[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / girltalk / guarida / loomis / lovelive / roze / tijuana / wx ]

/loli/ - Lolis

Lolis are Love, Lolis are Life
Winner of the 19th Attention-Hungry Games
/scifi/ - We won because we paid Yawn fifty bucks.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Several changes to the rules have been made | Board cleanup is underway | Direct your comments and complaints to the meta thread

d8786e No.48470

Hi guys, I recently acquired this board after the previous owner went inactive. To make this short and sweet, I want to hear what you guys think should be added or removed from the board, if anything. Also, please don't hesitate to report any spam/brownpills, I'll be monitoring the report log daily.

Post last edited at

034a52 No.74684

>>74681

Sounds like it, he doesn't know of the 2D/3D barrier. The CG thread has images that's trying to imitate 3DPD realism that's attracting these types of people, it's disgusting.


034a52 No.74685

>>74683

Good to know. Though the CG still has garbage models. Be nice to have quality control.


feeb2d No.74703

>>74637

Maybe whoever runs 8ch could tell if there is a solution for this "off the 25th page" issue?

What if when a new draw thread began we could copy the previous to a new board called /loliarchive ?


6dc1f8 No.74716

File: 6489712a89c3834⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 347.68 KB, 1100x1600, 11:16, 36508383_p1.jpg)

>>74659

>I would like futa to get banned

I like futa loli though. If we're not going to ban all the furry, guro, and piss stuff, no reason to draw the line at penises. Between it being a pretty niche combination and loli already kind of shunned in a lot of places, it's not like there's many other places to go to post about it anyway. Lolicons have to stick together! But, yeah, obviously something that it should have its own thread for.

The same goes for the extremely crude Western cartoon shit too. Posters should just be aware that most people find that as about as attractive as a stick figure and show some restraint when posting it.


3f6d9f No.74717

>>74716

The main problem with futa is that a great deal of "futa" posted (like your pic) isn't even futa in the first place because there's no visible hermaphroditism, just a dick and balls. At that point it's just a shota who may or may not have other feminine features. It also doesn't seem to me that the majority of futa posters give any kind of a fuck whether or not what they're posting is even correctly tagged as futa or not. This is more of a problem with loli than with non-loli because artists don't always nail or even bother to try emphasizing feminine features on a generally pre-pubescent style body. Furry, guro, piss, etc. might be unpalatable to most but they are at least not making it vague whether loli is even getting posted or not.

For the record, I don't have any problem with futa being allowed here as long as there's some basic self-moderation in deciding what to post.


16a94b No.74722

>>74716

>>74717

My two cents on the matter. I have never dwelved in futanari arguements because they've always shown to go nowhere. I have never thought of it like that how it might as well be a boy if she has dick and balls. But I believe it should stay and have its own containment thread, like /d/ centric thread, might as well thrown in the extreme ones at the cost of spoilering it.

By the way, I never understood the "cons" of having a board slow with low userbase. 8ch is one of handful sites that can host loli content. Treat it as a hosting sharing site instead of a chatroom where you know each other and post the same content over and over again.


bdd1f5 No.74728

>>74637

Is this board finally going to have quality control? So far /a/ seems to be my go to for loli threads, but I'll see what you can do to fix up the board.


ec1e8b No.74760

>>70410

canada, straya and uk isn't a "lot" of countries, but those are the bigger english speaking countries which makes you feel like it's banned everywhere. not mentioning countries where porn is outright banned or loli is grey area, you should probably be fine as long as you're not a retard who gets caught with real CP too or actually molests or rapes kids


33dbc6 No.74819

You need to fix the rules thread, specifying that is source requests must be posted in the request thread, and post the thread ID. This would make easier to peopleto put their requests in the right place.


ba6b1c No.74826

>>74819

From what I can see not only do we not have a rules thread, but the old rule page is dead too.

Made a new rules thread here. If anyone thinks some changes are needed, feel free to respond. >>74825


33dbc6 No.74846

>>74826

About rules:

>3. This is a 2D lolicon zone. Pedophilia discussion is not welcome.

I suggest to correct to 2D/3D. Because:

>nor any 3D renders that are realistic or lifelike. Anything that violates the DOST test will be removed.

What means that 3D in general is allowed.


ba6b1c No.74860

>>74846

Corrected to 2D/3DCG. Just saying 3D can still imply real girls. I'd like to just say no real girl pics at all even SFW, but I know people used to like talking about UAB and would occasionally mention it using real girls as a base. Honestly the more I think about that game the more it feels like it violates rule 2. Should've spared me the headache and just have used original characters instead.


dbbd0f No.74947

>>74860

Hi Tewi,

Our mutral friend has probably already mentioned me. I am here to say the very kind offer of support is mutral. If you need any help feel free to drop by and ask when ever.

Also clicking on >>74826 leads to a 404 yet it loads just fine from the catalog.


cc02e1 No.74953

>>74846

Regardless of rules, I just laugh at how hypocritical people are when the truth is, most people here would love 3d if they stopped being moralfags. Oh, and yes most people here would love to see laws changed but are too afraid to speak out. Censorship from government and board owners will only get worse unless people start speaking up. There is another board that allows you to discuss such matters. That is all I will say.


08ac6d No.74954

>>74953

>2D lolicon zone

>the only active thread apart from drawthread right now is about an artist who went to jail for softcore CP


ba6b1c No.74958

>>74947

>Our mutral friend has probably already mentioned me.

I wouldn't know anything about that.

>Also clicking on >>74826 leads to a 404

Fixed it.

>>74953

>most people here do a thing if you changed how they thought

Okay.

>"most people here would love" x2

You like to make a lot of assumptions about others, though given how the board was advertised on /b/ a while back I'm not surprised there are people who do think you way.

>see laws changed but are too afraid to speak out

>Censorship from government and board owners will only get worse unless people start speaking up

I don't care. Even if I was the only one here who didn't like 3DPD, it doesn't matter. This is the 2D zone.

>There is another board that allows you to discuss such matters

Then take it over there. Had enough of 3D shit bringing down 2D purity by association.


dbbd0f No.74959

>>74958

>I wouldn't know anything about that.

OK then glad I would be of assistance anyway.


33dbc6 No.74960

>>74953

I prefer 2D lolicon than 3D. 3D is something weird trying to be CP, but failing because some laws forbids hyper-realistic 3D, and there's lower possibilities of creating a Lolicon industry in the western: is a lot of anonymous individuals trying to sell their content, and another activists trying to stop Lolicon, what kind of shit is this? Even, I would talk about some kind of legality for… well, I stop, but in a really open-minded society you would talk freely about it.


bcbdd0 No.74975

>>74728

Agree, if they are removing the 3D CGI pics cartoon shit should also be removed or contained in a single thread that could be easily hidden.


ba6b1c No.74978

There doesn't seem to be any push back in this thread to protect original western 3DCG, so I can only assume the majority of users will be accepting of its removal.

Unless there's a ton of support to protect original western 3DCG with some really good reasoning, I'll begin clearing it out on Monday.

That means soon say goodbye to the following threads (and anything else I might've missed):

>>64696

>>57847

>>72030

>>44594

>>72661

>>68493

>>62374

>>62374

>>67424

>>63314

>>62642

>>62636

>>61280

Three days is plenty of warning, wouldn't you agree? 25 pages is way too much holy shit.

As for western character models from vidya and such, since they do receive some quality control from their creators I'm willing to let them stay. The Sims and Second Life are of generally poor quality though. Opinions?

>>74975

The situation with cartoons is still in the planning stage. Since there are people who want cartoons to stay, I was thinking of having some form of containment. Unfortunately I can't think of a good way to keep more than one thread for it (two including the drawthread). Keeping it all one thread is something I would be fine doing, but it's rather limiting for the fans. Would you western lovers be okay with that?


bcbdd0 No.74983

>>74978

There could be an eternal dump for cartoon stuff of all kinds, drawing requests and edits included, now personaly I dont hate ALL western stuff, just cartoon stuff since is so different and honestly unfapabble to a lot of us compared to Anime, however I do like when they draw realistic type stuff based on things that aren't cartoons like comics or videogames.


0a20de No.74986

>>74978

Is original 3DCG legally endangering the board? If not, then it should be kept. Because there's pretty much nowhere else for it anywhere, and there are as many opponents to Western 2D here as there are to 3D. If you're allowing one to remain, even with containment, there's no good reason to remove the other.


08ac6d No.74987

>>74860

>Honestly the more I think about that game the more it feels like it violates rule 2. Should've spared me the headache and just have used original characters instead.

Ew. What the fuck is wrong with you. UAB is sacred and the reason this board got any action since 2015. It's the foundation. Do not slander it just because you can't appreciate 3D young girls like normal lolicons do.


ba6b1c No.75000

>>74983

>I dont hate ALL western stuff, just cartoon stuff since is so different and honestly unfapabble to a lot of us compared to Anime

I don't hate it all either. There's some good and bad mixed in there, but I can't see western stuff as loli. Just as anime and cartoons are treated differently despite meaning the same thing, so too do I see anime lolis and cartoon girls being different.

>>74986

Some 3DCG can legally endanger the board and are already not allowed. While the majority may not, it still attempts to emulate reality. Not only does it fail miserably, the resulting quality is absolutely horrendous. It is an offense to my eyes and many others. Cartoons aren't the only reason why people think /loli/ is shit; we allow too much garbage to go unfiltered. I don't even expect good quality porn to show up here anymore, and the fun and meaningful discussions have all dried up. There's a reason why the old cgi loli board died, and it wasn't just potential cp scares. It's high time we start pruning some of this shit and work towards improving /loli/. That means we can't let trash continue to pile up just because it isn't illegal.

>>74987

>UAB is sacred

>It's the foundation

UAB is not a sacred cow. It is far from perfect and it received its fair share of criticism here back then too.

> Do not slander it just because you can't appreciate 3D young girls like normal lolicons do.

>appreciate 3D young girls

>normal lolicons

LOLI IS NOT 3D

I didn't really care for UAB. It had some good jokes, but that's about all I liked. I disliked the art style. Rather than a loli game, it was a pedo game. A game centered on pedophilia and child pornography. A bunch of shitty, slutty brats hynpotizing men into fucking them, then filming and selling it. Filled with the generic "kids enjoy it too" bullshit. All the girls' designs are based on real children, real child models and even emulating some of their works. The dialogue was all about how you're fucking kids and being a pedophile. All the adults were fit into a stereotype, with the "bad guys" as hysteric anti-pedos out on a witch hunt, and some of your allies as creepy pedophiles. (At least) One cameo character was an actual child molester. The plot gives a pretty shit reason as to why fucking the girls is a good things too, seeing as jews love fucking children in their degenerate demon-worshiping rituals.

I didn't say UAB was banned in my previous post. Hell, I admitted to not wording the rule in a way to let discussion of it slip through, in respect to the discussions of the past. But honestly I should probably reconsider.


c0b333 No.75003

>>74978

Glad you are bringing up the quality and putting your foot down. Those 3DCGs are uncanny valley. I don't mind 3DCG that has stylized semi-realism like TERA Online, Final Fantasy, Phantasy Star, Star Ocean among many others. Yet something about those 3DCG you are linking to rubs me the wrong way.

>>75000

Nothing wrong with Cartoons as long as the anatomy is good like Comic Book Characters, Avatar, Original Ben 10 and such. The cartoons that get shit on are ones based in Cal-Arts and such which have bad anatomy that looks like geometrical shapes and noodle arms. This isn't really an East vs West issue when you think about it. Even lolis from Crayon Shin-Chan wouldn't fly well due to similar complaints.


6b2241 No.75005

>>75000

>but I can't see western stuff as loli

Admit it. The definition of lolicon, though is an… abbreviation of Lolita Complex, starts in Japan, but I think Internet and globalization extended the definition to not only eastern content, today it covers eastern and western content, even furry. Gwen is considered a loli, though she wasn't created in Japan, the same Little Audrey or Disney's Alice, for example. You can't be so strictly with the definition when the language is changing constantly. Today we accept lolicon in general about characters that resembles a little girl.

3DCG… despite cartoon or anime stylished 3D, is a problem, if anyone wants to explore its real possibilities is problem for LEA, if not is a problem for its public (the ones whose want to see in 3D his desires like in a reality). But videogame 3D shouldn't to be a problem, at least for now.


08ac6d No.75006

>>75000

>I didn't really care for UAB. It had some good jokes, but that's about all I liked. I disliked the art style. Rather than a loli game, it was a pedo game.

Gross. Your misguided and weird hatred for pedophiles blocked you from enjoying that fantastic game.


03bc09 No.75007

>>75000

All I see is a lot of putting your personal views into the rules. 3D (not real) is no less lascivious than any drawn shit is. Don't care what art style it is.

I'm just speaking up because if I don't, who will? We had no issues with those threads so far have we? I may be out of the loop if something did happen, but otherwise, why start swinging your owner-dick around as soon as you have control like this over things -you- don't like? Is loli-futa next because it's not technically loli? the oppai loli thread? I agree it's dumb and defeats the purpose of loli, but it's something people like and it stays, I don't care or go into it and put 'em down or demand it be removed.

> It is an offense to my eyes and many others. Cartoons aren't the only reason why people think /loli/ is shit; we allow too much garbage to go unfiltered.

Personal Opinion. Some of it is shit, some if isn't, it's in the eye of the beholder.

>I don't even expect good quality porn to show up here anymore, and the fun and meaningful discussions have all dried up.

Nigga you're on a chan board, there's no quality requirement and discussion? We're here to discuss cartoon porn, there's no high horse to be had for miles about this shit.

>It's high time we start pruning some of this shit and work towards improving /loli/. That means we can't let trash continue to pile up just because it isn't illegal.

That's a slippery slope and sounding heavily cliquey/over-controlling. All you're gonna do is piss off the autists and invite trolls to post not only the shit you're outlawing just to mess with you and make you do more work, but idiots that spam illegal shit happens on any random given board and has since the dawn of the original chans, you're trying to fight a war that's never been won and trying to splinter an already-small community.


37ef8d No.75010

>>74978

>Second Life

I am a producer of Second Life content and would like it to stay here, where it's been for the last 9 months.

There's a lot of non-loli trash posts spamming up the thread lately for some reason, but I would rather see the trash removed, not the thread. I think the old thread is a good example of it producing enough good content and discussion to justify itself:

>>52500

/sl/ is not willing to accept a loli thread, so a removal of the thread would be the killing of that community. For numbers, there's been over 500 clicks on the discord link posted on the thread. It's somewhat popular even though the posting rate is way down.

I disagree in general with the banning of any expression of loli that's legal, just because people prefer a certain art style. I wouldn't expect people to start banning non-blonde lolis just because a majority preferred blonde hair or for some reason thought brunettes were immoral or not "real loli". It's just a fucked up enforcement of your personal preferences on other people, like with gelbooru and toddlercon.


37ef8d No.75012

>>75010

Also probably not helping my argument here, but furries are large part of the Second Life community, to the point that there is significantly more furry than non-furry lewding going on.

Out of courtesy I avoid posting most of my material on the thread because it mostly involves furry characters.

If the SL thread stays as an SL containment zone, I'd like to see it become an officially sanctioned furry containment zone as well. People who are sensitive to "ThingsIDontLike" are probably going to hide the thread anyway.


37ef8d No.75014

>>75012

Clarification: I meant "most of the pictures involve loli x furry", not "the pictures being mostly furry".


cc02e1 No.75015

>>74958

Well jailbait was the top sub on reddit before it got shutdown. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what people really want. You can keep censoring what people want, that is your choice. The irony is that if your goal is to somehow make the world a better place by blocking 3D art, then you are only making it grow faster.

Also I am not from /b and only come to this website for this board and one other related to the topic that is banned from being talked about here.

And again, you can keep being a hypocritical person for as long as you want. That is your prerogative. But nobody with half a brain actually believes any anon when he says "I only like 2D" or "3D is evil!" or "much 2D purity". It must be so wonderful being on the high horse of 2D art right? At least you aren't like those horrible 3D lovers who are all monsters. :P

*Random question for anyone who knows* Before a bunch of vigilantes spammed illegal photos in /hebe to get it shutdown, was it more popular than /b? Was it the most popular board on this site?


cc02e1 No.75016

>>75007

Exactly. Well spoken.


08ac6d No.75021

>>75007

Don't even bother talking to him. He dislikes UAB and dislikes pedophiles. He's not fit to be BO of this board. But the board's so small that no one wants it anyways. Just your typical newfag who thinks pedophilia and lolicon are separable.


affb56 No.75022

>>75000

Nice to see that you'll be bringing this board up to standard. Don't know why wait until Monday, but do what you gotta do.


8b90f9 No.75027

I guess I'll post in defense of 3D art in general on the board. Too lazy to quote specific posts but I think these are the arguments being made for banning it:

Argument 1) "It's too realistic to be legal"

Where is the precedent for 3D artwork depicting child pornography being any more illegal than 2D? The only cases I am even aware of where lolicon artwork is brought before a court has been 2D.

In my own country the laws make no mention of 2D vs 3D depictions of children. I have seen mention of "indistinguisable from a real photograph" in some laws, but most 3D artwork I have seen does not come close to meeting that definition.

If there are actual legal concerns over a specific piece of artwork, report it to the global admins as outlined here: https://8ch.net/obscenity.html

Posting of illegal content is already forbidden globally. There is no need to add board rules to forbid a specific style of artwork because you think it's more likely to encourage people to post something illegal. That same logic could be used to say loli should be banned globally on 8chan because someone is more likely to post something illegal if it's allowed.

Argument 2) "It's low quality"

Using the OPs of the examples linked here:

>>74978

I don't think any of these pictures would be considered too low quality on any appropriate boorus with minimum quality standards, which exist mainly to prevent people uploading chicken scratch sketches shot on a phone camera. It's true that in general 3D art looks uncanny and oddly posed, but someone who wasn't a fan of 2D could find similar things to pick at about trends in 2D artwork too.

Despite it looking like people throw down pre-made models in some posing program and snap a few screenshots (drawing 2d?? That's just slapping some lines down on a piece of paper and calling it art!), it does take time and effort to compose a good shot and tell a story with shots of 3D models. There are of course artists who don't use stock models, too, who this argument doesn't even apply to. There are also people who don't put in any effort and produce garbage, who should be the ones targetted.

Also the fact there is a lot of "less than stellar" 3D artwork posted vs 2D artwork doesn't mean that 3D is inherently low quality. It makes sense that people scrape the bottom of the barrel if there is less artwork being produced in 3D compared to 2D. Raising the bar on what's considered good enough to post makes sense, but outright banning 3D for quality reasons is insane. There is plenty of examples that any reasonable person would be lying if they say it isn't high, or even acceptable, quality.

Argument 3) "It's not real loli" or "It's simulated child porn"

Guess what: Whether it's 2D or 3D, it's artwork depicting little girls. Just because you rationalized yourself in to a "I'm not really a pedophile as long as they're 2D anime girls" mindset, doesn't make 2D anime artwork depicting children any less of a depiction of a child; and, therefore, 2D anime artwork depicting children getting fucked any less of a depiction of a child being fucked than 3D artwork.

Also the same argument used as a reason to ban eastern artwork is similarly silly. East or west, they are both cartoons drawn in different styles. Yes, your-favourite-booru and halfchan boards ban eastern artwork, since they were designed and made to specialize in Japanese culture and art. That's not justification in itself for doing the same here.

Argument 4) "It's shitting up my board"

If 3D-posters were flooding every thread where they're not welcome that should be addressed (just like if someone kept posting Maki pictures in every thread, they should be nuked from orbit), but if there's a small number of threads speciaizing in 3D artwork posting 3D artwork, it's no effort to hide the threads specializing in artwork you don't like.

If there does turn out to a large number of people who prefer not to see 3D artwork or eastern artwork in their /loli/ board, it should be a discussion of whether or not it is reasonable to force fragmentation of an already small community in to new boards. As long as a minority-liked content is taking an appropriate small amount of space/mindshare on the board, it should be allowed to co-exist with the majority-liked.

Argument 5) "Well there's people posting in this thread against it, so everybody must not want it"

Selection bias. Consider that the most likely reason people would have to come in to a meta thread to complain about a type of content is to rally to remove things that they don't like (example: /qa/ on hal-chan and the never-ending flow of posters trying to shut down /pol/). You would then see what few people who notice that there is such rallying going on to come to defend it (example: me). Neither of these people represent the majority of users. The majority of users don't post at all, let alone care to pro-actively involve themselves in board politics.


d88357 No.75029

File: 8ea971f906a8df3⋯.png (1.04 MB, 800x1280, 5:8, Styalized.png)

>>74978

It's great that you're doing something about the board. You're already a better BO than the last one.

>>75003

Yeah, 3DCG with artsyles such as this example image should be fine. Though I personally would love to see more inkling porn.


33dbc6 No.75031

>>75006

I don't hate UAB, but it's too far to be considered a sacred content, because:

1. As a Visual Novel has its flaws, it can't offer very much: a good ending, a bad ending, and a lot of Game Overs, if you want to take a challenging attittude, Game Over, if you want to insult someone, Game Over, isn't really a good VN, there's no many possibilities.

2. Art style: Isn't for western (there are beautiful and cute western styles), is for it wasn't solved in a better way, I don't like the style, really, and I can't consider those girls cute.


ba6b1c No.75033

>>75005

>You can't be so strictly with the definition when the language is changing constantly

The bastardization of language weakens our ability to communicate. When we've got too many people using words like "literally" in place of its antonym, and SJWs inventing nonsense terms to muddy the language, there's a problem.

>>75006

I was put off by the art style and the girls being sluts at first; it's only in retrospect that I started seeing it as a pedo game over a loli game.

>>75007

Should I not put my foot down when it comes to quality control? If I hold back because a handful of people like it, nothing will change.

>Is loli-futa next because it's not technically loli? the oppai loli thread? I

Those are fetishes; this is a particular style. Not all cgi is banned either; game character models from anywhere and japanese-made cgi are still permitted. It's just that original western cgi is held to a very low standard, and only really excels when it attempts to be hyper-realistic.

>Some of it is shit, some if isn't, it's in the eye of the beholder

The same mentality that killed western art. You can look at a kid's crayon drawing and think it's cute and charming, but that doesn't mean you can compare it to a classical work of art. There are ways to objectively judge the quality of art, or even just graphics, and most original western 3DCG art fails at it.

>Nigga you're on a chan board, there's no quality requirement and discussion?

Only if you let it. Some boards are of higher quality than others, due to a combination of rules and the board culture they've developed.

>That's a slippery slope and sounding heavily cliquey/over-controlling

I'm just trying to fix things; I can't help that.

>post not only the shit you're outlawing just to mess with you and make you do more work

The only new restriction on content is original western 3DCGI. Apart from directing people to the request and meta threads, I haven't put a filter on content or designated containment threads on anything. Those are the only change I've made to the rules; it's just that they haven't been open to read in a while.

>>75010

I didn't mean to single out Second Life as something in particular to remove; I was asking if people were okay with the amount of cgi stuff permitted. Whether this was good, they wanted less western stuff, if we should go purely 2D, or anything else.

> disagree in general with the banning of any expression of loli that's legal, just because people prefer a certain art style

>start banning non-blonde lolis

>gelbooru and toddlercon

I understand where you're coming from, but those are loli types and fetishes; not art styles.

>>75012

>If the SL thread stays as an SL containment zone, I'd like to see it become an officially sanctioned furry containment zone as well

>>75014

>I meant "most of the pictures involve loli x furry"

Furry-related SL can stay in the SL thread as long as loli is involved, be it furry loli or furry on loli.

>>75015

There are enough boards on 8chan to cater to 3DPD desires, and I'd like to see the 3DCGI board come back, so the people her have a place to go if they want it.

>And again, you can keep being a hypocritical person for as long as you want

>nobody with half a brain actually believes any anon when he says "I only like 2D" or "3D is evil!" or "much 2D purity"

People can like one and not the other. The 2D/3D barrier is a legitimate thing for some people. If I can do it, others can too.

>>75021

>He dislikes UAB and dislikes pedophiles

I can have my own tastes, and this is a loli board; not a pedo board.

>Just your typical newfag who thinks pedophilia and lolicon are separable

>Implying they're not

>>75022

I'm waiting to give the other side a chance to plead their case. A swaying of opinion or a compromise isn't always impossible.

>>75027

>Where is the precedent for 3D artwork depicting child pornography being any more illegal than 2D?

3D renders have a larger propensity for emulating reality. 2D drawings are more difficult to do so. When it does, if it's not a classical artwork it will be removed as well.

>Posting of illegal content is already forbidden globally. There is no need to add board rules to forbid a specific style of artwork because you think it's more likely to encourage people to post something illegal.

We have had people post traces and hyper-realistic renders in the past. The clarification in the rules is to help dissuade that.

>I don't think any of these pictures would be considered too low quality on any appropriate boorus with minimum quality standards

Appropriate boorus being the key term. A lot of boorus probably wouldn't accept it on is own.

> It makes sense that people scrape the bottom of the barrel if there is less artwork being produced in 3D compared to 2D.

True, but if the niche never grows and creators are never pressured to improve, they won't.

>Raising the bar on what's considered good enough to post makes sense, but outright banning 3D for quality reasons is insane

I cannot find a single point where I can draw the line as to where it is good enough to let be.

>Whether it's 2D or 3D, it's artwork depicting little girls. Just because you rationalized yourself in to a "I'm not really a pedophile as long as they're 2D anime girls" mindset, doesn't make 2D anime artwork depicting children any less of a depiction of a child; and, therefore, 2D anime artwork depicting children getting fucked any less of a depiction of a child being fucked than 3D artwork.

They're all little girls either way, so I might as well let people post the real thing then. Is that it?

>If there does turn out to a large number of people who prefer not to see 3D artwork or eastern artwork in their /loli/ board,

There already is a good number of people who want the trash 3DCGI out.

>it should be a discussion of whether or not it is reasonable to force fragmentation of an already small community in to new boards.

Is how "reasonable" it is really relevant?

As long as a minority-liked content is taking an appropriate small amount of space/mindshare on the board, it should be allowed to co-exist with the majority-liked.

Why? Just because it's small?

>The majority of users don't post at all, let alone care to pro-actively involve themselves in board politics.

Does no one care when board ownership changes? Do they not take notice that a new rules sticky exists? Have they no care that the meta thread has become far more active than it used to recently? If they don't want to pay attention and try to have their voices heard, they only have themselves to blame when they don't like things changing around them. You'd think a smaller community would have an easier time to get involved since it's quite easy to tell what's getting attention.

>>75028

>spam link in the meta thread

Top notch.

>>75029

Thanks for the vote of confidence.

>3DCG with artsyles such as this example image should be fine. Though I personally would love to see more inkling porn.

I've got nothing against video game models and anime-style models. They're good quality, and have a standard to meet.


ba6b1c No.75035

File: 57893cada290f1a⋯.png (375.68 KB, 1704x1212, 142:101, mlp report.png)

>you are not allowed to post this

What did he mean by this?


3f6d9f No.75036

>Bawww why do you want to get rid of 3D it'll fracture the community

How exactly is this a problem? There was a 3D loli board before, there can be a 3D loli board again. There's nothing stopping any of you whining idiots from making one right this minute. I hate this idea that's gained traction on the board lately of "everything related to non-real little girls MUST be given a place here." Actually, it probably would have never happened if /hebe/ refugees hadn't been given free reign. Fuck off, stop pretending like you're kindred spirits here and disparaging the people who don't give a fuck about anything except 2D as though they don't exist. You have no clue and you probably never will.


16a94b No.75037

>>75035

Patreon?


8b40f8 No.75038

File: 57b8b70cf85c3bb⋯.jpg (44.34 KB, 600x447, 200:149, angry squid.jpg)

>>74978

>>75033

REMOVE COMICSHIT

and the actual pedos too


83ff1b No.75039

File: 62e382c251d0f90⋯.jpg (66.38 KB, 494x522, 247:261, 0c736409e857a0c501625e9af8….jpg)

File: b0a4ec944d50caf⋯.jpg (124.44 KB, 796x854, 398:427, 2ca48e23ac6c25759f6c05687a….jpg)

>>75033

You're doing loli god's work.


08ac6d No.75040

>>75033

>3D renders have a larger propensity for emulating reality. 2D drawings are more difficult to do so. When it does, if it's not a classical artwork it will be removed as well.

Man, you're just creating concern for no reason. Show some normal person ExoticCondenser games, they say it's a babyfuck propaganda. Is it gonna be removed? No, because you, as a lolicon, don't view it that way. Same with all other types of lolicon content. It's gross and it's child porn if you ask the majority.

Maybe you're just power tripping. I dunno. I just know what i see, some guy who's first inclinations as a BO to remove active threads and curate discussions on a board with 10 regulars, and who's willingly admitted to disliking UAB, with one of the key reasons for disliking it being that it's a "pedo" game, like it's somehow a bad thing. You're just the worst. At least that's my first impressions of you.


79f4ba No.75041

I don't really see a problem with western stuff, most of the really oddball requests and stupid-looking noodle characters are generally contained by the drawthread (and I'm pretty sure it's just a handful of stubborn people that even keep making requests for them). As long as they stay clearly contained like that I don't care what they do. Stuff like the Natis thread, the 'good quality' western thread, etc. have no good reason to be removed.


ca3012 No.75043

>>75040

>if you don't like UAB you don't belong on this board

>if you're not a pedophile you don't belong on this board

The way you post makes it sound like you don't even care about 2D besides UAB, what possessed you to think you're in the right here? I'd tell you to go back to /hebe/ where you belong, but you guys fucked that up already, huh?


ba6b1c No.75044

>>75037

Probably. I don't recall 8chan having any policies in removing patreon content when requested.

>>75038

Pedos can leave and stay out. They've never belonged here.

>>75039

Thanks.

>>75040

>Man, you're just creating concern for no reason.

I'm just saying that's the precedent for western 3D content being "more illegal".

>some guy who's first inclinations as a BO to remove active threads

They're not all that active.

>curate discussions on a board with 10 regulars

Should we forego moderation entirely due to low population?

>willingly admitted to disliking UAB

Oy vey my perfect VN. I still haven't banned the game.

>with one of the key reasons for disliking it being that it's a "pedo" game, like it's somehow a bad thing

But it is.

>You're just the worst.

Duly noted.

>first impressions

I take it you don't browse many boards.

>>75041

>As long as they stay clearly contained

What is contained, how it's contained, and how much is contained are the big questions I have for containing western stuff. I don't want to be overly restrictive or step on too many toes regarding it, so it's difficult to come up with a plan. If anons mostly regulated themselves instead, that'd be fine too.

>Stuff like the Natis thread, the 'good quality' western thread, etc. have no good reason to be removed.

I wasn't planning on canning them outright either.

Really the only changes being made so far are moving request threads into the main one and excising western original 3DCGs.


0f5dcc No.75045

Look, you may be a faggot that stole someone's else thunder, but at least you're doing good work now.

  ⊂ニニニニニニニニ⊃
           (_ `ヽ.
             ∪/ /
            / /
     ∧_∧ / /   乙
    _( ´Д` )´ /
  / ,      〈
  (  `ー一⌒)  \    ノ|
   ̄⊂ニニニニニニニ二ノ


83ff1b No.75046

>>75044

When it comes to Western 2D, keep good shit like Toph, loli Wonder Woman and Gwen Tennyson along with other well drawn Western girls. Get rid of the potato faced noodle arms cal-arts characters and others that have geometric shapes as bodies.


ffaae3 No.75047

File: ce4b1a4b7891141⋯.png (77.91 KB, 480x461, 480:461, lola-web-desktop.png)

File: 0e683ca53f4e709⋯.jpg (46.1 KB, 665x464, 665:464, Gwen-Tennyson-gwen-tennyso….jpg)

>>75003

>Nothing wrong with Cartoons as long as the anatomy is good

If the anatomy is decent then is NOT a cartoon cartoons are supposed to be weird looking. What you are talking about is just Animated series.

I think either ban or contain characters like 1st pic and let characters as 2nd pic untouched.


4d38ea No.75048

WTF? This is still happening? I can't believe a loli board is trying to ban a specific type of loli when so many other sites like Hentai-Foundry, Piczel, Discord, Reddit, and more ban us altogether. I understand that there needs to be quality control, and drawing a stick figure getting fucked might not qualify as loli, but WHY all the hate on Western loli, which is a legitimate type of loli? There are so many great Western artists like Incognitymous, Pepipopo, AshesG, Padoga, Polyle, born-to-die, Fuchur, eroPastel, and more! If you wanna consider their art "low quality stick figures" then I can't understand that. AT LEAST contain it to one thread if people don't want to see jt! But honestly, I could give two fucks where my loli comes from or what artstyle it's drawn, I just want to fap to cute loli girls.

P.S.: I'm a noob who posted this on the wrong board and now the bot thinks I'm floodinh


4d38ea No.75049

Also, I like to fap to noodle-limb lolis sometimes because in porn pictures they usually aren't drawn exactly like that,and have thick arms and thighs to make them sexier. I don't think those are bad quality. Just MS Paint drawn shit should be banned


4d38ea No.75050

*Ms Paint or similar quality with minimal lines


83ff1b No.75051

>>75047

Ban the first, keep the second. Gwen is cute.


30cb1b No.75052

>>75047

Definitely get rid of the 1st. Gwen is more than welcomed here.


ffaae3 No.75053

File: e6a50db6c9ff1fc⋯.jpg (33.76 KB, 234x352, 117:176, Ruby_Gloom_TV_character1_1.jpg)

File: f96aa11c89f7725⋯.jpg (200.03 KB, 1106x1258, 553:629, Cindy_McPhearson.jpg)

>>75051

Read again, that's what I said (ban or contain). here is another example, ban/contain 1st, keep the 2nd.

Do you get me now?


4d38ea No.75054

THERE IS SUCH THING AS GOOD FAPPABLE LOUD HOUSE PORN!!! NOT ALL WESTERN LOLI IS DRAWN WITH THE SAME ANATOMY AS THE SOURCE MATERIAL!!!


4d38ea No.75055

Ruby Gloom is fucking bae! I can't believe this is happening. So your saying to ban Hoshime's art?


ffaae3 No.75056

>>75048

That is not loli, that is rule34, rule34 was invented as a "catch it all" for everything not Hentai/Anime related, If anything those sites are wrong for banning all underage characters due "lolicon" since cartoon characters do not resemble humans. It was more of a SJW pandering strategy than a legal one.

Loli ≠ Underage

Also I am an strong proposer of making containment threads and generals, people hate them but to me is the best way to search something in the catalog, and if you like it, you just hide one or two threads, as easy as that!


47380c No.75057

>>75044

You have a lot of work cut out for you. Getting rid of bad CG, Bad Western, Etcetera. Good luck on your endeavors to bring this board up to standard.

>>75053

Cindy has a cute attitude.


ca3012 No.75058

>>75048

>>75054

>>75055

Only a couple people in this thread want to get rid of all the western with no compromises. Quite a few people in this thread, however, want to get rid of on-model art of crappy-looking characters and stick figure-tier art in general. Read into the situation a bit more carefully before you start freaking out.


4d38ea No.75059

>>75056

It can be loli and Rule 34 at the same time! Wtf? Porn of Konata Izumi from Lucky Star is also Rule 34 since it's from a show! Also, most of the rule 34 sites HAVE ALREADY BANNED loli (or as you say"underage characters")

>>75058

I really don't see any porn of Loud House or other cartoons where they have spaghetti limbs. Maybe once in a while but that's it. Usually their model is reworked into a sexier version. Also there is a lot of detail put into the characters and backgrounds and shit.


16a94b No.75060

>>75059

Cool your 'tism jets


4d38ea No.75061

>>75056

Also, I can't believe you just said loli =/= underage! Whether you guys want to admit it or not, loli is the depiction of underage girls! It's not a japanese art style, not anymore. It is fictional 2d art that depicts characters with the body of underage girls, and people want to fap to it. It doesn't matter if it was made in Japan, Mexico, or Jupiter, if it's lines of a 2d little girl, IT IS LOLI.


ffaae3 No.75062

File: 09d807551e0c101⋯.png (234.28 KB, 1100x2308, 275:577, Gwen_Tennyson_(Reboot).png)

File: bf3f9b1f3f71089⋯.jpg (43.5 KB, 540x720, 3:4, Anime-style-loud-house.jpg)

>>75058

I already told you all, I don't want to get rid of all western content, it is rather style-based.

It does not matters if the property is Western or if the artists isn't Japanese as long as it looks like actual loli, for example while "classic" Gwen is loli the new one is not. And yes the loud House porn is loli as long as it is drawn properly.

I don't even want to ban cartoon style, just to contain it so it can be hidden for people that don't like it. And last I cant do shit I am just proposing stuff.


0f5dcc No.75063

File: 358c534cde1844e⋯.jpg (24.58 KB, 431x532, 431:532, 358c534cde1844eba44978d465….jpg)

>>75048

>>75054

While I approve of this change I have a rather differing opinion on what will happen. You're essentially switching form whatever user base this board has to the actual 8ch userbase + Some other groups with actual taste. There will be a few losses like those two posts I just replied, if that is fine with you, Tewi.


83ff1b No.75064

File: 0d43b840b9439cd⋯.jpg (327.1 KB, 689x900, 689:900, __nono_fire_emblem_and_fir….jpg)

>>75061

My loli is a thousand years old.

>>75062

So, a /co/ntainment thread?


ffaae3 No.75065

>>75064

I guess… but based on drawing style rather than property or artist's nationality.


ba6b1c No.75066

>>75046

>>75047

>>75058

So calarts, stick figures and the like (whether on model or fan drawn in that style) go in a containment thread, the draw threads remain split as they wish, and everything else is as normal. How does that sound?

>>75048

>which is a legitimate type of loli

It isn't really, but it's accepted.

>>75054

>>75055

Calm your autism.

>>75059

>Porn of Konata Izumi from Lucky Star is also Rule 34

No, it isn't. It's hentai because it's derived from anime, and generally in an anime style as well.

>>75061

>I can't believe you just said loli =/= underage!

>depicts characters with the body of underage girls

Which is it? One allows the existence of legal/adult lolis and mythical lolis, while the other does not.

>It's not a japanese art style, not anymore

Don't try to destroy the definition so it can be properly restored then.

>>75056

>is the best way to search something in the catalog, and if you like it, you just hide one or two threads

Which is why I'd rather do that than ban it, since there is good stuff amongst it.

>>75063

>You're essentially switching form whatever user base this board has to the actual 8ch userbase + Some other groups with actual taste.

That's the hope.

>There will be a few losses like those two posts I just replied, if that is fine with you, Tewi.

I'm doing my best to minimize losses while trying to raise board quality. It can't be helped if there are a few losses, but as long as it's not a terrible amount, I'm sure we'll do fine.

>>75065

>based on drawing style rather than property or artist's nationality

Well, yeah. Plenty of western artists draw anime style, after all. It's not like I plan on breaking down doors, hunting down artists of every image posted here and demanding their papers to make sure they were born in Japan.


fe94f1 No.75067

>>75064

Good idea. Also, I have a huge thing for loli moms and lolibabas

>>75066

You might as well make a cycling "/co/ntainment" thread for the noodle arms lovers. Last image in the Feet thread is a fucking noodle arm.


4d38ea No.75068

Look, my real issue with this situation is that so many Rule 34 sites have banned loli/underage characters and if this board bans "rule 34 loli" or whatever you wanna call it then IT WILL BE EVEN HARDER TO FIND THAT SHIT. I don't want it to be removed from the internet and unable to thrive and be made. This is what all these sites have been doing. Keep in mind I'm not talking about low quality drawings, but rule 34 of the cartoon style which is legitimate to me even if you don't wanna call it loli. At least a containment thread won't remove it completely, so whatever. I'm just saying it's getting really hard to find this type of art, and I don't want it to die.


0f5dcc No.75070

>>75068

AUTISM GENOCIDE 2017

AUTISM GENOCIDE 2017

AUTISM GENOCIDE 2017


ffaae3 No.75071

>>75067

Don't call it like that, that's stupid, call it "toontown" for the good old times, or "toon general" don't mix other boards, like, wth.


bd93b2 No.75072

>>75068

Calm your autism. Anons are already compromising a containment thread.

>>75066

Tewi, as you clean up the board, start a cycling containment thread for these toony lovers.


41434f No.75074

I've never seen a problem with toon-style drawings because I've never seen them posted. Posters like >>74638 and >>74465 are making up a problem that has never existed because they only want to see western style gone.

>>75070

You need to be 18 to post here.


ffaae3 No.75077

>>75074

Now that is an outright lie, drawthread no. 25 is half cartoons and the request are answered in cartoon style.

That's it, I am not posting anymore in this thread, I just hope /loli/ improves since in the end, I am just a hoarder of Hentai porn.


16a94b No.75078

>newfags panicking over nothing

>>75074

'Sup Spoods


41434f No.75079

File: 9ac20b7997a4067⋯.png (221.35 KB, 500x626, 250:313, 1490701559236.png)

>>75077

No, see I'm the one who calls you out to post actual content to combat the so-called "Western menace" everytime you pull this shit when the owner changes hands. Come back when you actually start posting content instead of leeching off other threads.

>>75078

Who?


2a6aa0 No.75081

Banning cartoons is a bad idea, so I'm also in favor of a containment thread. The nude filter threads have a lot of Western, so it should go to the containment thread too. As other anons pointed out, have it be a cycling thread. Clean up the rest of the board as well.


0a20de No.75082

>>75044

>I wasn't planning on canning them outright either.

>outright

A worrying qualifier.

>Really the only changes being made so far are moving request threads into the main one and excising western original 3DCGs.

Why not simply consolidate Western original CG to a single thread as well?


41434f No.75084

TBCH, I would like to see a crackdown on posters who start a thread for specific content and never further the thread by contributing to said thread.

>>75081

I wouldn't mind the nude filter threads being nixed permanently, seeing how nobody else will post anything that isn't a western cartoon screencap or a toddler character.


03bc09 No.75086

>>75033

>Should I not put my foot down when it comes to quality control? If I hold back because a handful of people like it, nothing will change.

What needs to change, exactly? What fires are burning our board down? All I hear is you and a couple others bitching about something you don't like keeping a board fairly active, and despite being a chan board, most folks stick to their own threads and don't go shitting up others'.

All it takes is a "Hm, I don't like this. I'll just hide the thread and go to one I actually like. It's not like we're limited to X number of threads and quality ones are in danger of being pushed off." - Don't be "that guy" and start power tripping all over the place. All you should be doing is removing genuinely illegal content(e.g; the real thing and only the real thing) and keeping spammers/non-loli posters under control. That's all you're here for and that's ALL you need to do. There is no fucking thing as "quality control" on a fucking chan board, the only Board Culture is that anonymity rules the day and you're free'er here than standard message boards. If you want to quality control, go make a normal forum like LAH, Lolicit, Lovers Lab, Shotachan, etc.

>>Is loli-futa next because it's not technically loli? the oppai loli thread? I

>Those are fetishes; this is a particular style. Not all cgi is banned either; game character models from anywhere and japanese-made cgi are still permitted. It's just that original western cgi is held to a very low standard, and only really excels when it attempts to be hyper-realistic.

All I'm hearing is "I don't like it" - If it wasn't popular, why the fuck would there be that many threads of it in the first place? The "Content majority" are just posting and not bothering to go into this thread, while the whiny minority use it to start swinging their preference-dick around because they're too lazy to hide threads. It's not like we're /v/ where shitposts are every other post, this is probably one of the most on-topic and "relatively" polite boards I've seen short of halfchan's /e/, but it's nowhere near active enough that you need to start pruning shit and turning it into a dedchan.

>>Some of it is shit, some if isn't, it's in the eye of the beholder

>The same mentality that killed western art. You can look at a kid's crayon drawing and think it's cute and charming, but that doesn't mean you can compare it to a classical work of art. There are ways to objectively judge the quality of art, or even just graphics, and most original western 3DCG art fails at it.

A) Western art isn't dead

B) Nigga did you just say you can compare cartoon kids getting fucked 3 ways to next tuesday to Picasso? I genuinely worry for this board's safety and longevity if so.

>>Nigga you're on a chan board, there's no quality requirement and discussion?

>Only if you let it. Some boards are of higher quality than others, due to a combination of rules and the board culture they've developed.

Loli porn boards ain't a haven for intellectual discussion, it's a Tattooine-esque hive of scum and villainy, and you're basically Jabba the Hutt running the place as Owner.

>>That's a slippery slope and sounding heavily cliquey/over-controlling

>I'm just trying to fix things; I can't help that.

Except yes, you can. There is nothing to fix. Just like cyber bullying, nigga close yo eyes if you see a thread you don't like and walk to the next thread.

>>TL;DR no new rules besides no western cdgi

So just do the same for Furry at the very least and allow a 3dcg containment thread. SL needs to keep its' own thread too as it's an inbetween.

>>>75010

>I didn't mean to single out Second Life as something in particular to remove; I was asking if people were okay with the amount of cgi stuff permitted. Whether this was good, they wanted less western stuff, if we should go purely 2D, or anything else.

Well you're getting that feedback. 3dcg needs to stay, you can rationalize it away however you want but most of us just see it as another fetish or style, it's all fake to anyone sane.

>> disagree in general with the banning of any expression of loli that's legal, just because people prefer a certain art style

>>start banning non-blonde lolis

>>gelbooru and toddlercon

>I understand where you're coming from, but those are loli types and fetishes; not art styles.

See above.

>3D renders have a larger propensity for emulating reality. 2D drawings are more difficult to do so. When it does, if it's not a classical artwork it will be removed as well.

Had you looked at Natis' thread? That shit is way more realistic than most 3dcg that gets posted. It's still all drawn and fake.

>There already is a good number of people who want the trash 3DCGI out.

Name them. Can we get a count of who wants it vs who doesn't? NOt just the vocal circlejerkers but the folks who, like me, just come here to fap on occasion and don't normally take part in this shit?


03bc09 No.75087

>>75062

Who fucking cares? If you don't like it, scroll past. Some of us like that noodly shit once in awhile. If anything it's less realistic and a good thing, at worst, it's a fetish.


e39de9 No.75088

>>75081

>>75084

Dedicated nude filter threads need to go. If they want to post nude filter images of their cartoon lolis, they should do it in the cartoon containment thread. As other anons suggested, have be a cycle thread so threads don't clutter the catalog after they reach bump limit.


8b90f9 No.75089

>>75033

>Should I not put my foot down when it comes to quality control? If I hold back because a handful of people like it, nothing will change.

>Those are fetishes; this is a particular style. Not all cgi is banned either; game character models from anywhere and japanese-made cgi are still permitted. It's just that original western cgi is held to a very low standard, and only really excels when it attempts to be hyper-realistic.

>The same mentality that killed western art. You can look at a kid's crayon drawing and think it's cute and charming, but that doesn't mean you can compare it to a classical work of art. There are ways to objectively judge the quality of art, or even just graphics, and most original western 3DCG art fails at it.

>Only if you let it. Some boards are of higher quality than others, due to a combination of rules and the board culture they've developed.

Eastern 2D art isn't inherently higher quality. This isn't a fine art exhibition. It's glorified cartoon porn up on a pedestal because it's drawn in a style that's mass-produced and despised in its own country of origin as much as "Cartoon Network" porn is in the west. I'm not saying that it's not cool to love Japanese artwork of little girls and post it all day long and want to have a board dedicated just to that, but saying it's for an objective quality reason is just trying to push an opinion as fact.

>I'm just trying to fix things; I can't help that.

Maybe nothing needs fixing? Maybe the way things naturally organized themselves (i.e., with 3d western art sharing a board with 2d eastern art) is fine? People complaining about other people posting things they don't like is part of that natural order too.

It's obviously going to appear like a hostile take-over if you take things the way they've been for a while, arguably without a problem, and decide to change it to appease a group in favour of a style that you prefer.

>There are enough boards on 8chan to cater to 3DPD desires, and I'd like to see the 3DCGI board come back, so the people her have a place to go if they want it.

If it's eastern 2D fans who want an isolated safe space, is taking over a board and shutting everyone else out the right way to do it? I mean, noone can stop you. It is kind of ironic that the OP image in this thread is western, though.

>>Raising the bar on what's considered good enough to post makes sense, but outright banning 3D for quality reasons is insane

>I cannot find a single point where I can draw the line as to where it is good enough to let be.

You say this, yet you also say…

>I've got nothing against video game models and anime-style models. They're good quality, and have a standard to meet.

>They're all little girls either way, so I might as well let people post the real thing then. Is that it?

Real child pornography has many obvious reasons why it shouldn't be posted here or anywhere. But this *is* a board for posting artwork depicting little girls. Comparing 3D artwork to real child pornography in a discussion about which styles of artwork depicting little girls should be allowed is absurd.

>There already is a good number of people who want the trash 3DCGI out.

There's a group of complainers in this mini echo chamber of a thread. There's clearly a good number of people who enjoy 3D and western artwork outside of this thread, going on the claims of there being too much of it posted for eastern 2D fans' liking.


300ba5 No.75090

Tewi, I came here to tell you something. I'm not here to tell what to do as any of the anons from either sides are doing. What I'm going to tell you is that BOs of any board has faced criticism and slander by anons in their respective boards. No matter what rules you make or which group of anons you'll appeal, you'll always face an opposing group of anons that disapprove of your decisions. In the end, you have the final say and you do what you think is right as it's your responsibility as BO.


ba6b1c No.75091

>>75068

It's not a ban; we're just containing the crappier art.

>>75067

>>75071

If you've got a particular OP in mind, go ahead and make it in advance.

>>75074

It's not made up; it's a quality concern for the more prominent content on the board.

>>75081

>>75084

>>75088

The nude filter thread at the moment is its own containment thread. If forced into the calarts containment thread, it'll bog down discussion there. Though at the same time, there would be less requests since the reason it gets so many is the idea that there are anons available and willing to do them.

>>75072

>>75081

Regarding clean up, I'll admit I will not be very thorough. We've got about 365 threads on the catalog right now. I'll probably only go a few pages deep, get anything else with it in the OP and leaving the rest as is (unless reported).

>>75082

>A worrying qualifier.

They'll be untouched, unless the containment procedure we finalize says otherwise. Considering how we want to do it now they're well within clean waters.

>Why not simply consolidate Western original CG to a single thread as well?

They're not worth keeping around.

>>75084

>a crackdown on posters who start a thread for specific content and never further the thread by contributing to said thread

There is sort of a way for 8chan to filter this. There's a feature called "Early 404" which will kill threads with less than 10 posts when they reach page 5. It's currently disabled, but seeing as how slow the board is it probably won't help much (current top of page 5 is just shy of two weeks from it's last post).

>>75086

>What needs to change, exactly? What fires are burning our board down?

A lack of quality enforcement further entrenching the small community we have, having driven out other users for wanting something better.

>keeping a board fairly active

Not very well mind you. They're not all as popular as they're portrayed.

>All you should be doing is removing genuinely illegal content(e.g; the real thing and only the real thing) and keeping spammers/non-loli posters under control.

As a volunteer, that's all I did. It's what I originally signed up for. And over time, I've only seen /loli/ decline further and further. I'm tired of seeing that.

>If it wasn't popular, why the fuck would there be that many threads of it in the first place?

3D shit has been a favorite of bot posting, and some anons are just shilling their own work.

>The "Content majority" are just posting and not bothering to go into this thread

The content majority won't care whether it stays or goes. They're rather content, after all. If my warning of change doesn't sway them, they're fine with it.

>Western art isn't dead

It's in the death throes.

>you can compare cartoon kids getting fucked 3 ways to next tuesday to Picasso?

I compared the tolerance of garbage leading to the decline of good works. Should I reference feminists using menstrual blood to paint and a can of garbage displayed as art instead?

>Loli porn boards ain't a haven for intellectual discussion

While the potential for one exists, intellectual discussion isn't the only form of a quality discussion.

>Just like cyber bullying, nigga close yo eyes if you see a thread you don't like and walk to the next thread.

ignoring a problem isn't always the solution. SJWs and commies come to mind. Not to mention that you wouldn't be arguing against my plans if that were viable.

>So just do the same for Furry at the very least and allow a 3dcg containment thread. SL needs to keep its' own thread too as it's an inbetween.

SL is fine to stay, but 3DCG needs to go.

>Had you looked at Natis' thread? That shit is way more realistic than most 3dcg that gets posted. It's still all drawn and fake.

I'm not fond of his works. It's realistic enough to be uncanny for me, but he has a noticeable art style and it's not bad. Unlike 3DCG which focuses on realism to it's own detriment, making everything look terrible.

>>75089

>Eastern 2D art isn't inherently higher quality

The average is far higher than what 3DCG provides.

>This isn't a fine art exhibition.

That's no reason why we can't expect better from the board.

>Maybe the way things naturally organized themselves (i.e., with 3d western art sharing a board with 2d eastern art) is fine?

It wasn't a seamless transition, as I recall. Back in Somyanon's time, I believe? It was seen as pretty shit then too, but there wasn't as much push back then. Nowadays people are more tired of it due to exposure.

>If it's eastern 2D fans who want an isolated safe space, is taking over a board and shutting everyone else out the right way to do it?

/loli/ is for loli, always has. Loli has mainly been anime style works, 2D and 3D. 3DCG is hardly loli; favoring realism over any art style.

>You say this, yet you also say…

Can I force 3DCG artists to go make even low quality vidya tier content? No. Are there any that make them on that level? Can they make realistic characters while maintaining an art style that both looks good and makes it clear it isn't real? I have yet to see anything where I can say it's fine to stay, so that remains to be seen.

>It is kind of ironic that the OP image in this thread is western, though.

Western 2D porn isn't getting banned though; just the poor quality stuff getting contained.

>Comparing 3D artwork to real child pornography in a discussion about which styles of artwork depicting little girls should be allowed is absurd.

Comparing the medium that emulates reality the most, occasionally to the point of needing to be removed for being too real isn't that absurd.

>>75090

Thanks. This sort of stuff is something I expected to get what taking over and making changes. I'm probably a bit more used to it than a normal person starting out would be due to my rabbit rabbit antics. This is a lot less hostile in comparison, so at least there's that.


ca3012 No.75092

>>75086

>>75089

>it's ok if people post garbage because it's on-topic

>who cares if it's shit, it would be bad to get rid of it because moderation is bad and should never interfere with the board

Let's just make every board /b/, then everyone will be happy, right?


03bc09 No.75093

>>75091

So what is the point of the meta thread if you're going to argue against and dismiss the opinions and speaking-up that were asked for?

You're clearly going to do as you please and let your opinions/preferences rule the board. Do it and get it over with, and don't bother with a meta thread if you're not going to listen to voiced opinions and requests/arguments to keep things you don't like.


52541a No.75098

At this point it might be easier to make a new board called jploli or something with a more stringent set of rules on the kind of content that gets posted than try to overhaul a board that has been co-opted by users with a preference for western style content.


16a94b No.75100

>>75093

Talk about a sore loser

>>75098

>make a new board for the audience that was here since the beginning

That's a good one. You are joking, right?


0a20de No.75102

>>75093

I have to second this. If your mind is made up, it's bad form to make a false show of considering your board users' input.


41434f No.75103

>>75098

/a/ board where Japanese lolis can be freely posted without mod reprisal? /a/ board where anything Western is frowned upon with contempt like of the Great Emperor Hirohito? Gosh, what sort of /a/ board would allow that?


6b6ec0 No.75104

>>75098

/loli/con is a weeb phrase. Let the Western lovers make their own board if they're no happy with the new paradigm.


0a20de No.75105

>>75104

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon

>The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex";

It's an English psychoanalytical term coined in reference to a Russian novel.


ca3012 No.75107

>>75105

I doubt very much if even 1% of jap lolicons have read Lolita, it has no bearing whatsoever on how the term has been used there since the mid-80s and the inception of 'lolicon' fascination and characters. It's basically always been a false friend, just like countless other borrowed words.


0a20de No.75111

>>75107

I doubt very much if one percent of people who are familiar with the phrase "lolita complex" have read Lolita. The Japanese use of the phrase "lolicon" is to describe someone with a lolita complex or content that would appeal to such a person. And they use the term "lolita" to describe a sexualized young girl in the same way an English speaker using the same term might. If they use an English phrase to mean the same things it would mean in English, the term's English origins certainly have a bearing. The only difference is not in the meaning but in the fact that it is not as taboo in Japan and thus they are free to use it in their pop culture, whereas here in the US you pretty much hear the word used in marketing for "barely legal" porn.


ba6b1c No.75113

>>75093

>>75102

I did say:

>>74467

>One thing I'll be concrete on is that original western 3DCG shit has to go

>>74978

>Unless there's a ton of support to protect original western 3DCG with some really good reasoning

Did you expect no resistance? Just take in the reasons to support it and say that's good enough? You need to be able to convince me that it should stay. I'm kind enough to give warning in advance and a chance to defend and possibly save it.

>>75098

It's just as easy for westerners to go and make their own board, one with a more fitting name than for us to have a redundant name like /jploli/. But eastern loli will always have a place here, so long as I'm in charge.

>>75103

>Just go to /a/

Might as well have western lovers to /co/ while we're at it and just shut down the board for being unnecessary.


bb4b81 No.75114

File: 1a0cc91a5735289⋯.jpg (64.42 KB, 500x494, 250:247, 1313657037262.jpg)

LOLWUT. This thread.

Anyways, I'm here to pass an olive leaf. I just started a new board the other day before I knew this was going on. I figure if there's going to be some infighting, I might as well come in a take refugees.

It's a board for western lolis. >>>/delicious/

As someone who admires both East and West, even with my interest in the West more, I do agree this board is lopsided. Hence why I believe migration will be hard.

So lets help each other out. Shall we?


33dbc6 No.75115

>>75044

>Pedos can leave and stay out. They've never belonged here.

You can't separate pedos from lolicon, the word is also used for men that have sexual preferences for little girls in Japan. It's hypocritical and absurd trying to censor pedos in a Lolicon board.


ba6b1c No.75116

>>75114

>I just started a new board the other day before I knew this was going on.

You're fucking with me.

>I figure if there's going to be some infighting, I might as well come in a take refugees.

Fair enough. I'm sure some people aren't going to stick around for my changes.

>migration will be hard

That's an understatement.

Good luck with your board. Hope it goes well, for both our sakes.

Putting only calarts/low quality stuff in containment is still my plan, so don't worry about me just suddenly throwing everyone out. Still, give this guy a chance.

>>75115

Too bad. The 2D/3D barrier is in full effect here.


08ac6d No.75117

>>75043

>The way you post makes it sound like you don't even care about 2D besides UAB

How dare you. I care deeply about 2D loli hentai. It's the art form that exist because pedophilia exist, and i appreciate it very much for that reason. And UAB is a rare western creation that reached those heights of Japanese lolicon, that's why i like it so much.

>I'd tell you to go back to /hebe/

I never discuss how sexy actual little girls are on 2D boards. It's not the place for it. I can appreciate both separately like a rational human being.


ca3012 No.75118

>>75117

>I never discuss how sexy actual little girls are on 2D boards

Funny, because that's exactly what you've been doing your whole time in this thread.


7245f9 No.75121

>>75114

sigh… why does nobody likes /Rule34/?


cc02e1 No.75126

>>75115

Yep. I hope he gets flooded with so much spam, he has no choice but to lift the hypocritical ban.

I also love how no discussion is allowed on laws. What is the point of the internet if you can't discuss problems? Especially when these topics are censored almost everywhere else on the web?


0f5dcc No.75130

File: cc83ff41c5c403d⋯.jpg (115.04 KB, 700x600, 7:6, 1356763348723.jpg)

>>75126

>I hope the skr1p kids raid this guy! I hate him so much!

wwwwww holy shit reddit.


08ac6d No.75132

>>75118

No, i haven't. For example i could've talked about how Lera is a 3D loli queen and that it was great to see her in UAB, or like how Mara has awakened my love for 3 year olds. But it's improper on a 2D loli board so i wouldn't dare do so. You think i was talking about little girls just because i admitted to being a pedo, so you instantly strawman and ignore everything i say because you can't focus on the discussion. Typical confused 2D lolicon!


ba6b1c No.75136

>>75126

>no choice but to lift the hypocritical ban

What's hypocritical? The pedo shit ban? Lifting that would be as disgusting as it is retarded. Pedo shit violates the global rule. Even if I allowed discussion, as soon as pics get posted it's party van time for the entire board.

>I also love how no discussion is allowed on laws.

Pedo laws are irrelevant; only laws regarding loli matter. It's still legal in the US. With the size of the community here, everyone should already be aware of how legal it is in their own country. Outside of that, the only thing anyone's gonna wonder is how safe it is to import items. There's not much to discuss unless laws start changing.

>What is the point of the internet if you can't discuss problems? Especially when these topics are censored almost everywhere else on the web?

There are plenty of actual pedo boards; go to one of those to "discuss" problems and whine about how oppressed you feel.

>>75132

>You think i was talking about little girls just because i admitted to being a pedo, so you instantly strawman and ignore everything i say because you can't focus on the discussion.

>>74640

>Not to mention it invites people who are only into 2D little girls, which are not real lolicons, they're basically mentally handicapped lolicons.

>>74676

>little girls are pretty much as perfect of a being as humanly possible, there's no greater goal than to capture that beauty

>Uncanny valley stuff is just the equivalent of garbage 2D art, made by people who's hearts are closed off to the beauty of young girls

>>74987

>Do not slander it just because you can't appreciate 3D young girls

>>75006

>Your misguided and weird hatred for pedophiles blocked you from enjoying that fantastic game

>>75021

>He dislikes UAB and dislikes pedophiles. He's not fit to be BO of this board.

> Just your typical newfag who thinks pedophilia and lolicon are separable.

>>75040

> with one of the key reasons for disliking it being that it's a "pedo" game, like it's somehow a bad thing

>>75117

> It's the art form that exist because pedophilia exist, and i appreciate it very much for that reason

You seem pretty damn focused on pedophilia and disparaging anyone who likes 2D only when it's mentioned in nearly every post you made.


33dbc6 No.75152

>>75136

We aren't asking you for allow CP in the board, even pedo discussion, obviously isn't at all convenient for the board, we are asking you to not censor 3DCG and western. You want to censor this content with the excuse to stay away pedos, do you know how many of these Japanese artists are pedos IRL, or even how many of them have got sex with children. You don't know, and if you know something like that about an artist, shall do you censor that artist? WIll do you censor any artwork with a pro-pedo message, like… Unteralterbach or any artist that tells that he is pro-pedophile? This what I say it's absurd to stay away pedos from a loli board…

About western content, I agree with you that some content needs quality control (past nude filter thread ended to be Rugrats nude filter thread). But in drawthread there's more Western artists and requesters, and I'll see more effort and politeness from Western artists than Eastern. Many Eastern only do sketches or flat colors mostly, aren't very polite even. And about beginners, do you censor them because they don't have enough quality? They need to learn, and drawthreads can be an option for improve.

And if there's some people that likes cartoon porn, what's the problem? There's are different threads for anime, cartoon and 3D lovers, sometimes they mix, but please don't censor. The board activity is lower than past six months, but we need some actions for increase the activity, not for make for /loli/ board a piece of crap where there's a new post every week. You decide.


3eb269 No.75153

>>75152

There is a new board more catered to western shenanigans now.

>>>/delicious/

3DCG should be fine there too. Less activity in exchange for more consistent quality is a trade-off I'm more than willing to accept. Might even give delicious a visit every once in a while.


8229aa No.75154

>>75152

A lot of Western 3DCG is shit.

>do you know how many of these Japanese artists are pedos IRL, or even how many of them have got sex with children

Not an argument to justify discussion on 3D

>do you censor them because they don't have enough quality? They need to learn, and drawthreads can be an option for improve.

He's not going to censor drawfags. I agree about allowing them to improve their skills. /monster/ has a separate art tutorial thread pinned on their board to encourage new artists.

>The board activity is lower than past six months, but we need some actions for increase the activity

Low quality shit isn't an excuse. Western noodly armed cartoons are allowed one containment thread, take it as it is. For those complaining about where would Western Loli go? Aside from the containment thread, they are allowed on the >>>/rule34/ board and there's the new >>>/delicious/ board.


8c6adb No.75161

Ok Tewi, just make the cartoon containment thread a cycle thread. Just do your job in cleaning and moderating the board.


7af5bd No.75164

Ok!! The /co/ntainment thread has been made! But Tewi, please don't purge all the other threads or posts in other threads containing toon loli. Just implement the new rule of one thread for it and keep the old threads up until they bump past the archive. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to erase everyone's hard work.


08ac6d No.75165

>>75136

Well it just cropped up that current BO dislikes UAB because it's a pedo game, thats all. I didn't bring it up first, you know. I just pointed out the obvious lack of taste. But i thought about it a bit more and on a grand scheme of things (we're on a board where people unironically masturbate to Incog's art and "artists" similar to him) you do not stand out in the slightest.

>>75048

>Pepipopo, AshesG, Padoga, Polyle, born-to-die, Fuchur, eroPastel

only Fuchur, Polyle (when he really tries) and Dfer are good out of that list. Add to that fdseason and simon, those guys are fantastic western artists too. Some of the best.


ba6b1c No.75184

>>75152

>we are asking you to not censor 3DCG and western

Western original 3DCG is being removed due to shit quality. Western 2D stuff is still permitted.

>do you know how many of these Japanese artists are pedos IRL, or even how many of them have got sex with children

Pedo discussion is not permitted; artists who are themselves pedo aren't banned unless they're tracing, which is a separate issue.

>WIll do you censor any artwork with a pro-pedo message, like… Unteralterbach or any artist that tells that he is pro-pedophile?

Don't discuss his stance then. His content is still tentatively permitted. I still haven't banned UAB.

>And about beginners, do you censor them because they don't have enough quality?

I already mentioned avoiding stepping on the toes of growing artists. I'm not gonna bother them.

>>75161

Righto. Doesn't really specify it's for containing calarts, stick figures and other poor quality styles though.

>>75164

That's a fair enough approach. I'd prefer doing that, as long as no one gets confused over the change.


ba6b1c No.75197

Original western 3DCGs are officially no longer accepted. No bans will be thrown out; just post deletions. Please report anything you come across.

The rules have been updated to reflect its removal, and the existence of the calarts containment thread. Old posts will be left alone, but please remember to post there from here on.


33dbc6 No.75202

>>75197

Stylished cartoon and anime 3D is still allowed?


ba6b1c No.75205


ba6b1c No.75226

>>75223

They are gone permanently. As far as I know, there are no dedicated boards for original western 3DCG, and the restriction on the new /delicious/ is similar to mine (just better worded). You'll probably need a new board for it.


e734b3 No.75250

>>75226

Now, I don't know who invented that western loli is called Cake.


4ade82 No.75252

>>75250

It came from 7chan. They have a loli board too but instead called /cake/ rather than /loli/. Their irc community sorta converted the term because people kept debating if western loli should be called loli at all. Similar to the differences between /a/ and /co/.

The cake term hasn't been used for western lolis for near 4+ years after 7chan slowed to a halt.


ac58f0 No.75256

>>75252

I think Cupcake would be a better phrase, considering Cake is already used to describe women over 25.


4ade82 No.75258

>>75256

I dunno, but that's how they put it at 7chan. I looked there just now and they still call them cake. Still a niche community it seems.


ffaae3 No.75273

>>75258

7chan is "eastern" as fuck though


90db98 No.75275

>>75273

I was referring to the ircs back in the day. Their boards on the other hand remained impenetrable. They did a better job maintaining it. Of course 7chan was known for their iron fist. All western lolis were pretty much left in /pco/. I do remember the camp sherwood guys would call western lolis cake too, though not often.


1b2f01 No.75329

File: 4a1e56fbb778258⋯.png (3.75 MB, 2048x1536, 4:3, __flandre_scarlet_and_remi….png)

File: d961d6d737548e9⋯.jpg (101.81 KB, 640x1218, 320:609, __elin_tera_online__b0a2d9….jpg)

I can't wait for the 3DCG threads to be up to standard. We could also encourage the use of MMD for anons new into making 3DCG.


50f8f4 No.75338

Hey Tewi, do something about new posts outside of their containment thread and that new 3DCG thread.


ba6b1c No.75340

>>75338

I think I got the ones you were talking about, but just as a reminder the report function is a thing.


d2e29f No.75424

Now that future cartoon posts are regulated to the containment thread, what about banners? There's the PowerPuff Girls and ugly Western Style banners that could be replaced with something better. We could use new banners, especially a cute classic Gwen Tennyson and Wonder Loli.


058734 No.75426

File: 6d2414864721b49⋯.gif (19.11 KB, 300x100, 3:1, Tewi.gif)

File: 202b9c472e7e9a3⋯.gif (314.66 KB, 300x100, 3:1, Loli Spanking.gif)

File: 03a2561f829ccf5⋯.png (37.96 KB, 300x100, 3:1, Jailer Twins.png)

File: fe81ffa0a031fcc⋯.png (55.32 KB, 300x100, 3:1, Go to Jail.png)

File: 8243269e1a983b9⋯.gif (58.94 KB, 300x100, 3:1, Police Car.gif)

>>75424

We could use new ones.


ba6b1c No.75428

>>75424

Sure, I can add in new banners. The PowerPuff Girls one was in twice, oddly enough. Most of the western ones are UAB; those ones can stay for now. Anyone who wants to make some more should remember the following:

>Banners must not exceed 500 KB (that is, 512,000 bytes);

>Only the following file types are allowed: jpeg; jpg; png; gif.

>Banners must be exactly 300px wide and 100px high.

>>75426

Added. We've got 98 out of 300 banners now.


e830b1 No.75430

File: 237f02715018c94⋯.gif (285.53 KB, 300x100, 3:1, RoQnH5UyOPVJ.gif)

>>75428

Here you go.


a001b4 No.75450

File: cc3645dcf8edef2⋯.png (1.25 KB, 327x16, 327:16, ss (2017-08-24 at 05.06.02….png)

How do I make a link that directs to a search of "drawthread" in the catalog?

On halfchan it's easy but I can't figure it out here


709a2a No.75454

A Tewi, you know how /monster/ has both a seperate drawthread and drawing tutorial thread with the tutorial thread pinned on their board? May you please pin the tutorial thread and make it a cycle?


ba6b1c No.75455

>>75430

Added.

>>75450

I wouldn't know of such a feature being present on fullchan. Try asking on >>>/sudo/ or something.

>>75454

I don't see why not. Done.


486569 No.75464

File: f98467e80b2b887⋯.jpg (115.02 KB, 760x760, 1:1, eureka_x_renton.jpg)

>>48470

I want to thank you for your service, and for actually moderating for this amazing board, and I wanted to say that furthreads, 3d cg, and everything inbetween (like 3d cg furloli) is good.


6cd2ef No.75473

File: 1da8327bacbe728⋯.jpg (103.49 KB, 619x774, 619:774, Screen_Shot_-_17-08-25_005.jpg)

Onii-chan, we have a problem. Considering the 2020 Olympics, I'm afraid that the Japanese Government will ban Lolicon.

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2017/08/sjws-convince-japanese-governor-to-pull-tourism-ad-for-being-sexist/37932/


693b91 No.75478

File: 3173a718a5860ba⋯.png (169.14 KB, 1576x1709, 1576:1709, 1486335819476.png)

>>75473

Whiny pieces of shit like that BBC reporter from a while back or those from your link will definitely make a big fat deal of everything, but I'm still convinced that at most it will just put a chill on some parts of the otaku scene in Tokyo for a year or two and maybe the government will form some half-assed committee to pretend they're doing something to appease Western busybodies until the Olympics blow over. Yeah the whole thing is shit altogether but this is no different than when any place hosts the Olympics; the nation hosting will hide its dirty laundry but it's entirely superficially. At least I hope that's the case, lolicon is a deeply ingrained part of the counterculture over there but even more controversial areas like U-15 idols have taken a huge hit in recent years.


369109 No.75480

>>75473

There is a big diference in a simple video ad and something that can and will change drastically and for worse one of the biggest industries in the country. The only way for this to happen is that Shinzo Abe and Nippon Kaigi lose the next election and Japan fall in the hands of the leftists. Otherise lolicon is safe for now..


59113b No.75483

Thanks for creating and pinning the Art Tutorial Thread. It's a good thing for anons to aspire in learning how to draw or for existing drawfags to improve their skills. Making it a cycle is a good idea, many anons learning can continuously post their progress in that thread and improve from the critique. Commision a man a drawing and you'd satisfy him for a day, Teach a man to draw and you'd satisfy him for a lifetime. Anyway, the board looks better managed so good job.


028fb3 No.75487

Hey Tewi, you should shorten the catalog like /a/'s. There's no reason to have a long catalog on a small and slow board.


ba6b1c No.75491

>>75487

Having 10-15 pages would probably be better. What does everyone else think? 25 pages still fine with you, or do you want us to go smaller? Keep in mind that if I shrink it down the older threads will be wiped.


04f182 No.75492

>>75491

Shrink it down. Threads after page 10 are completely dead. A board with low activity and few posts don't need many pages. Any living threads people like get bumped anyways. Also clean some threads. The "REAL ART" thread is bait and the dead Loli Circi thread has no lolis and it's only an ugly CG with no loli post.


16a94b No.75493

>>75491

I'd say go with 10 pages.

Just make an announcement to give people a number of days to save what-haves


a7d06c No.75496

If you are gonna delete pages, can you give us a week to save what we need? Please?

Personally, I don't see what deleting pages does besides erase people's work. I don't see the benefit in it. If someone can explain to me please do.


b3f898 No.75498

>>75496

I agree. There are some really good threads here that I wish do not disappear. Like the UAB thread. I adore all the lovely fanart that was shared and posted on there.

However, I do agree that having so many dead threads isn't that good either. So if we are gonna shrink down some pages, then I would like it to be at 15. I feel like that if we keep at 10, we'll lose some good threads in here.

>>75492

I don't really see what's so wrong with that real art thread. The artwork is very soft and I find the traditional art style very pretty.


16a94b No.75500

I have an idea but it may take some group effort

First, trim the board's fat by deleting unnecessary threads or ones that have about less than 10 posts

Next, that's where everyone contributes, list every thread that contains some worth. Mods find some way to bump it, either sticky it for a while or trim the unnecessary posts then bump

If you're that paranoid, here's how you can archive threads

Click on Expand all images, then save the page. Do this to as many threads as you want, then save them all to a .rar and share to your other tasteless, braindead, degenerate buddies


7a3864 No.75501

>>75498

The traditional art is good culture, but it doesn't belong here. 10 is perfect, threads after page 10 are completely deadas the other anons pointed out. Anons will start up new threads and repost many things anyway.


3eb269 No.75503

15 pages is a better cutoff point than 10. The place has a few healthy archives along with the bustling threads. And for a slower board, it doesn't 'always' have to be about the new, you know?


ba6b1c No.75504

>>75492

>>75493

>>75496

>>75498

>>75500

>>75501

>>75503

Seems like the general consensus is to shrink it. Slightly more in favor of 10 so far.

How about this: next Friday/Saturday, I shrink it down. Afterwards, I'll enable early 404 and delete any thread less than 10 posts after page 5 if they're still around. You'll have a week to save what you can and bump your favorite old threads (though if they're past page 10 the discussion for them has been long since dead and you would do better just archiving it or letting go). Sound good?

Also considering a new rule for dump threads that OP needs to contribute a certain amount. Not sure what would be a good minimum number of pics by X time to go with.


9653d6 No.75518

>>75496

The way I think of it is this: there are a great deal of threads in the catalog that haven't been posted in in over a year. These are almost certain to never get anything more posted in them, but they still sit there, and occasionally some idiot will even necrobump them without anything to contribute. Anything worth archiving shouldn't just sit on a imageboard for ages, there are far better kinds of sites for archiving work. If anything in that strata of dead threads is worth saving, it has likely been saved elsewhere by now.

On slow boards there's a tendency to forget that imageboards are fundamentally ephemeral in nature, things posted on them have no need to last much longer than a thread can stay active for.


3e1b33 No.75522

I hope the art tutorial thread is a permanent thing. It's good to see the board getting in order.


0a20de No.75523

>>75501

Good culture doesn't belong here. Good to know.


b3f898 No.75531

>>75197

Cartoon 3DCG is fine right? Not the realistic type of course, but the style like Pixar has or any other cartoon 3D show or movie out there. They are after all in the same category as anime. I guess a good example here would be Fuchur's stuff: http://rule34hentai.net/post/view/224292


ba6b1c No.75532

>>75531

Yeah, that's fine. Low quality ones are still subject to /co/ntainment, of course.

Post last edited at

b3f898 No.75533

>>75532

That's great to hear. Though I wonder, is Western video game lolis allowed in here? I'm talking about the SFM porn stuff like The Last of Us, Resident Evil and even fan characters such as Olivia Mann. Since Eastern video game characters are fine on this board, I wonder if the same applies to the Western stuff as well.


ba6b1c No.75534

>>75533

Yep. I mentioned those kinds.


91cded No.75617

We have a namefag in some threads. I get that there are anons not from here by noticing their posting styles. However that namefag should lurk more.


ba6b1c No.75619

>>75617

Already got fed up with him, slapped him with a day long ban and wiped his atrocious image dump from the Tanya thread. I'd guess he was from halfchan, but even they know better than to namefag. Gotta lurk more, dude.


1440d9 No.75697

>>75619

Hi Twei,

Newish BO of >>>/hgg/ here. The offer of support is a two way street so if you need any help at all feel free to ask.


b956a4 No.75709

Could you remove threads such as these >>75700 >>64725 >>61857 unless OP contributes more than 5 pictures and at least starts some kind of conversation?

This isn't Gelbooru.


ea9ff9 No.75714

Congratulations Tewi, you've been nominated .

>>>/sudo/47620


ba6b1c No.75715

>>75697

Thanks. Same to you.

>>75709

I said I was considering the rule. Not sure about requiring a conversation starter for an image dump thread. How many pics should we require? 6 at minimum?

>>75714

That's neat. It's a bit early in the week to be doing that though, isn't it?


b956a4 No.75716

>>75715

>I said I was considering the rule. Not sure about requiring a conversation starter for an image dump thread. How many pics should we require? 6 at minimum?

I'd say 15. That's 3 posts.


ba6b1c No.75768

>>75716

Rule added.

Rule 8 was slightly changed to include cartoon 3DCG. /delicious/ is also being advertised in the rules now.


ffaae3 No.75784

>>75617

I actually lol'ed, there is this one guy that is easily identifiable, requesting cartoon porn all over the place, he uses screenshots and even pictures of the goddamn tv as "reference", seems he is not even aware of the changes.


afb01f No.75821

I hope you deal with the necrobumping without thread contribution.


2821a4 No.75855

>>74473

>>75830

Hey Tewi what happened to https://8ch.net/loli/res/74473.html#75830 my thread on lewd loli dialogue with exploitable innuendo? The thread with favorite hentai quotes is still there even though that is unofficial scanlation stuff while mine was canonical. Getting a 404 error. Was not old, had just replied.


10792e No.75866

>>75855

Accidental deletion, sorry. It was a weird thread though.


9dfc00 No.75877

>>75784

>tyciol


10792e No.75908

>>75504

Final reminder that I'm shrinking the board down to 10 pages tomorrow. Save what you can!


10792e No.75947

>>75908

Board is down to 10 pages now, with early 404 enabled. Catalog is still full however, and making new/deleting old threads doesn't cause it to clear up. How strange. Will I have to manually delete them after all?


77012f No.76165

Can you do something about the few cartoon posts posted outside containment thread?


0870ea No.76168

>>76165

I am convinced Is one sole guy, two at most, since their posts styles are identical each time.


562f57 No.76169

>>76168

It seems so. The BO should be monitoring threads and such.


b36a51 No.76228

Can you please kill off the nude filter thread for good? It produces absolutely nothing of value because it's nearly 100% requests. It's also become home to a couple persistent shitposters like >>75837 >>76102 this fucko.


4ba34e No.76237

i have been gone for months due to work. tell me what happened to all the 3d western lolithreads.

i was expecting to come back to download all those pics but they are all gone.does any one have an archives of all those threads? i habe checks the wayback machine site but they have censored /loli/


10792e No.76238

>>76165

>>76169

Report it when you see it. That really helps. Remember that it's not a 100% containment policy on cartoons.

>>76228

I can't stand looking at it anymore either. I'll give it 12 hours.

>>76237

If you had bothered to read this thread or the rules thread, you would know that it's been axed and no longer allowed.


c4b21c No.76242

>>76238

man well that sucks. thanks for the update.8ch sure has changed…..this makes me angry.


2d17da No.76247

>>76242

Do not angry anon.

The website… is changed.

I feel it on the keyboard

I see it in the monitor

I smell it… in the AC

What that once was… is lost

For none now live who remember it.

It began with the forging of the Great /loli/

There, started to be occupied by the Lolicons; immortal, wisest and fairest of all beings.

Then came the Content Makers, great painters and craftsmen of the loli porns.

And then, the last one to came is the Troll Hoarders, who above all else desire porn.

For within these few years all races lived together in harmony.

Then everything changed when the SJWs attacked.

Only Pepe, master of all four tribe, could stop them.

But when the world needed him most, he vanished.

A hundred days passed and my brother and I discovered the new Pepe, a Mod named Tewi.

And although his moderation skills are great, he still has a lot to learn before he's ready to save anyone. But I believe Tewi can save /loli/.


d7c6c1 No.76250

>>76247

This explains everything!


052cea No.76252

File: dd9fca0f4884614⋯.jpg (54.54 KB, 418x576, 209:288, dd9fca0f48846147a30268d62d….jpg)

>>76247

spoken out of the prophets mouth.

praise be tewi and please give me a link to all the archived deleted 3d loli please


10792e No.76256

>>76252

>please give me a link to all the archived deleted 3d loli please

There's no archive. It's gone for good.


cbe1bf No.76258

Holy autism, Batman.


cbe1bf No.76259

Also, I'm pretty sure thats abusefag. He posted on /shota/ not too long ago.

>talking all philosophical and poor english to boot


efe082 No.76262

>>76259

You think >>76247 is abusefag? Half of that is the intro to The Last Airbender.


0870ea No.76267

>>76247

hey is not my fault that entering Sadpanda is fucking impossible on a dynamic IP!


21ec82 No.76287

I don't want to be a bother to anyone, but would you say that anything Yin Yang Yo/School For Vampires related lolis is outright banned, due to the autists who likes them? (Abusefag/Speedy)


0870ea No.76322

>>76287

No, just post at the cartoon general.


2d17da No.76326

>>76259

>abusefag

sure. pretend everyone you hate is an abusefag if that makes you happy

>posted on /shota/ not too long ago

lol wut im not gay enough to visit that crap

>talking all philosophical and poor english to boot

say that to J.R.R Tolkien and M.Night Shyamalan because im only quoting their well-known lines. i guess only illiterates cannot recognize them


cbe1bf No.76328

>>76326

My bad. He wouldn't type english this well.

Can you accept my fivegiveness?


10792e No.76334

>>76287

Rather than a rule, I put a warning about mistaken identity in the rules, and finally added my email to the rules. Unbanned the previous poster too to give him one chance.


64e156 No.76337

>>76335

>>76336

Fucked up my post. I'm going to sleep already.


64e156 No.76338

Anyway, I was asking if this board will get advertised.


10792e No.76339

Nude filter thread removed. Please wait a while before making it again, and reflect on what went wrong with them.

>>76337

Sleep tight.

>>76338

It's gotten a little attention on /a/ and /monster/ as I took over at least. People know things are changing here and that's good enough for now. Of course if it manages to win the attention-hungry games that's fine too.


d3529e No.76343

I don't if I going to stand Tewi's dictatorship… Now it's 95% failure rate to post any image or open any thread… I'm going to miss the old /loli/ times…


10792e No.76371

>>76343

Feel free to voice your concerns.

>Now it's 95% failure rate to post any image or open any thread

Not sure what you mean by that.


56f0fe No.76373

Tes


712043 No.76387

File: 70bac34336fd9f1⋯.gif (279.07 KB, 300x100, 3:1, GVJtd5wVD0Wm.gif)

File: 85e04839dd5a635⋯.gif (204.17 KB, 300x100, 3:1, nOeuNDGGauCI.gif)

File: 7f7e95aa7e6a6ca⋯.gif (396.36 KB, 300x100, 3:1, bPp4mid7l22H.gif)

File: 48b1b0c60afcd2d⋯.gif (305.36 KB, 300x100, 3:1, d7mrRYrDpNyR.gif)

File: 99c2c5faa1cf4fa⋯.gif (267.22 KB, 300x100, 3:1, qZ25FQfolwmF.gif)

Those UAB banners are ugly. So here are some cute ones.


712043 No.76388

File: 3aa51a613f43c25⋯.gif (666.5 KB, 300x100, 3:1, q0H7t2OBWzqS.gif)

File: a0d2b106e29d69e⋯.gif (82.01 KB, 300x100, 3:1, gzMrrp29icCx.gif)

File: e113c8d78a071d9⋯.gif (24.05 KB, 300x100, 3:1, pGCO2ZcgBiHE.gif)

File: 012a1f832398674⋯.gif (723.21 KB, 300x100, 3:1, if9MLaAhdN85.gif)

File: 4e35f363ff42cbb⋯.gif (587.25 KB, 300x100, 3:1, 3Bx8T6BzjZxN.gif)


10792e No.76389

>>76387

>>76388

Uploaded! Well most of them. 6, 9, and 10 are just over the 500KB file size limit unfortunately. Great stuff though.


56f0fe No.76390

>>2925

>>57763

>>75364

Three threads for Kemonomimi is excessive.


10792e No.76393

>>76390

One of them is for kemono rather than kemonomimi, which I'll leave be. Locked (and accidentally bumped) the one with less recent activity.


8c778f No.76407

Isn't the /pololi/ thread a stealth cartoon thread?


10792e No.76408

>>76407

Anything drawn related to US politics will inevitably have cartoon style by default. I'd rather it not just be a vampirina dump thread though.


df31f0 No.76428

can we have a thread for 3d western lolis?


10792e No.76435

>>76428

Did you read the rules? Western original realistic 3D is not allowed. Western cartoon and video game 3D however are still allowed. As long as you can abide by that, it should be fine.


3c2210 No.76503

I'm guessing that after the My Little Pony thread ran its coarse, future related posts will be regulated to the cartoon thread, right? Same as when old cartoon threads die?


45e7a0 No.76504

I would really like it if we could change Anonymous to ロリコン again. It was one of the things I really liked when I came here. It just doesn't fit with calling everyone Anonymous on a loli board.


ec341d No.76505

>>76504

Same, we should go back to that.


10792e No.76507

>>76503

Pretty much.

>>76504

>>76505

Sure, why not.


0d4ffb No.76522

>>76504

Why? Is it because Anonymous too "Western" to you?


56f0fe No.76523

>>76507

Why not better to change ロリコン to Bernd, in hommage to Unteralterbach?


45e7a0 No.76536

>>76522

No, it's because that's what one of the older BO's who used to be here called us. I never said anything about it being too Western. If you look at one of the older threads like, UAB for example, people were called ロリコン until it got changed to Anonymous. I just wanted to bring that back, that's all.

>>76523

That's a Krautchan thing. It doesn't really belong here on /loli/.


cbe1bf No.76697

Is there an checkbox ticked on that gives you a new ID(on a thread) every week? That leaves drawthreads open for gluttons.


10792e No.76699

>>76697

That doesn't exist. They're either using a proxy/vpn, or a dynamic IP.


24476f No.76703

File: df01559d75a4130⋯.jpg (13.27 KB, 320x320, 1:1, doggo wondering.jpg)

>>76699

So you are saying that in the drawthreads people are using proxy/vpn to make dozens of requests just to not be called "greeedy people"?(exactly the same that people used to do before ID implantation)

Again, why we still having IDs?


10792e No.76707

>>76703

Because Cluck decided to activate it, and no one asked to shut it off after I took over. Personally I'm fine with either.


f60b5d No.76709

>>76707

I don't think they need to go, they're still occasionally useful for outing idiots who don't even bother changing IPs. At the very least, having them doesn't particularly harm anything.


cbe1bf No.76711

>>76699

Then it must be each month. Aside from this ID I was c1d8cb, 16a94b, 41cdbf and c1d8cb


802c6a No.76718

Can you do something about the stealth cartoon threads? What's the point of the containment thread if you allow posts outside it?


cbe1bf No.76720

>>76718

It would help if you would list the threads


10792e No.76723

>>76718

This >>76720 hepls. I see the canon nudity thread's been reported. The only one that can be cleared out is OP's pic though, since the /co/ntainment is currently meant for bad/simplistic art styles. If it fills up with that sort, I'll get rid of it. Otherwise until everyone wants all western stuff in the containment thread there's not much I can do if it fills up with anime too.


0969dd No.76740

>>76703

so that i can find some arrogant newfags and humiliate them in front of everyone for being stupid


211f52 No.76822

>>76697

Everyone on the site gets a new ID in every thread whenever the site's IP hashing salt is changed. I don't know exactly how often that happens, but it's weekly or monthly or something inbetween. It's to stop anyone from being able to figure out IPs of old posts even if they have full access to all the site's data.


8938cf No.76943

>>76371

i'm pretty sure he means that you should cool down your moderation habit a little bit. you make the rules, you should follow it yourself. don't let your own specific porn preferences decide what can stay and what will be purged. from what i saw in the past few months, you have been discriminately purging western loli posts and threads. from toonfags, those insignificant numbers may appears to be 95% of all posts. remember tewi, this is /loli/ board, not /animeporn/ thread. "toon loli" is loli. "anime loli" is loli. "game loli" is loli. "drawn loli" is loli. except "3d lolis" as they clearly violated global rules. as long as it has loli characteristics, it is loli and you have no right to select them.


e23d90 No.76951

>>76943

The people wanted the purge because the /b/tard flood decreased the board quality. Don't misconstrue it as one man's sole decision. The board is better shape now. Just keep western things condensed and existent and seek /delicious/ for a more efficient western dominance.


afd6b6 No.76952

>>76943

It's not one man's decision, people want the purge. However instead of purging all of it completely, he had all future cartoon posts in a dedicated cartoon thread and allow the older cartoon threads from before his reign run their course. After the western furry thread runs their course, future posts will be forced into the cartoon containment thread for example. There's also >>>/delicious/ for dedicated western loli.


cbe1bf No.77456

Did

>>77455

delete his own post and trying to shift blame that a Jani did it?

Can you enable the board log to be public?


10792e No.77458

>>77456

To tell that I need to know what the post number was. I personally don't remember deleting such a request, and he has one involving those two characters in the thread still.

I can enable it if people want me to.


cbe1bf No.77463

File: 6cad16b24ec5dbe⋯.png (232.59 KB, 684x632, 171:158, shsgadsb.png)


87514a No.77475

It's like nobody reads the rules, so they post outside of containment.


10792e No.77478

>>77463

Alucard slapped that one down. Good on him. No one wants someone to pester every artist that posts with a "please do my request".

>>77475

They don't follow the image dump rule either.


0ddff3 No.77711

so with /delicious/ being a thing now, i guess we pretty much have 2 western style loli drawthreads.


3024d1 No.78642

File: 38e8a1f8666bb9d⋯.png (189.49 KB, 1366x405, 1366:405, 677888.png)

File: 4abfd3d78b7c930⋯.png (105.58 KB, 958x530, 479:265, wasted.png)

To: /loli/ community

From: Vampirefag

Subject: Why pic related was deleted?

>inb4 n-not was me, w-was Alucard! y-you fool :D !

Whatever:

Let's try it one more time:

Why I can't request my vampire lolis?

Can't you realize that you are treat me in the same way that the world treated just for be a loli lover?

Why you keep listening up the autistic troll stalker who chase my requests?

I thought that was this you wanted that I do after had a bunch of emails with you.

>inb4 the troll samefag as the fuck pretending be the whole community, just replying with a bunch of autistic lies.


c47c2b No.78647

>>78642

I haven't been following this drama, but I do have a few thoughts which might help.

If you've requested something a lot and no artists have drawn it, requesting it more probably won't help. In fact, making lots of identical requests will generally piss people off. To get artists to draw fetish art for you, you need to find one who shares your fetishes and then give them ideas for drawings which are more interesting than the ones they can think of themselves. An art request is a kind of cooperation - the artist brings their skills while the requester brings their ideas. You can't expect to attract a good artist with boring, obvious ideas.

Also, I don't think drawthreads here are even a very good place to get requests done. You'd have better luck finding an artist you like on deviantart or some similar site and then either commissioning them or joining a stream where they're taking suggestions from the viewers.

You are anonymous here, so unless you're making the same requests over and over again, nobody should even be able to recognize you. Begging and making threads like that won't help. In my experience, the best thing to do in your position is either lay low and wait for people to forget about you, or leave. The worst thing you can do is react. If someone recognizes you, ignore them and change your IP.

It's also possible that /loli/ is just full of assholes and kind of shit in general. For a board dedicated to such a heavily censored (and illegal in many countries) subject matter, it's kind of depressing to see how much in-fighting there is between different factions wanting different types of loli content censored. Maybe it would be better if /loli/ did get ultra-strict purist moderation, only permitting Japanese art of Japanese characters doing totally vanilla things. Then those people would be happy and everyone else could move to /delicious/.

Either way, good luck getting your fetishes drawn. It can be very frustrating to be into something that isn't popular.


1aae9a No.78649

>>78647

>Maybe it would be better if /loli/ did get ultra-strict purist moderation, only permitting Japanese art of Japanese characters doing totally vanilla things. Then those people would be happy and everyone else could move to /delicious/.

I agree with the idea of /loli/ being anime while cartoons go to /delicious/.


c47c2b No.78650

>>78649

Not just any anime - only the most boringly vanilla of Japanese loli art. /loli/ should serve as containment for the people who can't handle seeing a single thread about something they aren't into. I don't think people will be completely happy until even things like bondage are banned.


832ca3 No.78651

>>78650

I think that's going too far. I agree with banning shit like scat, guro and NTR, but other fetishes should be allowed. I do like the idea of cartoons and Western style shit getting the boot and that's because of the shit quality and annoying autists they bring.


1ecca1 No.78652

File: af32b42197bba5c⋯.jpg (282.76 KB, 1500x922, 750:461, 65768.jpg)

File: 33cdbd227ccc61f⋯.jpg (187 KB, 1351x932, 1351:932, 36575678678.jpg)

File: dcdf59b73e49775⋯.png (423.41 KB, 1268x707, 1268:707, screenshot-8ch.net 2017-03….png)

>>78647

>You are anonymous here, so unless you're making the same requests over and over again, nobody should even be able to recognize you

Did you know about this magic word? (First picture)

I even be banned for "an unspecific reason" (Second picture)

>the best thing to do in your position is either lay low and wait for people to forget about you, or leave.

Forget for what? for requesting porn loli at drawthreads at a image board called /loli/?

>The worst thing you can do is react.

Did you see how many times a troll always did spam reply to my requests at each drawthread with crap like: "fuck off; abusefag alert, etc", always insulting me just to derail the drawthread? now tell me how many times did you see that I reply to his shitpost? Zero times, why? Because I have something called CRITERION, and that helps to me to identify trolls. A shame that moderation thinks in a diferent way:

>they ban me and delete my loli requests at image board called /loli/

>menawhile all this spam and shitposting: the troll never is banned and his spam and shitposting never is deleted.

>b-but you always request the same, you are a filthy reposter!

See third picture.

Also:

And this is the people:

>>78651

>>78650

who don't know how the heck to use the option "hide post"

You don't like my request? then just hide the post!

You don't scat or guro threads? then just hide those threads!

Instead of do that(instead just ignore, like any kind of mature person will do) no, you just prefer that these people be banned, his stuff deleted and their fetish be banned to be posted anymore in this board. What childish behaviour!


c47c2b No.78653

>>78651

If you just kick out a single fetish, then they don't have enough mass to create their own board thanks to the network effect. Any board they tried to create would be very slow, and hence wouldn't be discoverable and couldn't grow.

As far as I can tell there's a sizable faction of people who are only into vanilla Japanese art and they just won't shut up about how they want other things banned. I haven't seen that kind of attitude from any other groups on the board, so the most logical solution seems to be to take the group who can't peacefully coexist with others and give them a safe space to live in on their own.

Everyone else who knows how to ignore things they don't like can move to another board where fun things are allowed.


c47c2b No.78654

>>78652

Yep, those bans are complete bullshit. As I say, I haven't been following the drama, so I didn't realize things were that bad.

There must be some way they are detecting you. Do you have a static IP? Are you regularly requesting the same characters? Any such detection process will have flaws. It will either be possible to slip under the radar, or it will be possible to cause false positives.


d2de42 No.78655

>>78654

>complete bullshit

Bans on him started because he managed to piss off a bunch of people in the drawthread and is a plague on such threads elsewhere. They continued and escalated because he evades every single time and refuses to stop doing any of the things that earned him enmity to begin with. The only possible reason you could take his side is because you don't know him.


c47c2b No.78656

>>78655

Care to explain what those things are?

Given the state of this board, I can imagine the only thing he'd need to do to earn the enmity of a lot of people is request art of a western character and/or a weird fetish.


d2de42 No.78657

>>78656

The people who knew him from other communities would know more, but at the very least since arriving in the drawthreads here more than a year ago, he has persistently spammed the same requests dozens of times, harassed people in those threads, harassed the mods, samefagged relentlessly when called out, and generally acted like a petulant ingrate whenever his requests aren't filled (like right now). He seems to have no intention of leaving or just shutting up and making commissions, since as far as I can tell he's had several hundred posts deleted since he started many drawthreads ago.

Also, not sure if you even pay any attention to things around here, because said drawthreads were and are mostly western requests.


d2de42 No.78658

>>78657

The most important thing at this point, though, is that he seems to think nothing he did before matters at all and that he has every right to make requests like everyone else. One could almost admire his persistence, in a twisted, autistic sort of way.


462a63 No.78659

File: 7676b47252a44d9⋯.jpg (177.88 KB, 1013x693, 1013:693, 34535.jpg)

>>78654

>There must be some way they are detecting you

>They

>Talking in plural

Dude, the only person who report my requests, is the single autistic troll who stalk me.

Is very easy:

If the troll who stalke me see a request that he don't like, in the reason of report he just need to write the magic words: Abusefag, and just with that any kind of post or reply in this board, will be deleted without do any kind of questions(as the judicial system of a Communist country!)

As I said before:

Here the real problem are not the TROLLS and WHINERS.

Here the real problem is when the people who own the power(mods, janitors, board onwer) listen up the TROLLS and WHINERS, and take as the only "true" all their complains.

If you don't believe me about this Thesis of mine, then just go to the current drawthread of /delicious/:

https://8ch.net/delicious/res/4.html

There the moderation is doing his work. I can post without problems, meanwhile each troll who wants to derail the thread is just banned and his shitposting deleted.

Note

>>78656

This >>78657 >>78655 is the troll stalker that am talking about. As usual, talking about bullshit without post any single screenshoot or link (as that crap of Hoshimi)


c47c2b No.78660

>>78657

I must admit, I poked my head into a drawthread once, saw a fucking shit-flinging match between some people who were offended by others making the wrong requests, and promptly left. I only come to /loli/ for one or two threads usually.

The advice I gave him was sound, so it's up to him whether he takes it.

>>78658

Your attitude runs completely counter to the way imageboards normally operate. The whole point of anonymity is that you don't carry around the baggage of a post history.

Then again, ignoring things you don't like has also historically been a part of imageboard culture, but /loli/ seems to have forgotten about that.


c47c2b No.78661

>>78659

>If you don't believe me about this Thesis of mine, then just go to the current drawthread of /delicious/:

I must admit, that drawthread seems to be a hell of a lot calmer and more civilized than the one on /loli/. I'd just abandon /loli/ and post there if I were you.


d2de42 No.78662

>>78660

It's not really anonymity when you post the same things day after day with a really distinct calling card. He might as well be a tripfag.


c47c2b No.78663

>>78662

Honestly it isn't worth wasting the mental energy trying to figure out who is lying about what here. The only thing I've learned from this is that drawthreads are pure, distilled cancer filled with all of the worst posters. It's a shame because the idea is nice.


1ecca1 No.78664

File: e99007979dd20de⋯.png (8.03 KB, 644x98, 46:7, he didnt delete.png)

File: 5e686f98a27652d⋯.png (12.91 KB, 997x92, 997:92, screenshot-8ch.net 2017-02….png)

File: 19cbaf3ef31b06a⋯.png (40.5 KB, 1202x140, 601:70, screenshot-boards.4chan.or….png)

File: 41ebc3ff3c70577⋯.png (150.81 KB, 1268x272, 317:68, screenshot-8ch.net 2017-03….png)

>>78655

>They continued and escalated because he evades every single time

Let me ask you something using an analogy:

If a cop arrives to your place, and puts your ass into the jail saying to you:

>You has been arrested by "an unspecific reason".

Tell me, what would you do? Say just "ok"? or you will try to get out your ass from there, because you has been arrested without any legit reason? Same thing happen whit me

1. First, my request were deleted for had a bunch of unlegit reports(the troll, using several IPs), and the mod felt that "he should delete my requests, just for the quantity of reports" without consider if my requests in fact was breaking the rules.(first picture)

2.knob ban me just because the troll said to him that thanks to me an artist called Hoshime quit /loli/ for my fault (really, he just said that, without any evidence, like a screenshot, a link, or something related) This tacitc was reasonable from his own point of view: as my requests never broke any rule, and as I never did anything that justify a ban, he simply "invented" a reason to justify his ban, that's why he took as tru that crap about Hoshimi

(Second image)

And here is the first time when this troll talk about that crap of Hoshime(knob took that as the only evidence that he needed to ban me)

https://8ch.net/loli/res/52061.html#q52173

3. And finally, I guess that knob "felt" again(seems like this mod used guide his criterion acording to his emotions, instead his brain) and he recognize that he was a jerk, and he offer to me a "deal" at the drawthread of /b/ from halfchan (the same time when he began to spam the board of /loli/ there) (see third picture)

>>78661

I have the same rigth as you to posting here. I think that this place could learn a lot about /delicious/ and his moderation(see last picture)


6ca6f2 No.78665

File: 52bf6b4535ce82c⋯.png (91.34 KB, 1632x630, 272:105, abusefag.png)

I understand your frustration, but please refrain from making threats.

>>78646

I've got a report for "cp trace" on this. Anyone know if that's true?


17bc9b No.78669

Friendly reminder that abusefag is a cuckchan crossposter and /cow/ material aswell


b33000 No.78672

>>78664

Your example with the cop is wrong.

Here is an example who fit better for you:

You start to spam your request, everyone tell you to calm down, you still spam your request more than before, people start to be pissed, admin/janitor tell you to calm down, you still don't listen to them. You got several "warnings" and you still act like an asshole, now the cop put you in prison and people report you when you evade. Here is the true example contrary to your sophism.

This isn't normal to spam your requests like that.

This isn't normal to stalk artists like you did.

This isn't normal to whine like a child when you know you're wrong.

This isn't normal so far at this point you don't question yourself.

This isn't normal to act like a victim when you start to flame a entire community https://8ch.net/delicious/res/219.html#335

AT the begining, i'm one of the guy who kindly warned you if you still act like that, you risked to have a bad reputation, and do you see ? I've had right. Now you reap what you sow.

And stop thinking "it's the other people the problem, not me"


ccef8f No.78675

>>78665

Sup Tewi and /lol/, BO from /delicious/ here. I got the same report of cp tracing and received the censored image it was traced from(poorly of course).

So, yes. It's cp traced.

And since I'm here and we're on the topic - Vampirefag, you're banned from /delicious/.


85a21c No.78677

>>78675

Holy goddamn, now I've got more reason to despise the cretin


480f10 No.78679

>>78663

Actually, I'll say one more thing on this topic. I think I understand why drawthreads are so shit compared to all other threads.

In most threads anons are working cooperatively. Each post adds to the thread, and people are free to save whatever images they like or skip past ones they don't like. In most cases a post can only improve the quality of the thread.

In a drawthread on the other hand, the posts by requestfags only lower the quality of the thread. The ideal thread from the point of view of the average anon is full of drawfags who are desperate for requests. Every request someone else makes lowers the chances of your own request making it through. The only posts which make the thread "better" come from drawfags. It naturally follows that anons end up bitterly fighting over the slightest thing. In fact you end up with a situation very similar to that of 3DPD dating. The drawfags are the women and the requestfags are the men. With this in mind it should come as no surprise that we see the emergence of al the same bullshit including "white knights" and "incels".

Drawthreads should be avoided for the same reason camwhore threads should be avoided.


cbaba6 No.78680

>>78679

tl;dr

Drawthreads are a honeypot for autists


98d5e6 No.78681

>>78675

>Vampirefag

He’s more widely known as Abusefag. He requestes other characters too such as Alice from Alice in Wonderland and that girl from All Dogs go to Heaven.


6ca6f2 No.78682

>>78675

Good to know, thanks.


c3ef02 No.78686

>>78682

And Ruby Gloom as well >>77398


8593c3 No.78710

>>78651

>banning.

ehh, just have containment threads where it can be posted freely. and label&spoiler that content when posted in other threads. assuming it does at least fit the theme of those other threads of course.

>>78652

>that third pic

are you stupid. thats a requester making a request in two different threads. thats not spam.

there are plenty of requests that get repeated in each thread until they get done, the requester gives up or they make a new one,

thats just how drawthreads work.


9bafc3 No.78760

Tewi, deal with posts outside of the /co/ntainment thread. It seems like you are slacking off. Please be more active and pay attention to what gets posted on this board.


6ca6f2 No.78761

>>78760

The /co/ntainment thread is currently for poor quality western art styles like calarts. Would anons like to see it be the designated thread for all western art now?


b42aac No.78762

>>78761

Please do.


b424d8 No.78763

>>78761

They have the containment thread and /delicious/, so you tell me.


71dacc No.78764

>>78761

The Loud House image in the Oppai thread is not quality.

>>78763

I'm surprised nobody has made an /aloli/.


9bafc3 No.78765

>>78761

Do what you think needs to be done. Personally Western styles that imitate aspects of anime such as Scasblog should be fine and don't need containment.


6ca6f2 No.78766

>>78763

>>78762

Well I do wanna phase out western stuff eventually. I'm sure Lincoln will appreciate getting more activity. I'll wait to see some more opinions before taking action of course.

>>78764

True, which is why I took care of that one.

>>78765

Anime imitations might be fine. Depends on how well others receive it.


71dacc No.78767

>>78766

Anime-like styles should be fine. It's nice that you plan on phasing out Westernshit, it would be appreciated. Also, Lincoln seems to be a cool guy and his board would benefit with activity.


b33000 No.78770

>>78769

Did I talked about Hoshimi ? Nope. But if you want an example, Panzer

Panzer did your request, later he told us he regret to have done your request because you spammed him, he said something like "After that, he thinked I was his new best friend" something like that.


315e19 No.78771

>>78770

Vampirefag sounds like a /cow/.


85a21c No.78774

File: 1896862216a3740⋯.png (216.97 KB, 1419x799, 1419:799, abusefag is a loving perso….png)


8b990b No.78775

>>78770

Wandering the deepest sectors of the web, hoping to find some pitiful sap he can manipulate to withdraw anything he wants for free.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyMvx0g-PgE

It's a good thing he's completely impotent, obnoxious, ineffective and obvious, or else someone can get seriously hurt by his existence. They're the kinda people that really need to do some time.


cf39d6 No.78812

>>78761

No! Make a cartoon one and a western one! Cartoons are western but not all western are cartoons!


cbfa69 No.79043

https://boards.4chan.org/qa/thread/1665727#p1665727

Come help bring loli back to 4chan.


ec07c5 No.79122

>>79043

4chan doesn't want to lose advertising money or be delisted from Google as happened here, if they have a board for lolicon.


ded2f9 No.79147

>>79122

The lolicons there might as well come here.


05d33b No.79729

Alright, I think it's time to go over two potential changes that I may make soon. Or more, if you guys have anything you'd like to see happen.

1. We've talked about increasing the /co/ntainment thread to cover all western style art a couple weeks back. Since there hasn't been any push back against it, I think I'll go ahead on that this weekend. Maybe I need to start making announcement stickies to get people's attention when discussing changes.

2. It seems like we've been getting a lot more reports on vidya 3DCG webms lately. A lot of them are pretty realistic, especially from newer "cinematic" games, so I understand their reasoning. Something I've been thinking about is the usage of people as models for characters in some games. If that is the case for some of the girls being posted, then I can see that as being a problem. What are your thoughts?


3839a3 No.79751

>>79729

That's a tough one. I personally wouldn't want to see all 3DLoli go, but perhaps forcing spoiler tags on NSFW 3DLoli images could help alleviate the backlash a bit. If there's any 3DLoli that deserves the banhammer, it's probably Second Life and all the 'next-level-cybering' that goes with it.


70b0cd No.79818

>>79729

Half the good threads are Western you dope.


edd3d5 No.79819

>>79729

>A lot of them are pretty realistic, especially from newer "cinematic" games,

I think that theres no problem if its not real CP trace. If its to ban 3DCG that is not real CP trace, it'll fall in the discussion on the diference of fiction and reality, wich cover the entire existence of this board.

So with that in mind, I think its dumb to censor 3DCG, and if the kids are getting triggered so much by it then ask for spoiler tags for the NSFW. Theres a lot of good cg stuff.


1cd5d5 No.79822

>>79729

Only ban CG that looks dangerously close to 3DPD. A containment thread for Western is fine, they have >>>/delicious/ as a dedicated board anyway if they're not happy with a containment thread.


18e6e4 No.79824

>>79729

I believe the ban on 3dcg should be lifted and it should be all kept to a containment thread including the vidya CG.


4ece94 No.79825

>>79824

nice try.


18e6e4 No.79826

>>79825

He asked us for our thoughts. And doing this would make it much simpler to moderate.


05d33b No.79894

Rule change made in the rules post.

>(11/12) All western/cartoon art will be kept in the /co/ntainment thread >>75159 , except when it is a reference or a completed work as part of an original content creation thread (i.e. drawthread, anon game development, etc.).

Should be good. I want to avoid removing any images from before the change, but I'm considering bumplocking old cartoon threads to keep them from growing further.

>>79751

>>79819

Spoilering could be an option.

>>79822

Banning overly realistic 3DCG is already a thing. The issue is determining how realistic it has to be to cross the line.

>>79824

Sorry, that ban isn't lifting.


05d33b No.80154

File: 245e903f0bd3ffc⋯.png (235.54 KB, 1214x582, 607:291, report.png)

Is there some special meaning behind this, or is it another gibberish report? We get too many gibberish/blank reports.


8f0ea1 No.80675

>>79894

I know I'm like two weeks late on this, but is this really such a good idea? I understand if that thread was only meant for cartoon art with low quality, but I don't see a reason to put all western/cartoon art in there as well. It just feels wrong to limit art in such a way like that. Especially art with high quality.

Maybe making different types of containment threads with different types of art and quality would have been a better idea. I'm not sure if putting everything on just one thread is gonna go so well with it.


3839a3 No.80679

>>80675

If it feels wrong it's all the more reason to migrate to /delicious/. The move may be a way to promote it in the first place.


e76b12 No.80683

>>48470

>Sorry, that ban isn't lifting.

So just to be clear, this board now bans any 3D porn that looks too real but is not based off a real person? I didn't think the cucking could get any worse around here. Maybe instead of being hypocritical, you could all just embrace 3D as much as you do your waifu material.


e76b12 No.80685

>>80679

>3: Stylized 3D models of cartoon/comic/game characters are welcome. Realistic original 3DCG is prohibited.

Except this rule exists there too. Why are board and site owners going on and on about net neutrality, but don't have the balls to allow what everyone really wants?


05d33b No.80689

>>80679

That's one reason for it. Promoting a board the specifically caters to western tastes, while returning this one to more eastern-oriented roots. Hopefully it brings the east vs west conflict to a minimum.

>>80683

>this board now bans any 3D porn that looks too real

Even putting my personal tastes aside, the site tries to adhere to the dost test. https://8ch.net/dost.html

>For the purposes of 8chan, given the legal grayness surrounding three-dimensional (3D) computer-generated child pornography and the so-called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the aforementioned Dost test and are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>I didn't think the cucking could get any worse around here. Maybe instead of being hypocritical, you could all just embrace 3D as much as you do your waifu material.

>>80685

>but don't have the balls to allow what everyone really wants

Go be a pedo somewhere else.


335511 No.80690

>>80689

>Even putting my personal tastes aside, the site tries to adhere to the dost test

You have realistic facial proportions and not be indistinguishable from a photograph.


21bfc1 No.80691

>>80689

Yet you allow the source filmmaker thread. At least do your job to clean up the board and direct anons to /delicious/


e76b12 No.80693

>>80689

>Go be a pedo somewhere else.

Don't like it when people point out hypocrisy eh? I am hebe btw ;)


790b1a No.80694

>>80689

> Go be a pedo somewhere else

Fapping to alien artstyle doesn't make less of a pedo.


18e6e4 No.80697

>>80689

>and are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children

Images like the ones in >>>/b/7553450 are as distinguishable from real children as the images in >>68360 . If it is the ruling of the board that the images in the /b/ thread (in which no images have been deleted or anyone banned) violate DOST, then the images in the Skyrim modding thread or SFM images likewise must violate DOST.


727878 No.80700

>>80689

Why is this faggot the owner of a loli board?


05d33b No.80703

>>80691

You're right; I make too many concessions to appease people. I don't even like 3DCG; I keep it around for the sake of others. But the SFM thread has too many realistic models that violate my standards, and models based on real people. I'm deleting it; I don't want that around even if it draws complaints.

Singling out western original and not all original 3D styles may have been a mistake as well, since there's plenty of eastern shit as well that try to be overly realistic.

Speaking of rule changes, I've avoiding deleting old posts that violate my rule changes to not retroactively punish anons, and allow them to access old content. This will or already has caused confusion. I will be making several changes, most of which will be seen in bold in the rules. The big changes are in redtext.

Models based off of real kids are prohibited, even video game models.

The original 3DCG ban will encompass eastern realistic as well. Rule 8 will no longer start with "for the sake of quality control".

3DCG will be kept to two containment threads - one for games, h-games, and mods; the other for images and videos that aren't from those games/mods. Threads will be made soon.

With these restrictions, this isn't really a 3DCG lolicon zone, so rule 3 was altered to reflect that.

On December 1st, I will start cleaning up the entire board; deleting threads and scrubbing posts for any western and 3DCG outside of containment.

I've tried to be nice and ask everyone for their input before making changes, but clearly I need to get over my timidness and act on my own judgement.

>>80697

The Skyrim models are generally low poly enough to be distinguishable from real children, but I can see where some of them get too close for comfort.


91e624 No.80704

>>80703

I'm proud that you are finally growing a pair. A BO isn't supposed to appease everyone, a BO is supposed to maintain order of the board. Do what you gotta do and ask other BOs that you're cool with for advice.


790b1a No.80706

>>80703

> some of them get too close for comfort

Can you give the links?

I want to know who is doing a good job.


18e6e4 No.80708

>>80703

Though I still don't agree with the ban as /b/ demonstrates it doesn't violate DOST there, this is respectable, but I don't think it goes far enough. If you're going to ban 3DCG you should do it unilaterally. Trying to sort some out as permissible will continue to cause the problems you're currently having.

>>80700

Because nobody else stepped up when ownership lapsed.


3839a3 No.80710

>>80700

Because nice things happen every once in a while.

RIP SFM board, but it's out of place as I figured.


727878 No.80712

>>80703

>But the SFM thread has too many realistic models that violate my standards

Thanks for finally admitting the DOST excuse was just a scapegoat.


2c555e No.80757

Wait, since when SFM were considered "realistic"? Which retarded dimension are you guys in?


3839a3 No.80763

>>80757

Nah, I think I seen that Natalie Korda is based off of a real person. Games like the Last of Us capitalize off realism. If there's a more appropriate place to discuss SFM models, that would be nice.


e76b12 No.80766

>>80712

Yep. Stopped reading after I saw that. I understand that the site owner is a huge pedo hater, but it would have been nice to have a board owner that at least tried to stand up against this crap. But is he doing this purely out of his own screwed up hypocrisy? Or is he doing it to save face with the site owner? Which is worse?


3839a3 No.80767

>>80766

Just another divide is in order. Revive /cgiloli/.

That board was deader than a doornail over 3 years ago and now suddenly everyone wants to be appalled at 3DCG being discouraged. Show some positive presence and do something constructive for the people.


ac62dc No.80769

>>80763

>Natalie Korda is based off of a real person

If it's based off real person, then it is just a plain 3D material, not SFM. One of SFM's distinguishing feature is that SFM models are blocky or boxy. Anyone who complains that SFM is too realistic clearly have something wrong with their eyes, or brain.


ac62dc No.80770

File: e17bbe4c57cae06⋯.jpg (1.04 MB, 1920x912, 40:19, 1465091226384-1.jpg)

Here, a sample of standard quality SFM. Which part of these are realistic? Anti-SFM guys clearly need a doctor.

I don't really care if you hate SFM and want to purge it off this site, because a diamond doesn't really fit among trashes anyway. Next time you guys want to talk trash about something you hate, at least give a better reason.


3839a3 No.80772

>>80770

It's like you didn't even attend the SFM Thread that got deleted. Long story short, nobody gave a damn about Clementine there.


ac62dc No.80774

>>80772

Never had a chance coz the current mod is so edgy and salty


ac62dc No.80775

>>80712

>>80766

I guess I'm not the only one who feel that way huh?


3839a3 No.80777

>>80775

It's hard to have sympathy when they're being so hostile in their position.

He was being lenient about the whole thing until the edgelords waltzed in and literally said 'get rid of everything remotely 3D' as shown in >>80691

And now they're being passive-aggressive dillholes. I couldn't be a mod in this sort of environment since I'd be quick to whip out the banhammer. At any rate I am re-iterating

>>80767

This is probably a good time for a /cgiloli/ revival. Let lolis be lolis, let calarts be delicious, and let the uncanny valley be its own little plateau.


727878 No.80778

>>80766

Lolicons are used to being called pedos. It's a bad sign when the BO whips out that same tactic against something he personally doesn't like.


af3f34 No.80783

>>80675

Cartoons are by definition of low quality, if the cartoon characters were drawn in anime style or some other ore realistic style they could still be posted on relevant threads, nowadays I am not sure anymore.


ca155d No.80785

>>80778

I predicted this board would turn to shit as soon as the new BO announced his plans to "clean it up" over on /a/. He essentially wants to ban anything that wouldn't be appropriate for a loli thread on /a/, and since there are barely enough posts to keep the loli thread on /a/ alive I don't see how he can expect to sustain an entire board.


727878 No.80786

>>80785

Well it's already dropped out of the top board section.


e3ab6d No.80787

>>80778

>Lolicons are used to being called pedos

>>80774

>Adhering to the rules is edgy

Well, there's /delicious/ for you to go to.

>>80785

>>80786

The loli thread was really active, it passed that board's bump limit.


2f2599 No.80788

>>80774

You guys are the salty ones. Even when >>>/delicious/ was made for you to post western content to your hearts content, you rather stay and cry about it. If he was edgy, he would delete everything without warning and told you to go fuck yourselves.

>>80693

>;)

Using some text emote instead of a reaction image like a normal fucking anon. You are obviously not from here.


218763 No.80789

It's just the last of the abusefag clones bitching at the top of their lungs. The pedofags are just as bad as he was. Anyone that knew of he and Colby's existence beforehand uses the internet improperly, and should seriously evaluate their life before the death of net neutrality fucks them sideways.


177dba No.80795

>>80788

> literally /a/ seized the board

> u mad bruh??? XddddDDDd


18e6e4 No.80796

>>80767

>Revive /cgiloli/.

>>80777

> /cgiloli/ revival

Do it.


9c67a6 No.80797

What a mess


8b86c4 No.80801

>>80797

I know right? There's so many faggots giving him an echo chamber of approval he can't hear the rest of us and is running it based on his opinion, not the content goal. This is loli, not animeloli or qualityloli, and since it's the base board, it needs to have base tastes available to all. We're prejudiced against enough as it is without faggots like him splintering us further. It shouldn't be a lawless wasteland of shit but there's so many rules now it's fucking stupid and I've noted a lot less posting "in general" since this shit began.


3839a3 No.80802

>>80801

It's because the shitposting agony that everyone was originally complaining about (and drove the other admins mad) is all but gone. The /b/tards and worst among the CalArt morons ruined it for everyone. That kind of posting made me ashamed to be a lolicon for about a half a year straight and now 'mostly' everything is k. Revive /cgiloli/ and everyone will be kay.

>>80796

>Do it.

Not convinced enough that 3/4s of the /cgiloli/ community are just thankless leeches that would not provide enough cgiloli entertainment for a board to run in a healthy enough manner to be worthwhile. It's not just you guys generating that opinion, but the abyssmal history of /cgiloli/ that I mentioned before, and the fact that any 3DCG loli artist I know outside of here have pretty much discontinued having passion about the stuff. It's probably because of people like these are being three-quarters of the people that the artists have to associate with on a daily basis. And thinking about that is already depressing enough as it is.


a548d6 No.80807

>>80801

This.

Idk wtf the new management is doing, but there's no need for it. Leave the fucking board alone, the rules were fine. Leave it alone. Keep illegal content off the board and spam and other than that LEAVE IT ALONE.


35cb48 No.80826

>>80802

You can just post Western CG at /delicious/.

>>80801

>>80807

>>>/delicious/


3839a3 No.80827

File: afb193873f2ee07⋯.png (466.71 KB, 800x600, 4:3, a7zEJH7.png)


f6220d No.80832

>>80770

stuff like this?


18e6e4 No.80834

>>80802

>wants /cgiloli/ revived

>points out the reasons it never works

Then support it here.


ca155d No.80835

>>80787

>The loli thread was really active, it passed that board's bump limit.

I'm a regular poster in any loli-related threads on /a/ and I can tell you that they regularly fall halfway down the catalog before being bumped. They eventually reach the bump limit, yes, but they only get a few posts per day. It's not as if we're filling a thread per day or anything.

What I gather from this is that there just isn't that much interest in loli content, even on /a/.

>>80832

Anyone who thinks that's real is a fucking moron.


ca155d No.80836

>>80834

Didn't you get the memo? The network effect doesn't exist and it's better to fracture every community into as many pieces as possible to ensure that nobody ever has to see anything they can't personally fap to.

The best solution is for everyone to have their own board where they can post their own personal fap material to without running the risk of encountering another anon. When those individual boards inevitably end up abandoned, it's proof that they could have never sustained a combined board either.


3839a3 No.80837

>>80835

Don't forget that the dozens of posts per day format was due to the many notorious CalArt fags that were griefing the DrawThreads and causing a great period of suffering.

>>80834

My observations are not necessarily facts. If people are really as passionate about cgiloli as they are projecting themselves here, then a /cgiloli/ revival can be productive contrary to my beliefs.

Me running a board is just not a thing in general. I'm a full-time worker who is more suited to supporting nice things. Therefore I would support a cgiloli revival if it happened, but at this point in time, there's no way that I can run the show. Plus there's different things that I have more of a passion for to begin with.


ab9d3d No.80838

File: 2521ac0be62e8c6⋯.gif (1.99 MB, 400x400, 1:1, nlfzwi9WwN1qb9x1g.gif)

>All this pedo butthurt over their separation with loli


b7671f No.80839

>>80703

>I need to get over my timidness

Thats right Tewi

Establish dominance

Maintain dominance


727878 No.80841

>>80835

>Anyone who thinks that's real is a fucking moron.

Anyone who thinks any CG is real is a moron. There is no such thing as "indistinguishable from the real thing" yet.

I think people forget that the reason CP is illegal isn't because "eww pedos!", it's because real children are harmed in the production. 3DCG, no matter how realistic it looks, doesn't have that problem.


f6220d No.80844

>>80835

yeah but its so well done can be argued too relaistic


56a261 No.80846

>>80844

sauce on artist please


f6220d No.80848

>>80846

Selfdrillingsms


db4d83 No.80855

>>80801

>This is loli, not animeloli or qualityloli, and since it's the base board, it needs to have base tastes available to all.

Would like to hear a response to this. If starting anew in an alternate board like /delicious/ is an acceptable solution for people who like 3DCG and western art, why can't anime loli go to /aloli/ instead of taking over this board?


080cd1 No.80869

>>80801

He can totally hear everything.

It's been told, he is from /a/.

He has his own personal motives.


3839a3 No.80872

File: 9be5e69112a1c2e⋯.jpg (1.06 MB, 1300x1500, 13:15, 56669685_p0.jpg)

>>80869

The board has to be suitable for the Eientei Empire. Being a lone rabbit must be tough.

Which reminds me. One time I made a loli thread here about one-piece dresses that was shaping up to be almost /c/ tier, and it got deleted like it broke some rule. I could never wrap my head around that one.


b135be No.80874

>>80844

Are you sure that's an SFM artwork? SFM can't render that much texture.


f6220d No.80877

>>80874

they're sfm models and thats what he claims to use, I think its the lighting that tricks you into thinking its higher quality than it is


6ca35e No.80885

>>74953

fuck you with your sjw shit, nobody cares. People like you are going to help them shame the lolifaggots who dont go over 2d shit.

Godamned retard, sjw shitdog.


6ca35e No.80886

>>80778

>>80766

lolicons are called pedos by boomerfags on /pol/ or goons who want to shove you in the same boat as those people. pedos cant differentiate they have lower IQ's than your average lolifaggot who faps to 2d.

Stop making this into identity politics bullshit, you can go to tumblr for this crap.


f9c025 No.80889

>>80886

Pedos = manlets, frogfaced, left handed, low IQs, love star trek.

Lolicons = gentle NEETs of patrician taste.


cbbfd3 No.80891

File: 3c3d4096270e230⋯.webm (2.9 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, gaijin.webm)

File: eee7c021ce38e53⋯.jpg (93.93 KB, 1041x294, 347:98, Untitled-1232222.jpg)

There shouldn't be containment threads at all here, including no exceptions for content creation (re: draw threads). There should be a giant flashing red marque banner saying "THIS BOARD IS FOR EASTERN/ANIME INSPIRED LOLI, GO TO /delicious/ IF YOU WANT TO POST SIMPLIFIED WESTERN SHAPE TOOL CARTOONS".

They have a board dedicated to their giant potato head Cal Arts geometry porn and every single creepy namefag shit poster likes that style of art. Even if you go on Pixiv and look at who favorites Western artists work it's 95% other Westerners, there is little overlap between the two camps example webm included. Same thing with Easterners, very few favorite Western work yet they flooded Pixiv with their shit. The people screaming are just a vocal minority and they can go to /delicious/, /pco/, or any number of boards that already cater to their shit.

Yes the drawthread would slow down and there may be some overlap but we really need some fertile soil to grow here since the Western shit drowned most everything else out. We cannot cohabitate and there should be no ambiguity that this is an Eastern loli community.

Lastly, here is the first result for googling "loli" with the relevant part highlights.


d9ffaa No.80892

>>80891

It checks out. There's no point for a containment thread now that they have >>>/delicious/ and loli is a term from the anime fandom. I've seen cartoonfags use the term "waifu" and bronies had taken the term "plot", which is a term that was used as a joke for fan service in anime to refer to horse asses. Cartoonfags leech off idioms and jokes from the anime fandom for whatever reason. They have their own board now, they can go.


335511 No.80893

/delicious/ is dead as fuck, it isn't really a viable alternative right now.


eee63b No.80895

>>80893

>/delicious/ is dead as fuck

Because you faggots are still here autistically screeching. Enter /delicious/ in the attention hungry games and gather your ilk there.


335511 No.80896

>>80895

I browse both boards because I like both eastern and western styles.


a46bab No.80897

>>80895

I think they're afraid to move on. Afraid to contribute and build a new community that is given to them. They need someone in /loli/ to make a thread so they can hijack it because irl, they have difficulties striking a conversation.


335511 No.80898

>>80897

Face it, if you were a new user looking for a board with underage cartoon girls to talk about/jerk off to, you would go to a board named loli, not some weird ass named delicious board. Smaller splinter boards are never going to get the traffic the main board does.


6ca35e No.80901

>>80890

look faggot, nobody cares about your life choices, if you're a pedo keep it to yourself, this is a board for content, not a pedo support group board. Dont bring this nonchan support group bullshit here.


335511 No.80902

>>80901

I thought this was a board about meta. Talking about users of the board is still meta.


29faba No.80903

>>80896

(((western))) style is complete shit.


335511 No.80905

>>80903

If you think the face mostly consists of eyeball.


05d33b No.80909

>>80872

>One time I made a loli thread here about one-piece dresses that was shaping up to be almost /c/ tier, and it got deleted like it broke some rule.

I can't remember a thread like that. How long ago was it? If it was after August, then my only guess could be rule 9/lack of OP contribution to an image dump thread.

>>80891

>>80892

I think that taking it slowly and letting people get better-used to visiting /delicious/ for their western needs before removing it entirely works better than cutting it all out at once and leaving them to scramble for an alternative.

>>80893

Rome wasn't built in a day. Give it a chance and help it grow.

>>80902

Hypothetical scenarios about real life relationships don't count.


6e23a7 No.80910

>>80891

>Eastern loli

All loli is eastern, is just like "waifu" waifu means just eastern manga-style rendered characters but people started to call every fictional character waifus, just because a character is underage does not means she is a loli.


fa37fc No.80913

>>80909

>taking it slowly

>Give it a chance

Just kill the containment and drawthread already. You need to kill weeds first before you can plant grains.


f6220d No.80932

File: 94075304ee1b1c0⋯.png (58.66 KB, 172x163, 172:163, arice.png)

kek mods couldnt handle the webms


6ca35e No.80946

>>80932

are you really going to be a salty autistic spastic?

This a board not a fucking identity politics platform for you faggots.


715e8f No.80948

>>80891

> SIMPLIFIED

> giant potato head

You are describing anime artstyle.

> minority

You could clearly see who was a minority by theme of threads on the first page.

> they can go to

And you can go to any of a thousands of those giant ass boorus made strictly for "eastern" art.

So what?


ca6d52 No.80951

File: 328ef2da46a0c28⋯.jpg (189.45 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault (1).jpg)

>>80948

You can't be serious mate, Anime is orders of magnitude more realistic than cartoons and even my dad can clearly recognize it from anything the west has produced.


335511 No.80956

>>80910

Because Nabokov was a Japanese author.


335511 No.80959

>>80951

That one on the right can't be anime, she has a nose.


727878 No.80961

>>80946

What the fuck are you even talking about? Constantly repeating a buzzword doesn't make it relevant to the discussion, retard.


5c61b4 No.80967

File: 106a827ef3c4f7d⋯.jpg (73.01 KB, 524x468, 131:117, 1361076523836.jpg)

>>80951

if that is what you call anime you are retarded.

I guess Akabur is a mangaka


5c61b4 No.80968

File: daa0858d9a6badb⋯.png (231.55 KB, 800x800, 1:1, 1490176509121.png)

just let me know if this board is now dead and will become /a/ second page


7a07d7 No.80981

>>80967

I found that on google Images but more power to my argument then, Anime is even more realistic and of even higher quality.


5202f2 No.81000

File: 98b33aa265d3156⋯.png (330.69 KB, 800x711, 800:711, ackroygtnnhnithjkwrq.png)

>>80951

> nose

> small eyes

> normal eyes

It is not classic anime style, it looks more like Disney style.

And it is also banned from here now.

Picture author probably said it's "anime" because original artist is asian.

That just shows how retarded this classification is.

Both eastern in western artists can draw in very different styles, you can't move everything into two categories.

Both anime and western designs can be either realistic or simplified/cartoonish.


215c5e No.81004

Doraemon, some Ghibli stuffs and Osamu Tezuka's shit should be classified as western too if you guys want to pursue this kind of retarded classification. These guys already admitted they copied Disney style afterall. Seriously guys. This issue (and the whole board) is getting out of hand. BO need to stop being a wuss and take a stand already. Kill drawthread, containment, skyrim, furry, natis, shadman, and sfm threads now. Or leave them alone and live in peace and harmony.


727878 No.81007

>>81004

Not to mention Unteralterbach, which is pretty much the official /loli/ VN.


45e087 No.81008

I am so sick of this entire fucking site getting rulecucked again and again.

This was one of the few boards on this shithole I still went to after the jim fiasco and now I don't even want to come here anymore because the BO decided anything he doesn't like isn't allowed now just like jim did when he became admin.

Just fuck this site up fam.


3839a3 No.81009

>>81004

That would be the day, a board void of mouthbreathing degenerates? Nah, too good to be true.


727878 No.81010

>>81009

>degenerates

>he says on /loli/

the ironing


6592ad No.81024

>>80909

They would never leave. They'll just keep complaining in this board. Just have the rules direct them to /delicious/, it's their fault for not lurking.


335511 No.81026

>>81024

And what about western art that isn't cartoon? Where does that go?


8853b8 No.81027

>>81026

/delicious/ as well. >>>/delicious/ accepts western styles entirely.


335511 No.81028

>>81027

It says in the rules that only stylized artwork is allowed, not realistic looking.


345334 No.81029

if its ambiguous then just allow it on both.


ca6d52 No.81030

>>81004

Doraemon, some Ghibli stuffs and Osamu Tezuka's shit still obeys the law of proportion, perspective and basic anatomy which cartoons do not. I can draw cartoons but I cant draw Anime for shit since I just cannot master the basics, Anime is lazy realism but still, based on reality.


727878 No.81031

File: 4e823515e467f75⋯.jpg (77.88 KB, 640x360, 16:9, sazae.jpg)


ca6d52 No.81033

>>81000

>Both anime and western designs can be either realistic or simplified/cartoonish.

This is why cartoons are in a containment thread, everything was good until they decided to move EVERYTHING western to the cartoon thread.

Western ≠ cartoon.


335511 No.81034

File: 1a1e912c8999d69⋯.jpg (81.37 KB, 637x516, 637:516, zun.jpg)

>>81030

If ZUN can do it, anyone can.


bfef15 No.81035

>>81028

That's regarding original 3D.


43cc85 No.81038

>ban /co/ lolis from /loli/

>/loli/ slows down or dies due to complications for new lurking anons and unfriendly Eastern art style superiority complex

This is what happens when you listen to /a/fags. This kind of complication >>81004 is also what I want to avoid also. I like both /a/ and /co/ styles. Why can't /loli/ do both all of a sudden like it was doing for a past good year? What went wrong?

/delicious/ is a nice concept but its not much different from what you can already do on /loli/.


3839a3 No.81043

File: 1ffe266cfd4cf5c⋯.gif (1.28 MB, 450x800, 9:16, wkdg25i9qaty.gif)

File: 46317798265bc87⋯.png (300.67 KB, 1752x2000, 219:250, mabel_pines_2_by_philiptom….png)

>>81010

There's a big difference between fapping to literal fap fuel and children's cartoon characters. This entire argument is literally just:

>Lolifags need to accept the western lolis just the same as animu!

>No, get out.

Just accept the difference and do not force an integration of two drastically different genres. Lolicon is a culture, cartoon 'cake' is a niche subcategory.


335511 No.81044

File: 5128eb8ad0435d6⋯.png (344.59 KB, 1045x1503, 1045:1503, SaHa_Little_Twins_Fantasy_….png)

>>81043

Most lolicon hentai is also children's cartoon characters, just Japanese children's cartoon characters.


3839a3 No.81045

>>81038

>Why can't /loli/ do both all of a sudden like it was doing for a past good year? What went wrong?

Any board that attracts A.Fag and C.James on a daily basis is not a healthy board. You're not thinking about the mods and how they have to deal with them differently from the rest of the people. They were the central reason why the rest of the mods stepped down, because those kinds of people make an anon regret remotely being a lolicon.


335511 No.81046

>>81045

No matter what the scope of the board is, you are going to have annoying users.


c73b2a No.81047

>>80913

This. You paying attention Tewi? Just direct them to /delicious/ in the rules. Anons should learn how to lurk as some didn't even know the change in BO.

>>81045

How is it that despite the autistic cringe of the anime fandom, cartoonfags have people that are much worse?


cbbfd3 No.81048

>>81046

They're disproportionately Western cartoon people. Speedy, Abusefag, Colby James, etc. You know… the types that are so far on the spectrum and unhinged to the point of are notoriety they've been banned in just about every community they plague and evade 18 hours a day. I'm hard pressed to find Easterners that go further than "minor annoyance and highly awkward" tier and most of the times it's the just pathetic to the point its endearing and you can safely ignore them.


335511 No.81049

>>81048

Why is it than you can ignore /a/ tripcode users, but not /co/ tripcode users? It really isn't that hard and you don't need to ban content to do it.


43d69f No.81052

>>81049

>tripcode users

>on /a/

I've never seen anyone on /a/ as cancerous as these cartoonfags and I don't think even /co/ wants them. On a porn board, Easternfags and Westernfags can't exactly coexist due to such a large difference. /delicious/ was made to cater to Western styles. Tewi plans on phasing out western styles when he became BO but decided to do it slowly for a peaceful transition. If you like both styles, then browsing both boards shouldn't be a problem.


cbbfd3 No.81053

>>81049

That's the thing. I can't think of 1 consumer of Eastern content that has been a tick to the point they derail threads into shitpost infernos, get banned, evade 18 hours a day around range bans both here and other boards with seemingly infinite IPs, spam their garbage, or post CP traces (and outright CP). This is a Cal Arts/Western content phenomenon.

> you don't need to ban content to do it.

If you read the rules you can find this gem, so… apparently you DO need to ban the content :

>if you post "lolis" from Yin Yang Yo or School For Vampires, you may be mistaken for on of our resident autists Speedy and Abusefag, who are the only ones who talk about that trash. The two are ban on sight. You were warned.

Note the quotes. Cal Arts is a retard magnet and there are a bunch of other lesser spergs that have floated in and out over the years sharing that trait in common.


3839a3 No.81055

>>81047

>How is it that despite the autistic cringe of the anime fandom, cartoonfags have people that are much worse?

It all boils down to acceptance.

"Lolicon is a culture, cartoon 'cake' is a niche subcategory."

This isn't bias, it's a fact. Japan is one of the only country left sexualizing fictitious minors on their own where countries like Canada and England are outlawing it outright. Everyone's objective is to find their niche in the world and be comfortable with that niche. It's exponentially easier to do for Japanese characters as there is a literal market for the stuff out in the open. For Western cartoon characters, it's embedded so deep underground in comparison that people wind up going mad trying to find that security, hence how people like the names we've thrown out several times already develop.


335511 No.81058

>>81053

>Japan is one of the only country left sexualizing fictitious minors on their own where countries like Canada and England are outlawing it outright

Remember the "nonexistent youth" bill? Japan is trying to ban loli the same as everyone else.

>it's embedded so deep underground in comparison

I don't see how deep underground if people are publishing it online. I can find Randy Dave images as easily as I can find any Japanese pixiv artist.


6c292a No.81059

>>81043

>literal fap fuel

This is the very essence of the Eastern v. Western "debate". Why is it so hard for some people to understand the difference between a character that was literally designed with eros as the primary or at least major factor and meant to sell on sex appeal, versus a glorified stick figure designed to make dumb kids engage with a TV instead of bothering their parents?

>>81044

>most

The only children's anime that produce a meaningful amount of porn are magical girl or idol shows, types which have had a history of being sexualized deliberately for nearly their entire existence. Meanwhile, most of the porn that's actually being drawn is from series full of characters designed with the primary purpose of stimulating libidos and wallets. Porn of series which are stylized to the same extent as western cartoons is rare, a niche within a niche within a niche. Proof? Doraemon is for sure the most popular of all such series and has an iconic loli as a major character. It gets a measly 129 results on ExH. Comparatively? 8,272 results for KanColle, which has been around a tenth as long, if that.

>>81053

>I can't think of 1

Well, there's ACK, but that's a plague on the yuri community which is already shit anyway, and has nothing to do with here.


335511 No.81060

File: 6b1bd151ad5796c⋯.jpg (51.14 KB, 450x260, 45:26, kimono friends.jpg)

>>81059

>actually being drawn is from series full of characters designed with the primary purpose of stimulating libidos and wallets

So I went on xhentai and picked one of the first doujins based on a TV series and I got this.

Looks like a children's cartoon show, not a series aiming at the lolicon community, like, say, Moetan or Ichigo Mashimaro.


6c292a No.81062

>>81060

A show based on an obscure mobage and airing at 1:30 in the morning was definitely not trying to pull in the little kid audience. Kemono Friends is a pretty interesting case, though, I'll admit, it became popular to the surprise of literally everyone including its creators. However, you could look at almost any "moe" series and see something innocent and simplistic enough to be watched by children, I'm pretty sure K-On had reruns in daytime slots after it got popular, for example (Kemono Friends probably also will). Doesn't change what their intention is, though, a ton of those cutesy girly-looking manga series that get anime-adapted are published in seinen mags like Kirara. It's a pretty strange place and their fetishization of cuteness runs deeper than most people give it credit for.

Just for the record, I don't actually care too much whether this board decides to segregate Western art, and that the board being monolithic is helpful to it but not critical to its mission. I think it's disingenuous though to claim there's no reason why people want it separated.


335511 No.81063

>>81059

Plus I don't see how you can both ban cartoons for being too stylized and other western art for being too realistic. Doublethink much?


6c292a No.81065

>>81063

Probably more a case of "Goldilocks zone" than anything else, where people want something that doesn't evoke the real thing either too much or too little. For my part I would rather only see the aspects of reality that are pretty or sexy in my porn. Striving for realism is a very mixed bag, frankly even a lot of nip artists are too 'real' for my taste. Though, I tend to see realism (both in art and scenario) more in non-loli porn than loli, availability of reference might have more to do with that. If in the end it's only being removed from this board because of taste, that's as good a reason as any considering that classifying porn within legal bounds is only a matter of taste to begin with.


7e9997 No.81070

File: 7ffc116b916fbea⋯.jpg (81.69 KB, 380x283, 380:283, 22307708-large.jpg)

>>74825 presently includes under rule 2

>No posting of images that are traces or recreations of cp,

>nor any 3D renders that are realistic or lifelike.

>No 3D models that are modeled from or recreations of real people, including video game models.

I am not interested in anything 3D or anything based on porn. But I am wondering what your policy is regarding real-life name-revealed minors (girls under 18, under the age of consent) and requesting 2D non-pornographic artwork depicting them.

For example girls in the public eye who have been named and had images shown of them in major media outlets, such as in https://web.archive.org/web/20171110151030/http://kdvr.com/2017/11/09/colorado-girl-suing-us-attorney-general-to-legalize-medical-marijuana-nationwide/ where a 12 year old girl named Alexis Bortell is shown by Fox News advocating for the legalization of marijuana and launching a lawsuit against Jeff Sessions. Right now she even comes up in google results searching for Jeff Sessions.

In the drawthreads I was thinking of posting a request to have someone draw her 2D in an anime-esque style but do not want to do so until I am sure it is okay.

That said… if non-porn 2D art is okay to request in this context, then part 2 of my question is whether or not it is okay to request pornographic 2D art based on them. I'm not really thinking anything hardcore, maybe even just ecchi's where she's nude except for cannabis leafs covering her genitals while stomping on Jeff Session's scrotum.


1e59d0 No.81074

>>81060

>Kemono Fiends

>big boobed dead penguin waifus

>aiming at loli community

Stop picking random examples

>>81062

>airing at 1:30 in the morning

Because its aiming fugly lonely weebs. It is generally accepted that weebs regularly fap during 12am - 3am.

>>81065

>Goldilocks are western cartoon! Kill her! lol

>>81070

It's a bit refreshing to see someone decided to take a break from these tiring west vs east argument.

Rule 2 clearly states that you can neither trace from CP nor posting 3D works. If you trace that girl in 2D and non-lewd, I don't see how that can be a problem. But how will you request that without posting a sample picture (which is clearly global rule breaking)?


e483f4 No.81079

>>81044

They are NOT cartoon characters they are drawn several orders of magnitude more realistic and skillfully, they are tridimensional, obey anatomy basics, perspective, etc.

Cartoons are to abstract and simplistic to even resemble reality at an acceptable level for porn.


ac9bb3 No.81081

>>81079

So, what is out of rules - more realistic or less realistic?

I don't get it.


dd33e7 No.81083

>>81081

Theres no way to get it because its just based on feelings.

If the BO feels like what you're posting is too realistic then its not allowed, if they feel its not realistic enough then its not allowed either.

I guess your best bet for avoiding breaking the rules is to get in contact with them and ask them how they feel about anything you're about to post before you post it.


1e59d0 No.81086

>>81083

>get in contact with them and ask them how they feel about anything you're about to post

and thus, the death of freedom of speech


dd33e7 No.81087

>>81086

Freedom of speech died on this site the second hotwheels gave up on us, this is just adding insult to injury.


05d33b No.81090

>>81070

>But I am wondering what your policy is regarding real-life name-revealed minors (girls under 18, under the age of consent) and requesting 2D non-pornographic artwork depicting them.

I'd rather you didn't, but there are a lot of works like that and I can't stop artists from drawing it elsewhere and having the art float back here. At the very least don't trace any part of her or of any other real child.

>>81081

Too realistic is not allowed, and western styles are being phased out in favor of eastern ones. It's not that confusing.

>>81086

>>81087

Not everything is an attack on freedom of speech.


ac9bb3 No.81093

>>81090

Now define "westerm styles".


1e59d0 No.81095

>>81090

>western styles are being phased out in favor of eastern ones

great. like this guy >>81004 said. kill "western styled" anime too whenever they appeared here or you're being a complete retarded bigot for not clarifying what "western style" means.


a548d6 No.81097

File: ce6ead6ad58a446⋯.png (658.11 KB, 1300x1259, 1300:1259, Blargsnarf.png)

>>81090

I hope you realize you're ruining lives. Look at you. You don't even care.


d3f2c1 No.81098

>>81095

>Uses the word "bigot" unironically

I bet you're triggered.

>>81097

>ruining lives

Now that's an over exaggeration. Just visit /delicious/.

>>>/delicious/


ca6d52 No.81099

>>81097

>ruining lives

They are just goddamn cartoons, their creators probably give less of a shit to them if not because they are their source of income, they were not meant to be sexualized, don't take it so seriously, relax you can also go to >>>/rule34/.


1e59d0 No.81100

>>81098

you don't even know what 'bigot', 'unironically' and 'triggered' means. not only that, you can't even counter the arguments. i wonder whether you are a retard, a manchild or just a dumb 6yo kid.


b665e2 No.81101

File: 7c274d62d2a313b⋯.png (88.45 KB, 258x371, 258:371, someones a grumpy gus here.PNG)


07a0cd No.81104

Hey Tewi, while you're phasing out Western, you should get rid of the UAB banners. to those that like UAB, it already has a home in /delicious/

>>>/delicious/198


335511 No.81108

>>81079

Oh, come on, the girls in panel two don't even have arms. Saying Japan is always realistic and never uses what basically amounts to stick figures is just willfully ignorant.


335511 No.81109

File: 2e55473cb269a5a⋯.png (64.51 KB, 600x500, 6:5, eastern.png)

>>81093

Eastern style:

Big eyes, small mouth with no teeth, no nose.

Western style:

Everything else

At least that's what I'm going with from now on here.


5c61b4 No.81114

why did we get this downgrade in moderation?

can the mod fuck off and we keep only janitors to delete the CP links? we really don't need this


3839a3 No.81115

>>81114

You've been absolutely nothing but passive-aggressive, negative, and anti-constructive. Why are you even bothering to post? You're wasting energy.


727878 No.81117

>>81114

New BO is probably just trying to destroy the board from the inside.


4c6cec No.81125

Tewi, just wipe this board clean and point them to /delicious/. No containment thread. /delicious/ might as well have an anime containment thread if there's a cartoon containment thread here. Don't half ass anything.


05d33b No.81128

>>81093

Things that aren't anime/anime-derived?

>>81004

>Doraemon, some Ghibli stuffs and Osamu Tezuka's shit

That's still eastern.

>>81104

I'll do that, thanks for reminding me.

>>81125

How many people would actually prefer no containment anymore? At this point I'd want a very large amount of support before cutting all western content (including 3DCG) entirely.


5c61b4 No.81130

>>81117

I feel like they really stole all the effort posters put into here.

like I am 100% sure, tewi never posted more pictures than he deleted, it was not only a net loss, it was a farce and a slease move.


c94917 No.81131

>>81128

Containment doesn't help anybody. Various tops related to cartoons get stuffed into one thread. At least with /delicious/ they can make various topics of what they like without being restrictive. Keep anime 3DCGs and 3DCGs from Eastern games.


5c61b4 No.81132

>>81131

if loli won't get deleted over there then is the perfect replacement I guess, just hope we can get to know the mod before having troubles like this down the line again


a6a123 No.81133

>>81128

The containment thread is pointless. /delicious/ already exists and many posters moved their since they like to have specific threads.


a6a123 No.81134

>>81132

Tewi and the BO of /delicious/ are cool with each other. The new paradigm is that /loli/ will be an anime board while /delicious/ will be everything Western. /delicious/ was made for Western and I think it can looks comfy for the Western loli lovers. It's as if the Board was split into two with the animefags keeping the /loli/ name.


cbbfd3 No.81137

>>81128

>How many people would actually prefer no containment anymore?

Just pull off the bandaid before it gets more overgrown with pus and hair, they're going scream when you do it eitherway. Everyone knows it's coming and can easily be redirected to /delicious/, we're just protracting the process for… some reason.


213e09 No.81138

>>81128

I was OK with the containment until everyone seemed to move non-cartoony stuff there for no reason other than it's origin, but also I wouldn't care if it get's deleted because it is barely used anyway.


547c91 No.81145

/thread/


335511 No.81146

>>81128

So you really just mean that the artist is from Japan and all this talk of style is pussyfooting around it.


6ca18e No.81148

>>81146

He means he doesn't want garbage on the board. You seem completely entrenched in the idea that allowing western is good because of the small fraction of it that isn't shit. Since you'll never reconcile with everyone who disagrees with that, I'm not sure why you're even still here. Do you think that constantly mentioning that bad eastern art exists is some kind of a point?


335511 No.81150

>>81148

>He means he doesn't want garbage on the board

Why? What's the sudden need for massive quality control?

>Since you'll never reconcile with everyone who disagrees with that, I'm not sure why you're even still here.

Just go down the threads on the front page:

>>76801 (western artist)

>>48470 (this thread)

>>81088 (western artist)

>>80621 (off topic)

>>78785 (original content, mostly westerners)

>>60572 (western 3D)

Clearly this shows that the majority of users support 100% Japan content.


6ca18e No.81151

>>81150

>quality control is bad

Maybe /b/ is more your speed, huh?

Let's look at by far the two most active of those threads besides this one.

>>76801 has been off-topic for its entire run and arguably shouldn't have even been allowed. The fact that it's now completely irrelevant since said artist is back in jail after everyone in the thread fussed about bullshit only cements that point.

>>78785 the drawthread is by far the biggest imitation of activity in this board's history. A while back when most of the old drawthreads were still around, I thought about archiving all the deliveries. Do you know what I found? 95% of the posts in all those threads were request spam and shitposting (mostly from the same half-dozen or so faggots), and most of the actual deliveries were the equivalent of someone's drawing practice. In the >10000 post history of drawthreads there's been maybe 100-200 posts of worthwhile content. Having semi-resident artists seems nice, but those guys are going to be drawing things that will reach these communities anyway, why invite a bunch of posters who do nothing but make requests along with them?

If anything, the threads you listed are ample evidence for why more quality control and narrower focus is a good thing.


7c3230 No.81154

>>81128

You can't be more weeb than this.


ca6d52 No.81161

>>81146

I have a pixiv account as most of you, Japanese people that draw as a hobby seem incapable of drawing "low quality" stuff, it seems to be genetic, they are just better at drawing in general, Just like how blacks are better at dancing.


3839a3 No.81162

>>81161

This commissionfag has learned that hispanics (Not Mexico but South America, Spain etc.) got a heck of a talent out there.


ca6d52 No.81163

>>81162

Seems logical, spics are huge weeaboos, the Otaku fever started there first in the mid 90's and is still there, i have never commissioned anything though.

>paying for porn


5c61b4 No.81171

>>81150

the majority would speak as the majority.

you are an sleasebag of vocal minority that shat a rule out of nowhere and enforced thousand images and webms to be deleted. weebs are scum, not the majority.


6ca18e No.81173

>>81171

>how DARE a board owner do what they want with their board on a site where literally anyone can make a board and do what they want with it

Literally you, are you even self-aware of how asspained you sound?


335511 No.81176

>>81171

When I said

>Clearly this shows that the majority of users support 100% Japan content.

I was being facetious. It was supposed to be taken sarcastically.


335511 No.81177

>>81151

>If anything, the threads you listed are ample evidence for why more quality control and narrower focus is a good thing.

It would be one thing if there was a bunch of problem children shitting up threads, but when your idea of "bad content" is the entire board, more or less, why not just make a new board at that point? Maybe /Japonlyloli/ or something.


8cd249 No.81180

File: 6c6114702477de0⋯.jpg (32.56 KB, 443x296, 443:296, Loli is Jap.JPG)

>>81177

Because the phrase loli is synonymous with Japan. That's why Western content went to /delicious/.


335511 No.81181

File: 9bab19690b53761⋯.jpg (53.53 KB, 959x253, 959:253, loli.jpg)

>>81180

That article says lolicon, not loli.

Gee, I wonder why the term lolicon specifically refers to the Japanese usage. Maybe because people outside of Japan don't spell complex with an n.

Loli predates Japan's usage by a long shot.


1cd5d5 No.81182

>>81180

>>81181

What's done is done. Even then the current use of the phrase makes people think of anime, so there's no helping it. /loli/ will be a board dedicated to the East and /delicious/ will be a board dedicated to the West. Many including western style drawfags left to /delicious/ and that board will be western and cartoon only. /loli/ will only be Eastern and anime. It's done and there's no reversing it.


335511 No.81183

>>81182

>On December 1st, all old content outside of their respective containment threads will be removed

We still have the rest of the day until Tewi wipes the board.


ca6d52 No.81184

File: 4fff2296832430b⋯.gif (377.82 KB, 500x281, 500:281, 14450500749810.gif)

File: ecdaf45ee8f3025⋯.jpg (50.19 KB, 600x400, 3:2, 1439904590666.jpg)

>>81183

>Finally free from redditors and tumblrfags


9d7608 No.81185

>>81184

This is glorious news.


335511 No.81188

>>81184

Enjoy your nose-free, and soon to be, activity-free board.


335511 No.81189

/delicious/ allows eastern art, too, so I say we should all just ditch this lemonade stand and post everything loli there.


b665e2 No.81191

File: 92065bdf2497b52⋯.png (782.59 KB, 900x720, 5:4, ClipboardImage.png)

>Am I right my fellow brethren?


3839a3 No.81192

>>81183

The question is should we do our part in this wipe mastuh Tewi? Do we report what we see so that you do not have to wade through every single image in this board?


335511 No.81193

>>81192

I'm figuring he's just going to delete everything.


ca6d52 No.81195

>>81193

Woke as fuck.


9ffbce No.81196

>>81189

>/delicious/ allows eastern art, too,

In one general. The board is still made for Western according to their BO.

>I say we should all just ditch this lemonade stand and post everything loli there.

Except I'm staying here. Many of the anime posters here want nothing to do with Westernshit. Only ones going with you Western lovers happen to be those that like both. The community of the board has split in two.


3cabc4 No.81203

I still see some UAB banners, so it would be nice of you to get rid of them.


05d33b No.81205

To the person who reported the Touhou thread - toddlercon is still allowed.

>>81192

Wait a day or two before reporting anything I missed. I won't be able to do much deleting until after work, and also I might leave a thread or two up due to indecisiveness.

>>81193

I'd rather not delete literally every single thread if I can help it.

>>81203

I was gonna save it until tomorrow, but I've cleared them out now.


335511 No.81211

>>81196

There is no containment thread rule like there is on /loli/ and it specifically says it's allowed.

>The community of the board has split in two.

Do you really want to be on a board that wants half of its userbase gone? Even if you don't like western content, it's the point of the matter.


a548d6 No.81215

Welp, boards dead.

See you on /delicious/ space cowboy.


2447a9 No.81221

it's already 1st of december. nothing happened. tewi is still a cuck


7db4e9 No.81222

>>81189

Problem with delicious is in it's name, it's hard to find it for new people.

The other problem is that BO is an autist too, and doesn't like anything realistic.

I kinda suspect they both might be the same guy that just hates lolicons

>>81192

Don't worry, it won't be hard to moderate 1 post per day.


e27fb2 No.81224

File: 93ff50d2521fb88⋯.jpg (37.72 KB, 1170x325, 18:5, lolisearch.jpg)

>>81222

Searching "loli" on 8chan brings up… well, not /loli/


2447a9 No.81225

>>73883

>I don't want everything to fall into chaos like what i saw before claiming this board.

Dread it. Run from it. Destiny still arrives.


000000 No.81228

rabbit rabbit rabbit


05d33b No.81229

>>81221

I just woke up a little bit ago and I've got work to be at.

>>81224

Huh. Thought tags were already on. Should a few there now.


ca6d52 No.81233

>>81229

I hope that now that we get some free space people would finally upload download links or alternatively dump doujins from Sad Panda since I have never been allowed on that site.


1cd5d5 No.81234

>>81233

>I hope that now that we get some free space people would finally upload download links or alternatively dump doujins from Sad Panda since I have never been allowed on that site.

We already have a thread. >>76273


7db4e9 No.81235

>>81233

What was stopping you from doing all this before?

Or do you think that shit is gonna bring here new people that will do it for you?


a548d6 No.81238

>>81233

Word is hitomi.la has everything that sadpanda has and that sadpanda is run by fags.


6ca18e No.81242

>>81238

Except that's not true and even if it were their tagging is so shit you'd barely find any of it. There's also ads and the site layout is shit. Far worse alternative than nhentai.


a548d6 No.81243

>>81242

Lol nhentai doesn't even have tc because the owner doesn't like it.


b665e2 No.81244

>>81242

>Except that's not true

You would've known that beforehand, had you seen his previous posts in this thread.

Always check the ID before you exchange words with each other. You give a shitposter's only thing worth living which is attention.


a548d6 No.81246

>>81244

Genuine and honest posting for only one week and already I have my first anally frustrated stalker trying to jack my style and ride my jock.


1cd5d5 No.81248

I wonder if Tewi is going through every thread now? With Gwen being the only Western left, he might as well start a new meta thread.


b665e2 No.81249

>>81248

He could just delete the image, not the thread. Or could he change it, is that possible in 8chin?


05d33b No.81252

>>81248

I should've made the new thread when I took over.

>>81249

Best I can do is delete the image and embed a video in the OP.


91c4ab No.81253

>>81252

Might as well start a new thread. This thread was from a previous regime anyways.


f0be61 No.81259

When do you start deleting shit?


05d33b No.81263

>>81253

I'll do that sometime tonight. I'll leave this one locked with a link to the new one.

>>81259

I've deleted a good amount already.


8b86c4 No.81266

>>81263

Why'd you wipe the Second Life thread? That doesn't really fall under any other containment threads, and it, in itself, was a containment thread for SL pictures.


05d33b No.81269

>>81266

>That doesn't really fall under any other containment threads

>10. 3DCG outside of anime styles will be kept to two containment threads - one for interactive sources (games/h-games and mods) (thread pending), and the other for non-interactive sources (images, SFM, pre-rendered videos, etc) (thread pending).

It'd fall under the former thread.


1cd5d5 No.81273

>>81263

>I've deleted a good amount already.

Continue doing what you need to.


ed4c18 No.81277

>>81263

Why do i still see Toon Town and Natas?


683a9f No.81279

>>81277

There's still plenty he has yet to delete.


a548d6 No.81280

I STRONGLY recommend that the Natis threads NOT be deleted, as they are important and should be archived.

I also strongly recommend that anyone who is a fan of natis download everything here, as you can not find it anywhere else. Once it's gone, it's fucking gone.


05d33b No.81281

>>81277

I've been playing games with my friends for a bit, so I wasn't focused on deleting stuff. The toon town thread is the /co/ntainment thread.


a548d6 No.81282

>>81281

I'm begging you not to delete the natis threads. They serve as important information and if lost will rob new artists of knowledge. The mans talent cannot be denied, and it would be devestating to see the threads erased as if they never were.

If you don't want the images, please, please compromise and remove them, but leave the threads.


cbbfd3 No.81284

>>81282

Download the images and HTML, zip them, and distribute them yourself then. Image boards aren't a perpetual historical archive, the thread will have to die sometime. The guy downloaded actual CP and isn't a good metric for legal discussion anyway.


ed4c18 No.81287

>>81280

>Once it's gone, it's fucking gone

well, that's the point for all this right? kill it or tell him to draw in eastern style


6ca18e No.81289

>>81282

Even if that thread was important (it's not from a legal sense), the artist in question is in jail and his only link with the outside world has already decided not to post outside their blog. It's a completely dead issue, or are you thinking the thread should just live on perpetually in its current state? If you actually want to circulate something to people and preserve information long-term, a drawn-out thread no one will want to read all of on something as unreliable as an imageboard is one of the worst imaginable ways. Actually, if you actually cared about any of the things you claim to you would have been in the process of saving and curating them since the very beginning. If loli were outlawed tommorow, every loli artist jap or not jailed, and every site taken down I would already be set. Would you?


05d33b No.81292

>>81280

>>81282

This anon >>81284 tells it well enough. Imageboards can't hold it forever. True fans would've saved the images as they were posted, and with a warning one week in advance you would've had ample time to save the entire thread. I've suggested it before with the drawthreads.

The natis thread has already been deleted, but I can keep the court thread up a little longer, for whatever it's worth.

>>81287

>tell him to draw in eastern style

According to the court thread he's back in jail, so he won't be back any time soon. He'll be lucky if he's allowed to draw anything.

New meta thread >>81288




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / girltalk / guarida / loomis / lovelive / roze / tijuana / wx ]