[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/logcabin/ - Right-Leaning Homosexual Males

no trannies allowed

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 2 per post.


File: 1456347642431.jpg (62.54 KB, 850x474, 425:237, Pokemon_Gay_Proposal_2.jpg)

 No.275

When Brett decided to propose to Max, he came up with one of the most cutest and geekiest ways in the world to do it.

Both lovers of Pokémon, he decided to offer him a ring of his choice; a grass type, a fire type and a water type.

The grass type ring had a wooden inlay, the fire type was black with a red gem, and the water type had a mother of pearl inlay.

He said yes. Max picked the fire ring, but still got to keep the other two rings.

"At the beginning of every adventure, you need to pick a partner. I chose him. So, I figured if he said yes, he could decide what to wear on his finger. Whatever he picked as his official starter will “evolve” at milestone anniversaries. I got plans."

http://archive.is/Zchob

 No.278

>getting married

>proposing gay millennial style

Shill, pls go


 No.290

File: 1456364789532.png (474.47 KB, 683x704, 683:704, 1453318930644.png)

I'm torn because they are (I'm assuming) staying in a monogamous relationship, but this is cringy as shit.

also i don't like that one of these cringelords shares my name


 No.295

>gay marriage

>pokemon

>>>/cuteboys/


 No.299

>>295

what's wrong with gay marriage?


 No.300

>>275

That's really cute. :3


 No.301

>>299

Marriage belongs to men and women regulate, from a social standpoint, procreation. The family is the building block of any civilisation, and to undermine its legitimacy and specificity is degenerate.


 No.302

>>301

>women to regulate*


 No.303

>>301

well what if science gave gay men the ability to reproduce?

how is a married gay couple any more degenerate than a childless married straight couple?


 No.304

>>303

Regarding infertile straight couples, it's about principle; if you bite into an apple with a worm in it, that doesn't change the fact that you're still biting into an apple. It's about one man and one woman, not two random beings who're able to reproduce sexually.

Also, raising children is the job of housewives with the presence of the father as the leader figure, the bread winner. The dynamic is also psychological; women and men are not interchangeable neurologically.

What you're suggesting is that human kind breaks hundreds of thousands of years of tradition, and for what? This moral relativism, this "whatever suits the individual," is a slippery slope.

Related:

http://westcoastrxers.com/2016/02/05/ex-falso-quodlibet/


 No.305

>>303

As for science and homosexual reproduction? Absolutely hypothetical nonsense – and what's more, you'd be going full circle back to heterosexual parents considering the fact that people need both male and female guidance figures growing up. A transsexual cannot imitate a genuine woman on a neurological, biological level.


 No.310

File: 1456439799857.gif (16.08 KB, 400x400, 1:1, 1001-100406.gif)

This is the dumbest shit I could imagine. I mean, aside from my hold ups over gay marriage, it's just so fucking tacky and low class. A pokemon ball? A kids show? Grow up, holy hell.


 No.313

>>305

>A transsexual cannot imitate a genuine woman on a neurological, biological level.

citation?

>>304

>truisms from unrelated contexts

classic jew tactic

As a proud white gay man, you should have pride in every aspect of your identity, your homosexuality included. Should you doubt your own competence to the extent that you won't allow yourself to marry the man of your choice? You sound like a self-hating gay trying to fit in with the alt right like a self-hating white tries to fit in with BLM. Have pride in who you are.


 No.316

>>310

This.

>"citation?"

Fucking hell. I'm not hunting for infographics or anything for you. If you believe it's morally acceptable for men to become women or vice versa you belong in a gas chamber.

>>313

>"truisms"

No, it's related because your train of thought here is solely individualistic without considering the wider implications of the subject. Gay marriage undermines the traditional social order and is inherently degenerate – there are zero exceptions to this rule.


 No.323

>>316

>undermines the traditional social order

lol

i didn't know that marrying the man of your choice instead of just having gay sex was going to undermine the social order and cause society to collapse


 No.327

>>323

You sound like a Leftie faggot who needs to be curbstomped.


 No.329

>>327

you're not addressing my argument. Did I trigger you? tell me how marrying the man you're having sex with instead of just having sex with him undermines the social order


 No.353

>>329

It should be called a civil union, because words trigger me easily.


 No.369

It should be called a Civil Union and Churches shouldn't be forced to "marry" gay couples.


 No.602

If you were to get married would you want you or your partner's last name changed? Do you care?


 No.605

>>602

Wow, I've actually never thought about this.


 No.608

>>602

I wouldn't care. Are there incentives for changing your name? Does it make paperwork easier? I'd reconsider if there were practical benefits.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]