/loli/ - Lolis

>tor

>don't save pics

>solved

convert to islam.

>>31631

pretty sure tor isn't safe anymore

>>31638

It's safe. Some government agents like to go around spreading FUD about Tor. If anything that's a suggestion of its efficacy.

I live in the UK and I look at lolicon. I wrote a blog about my feelings last year after that dude was arrested: http://jigsy1.blogspot.com/2014/10/defending-lolicon.html

That said, I don't use Tor, or proxies, or anything like that, though. Mainly because I'm quite willing to defend what I do in a court of law if shit ever hits the fan.

We're talking about drawn artwork and illustrated literature, after all.

>>31640

Fuck. I keep saying "arrested," I mean convicted.

Uh, don't come here? Don't look up or consume anything that has to do with loli or underage porn(teen looking stuff). Seriously, if you life in the UK, you can't afford to fuck around with this shit.

Great article. And as a fellow british Lolicon, I say keep your nose clean, your head down, and don't give them any reason to pick on you. Generally, its an open secret that despite having near unlimited powers, our crime prevention/detection services are stretched to breaking point. Unless something is brought directly to their attention, or is an ancillary crime to something else- e.g, you're a drug dealer or terrorist- thought crimes and paper crimes are a very low priority for them.

Is there a chance you could, like that one guy, still get arrested? Perhaps, but if you know your rights, keep a cool head, you can probably cut a deal. Most Police officers would rather be dealing with real criminals, not wasting time going after you specifically.

Its good to be paranoid, but be realistic about it too.

>>31647

Never cut a deal. We're talking about something that shouldn't be a crime to start with.

Always plead not guilty, regardless.

>>31640

What do you mean by "willing do defend". It's illegal in UK, what are you defending yourself against? You're guilty for owning it.

You can defend yourself in America and try to contact CBLDF so they convince the court that lolicon has artistic value and shouldn't be criminalized if the need arises. But UK? What kind of defense you're planning on doing? The only thing you can do is reduce your sentence and plead guilty.

At least get a decent VPN subscription (plus tor, i2p, etc.), encrypt your computer, and don't browse loli sites on the same machine you submit CV for a job.

>>31654

So if a law is totally unjustifiable we should all just blindly obey it 'cause after all, law is law, right?

>>31659

Oh of course not, but you can't fight the law when you're already in court defending your illegal activity. Fighting unjust laws starts before that, with social activism, raising awareness, writing papers, organizing movements, and all requires you actually not committing the crime.

>>31678

I disagree with that.

There was a civil servent who was guilty of whistleblowing state secrets back in the 80s. The jury aquitted him.

>>31654

There is such a thing as jury nullification.

Of course there's practically zero chance of it actually succeeding, but if I was in that situation I would use my time in court to point out how absurd the law is and demand that the jury acknowledge the injustice of it.

I'd probably kill myself before being dragged into court though. Given how shitty life is, it just wouldn't be worth the effort of fighting a futile battle.

>>31701

"You have enemies? Good. That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life."

>>31657

>encrypt your computer

Is there point? If you won't agree to decrypt it for them you'll get time anyway.

>>31703

One good quote deserves another.

"An honest man is always in trouble."

Ah yes, the UK. The country that convicts people for fapping to 2D children but pardons actual child rapists.

>>31715

Deniable encryption is an option.

There's also the option of using a computer with no permanent storage attached except for a small memory stick or something. Boot from a liveCD, save images to an encrypted container on the memory stick, then keep it somewhere well hidden. If they can't find the memory stick, they can't demand the encryption keys for it.

>>31715

Plausible deniability can help.

>>31745

They've trained sniffer dogs in some countries for that.

Though, I can't help wonder what would happen if you hid it in a spice cupboard, or vacuum flask, or a fake rock placed in some soil in a house plant when they try that.

>>31806

A vacuum flask would definitely work. In fact, any kind of airtight container would be a pretty safe bet. Also, I find it really hard to believe that a sniffer dog could find a tiny memory card/stick in a modern home full of electrical stuff.

>>31806

>sniffer dogs for electronics

hide it in an old CRT TV, it would mask the scent.

also, sniffing out electronics is stupid, they're everywhere now.

It's something to do with polycarbonates according to the article.

https://archive.is/oDYzD [Ars Technica]

>>31848

Actually the polycarbonates was only in reference to finding hidden optical disks.

For the memory sticks it just gave a relatively useless description of "scents such as metals and other components".

If you really wanted to beat it, just get hold of an old dead hard drive, attack it with an angle grinder or sledge hammer, and scatter the resulting dust into all your cupboards and drawers.

Also it's probably a good idea to keep any long-term backups away from home. Bury them in the woods or something.