1456154567290.jpg (77.75 KB, 500x489, 500:489, 1453838315537.jpg)

 No.124

This is pretty fucking gay.

Nevertheless, it's not a terrible idea to have this as a sort of containment board. The "ALT-RIGHT SUPPORTS LBGTBBQ+ GAS ALL THE FAGGOTS" crowd is surely – at least in part – some sort of divide et impera thing. Dudes liking dudes doesn't involve politics, and I'm sure everyone – or most – here would agree that gay marriage, adoption of children, etc. is unacceptable. What we're looking for is companionship, self-understanding, and so forth. Things which are personal and seldom involve external society.

Poll on your sexual orientation:

http://strawpoll.me/6889799

Something which might interest some here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranian

 No.125

The "third sex" theory is bollocks.


 No.136

>>125

Never claimed it to be true or totally accurate, but interesting to some degree.


 No.149

>>124

>Nevertheless, it's not a terrible idea to have this as a sort of containment board.

I agree, and not at all my intention. /pol/ has enough failed competitors.

>This is pretty fucking gay.

Brace yourselves. I might advertise on /cuteboys/.


 No.159


 No.177

File: 1456159126510.jpg (31.33 KB, 350x500, 7:10, 76dGlkre8.jpg)

>>159

Much appreciated!


 No.196

>>177

No worries.

What exactly prompted the creation of this board?


 No.224

>>196

I did not like my options. If I want to socialize with peers online, I have to wade through the jenk that is lgbt. Cross dressers, shaved asses, and all.

Also I think our community could badly use a little masculating encouragement.


 No.226

>>224

Fair enough. There is definitely a proportion of Rightists online who lean towards homosexuality/homoeroticism. It's not a large group of people, but you see them on /pol/ and /cuteboys/ enough. >>>/cuteboys/241862 , >>>/cuteboys/233271 , >>>/cuteboys/233174 , >>>/cuteboys/211098 , for example.

Hopefully this board will pick-up in users. Should be neat.


 No.367

File: 1456709468342.png (108.25 KB, 701x87, 701:87, logcabinstrawpoll.PNG)

What are pic related anons doing here answering polls?


 No.370

>>367

Probably guys who are in denial and still consider themselves straight.


 No.374

>>367

Interesting that bi is in the lead.


 No.375

>>374

bi was always in the lead

fuck off hotwheels fix your god damn site you crippled piece of shit


 No.376

>>375

Well, they're more than welcome here so long as they encourage masculinity and camaraderie.


 No.384

>>367

I accidently clicked hetero when I meant to click homo…


 No.461

>>124

>What we're looking for is companionship, self-understanding, and so forth. Things which are personal and seldom involve external society.

That was very well put. I don't mind the hate from /pol/. I think it's necessary to keep new friends in check. But here we can laugh a little more comfortably. Online communities often have their own inside jokes and brand of humor. Should this place pick up, I'm curious to know what kind of funny /logcabin/ can produce.


 No.494

File: 1457524041240.jpg (213.28 KB, 600x1026, 100:171, 1891AmericanHomosexualMani….jpg)


 No.495

>>461

After watching a few boards turn cancerous here I'd almost rather it never "pick up", instead staying a smaller community.


 No.504

Does this board support maternal and "patriarchal" same-sex relationship or would that be /trap/ and transexual territory?


 No.507

>>504

I consider myself masculine, but I think I would fall naturally more into the "maternal" role, due to my personal habits. I like to take care of people. I even do it for a living.


 No.516

>>495

I don't think it will pick up. People are content with services like reddit, twitter, and other non-anonymous platforms.

I've successfully avoided these outlets since their development. But maybe I should stop being paranoid and accept this fate as well.


 No.517

>>494

do you have a .pdf of this?


 No.520

File: 1457977913336.jpg (23.53 KB, 720x720, 1:1, 1457083856545.jpg)

>Dudes liking dudes doesn't involve politics, and I'm sure everyone – or most – here would agree that gay marriage, adoption of children, etc. is unacceptable.

Do I want to get married? Not really, it's an overblown and overpriced farce these days and I'm non-religous. Do I want children? No, I'm not a moron who wants to surrender all his time and money on a tiny ingrate, nor do I want to waste this carte blanche to get out of baby pressure. Should fags have tacky lust parades, most of which have children present? No, it's obnoxious and creepy as fuck. Should religious institutions be forced to marry gay couples? Absolutely not.

But should gay people be denied the rights of straighties? No. I say this as a pretty conservative guy too, I don't get why, in the face of tight adoption regulations and basic rights, fags should be restricted the way straighties aren't. Love is love, provided the only difference between a "normal" and gay couple is the genders involved, why can't they live their lives as they want? Being rhetorical by the way, I get that people disagree with it for their own good reasons. Just felt the need to be a little vocal for the less extreme of the lurkers here.


 No.530

>>124

>I'm sure everyone – or most – here would agree that gay marriage, adoption of children, etc. is unacceptable.

I disagree.

White people are declining as a race, we have to do our part to get more white people into the world, because I genuinely believe we're dying out.

We used to be over 30% of world population and are approaching single digit and relative size does matter more than absolute size which is also decreasing.

I think demonizing getting a surrogate mother or a mock marriage with a woman just to bring kids into the world is just being too lazy to do your part to preserve ourselves.


 No.594

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

behold: faggotry


 No.596

>>594

That was entertaining. Is it wrong that a roommate spitting juice all over the wall/counter/window wouth bother me more than finding a dead flip in my tub?


 No.597

>>596

would*

fat fingers today


 No.604

>>594

>that vid

I guess i wont be calling myself a bear anymore.


 No.620

SM from /pol/ here, wandered in here to explore.

Most of us don't have a real problem with homosexuality. What we have a problem with is flamboyant nature of many effeminate men which has created a culture of degeneration.

When the day of rope comes

We're going after the fags, not the homosexuals

- Uncle /pol/


 No.621

File: 1458757180961.jpg (170.25 KB, 658x323, 658:323, bog.jpg)

>>620

Fag enablers like you will be first to go on the day of the rope.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]