No.21833[Last 50 Posts]
I own /r/Lolicons
Ask me anything
No.21834
No.21835
No.21838
No.21842
I happened to wander around that place earlier this week.
Why is your taste (generally speaking) in lolis so dismal?}
Half of this chart is arguably not loli.
No.21845
>>21838
Why not?
>>21842
To be honest, a lot of that needs revision. Girls need to be taken out, other girls need to be added. I have hired (free) goons that do that stuff for me but I'm too lazy to even talk to them about it.
I view Reddit exclusively in night mode, so I don't see our overly-flamboyant CSS. That included.
No.21846
How much trouble do you generally get from normies, and or actual authorities?
Do you feel like reddit's administration is supportive, neutral, wary, or actively against you?
No.21847
>>21846
>How much trouble do you generally get from normies, and or actual authorities?
None from authorities so far. As for normie hate, there's been a little bit, but they generally will talk shit in their own corner where I can't hear it.There's been a few mod mails sent over the years complaining, but not as many as you'd expect.
>Do you feel like reddit's administration is supportive, neutral, wary, or actively against you?
Reddit's administration is purely about the money. They don't want to needlessly censor their platform if they don't have to because it will upset their userbase. But if it effects their company's image or investors, then they will take action against it. So far we pose no such threat, so they're neutral.
No.21850
do you fear the wrath of the honorable chairman?
No.21851
No.21859
Favourite Loli, and Favourite Loli Artist, if you have one?
No.21860
>>21859
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess his favorite loli is Shinobu.
No.21864
>>21845
Goons as in low-rent thugs, or goons as in the idiots from SomethingAwful?
No.21870
>>21833
>>21859
Opinion on Western artists? Favorite Western lolis?
No.21888
>>21859
My favorite is indeed Shinobu as somebody guessed.
My favorite artist is hard. I'm a big fan of Rustle, so probably him. I have a lot of other favorite artists but they don't make as much exclusively loli contest as Rustle does.
No.21889
>>21864
Nah I just meant people I have do things for me. I like to call them hired goons, even though they do it for free.
No.21890
>>21870
Generally I find most western art to be objectively bad. Has nothing to do with the girls, I just think the art looks terrible. I honestly don't know why that is. That's not to say there aren't decent western artists and pieces, but comparing the average DeviantArt submission to the average Pixiv, and there's a pretty big quality gap. Though not to say Pixiv doesn't have it's horribly bad art too. Just on average it's better imo.
Probably has something to do with the fact that in a lot of western cartoon porn they try to stick with the original style of the cartoon, and that style is just awful. Cartoons aren't works of art in the west like they are in the east. Completely separate levels of quality.
Favorite western loli, hmm…Does Toph from Avatar count? If so, probably her. I liked her a lot.
No.21891
>>21890
You do know it is impossible to be objective when stating an opinion. It always comes down to people always say they don;t like the style, which is 100% based on opinion.
No.21892
>>21891
My point was I'm not judging it because of the characters or because it's western, I just think it looks bad based on its artistic value.
No.21893
>>21892
Artistic value is subjective :x
No.21894
No.21896
I'd argue that there are western cartoons that are works of art, but for the most part I'd say it doesn't always relate to the type of content you'd want on a board like this.
That isn't to say its impossible to keep the style and relate closer to NSFW content, but I don't think it comes as naturally, and it attracts poorer artists much of the time.
This is probably compounded by western media not being accepting of animation as an adult choice.
No.21898
>>21896
Yep I'd agree with most of that
No.21902
>>21833
>those rules
>1.Absolutely no posting of real children.
>2.No discussing real children.
>3.Only sex that is allowed is Vanilla/Yuri
>4.Lewdity is allowed, however only modestly. If you have a question whether something is acceptable or not, ask a Mod.
>5.Absolutely no violent, rape or disturbing images or comments of lolis. Lolis are made for tender loving.
Fuck off back to plebbit, you fucking casual.
No.21903
>>21902
Yeah i'm surprised the guy actually came here of all places to announce proudly that he owns /r/lolicons, the subreddit is an embarrassment to lolicon as an art form and just plain pandering to people who have nothing to do with it.
No.21904
Why do you suck so much cock?
/r/pomf is better
No.21905
>>21902
>>21903
>>21904
Not sure why having a distaste of abuse and rape is a bad thing. Lolicon in itself has nothing to do with those things, it just so happens that a lot of disgusting people who are into those fetishes are also into children.
No.21906
>>21905
Yeah, and that's why projecting your personal shitty taste onto rules is a good thing.
No.21907
>>21906
Absolutely. I don't want to see things I don't like. It's tailored to my taste, as it should be. Why would I accept things I don't like?
No.21908
>>21907
Because the subreddit isn't, or shouldn't be, your personal domain. It's not your blog, nor your webpage. It's a forum for people who like loli material, yet because of your own tastes you choose to constrict the range of available material. Look, I personally prefer vanilla and yuri over rape and guro as well, but if it's posted I can just not look at it, and share the forum with others who have similar tastes as I do. I can tolerate things I dislike.
However, because you have a position of power, you choose to institute your taste as law, preventing yourself from developing tolerance of distasteful material and driving away potentially valuable contributors. Many posters like both harder and softer material, after all.
No.21909
>>21908
Well then those people are welcome to post on /r/pomf. I'm not interested in gaining the absolute greatest amount of subscribers possible. If I was, then yes I would have much less constricting rules. I'm interested in an environment that has tasteful imagery. If people want to post violent rape and gore, then they can do so elsewhere.
No.21910
>>21909
That is, of course, your prerogative, so long as everyone knows what they're getting into from the outset. I strongly disagree, however, with your choosing to call people who like rape and abuse "disgusting," as though this were a matter of morality and not one of taste.
No.21911
>>21908
I have to say, I hardly think my rules are that constricting either. We allow almost anything except for the most hardcore and violent fetishes. It's not like we're a SFW subreddit or something. Sex is absolutely allowed, provided the loli is enjoying herself. I don't see how that's too much to ask.
No.21912
>>21910
It's not immoral to enjoy fictional images of violence. But I still find it disgusting. It's not something I want myself associated with in the slightest.
Our rules have changed very little since our inception, so all of our contributors know how we do things. If anything, our rules have gotten looser of the years. Previously we didn't allow penetrative sex of any kind.
No.21913
You know? I suppose I'll tolerate this. Just as not every forum has to be Reddit, so too must not every forum be 8chan. The tighter strictures aren't to my taste, and I probably won't ever post there, but if people enjoy it then I won't look askance.
No.21914
>>21913
I also understand your stance. Rules are kind of a slippery slope when you start banning certain kinds of content, but in the case of my subreddit, it's been that way since its inception and will always be that way. I've never pretended to be a champion of free speech or expression.
I just have a soft spot for little anime girls. I think they're cute and adorable, and sometimes sexy. I don't think they should be abused. But if people want to see that, then they can get their fix elsewhere.
Idk about you per say, but a lot of people seem to think everything is either censorship, or complete tyranny. They want absolute, complete freedom to do whatever, and if they don't have that, then they consider it oppression and censorship. I'm not saying that's how you think, but a lot of people on Reddit think that way. And I think it's dumb.
No.21915
>>21914
There is a place for rules as long as they're well-understood and not arbitrary, and the punishments for breaking them isn't too severe. In the case of your subreddit, I think I deceived myself, or assumed that it was dedicated to all loloicon content, when that wasn't the case and has never been the case. Certain communities benefit from tighter rules, although I myself prefer less binding ones.
No.21917
>>21915
Glad we understand one another, have a cute Shinobu
No.21918
BLOGPOST:
I feel like a stupid todlercon. I was on skype drawing some stuff while others watched, and after I saved a folder of all my pedo shit comes up and everyone sees it. I played it off as if I just achived all that shit from /b/ because it was just some of many other messed up stuff found on there. eventually I showed them some gore and other shocking stuff that I recently saved in the folder. And we just had a regular conversation after that like all was normal.
But I still have reason to believe that they think I'm a pedo. should I keep it cool or kill myself? That was pretty stupid and I'm sweating for real over this.
No.21926
No.21927
>>21918
> I was on skype
With who? Real life friends? What where you drawing? If you were drawing loli, then I don't see why they'd give a fuck.
>all my pedo shit comes up
2D loli, 3D CGI or like, real girls?
If it was 2D loli, I highly doubt they give a shit. They'd probably think it's just normal hentai.
However if it was like actual real girls you saved(and since you said /b/, I assume it is), then yeah you fucked up and they definitely will think you're a pedo, even if they don't admit it. Showing them gore/shock images isn't going to make up for seeing that you saved children.(double standards)
I'd be very careful from now on.
No.21928
What's that? I can't hear you over the sound of r/pomf being less hypocritical and restricting about what content they allow in order to keep up the image of the "harmless pedophile" even in fiction.
The place is rotten anyway, since every other notable subreddit about hentai - yes, even fucking r34 - prohibits underage art when they should be inclusive of all genres. Instead, they segregate "objectionable" content from the rest to keep people from complaining. At least our r34 boards don't make a difference between loli and non-loli art.
Also, how does it feel to have helped organize the donation of money to an institution(UNICEF) that has repeatedly worked on getting lolicon outlawed in Europe and Japan?
No.21930
>>21928
>What's that? I can't hear you over the sound of r/pomf being less hypocritical and restricting about what content they allow in order to keep up the image of the "harmless pedophile" even in fiction.
I don't see how I'm hypocritical at all. But I do think the general public will react much more harshly against a community that encourages such unnerving imagery, such as what is hosted on /r/pomf.
>The place is rotten anyway, since every other notable subreddit about hentai - yes, even fucking r34 - prohibits underage art when they should be inclusive of all genres. Instead, they segregate "objectionable" content from the rest to keep people from complaining. At least our r34 boards don't make a difference between loli and non-loli art.
A lot of subreddits are scared of being banned by the admins if they host underage fictonal content. That's what happened to the /r/Lolicon subreddit before I made mine. So it's obvious they would rather keep themselves safe and ban that specific type of porn rather than allow it and face possible expulsion. Not everybody wants to be a 'free speech martyr'.
Plus I think removing content that the overall community complains about is kind of part of a moderator's job.
>Also, how does it feel to have helped organize the donation of money to an institution(UNICEF) that has repeatedly worked on getting lolicon outlawed in Europe and Japan?
The money went to help children in need. That's what the contest's purpose was. Maybe there were better charities to donate to, but it's too late to worry about it now.
No.21931
>>21912
>Our rules have changed very little since our inception, so all of our contributors know how we do things. If anything, our rules have gotten looser of the years. Previously we didn't allow penetrative sex of any kind.
Absolutely disgusting. Instead of recognizing that you own one of the few places where you can actually share and discuss lolicon art you contributed (probably not intentionally, just short-sightedness) to the modern downward trend of self-censorship, shaming of artists and reduced availability of lolicon art. You may look at /r/lolicons as a place to share ecchi work, i look at it as one of the nails in the coffin of lolicon art awareness in the west.
>>21930
Any lolicon fanbase interaction with "child's rights" groups is by it's essence not altruistic, and is just a way to say "look, we're not pedos, we don't want to harm anyone!". Absolutely pointless and only taints the notion of lolicon as artistic expression and a fantasy and nothing more. The fact that this organization also anti-lolicon (as a lot of the pro-child ones are) is just an icing on the cake. You proved yourself blind not only to the danger of segregating lolicon art but also naive enough to think child rights groups are not against lolicon.
No.21933
>>21931
I don't get it, a lot of people just don't like seeing violent shit. It's like complaining about /r/porn not allowing guro rape. If you want guro rape then go to /r/gurorape, if you want hardcore loli sex then go to /r/pomf
No.21934
File: 1435061146360.png (696.93 KB, 700x851, 700:851, 0ba19b82a3f3bc089ec92d02f9….png)
>>21931
Look man. I'm not a champion of 'free speech' and anti-censorship or any of that crap. Honestly, I wish violent rape and guro porn of any kind, lolicon especially, didn't exist. If I helped the self-censorship of that specific fetish, then good. I'm glad. I don't want it to exist. But if it must exist, then I don't want to see it.
I'm not on a pseudo-moral crusade against guro and rape. It can keep existing and people can keep enjoying it where they like. But that place will never be /r/Lolicons.
The contest's purpose wasn't to try and win favor with any group. The purpose was to help children in need. If you can't accept that for what it is, then I'm sorry but that's all there is to it. I'm aware that most children's aid groups are anti-lolicon. Some things can't be helped.
>>21933
Couldn't agree more.
No.21935
what does it take to get mod on your subreddit
No.21936
File: 1435061252311.jpg (624.1 KB, 899x1389, 899:1389, d8bbbf8c0c327908719128992f….jpg)
>>21935
Some kind of skill that we're in need of, for example 2 of our mods are there simply to do CSS work.
No.21937
File: 1435061580244.png (7.18 MB, 2461x3500, 2461:3500, 253e3e64a0220965587338b876….png)
>>21935
Some others also donated the highest goal during the donation event and that got them mod. There isn't currently a donation event running now though.
No.21941
>>21934
We're at that point that your type of logic, unfortunately, is anti-lolicon. 10 years ago? Not so much. But now, when lolicon is seriously getting legislated as child porn and even websites with hentai that legally are allowed to host lolicon chose to ban it, any platform that helps further the divide (by breeding people that think certain types of hentai art are bad) is anti-lolicon definition.
Oh, next time if you want to donate to something good and actually related to lolicon, donate to CBLDF.
No.21942
I'm totally with RSP on this. I love /r/lolicons specifically because of the "no violence/rape" rule.
Granted, I also frequent /r/pomf and this board, but a good portion of the content in those places really doesn't appeal to me.
No.21945
>>21941
Well then I guess that's how it is. My stance isn't changing. Loli or not, I don't like any degree of serious violence in porn.
I'll keep CBLDF in mind if we do another donation event.
No.21963
>>21927
It was real friends, was drawing a buff dude
It was loli, just regular, but they're not stupid, they pointed it out and I was like, "oh whoops, don't mind that just shit from /b/ its no big deal." So I showed them it was just run of the mill stuff along with other anime tiddys you would find on /b/ from archived threads.
fuck
No.21965
>>21963
Should have redpilled them on the history of lolicon and importance of freedom of artistic expression and how it gets circumvented under the false pretense of protecting children from child abuse, much like anti-privacy laws pass under the pretense of some terrorist menace. You missed your chance to do some good in the world buddy.
No.21984
>>21965
Not sure if ironic
No.21990
Are there plans for another charity fundraising thing? I want to be promoted from Loli Grand Master to something much more impressive.
No.21992
>>21990
I was planning on doing another event around Christmas this year, like I did last year. Maybe make it an annual thing, especially since last year's went so well.
No.21993
>>21992
That's cool, I'll donate again when the time comes. I hope the people who receive the donations see that it's a bunch of pedos giving them money.
No.22000
No.22004
>>21993
You posted in the weekly contest yet? Chance to win gold friend
No.22040
>>22004
Yep. I want to contribute more in general, but almost all of my stuff is ripped directly from /c/, so I don't have much of that "kind of lewd but not entirely" stuff that fits on the subreddit.
No.22043
>>21905
You just called half the board "disgusting people", faggot. Fuck off back to plebbit.
You are an example of the worst kind of moderator, and people like you are the reason reddit is an intolerable shithole.
No.22048
>>21833
Whats your opinion of this board and how the mods run it?
No.22085
>>22043
You're defending pedos who want to rape and abuse real children. Think about that.
No.22100
>>21845
>I have hired (free) goons that do that stuff for me but I'm too lazy to even talk to them about it.
You aren't even a lolicon. You are a faggot who is prancing around on a high horse and now wants attention on 8chan.
sage
No.22116
>>22042
Don't like it
>>22043
Sure bud
>>22048
I think if the community here is happy then they're doing a good job. That's a moderator's job.
>>22100
Don't tell me what I am
No.22170
>>22085
>real children
>lolicons
Pick one, retard.
No.22173
>>21905
>bondage is necessarily abuse
Get a load of this faggot. Do you at least allow lolidom?
No.22179
>>21905
>bondage is synonymous with abuse
Holy shit, this is the exact same line my high school gym/sex "ed" teacher tried to feed us. I didn't think anyone else sincerely bought into that. How fucking delusional do you even need to be to make that assumption? First off, one of the core aspects of bondage play is trust and consent, which immediately puts it as far away from abuse as it can get, and secondly, drawings aren't fucking real. No lolis are harmed by the making of these pictures.
I see the point you're attempting to make, and it's bullshit.
Yes, people can use bondage gear to do bad things. Bondage is still hot.
There used to be (and possibly still are) convents that did horrible things to their initiates. Nuns are still hot.
The Nazis were the goddamn Nazis. Girls in Nazi uniforms are still hot.
Some people are bad and that's bad, but it's fucking asinine to let them ruin a kink for everyone else. Pull your head out of your ass m8.
On an unrelated note isn't it kinda weird that the gym teachers routinely give terrible pro-abstinence, pro-marriage, anti-birth control sex ex, but whenever you hear about a pedo case at a school, it's usually the gym teacher?
This thread is now a lolibondage thread.
No.22186
>>22179
In fact I find bondage/domination/humiliation far hotter if the loli is into it too. Rapey stuff can be fun, but there's nothing quite as sexy as a loli with the same fetishes as me.
No.22244
>>22179
Lolibondage is a go.
No.22307
>>22247
>>22245
>>22244
>>22186
thanks bros. I'd be posting more myself, but my grandparents and brother are over and I had to temporarily sanitize my computer
I'll find you guys some stuff once they're gone
No.22315
No.22331
>>22315
And mine too. I guess I shouldn't be surprised the OP doesn't like it though and only gave a few word explanation.
I don't like everything either, heck I don't like guro, scat, or rape at all (major turnoff). But the people who happen to like some of the things I like loli wise and also happen to like some of the things I'm not a fan of should still be welcome cus in the end I think we all overlap in the fact we really like lolis, particularly lewd pics of lolis.
At least the owner of this board didn't ban or censor toddlercon when he very well could have after stating he wasn't a fan. But he's not an asshat who bans posting stuff he doesn't like, and perhaps there are those on here that didn't come for anything like toddlercon but by finding one of the threads here eventually became a fan of it. That's why you don't censor for places like this and allow everyone at least a thread for their interests.
No.22471
>>22331
I actually don't mind bondage at all. So long as it's consensual. I just don't like violent rape, much to the disagreement of those who spammed my thread with images they'd think I didn't like.
No.22472
>>22173
>>22179
You guys are putting words in my mouth. I never once said anything is wrong with bondage. I specifically said that I have a distaste for abuse and rape.
I did not say bondage is abuse.
So before you write a paragraph (too late) responding to what you think I said, please read what I actually said.
No.22476
>>22472
your a fagget.
Take back your toy and get lost.
No.22477
>>22476
That's pretty rude homie
No.22478
>>22472
You should know edgyfags are always the most sensitive. Say something they don't like and they will cry their edgy tears.
No.22482
>>22477
So rude. That doesn't even look like a nice dildo.
No.22490
>>22477
I fucking hope so.
No.22492
>>22472
Dude, they're fucking 2D. Nothing is abuse, because abuse is impossible.
Maybe you should let your friends at UNICEF know that when you send your next donation to them.
No.22493
>>22492
I dunno, I see where he's coming from. Even though they're completely fictional, I strongly prefer to see the girls into it.
No.22520
>>22492
I'm not saying they're being abused so the cops should be called.
I don't understand why it's so hard to understand that I don't like seeing cute girls being victim to violence.
Are you just looking for a reason to be mad at this point? That's all I can think of.
>>22490
I love tacos, thanks yo
No.22529
>>22520
I'm mad for the same reasons I was when you first posted.
/r/lolicons should not be restricted to your personal tastes. It should, as the name suggests, be a place for all lolicons.
You should also not be donating money to organisations which are actively trying to get us all thrown in prison.
No.22532
>>22529
Ah, gotcha. Well your feelings are dully noted.
No.22533
>>21833
I don't really hate reddit but my advice is to stop using imgur since imgur compresses and destroys the image quality. (Yes, I am weird)
No.22534
>>22533
I'd agree with that, but to be honest I have yet to find a better alternative. Imgur is very easy to use. The ability to drag images onto the webpage and upload them that way is irreplaceable.
No.22629
File: 1435908141619.jpg (641.65 KB, 1134x1632, 189:272, SaHa_Naughty_Yui_chan_04.jpg)
Why so lame?
3.Only sex that is allowed is Vanilla/Yuri
4.Lewdity is allowed, however only modestly. If you have a question whether something is acceptable or not, ask a Mod.
5.Absolutely no violent, rape or disturbing images or comments of lolis. Lolis are made for tender loving.
9.Use albums instead of making multiple posts. Don't spam the front page.
11.Toddlercon is not welcome.
No.22633
>>22629
Because I only allow things that I like
No.22634
>>22633
That's a very succinct summary of why you are a shit mod.
No.22636
>>22634
Luckily there's plenty of good cute material to post instead
No.22638
>>22629
there's probably also a problem with the reddit admins
No.22641
>>22638
That is definitely of some concern. I feel that if I harbor porn that is blatantly violent in nature, then normies would be more inclined to petition for my sub's removal.
/r/Lolicons and /r/Pomf operate in a technical loophole, actually it's more of an oversight, in Reddit's rules. All it would take is a decent amount of riled up people yelling at the Reddit admins and the subs would be gone.
No.22666
>>22641
Why do you still support their site? By keeping those subs active you're helping fund reddit.
No.22686
No.22693
>>22638
>there's probably also a problem with the reddit admins
A lot more of them need to have fun
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Ellen_Pao
No.22703
>>22693
Their boss is a freedom of speech blocking femnazi, I thought everyone knew this?
No.22739
Moving a community is pretty difficult and you lose a lot of people, so until Reddit completely and utterly dies like Digg, then I'll be keeping it there
No.22781
Why did you ban /u/Rebbit_man? He was a quality poster.
No.22782
>>22641
Normal person here.
I can confirm that 99% of Reddit will never even know/care that your subreddit exists, and probably doesn't know what loli is. I have also lurked both /r/lolicons and /r/pomf for quite a while, and while I see plenty of
>omg careful we could get shut down!!1
fear, I have never seen anyone actually try to get the sub shut down.
No.22783
>>22782
there were other loli subreddits before that that got shut down so their fear is justified
No.22809
>>22782
While I know you're mostly correct, it's better to be safe than sorry. I have much more to lose by not covering my ass than by doing so. The 1% of moral self-righteous crusaders is all it would take.
But I don't lose sleep over it, it hardly ever even crosses my mind. I think we're fine as is.
No.22812
>>22783
Which ones? IIRC, it was just /r/lolicon and that was due to that /r/jailbait scandal.
>>22809
>it's better to be safe than sorry. I have much more to lose by not covering my ass than by doing so.
Could you explain what you mean by this? You're operating a subreddit that features cartoon little girls being erotic, nude or fucked. In the UK, Canada and Australia, they would simply call you the operator of a 'child porn ring'. So it seems like you would be "covering your ass" by using a throwaway Reddit account over Tor, and basically making your /r/lolicon activities as secret and anonymous as possible. But instead, you seem to think that your ass is covered by banning certain content from your subreddit, which is just silly to me. Are the moral crusaders you refer to going to say
>Oh, okay, the kids in those pics are only being tenderly loved by their onii-chan. For a sec I thought that was rape-rape!
? I doubt it. It sounds like all this talk about being shut down is just an excuse to ban whatever you don't like. But I don't lose sleep over it, it hardly ever even crosses my mind.
No.22814
>>22812
If you can't understand that, in general, people are more likely to be up in arms about something that is depicting more violent and obscene sexual content than something that is more tame, then I'm sorry but I can't help you.
No.22816
>>22781
He violated our rules. Simple as that.
No.22819
Question:
I just hopped on one of my sockpuppets to post some anal. It was deleted. Could you explain why? Pic related, it was the pic I posted.
No.22820
>>22819
Too extreme content. Comically so. Please see Rule 4.
No.22821
>>22819
I'm sure it would be well received on /r/pomf however. Try there if that's the kind of content you wish to submit.
No.22822
>>22820
Alright.
in the future, I will make sure I check with the mods to see if an image is okay. What is the standard response time for your team?
No.22823
>>22822
Quickly because it usually makes my phone buzz from the Reddit notification. But if I'm asleep and another mod has to verify it then I'm not sure.
No.22831
>>22829
I should probably sign it but I'm pretty lazy, can't be asked
No.22838
No.22895
>>22838
The violation that got him banned was Rule 5. Up until that point I had had to remove several of his posts for rule-breaking content. I finally decided to put my foot down so I banned him. /r/pomf seems to be more his speed.
No.22896
>>21835
I believe you because no one would go on the internet and tell lies
No.22898
>>22896
This would have to be one big elaborate lie for absolutely no purpose if that were true. Which maybe it is. Who knows? That's what makes it fun! Such is the power of anonymity
No.22944
>>22895
Hey man, I have a lot of respect for your sub, although I do spend a lot more time on /r/pomf, but you guys have your own thing going, so thanks.
My questions:
1. What was your stance on AMAgeddon?
2. Did you go dark?
3. Have you prepared for reddits abandonment?
4. Why do the Admins allow /r/lolicons and /r/pomf to continue, despite their rule against the sexualisation of minors? I run a small (830 subscribers) NSFW subreddit that has the risk of including content that does such, I just want to know what my boundaries are and how I can keep us open whilst including such content.
No.22968
>>22944
Thanks for the kind words
1.) The subs had very good reason to go dark. I think they caved too early to hollow promises from the admins. This was their one chance to really make an impact and have their voice be heard by the company, and it was wasted.
2.) We didn't
3.) Not as much as I probably should, but we have a Voat page as that seems to be what everybody talks about the most.
4.) They tolerate them because nobody has cried loud enough about them yet. They know that the majority of Reddit doesn't consider fictitious art to be CP, anytime it's come up Reddit will usually defend loli due to its not harming anyone and even being therapeutic to real paedophiles, allowing them to curb their desire to see real CP.
They care about what makes them money, plain and simple. Removing subs for "moral" reasons doesn't make them money. But if investors were to learn of the boards and complained? Then you bet your ass they'd remove them immediately. Or if it garnered them bad publicity like /r/jailbait did.
No.23019
>>22968
In the /r/jailbait scandal, the old loli boards were removed, though?
Is it just a luck of the draw type situation?
No.23022
>>23019
They were removed then, yes. Because during an event like that, when you community already have their pitchforks in hand and the censor tape at the ready, it's very easy to be rid of things that normally you wouldn't be able to as easily.
After it all quieted down, it was discovered that a lot of subs that weren't really related and shouldn't have been banned, were banned. But it was too late. The admins used a very thick brush, they weren't taking any chances. Best to eliminate anything that had to do with underage pornography, even fictional.
/r/Lolicons was created after the fire died down. It'll take another fire to burn it down.
No.23318
It's good there's a place for mild lolicon, the stuff that's posted here is way too fetishistic for most people, myself included. The stuff that's in /r/lolicon can appeal to pretty much anyone that isn't a self-policing self-righteous moral fag. It's good PR to show that lolicon isn't just some evil thing that only 'pedos' like.
>>23309
sauce pls
No.23325
>>23318
(Nora Shinji) Mayoi wa Kinmotsu
No.23509
>>23318
Thanks a lot, glad to know there are others here who appreciate it.
No.23658
how does it feel to have /r/lolicons banned on reddit? :^)
No.23712
OP is the owner of a super casual group of self proclaimed lolicons who the vast marjority dont even sad panda. Most of them are moralfags who dislike rape or touchy subjects and prefer lovey dovey pure casual bullfuckery.
Kill yourself.
No.23715
>>23712
Still 100x better than the edgyfag lolicons with their sad over compensation for being little bitches IRL.
No.23722
>>23715
>Still 100x better than the edgyfag lolicons
No. A true patrician understands and isn't cringed out by loli fetishes. Sticking to vanilla sex is probably a product of being an entry level lolicon. Even Japan heralds having multiple fetishes.
>with their sad over compensation for being little bitches IRL
Nice ad hominem.
No.23723
>>23722
No and no. Not being an edgyfag has nothing to do with being "entry level". I've probably been fapping to loli since you were in diapers. Gonna have to accept that even amoung the like minded, I.E. other lolicons, edgyfags are and always have been looked down on.
No.23754
>>23658
I wouldn't know, /r/Lolicons isn't banned on Reddit.
>>23712
>self proclaimed lolicons
as opposed to….?
No.23813
>>23712
>>23715
Not him but the owner of r/lolicons is shit and if it comes to "/r/lolicons or nothing" I will kindly just leave the community. You have a community that is ALREADY not allowed and then you whine about tons of shit and try to force in morals? Get the fuck out.
No.23839
>>23813
Well then I guess good thing places like this exist, as I don't want you in my community any more than you want to be a part of it yourself
No.23933
>>23712
since when has not being into more hardcore fetishes been "casual"? it's not a contest lol
No.24738
>>22472
>i find rape distasteful that's why i blocked it in my community
confirmed for complete and utter faggot
you got your attention now get the fuck out or youre gonna get triggered
No.24739
>>22636
proven for faggot kill yourself
No.24740
>>22820
>too extreme
go fuck yourself
No.24741
Got an edgy samefag bumping like the little faggot he is.
No.24758
>>24740
>>24739
>>24738
You could at least try and hide the fact that you're samefag spamming, or are you just too autistic
No.24763
>>23933
There's a vast difference between not being into something and actively censoring it so others can't see it.
Anyway, the best thing to do is let the thread die at this point. OP is a massive faggot, and he doesn't deserve to have his shitty subreddit advertised on /loli/.
No.24809
>>24763
Yeah, well, y'know, that's just like uh, your opinion man
No.24811
Does it get you hard when little girls are raped? Do you like seeing their cunt overstuffed with a huge cocktail? Like choking her until she passes out? Cum in all her holes? Beat her some more. Get hard again from her tears to duck her even harder all over again?
No.24812
>>24811
ye dude, i love 4 yr old loli cunny
No.24813
i like all these people talking about censorship when there were literally censor free communities already on the same website. hell, /r/lolicons actually fills a niche for people who don't want to see any 'hardcore' content. OP might be a fag because he claims some moral superiority over liking his cartoon CP one way over another, but bitching at him for the fact that he created a community with rules is pretty dumb.
No.24818
>>24813
I never said I was better than anybody who enjoys a separate fetish than me, they're free to enjoy it as much as they like, just not in my community.
As you said, there are other communities on Reddit already dedicated to being censor-free, they're absolutely free to post over there.
No.24857
i guess it is a general problem that everyone keeps equalling loli/pedophilia and violence.
what in the god fucking hell is supposed to make it impossible to have a positive, non-harmful sexual relationship with an underage girl? guys like the /r/lolicon one might be limiting freedom of speech, but by doing so, they prevent further reinforcement of mainstream associations between loli/pedophilia and violence, which are, supposedly, the very reason for the persecution we are facing. therefore you should be grateful that there are people out there, who promote less negative and threatening impressions of loli/pedophilia to the general public.
as to me always referring to pedophilia as well, yep, i think it applies there as well, shame seeing how even that similar oppressed minorities still hate on regular, non-violent pedophilia. hoping the us pulling a galilei on this study won't throw you off
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
No.24879
>>24857
>what in the god fucking hell is supposed to make it impossible to have a positive, non-harmful sexual relationship with an underage girl?
Right now? The fact that society will convince them that they suffered horrible trauma, regardless of how non-traumatic it was at the time. Simply having memories of such an encounter is dangerous in our current society. You'd be playing Russian roulette with a child's future. You don't give a kid a loaded gun to play with just because they asked for it.
Throwing loli under the bus in the hopes that people will let you fuck their kids is utterly fucking retarded.
No.24889
>>24879
Not him but then that is not the fault of the party who had a consensual relationship with the child. That's purely the fault of the "rescuers" and society forcing harm into their minds.
No.24893
It shouldnt matter what content is drawn, art should be a restriction free medium. I'd argue for it whether its lolis or anything else. We are overtly sensitive assholes in society, sticking our nose in everything, potraying a fondness of art as a bad thing is what led to your thinking that those people are more likely to be pedos. Go back to leddit, you dont have a place here.
No.24897
>>24889
That's like pushing someone in front of a speeding car and saying that it's entirely the fault of the driver for speeding, or calling a SWAT raid on someone's house and then acting innocent when their kid ends up dead.
If you know a certain action may result in harm to a child, you are ethically obligated to avoid doing it, regardless of who's "fault" it may technically be.
No.24901
>>24897
Not even close to a comparable analogy. You are taking about murder/attempted murder. Not consensual love. Putting you child in a car and driving them to school "may harm them" you does that mean you should never put a child in a car? And again, it is the would be self righteous "rescuers" that cause the harm but forcing the mentality of "you are and must be a damaged victim because we say so".
No.24914
>>24901
>Putting you child in a car and driving them to school "may harm them" you does that mean you should never put a child in a car?
Not even close to a comparable analogy.
>it is the would be self righteous "rescuers" that cause the harm
So you do agree that there is a more than 1-in-a-million chance of harm being caused. Could you prevent that chance? Yes. Therefore you should fucking prevent it. Nothing more needs to be considered in the situation. Assign blame after you've ensured that no harm will come to a child, not as a way to let you disregard the child's safety.
I'm not saying that it isn't almost entirely the fault of society that the child ends up harmed, at least in the consensual cases. I'm saying that if there is a way for you to prevent that harm from occurring, you are obligated to do so. Don't drag children into your war, however righteous you believe your cause to be. You know exactly what happens to many of them when you do.
No.24916
>>24914
It wasn't an analogy, so keep up. It was an example of your "If you know a certain action may result in harm to a child, you are ethically obligated to avoid doing it, regardless of who's "fault" it may technically be", you putting a child in a car may result in the child being injured via accident, even if it's the "fault" of another diver as you put it. The chances of being in a car accident is less than 1 in a million and you have no problem with that. This is just to show how much of a fallacy the logic you're using is. You can stop trying to twist it around, in the end the vast majority of "bictim' as purposely manufactured by these pretend moralists.
No.24917
>>24916
So it is completely acceptable to do something which you know would result in harm, as long as you can blame someone else?
Would you be totally happy about someone reporting you for child abuse, because it's not them who are actually causing the harm? I mean, in a perfect society you wouldn't suffer as a result of them informing the authorities, so any suffering can't be their fault.
No.24918
>>24916
Actually, let's just get to the core of this.
There is a room with a child in it, an observation window, and a button labelled "warning: pressing this button will kill the child". It's okay to press the button because the person who put the child in the automated-killing-room was ultimately to blame for their death. In an ideal world the button wouldn't do anything, so anyone has the right to press the button.
No.24925
>>24917
No, don't put words in my mouth, I said nothing even remotely close to that. Also your example would be something to ask the fake rescuers, they are pounding trauma into their minds.
>>24918
Your hypothetical still does not apply here and are still, wrongly, trying to comparing purposeful harm with a consensual relationship. You are just going in circles saying nothing. Harm is the exception, caused by third parties, not the rule in consensual cases.
No.24929
>>24893
That would more apply if he was calling for a ban on rape porn and the like. Which he isn't. I think it's perfectly reasonable for people to not like certain things and thusly don't want to see them.
Obviously banning a form of art in it's entirety is absurd but nobody here is calling for that.
No.24943
>>24925
It doesn't really matter who causes the harm. What matters is that you can prevent it.
Even if it is the exception rather than the rule, you're still gambling with a child's life. It would have to be a very rare exception to be justified, and I don't think you really know how common or rare it is. That kind of data is obviously very hard to accurately gather in this world.
No.24952
>>24943
Which, as I said, is an argument base on pure fallacy. The logic you're using makes no sense and is worded in a way to place full blame on one not responsible. It's easy to find the "data" aka reports on cases involving children having sex with adults, the vast majority say they liked it, they enjoyed it. But then it is forced into their heads that "No, you're a victim, they hurt you. Now be a harmed, damaged victim".
No.24958
No.24979
No.24980
>>24952
Molestation victim here, the harassment I got from family, police, and social workers was much more stressful to me than the fact that I got molested. Anywhere I went for support later in life was rutted with apologists making excuses like "ids a defense mekunism" and other such faggotry.
They were just as abusive as the molester. If not moreso.
No.24983
>>24979
Don't really care haha. It's just a subreddit, me and my friends can still trade Gelbooru stuff on IRC.
No.24985
Sorry your subreddit got fucked. I was really sad to see it gone today. Have you started another subreddit yet?
No.24986
>>24980
Make or female?How old were you? What happened? Just curious.
No.24988
>>24986
Male, 6, and the neighbor. Don't really remember too much of it. All I remember is people acting like I got my legs blown off.
No.24991
>>24988
Yeah, I can totally see that happening. My sister killed herself and I just hated everyone around me telling me how sad I should be and feeling pressured into publicly showing my grief. Yeah, I'm fucking devastated, but I dont want to sit around so we can all show each other how upset we are, like one big fucking grief circlejerk. "Its just a defense mechanism, you're in shock, it'll hit you later, maybe in a month, maybe in a year, maybe in a decade". No, I feel like shit now. I just dont feel like proving it to you.
/rant
No.24993
>>24985
No point, with the new policy update all "animated CP" as spez put it (what an idiot), is banned.
You could do one on Voat if there's not one already.
No.24994
>reddit bans drawn cp
>inb4 some blind faggots going "It's nothing! Purely coincidental! A-as long as we have the deep web nothing will change!"
Ah… the diarrhea of a deluded person's mind.
No.24995
>>24994
reddit has been teetering on the edge of doing this for years, I don't think it surprised anyone in this community whether they thought loli was doomed or not
No.24999
>>24994
>drawn cp
Nothing you say has any validity for being a retard. You are trying to spread fear over a site taken over by SJWs long ago.
No.25010
>>24999
They said textually "animated cp"
The motherfuckers actually believe that.
PROTECT THE PIXELS
No.25011
how does it feel now that your sub is actually banned?
No.25017
>>25010
I believe it, its the buzz word all the SJWs use. They use it to attach a stigma to it.
No.25023
I think it's actually time to take a stand.
No.25025
>>25023
People are too damn afraid too.
Whenever a site or such bans loli/shota there are always the idiots who say "who cares there are still x, y, and z sites that have it"
When there are fucks like Germany, Russia, and the UK parading around forcing their morality/view/beliefs on other sites and countries the situation will only get worse from here.
Especially Germany. Fuck Germany. They've been responsible for a lot of the bannings and blocks recently.
No.25026
>>25025
> People are too damn afraid too.
First you've got to get mad.
No.25027
>>25026
where are the people getting mad? there's only so many fucks i could give since i've never used reddit and it seems like a lost cause, but when things like this happen, like with paheal, i don't see very many people actually speaking out about it.
No.25028
>>25027
It's all scapegoating pedos to justify authoritarian policies, JUST THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
It doesn't just affect the pedos, it's just a first step. Everyone with half a brain that is informed realizes this.
It stops here.
No.25029
>>25027
The loss of /r/lolicons and /r/pomf content-wise is unimportant since both were very slow and anything you could find on there you could already find else where.
But on the bigger picture it's just another hit against loli/shota and people forcing their views on everyone else
paheal, foundry, sankaku(when the ban was in plcae), reddit, ect. just another nail in the coffin
No.25045
>>25025
loli is legal in germany m8.
If anything its one of those fucking unofficial child protection organizations who hold zero real world power and its the websites fault if they cave in to bullshit like that
No.25047
>>24952
>The logic you're using makes no sense and is worded in a way to place full blame on one not responsible.
No. Let me be very clear. The blame lies entirely with society, the police, and social workers. However, just because it is their fault, does not mean you shouldn't do what you can to stop them from causing that harm. One of the best ways to stop them is to avoid getting the child involved in the situation in the first place.
I'm giving practical advice to prevent harm from occurring. It's no different to telling a girl not to walk down a dark alley at night wearing a very short skirt and no panties. It wouldn't be her fault if she got raped by a tentacle monster, but she could prevent it.
I'm on your side in this, but if you love the child you won't risk them going through what >>24980 went through. Fix society first, then have your fun.
No.25067
>>25047
Which is nonsensical logic. You are still trying to shift blame at any cost to the person who did not inflicted the harm. In your analogy and using your logic you would blame the girl, because she put her self in the situation.
No.25073
>>25067
You seem absolutely determined to ignore reality and pretend that the world is just like your ideal fantasy of it. You refuse to acknowledge the existence of bad things when making decisions, at least when they only pose a danger to others. You think that just because your actions wouldn't result in harm in an ideal world, that makes them universally correct actions which will always be good regardless of what reality is like.
I don't give a fuck who you want to "blame". Blame the fucking gods if you like. What matters is that given a choice, you should choose the path which doesn't end with a child suffering at anyone's hands.
I cannot possibly make this any clearer, and if you still don't understand you should stop letting your genitalia do your thinking for you. Right now you seem like a classic example of an uncaring pedophile who just wants to get his fix regardless of the consequences. If you want to fix our image in the public eye, don't ban violent loli porn; Develop a sense of empathy instead.
I'm done with this fucking stupid argument.
No.25078
>>25073
You have that backwards. You are the determined to ignore reality and blame the wrong side. You using poor logic will never be clear, "the people causing harm aren't to blame, the person I decide is". Not at all an "uncaring pedophile" you just seem like a retarded SJW preaching BS about consensual love is damaging even though it causes no harm until a third party comes in and shove the harm into their minds. You keep using analogies that don't fit, circular arguments and keep putting words in my mouth and then attack said words with based on fallacies.
No.25197
>>24995
3 years of teetering, though?
I want to know what was the breaking point for them. Who and what pushed them to act.
No.25202
>>25197
as far as I can tell the only reason it wasn't killed before was that it hadn't attracted the attention of anyone the reddit staff wanted to appease.
chances are an advertiser was fed a list of 'objectionable' subs and then that was fed back to the admins, whether that was the result of some SJW hidden hand, who knows
No.25211
>>24991
Well you didn't have to love or care about your sister. I bet she was a rentless bitch anyway. Good riddance.
>>25078
Consensual love? I thought this was a place for loli porn not a place where dudes are fucking girls. Anyway ask any pedophile who has been to jail…..it ain't worth it in the US. But I can see you already been fucking girls so hopefully you are in a place where you could fuck em good and legal.
No.25220
>>25211
Careful with that edge. No one was talking about jail. So either keep up or don't talk, it makes you look stupid when you don't know the topic.
No.25238
>>25220
This is 8ch.net not some intellictual talk show. I don't need to keep up with shit. Nothing here is that important. Jail is very real and in certain places this shit is considered cp .Also why the fuck are people use the term edgy? This is 8ch. I'm not posting cp or snuff content. I'm far from edgy.
No.25273
>>25238
You being edgy about a person committing suicide. Also you are still talking off topic about what was being discussed. Why come into the discussion about something we aren't talking about? This is only "CP" in shitty countries ran by the thought police, lines on a paere will never be CP.
No.29936
>wahh this fag won't let me toast ebin abuse on his personal plebbit uh bloo bloo
so make your own you edgy retards.
I understand that we all want to fuck 8 year olds but that doesn't mean you have to act like one too.