/loli/ - Lolis

I have different affinities for 2D and 3D. Fortunately for me, I do not really like explicitly sexual images no matter what spectrum so I don't have any nor desire intercourse. The tickle fetish I have is an entirely different story. The various 2D images and 3D adult videos keep me satisfied in that department.

It's rare that someone watches adult hentai, yet never touches adult 3d porn. No one would even raise such a question because it's just silly to think otherwise.

So, to say that you only care for 2D loli and have absolutely no attraction to it being in another dimension just reeks of denial.

There's really no other way to put it. I'm sure this has been stated many times before and some will argue they aren't in denial, but that's just my 2 cents.

>>18750

Not comparable and to try to speak for others and call what their preferences are denial because you disagree/like bout is just a shallow view point. There are many who also say they never watch 3D porn and only watch hentai, it's preference not denial.

>>18769

>don't believe

See, there's the issue. That's why whenever someone comes in and says he doesn't you have fanatics claim that the guy's just suppressing.

>>18769

I find that pic hot, can't say anything about CP single i haven't seen it.

>>18769

I'd imagine that an identical 3D image would be full of unsightly blemishes and shapes and the overall feel of the image not being the same - possibly forced. Lolis are created to be perfect in the artists eyes, which is why 2D has a less arguable appeal to it (you know, besides one being more legal than the other.)

>>18740

That's still somewhat part of the BDSM category. A shame since that means the 'somewhat boring' Kusuguri Gakuen series is the closest thing you're going to get. Unless I'm wrong..

>>18769

I fap to furry and don't find and don't find animals attractive.

Just sayin'.

>>18769

Loli is idealized and beautified to the fullest, 3D is not. They are very different and you can't project your attraction to both on to others.

>>18778

>They are very different

That's like saying you're only attracted to vogue magazine models because they're idealized/beautified with photoshop/make-up. The subject is still exactly the same, which is the entire point. In this case, you're attracted to the idea that a real girl is beautified/perfect.

So,2D loli can be as perfect and pristine as it wants to be, but it will always be based around it's 3D counterpart.

>>18775

Ok i'm getting a bit worried, why is this arousing?

>>18781

That example does not fit. The subject is not the same since it's fantasy vs reality and you are talking reality vs reality +makeup/photo shop. A right example would be you want to kill someone in real like because you play COD or GTA because "it's based around a 3D counterpart."

>>18775

Can see blemishes. Even most mediocre loli artists can make a better looking loli.

>>18777

Okay, another example.

I masturbate to the ponies in My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic yet have no desire to go out and fuck horses.

>>18794

horsefucker pls go.

>>18797

No.

Real life proud and self-loving paedosexual here. My attraction is not evil or wrong. Any expressions of my attraction shared with a consenting child are not wrong either. The ONLY reason I am not overtly sexual with the little girls I care for and love is because of how society and the adults in her life would react if found out. Possibly ruining her life as well as mine. I have been asked to rub vaginas, kiss them, to show myself, etc. Kids are curious and love pleasure and feeling good with people they like.

Anyway if you view children with respect and as equals and not just as sex objects then there is absolutely no mechanism for harm when it comes to consensual sexual interactions.

Want to love yourself and children more? Want to learn how to be the best paedo you can be? Join: visionsofalice.com

Completely legal, accessible through TOR. Great support group of child LOVERS. We respect children and they respect us.

I have done nothing more than empower little girls, make them feel confident, help them love themselves and others. Life is good. It needs to become better.

Fight the paedosexual and child sexuality witch hunt!

>>18831

Sounds kinda wierd, but i still think that witch hunt should stop.

When you get past all the sophistry and mental gymnastics people use to justify themselves, in the abstract sense, it is absolutely the same. A pedophile/lolicon is one who is attracted to children. Nothing says that it has to be a real child. Nothing says that one has to act out on the deeprooted impulse. You just have to be aroused by the abstract form and attributes of a little girl. It's as simple as the visual processing by the brain. If you can become aroused by the image of a young female without breasts, then you are a pedobear/lolicon. It doesn't matter whether it's real or not, or whether it's even supposed to be a child, for that matter. Even if you're into petite flatchested babyfaced 18 year old adult women who look not a day older than 12, you are still a pedo/lolicon, since you can become aroused by a childlike female without adult proportions, otherwise you would be disgusted by the lack of adult proportions. In fact there is tons of legal 'loli' AV in Japan with baby faced flat chested girls under 150 cm that don't look any older than JC.

Now I'm not saying that everyone who can become aroused without fictional 2d porn can become aroused with real children / is a threat to real children. But that's irrelevant to the fact that you have an attraction to the idealized child form.

If you claim to like 2D loli only, you're the same as one of those virginfags who never gets laid that faps to 2D girls, but would go limp and have a panic attack around any 3D girl. It doesn't matter that such an individual would be unable to go through with it in real life. The fact that these individual find erotic depictions of heterosexual activity stimulating means they are heterosexual, and not truly asexual, regardless of how they deal with reality. If one could find it attractive in any sense, fictional or real, it would make that person definitively a heterosexual and not a asexual. Likewise, a 2D lolicon who abhors 3D for whatever reason, but arousal level goes over 9000 for what is essentially erotic art depicting pedosex is still a pedophile, regardless of how they react to real life children. The only way one could not be a pedophile is if one could not become aroused by anything without strictly adult proportions / body shape. It's a matter of hardwired erotic taste that is processed by the brain through visual stimuli. A true non-pedophile would not be able to fap any image of a female that is not adult sized and curvy.

A virgin loser fag with social anxiety that faps to 2D isn't a true asexual, and is still a heterosexual, and a 'lolicon' with socially instilled pedophobia is still a pedophile. If a true normalfag were reborn in an alternate universe where all females stop growing after 10 and remain lolis for life, he would be really frustrated, much like a man in prison, while every lolicon and pedobear would be in heaven.

>>18798

The connection between video games and 2d erotic depictions of minors is tenuous at best. You enjoy Super Mario Bros. because of the game mechanics, not because it's violence against turtles. Pornography isn't video games though. You look at it the body shape, and your dick and your brain either likes it, or it doesn't. If you find the child form attractive in any way, shape or form, context and the reality of real world society ignored, then you are a pedobear deep down inside.

>>18794

My little pony looks vastly different from real horses, whereas loli features high quality realistic depictions of the child form in explicit situations. Unless you're telling me you don't look at the body at all, and it's the animu eyes that you jerk off to. In that case, I'm sure why you need this board when you could just fap to regular cute /a/ material.

seen real CP, I mean, anyone who used kazaa and 4chan has at some point. I find it disgusting.

prefer 13+

but I know to stay the hell away because already know from experience that at that age they are manipulative and unstable little sluts and they sure as hell will cry wolf at you.

Know from experience because when I was 18, little girls were interested in me for some reason. Almost got into trouble because of their stupid shit. Also have a 12 year old cousin and I can already see her becoming a cockgobling selfish slut.

Don't really find majority of loli and teen models attractive. Some girls though, man. Some girls are just so beautiful that you just know they will be beautiful for the rest of their lives.

loli just turns me on because I have a fetish for petite girls taking big objects in their holes.

>>7085

Compare the technology of the 1970s to what we have now. We've achieved more in just forty years than the entire culmination of all of existence on earth in billions. Imagine what will happen in another forty. Progress will happen faster than it can be regulated, it's fact now.

The future is closer than you think.

For me most of the loli images look more like teens, so aren't we in that sense kinda like hebes?

>>18969

Most furries aren't into bestiality, they are into costume sex.

>>18970

Most aren't even into fursuit sex, though I think that's because current fursuit designs aren't sufficiently realistic. Once fursuits integrate with the nervous system to reproduce facial expressions and relay sensations, then it will become a lot more popular.

What most furries are actually into is anthropomorphic animals/aliens/etc. Anything with a human mind and a non-human body, basically.

lolicons better cp can fuck it self i no ur not talking about cp but other ppl are so all thous who llov cp turn to lolical it gave more content and its better i think

lolicons better, cp can fuck it self, i no ur not talking about cp, but other ppl are so all thous who love cp. turn to lolicon. it gives more content and its, better i think?

>>19003

And how doee that make it more than a rumor? That anagram just means loli.

>>19013

>if it can do as little as speak english.

If it's so easy, why don't you go and program a computer to do it. You'd become a millionaire overnight.

>>19013

As a biology nerd I find funny how they get the dicks wrong… imagine anatomically correct echidna or turtle dicks!

>>19015

Anatomically correct anthropomorphic snails.

>>18925

A thousand times this.

People just need to be more honest on the internet.

Damn, so many fucking myths.

>Destroying kid's lives.

Doesn't actually happen in most circumstances

where mutual feelings are present between both parties. Only weakfags get hurt by this.

>Lel touching kidz is bad

I think you're bad for touching adults. Freaking disgusting, hair on vajin, hair around the fucking dick, deep voice instead of that nice soothing high pitched voice, freaking gross you adult fuckers are.

If I had the chance to fuck a girl that was 10 and she wanted it, I'd say something depending on if she met my standards for lolis.

Sage out.

>>19029

Not that i know anything, but i think that

>and she wanted it

your want and her want are different.

>>18774

>The somewhat boring Kusuguri Gakuen series is the closest thing you're going to get.

Child World, Papaka and Vladmodels had some stuff. Not sure other than that.

Personally, I DID have a little bit of 3d attraction–I even looked at CP a few times. But I discovered lolicon when I was still in 6th grade myself, prime loli age. Now I actually prefer teenaged and adult characters. I wanted to be the little girl, anyway. Kind of regret not going farther with those guys on the internet that were trying to groom me a decade ago.

>>8312

I think you're wrong, I'd say the majority of people who like 2d don't like 3D. I like lolicon, but find real children to be a bit repelling. I don't have anything against pedos though

>>12931

More and more as of late the SJWs *are* the moralfags

>>21450

It isn't just a recent phenomenon. SJWs have been the moralfags for at least as long as they have been called SJWs. The sex negative branch of feminism might even pre-date the more libertarian kind.

>>19036

He wasn't making a claim about what she wanted. He was setting a condition. The grammar in that sentence was fairly unambiguous.

>If (he had the opportunity to fuck a 10 year old girl) and (she wanted [to be fucked]) he would ….

If, as you propose, she didn't actually want what he wanted, then the "(she wanted [to be fucked])" clause would be false and hence, according to his own statement, he wouldn't do anything.

>>7346

Seconded.

>>8858

As an option, maybe. I usually apply what I'm gonna call the "Gay test" on these matters.

If the name didnt give it away, I cross out "pedo", replace it with "homo", and see how sensible it sounds.

Here we go:

>In the UK, there was recently a documentary on homsexuals "coming out", calling for treatment to be available before offences are committed.

>In particular, this documentary encourages the view that homosexuality is a medical disorder, one that needs drug or intensive therapy in order to treat, a sexual preference formed by complex circumstances that can be cured.

>My question to you all is: If treatment was available anonymously to you, would you take it?

So, it's a program for homosexuals who feel they can't control themselves. It's about sexual assult.

How about attacking and fighting the "Assult" part, and not the "Sexual" part?

These people have the right to their sexuality and to express it within laws of assult and public decency.

I'd fuck a 12 year old if she was into it. Although fact that I'm even writing this fills me with intense shame and self-hatred that I wonder if I would actually do it if the opportunity were to magically present itself. I'm too fucking pathetic. I guess that's why I like lolicon, because its always too-good-to-be-true scenarios.

I really don't think there's anything wrong to fapping to 2D lolis or even legal 3D stuff… but I think doing so also opens the floodgates. And I think the pro-pedo rhetoric that some users of this site espouse is truly disturbing.

Seeing a sexy young girl in public is anguish. I always force myself to look away, but of course doing that just makes me want to look more. It reminds of how much of a mess I am. Although honestly, I'm probably going to end up killing myself in a few years so I guess I've given up on being a well-adjusted human being.

>>21475

>but I think doing so also opens the floodgates

Same slippery slope bullshit that has been used to condemn gay rights, and almost every other anti-bigotry movement.

Unless you can give evidence to prove that lolicon itself causes harm (you can't, because it doesn't), you don't have a leg to stand on.

>>21499

Indeed pederasty is hallmark of pedos, and back then there used to be a strong equal sign between queers and pederasts.

However using it in argument is flawed 'A is related to B and A is related to C, therefore A is related to C'.

Age restrictions are orthogonal to homo/hetero as they are put in for entirely different reasons.

>>21503

>give compelling argument for slippery slope

I think the floodgates are with relation to porn industry (let's put lolicon aside, that is obviously pretty much harmless compared to meatspace production).

Those gates were opened to gays once queers became publicly accepted (ie before that, gay porn magazines were underground just like CP is now). Except for gays, nobody is hurt as its just adults making adult decisions.

I think a better model for this would be war on drugs. Is it better to wage war on heroin and meth production (and thus keep it's market permanently cornered), or let the spice flow? Ponder it for a moment.

Just like pedophilia and things related, hard drugs can be insanely dangerous when handled incorrectly. On the other hand, assuming everyone has it's own agency "war on drugs" makes absolutely no sense.

>>21505

>Those gates were opened to gays once queers became publicly accepted (ie before that, gay porn magazines were underground just like CP is now). Except for gays, nobody is hurt as its just adults making adult decisions.

Great, so you've made an analogy to something which actually happened, then explained exactly why it's a completely different situation with different ethical constraints.

>I think a better model for this would be war on drugs. Is it better to wage war on heroin and meth production (and thus keep it's market permanently cornered), or let the spice flow? Ponder it for a moment.

>Just like pedophilia and things related, hard drugs can be insanely dangerous when handled incorrectly. On the other hand, assuming everyone has it's own agency "war on drugs" makes absolutely no sense.

I'm not sure what you're getting at here. It's a deeply flawed analogy. How the fuck is a sexuality equivalent to hard drugs? Is homosexuality equivalent to tobacco? Has /pol/ has been trying to save us from getting lung cancer?

As for the war on drugs, it is one of the most barbaric, cruel and generally evil things still going on in Western countries. You might as well ask me to ponder whether stabbing a billion kittens is better or worse than donating to charity.

>>21505

We can't give people chainsaws. Everyone would end up mutilating their mouths and killing themselves.

When people are given toothbrushes they put them in their mouths every day. Except for toothbrushes, nobody gets hurt when they do that.

Yesyes, attractio to females even VERY yong ones is escentially natural. But we are not in the caves age. We went against ethics and screw it all. Now they create laws to protects kids from rapists and molesters. That's why it is wrong. Not because of you, TRUE pedophiles who (disrregarding sexual attracction) can have strong romantic feelings towards children, as adults feels towards other adults; but because of those bastards who violated and still do violate innocent children.

In the past it was not so uncommon for a man to feel love towards a 13 years old girl. Because it was in fact love, not pure sexual desire regardless her will. But then sexual perverted beasts appeared, raping and using kids against their will and rules had to be placed on the table, dictating that relations between adults and children was prohibited. Of course there was people who felt true not-malice oriented feelings, but to be just sometimes you have to be unfair, and this is a true reality.

Now imagine that in the nowadays society relationships between adults and kids are allowed. Hurray! your dream came true! But with our current society (involving EVERY aspect of it, laws, ethics, education, etc) girls will be "taken" (as in married) by adults, if and only if they (she) have the good wil to, of course. Yes, boys will be taken too by adult women, but that is another topic. Now lets put ourselves in a future where this is implemented. Girls will start to feel attraction by adults, or more grown up men (as in maturity) thus since their preteen age they will start to develop a fast pace maturity because of the kind of relations they will have (involving grown up relationships). Now, in school, there will be a big difference between boys and girls in both behavior and psiquis. Then boys of 10 years old will not be the same as a 10 years old girl. And sincerely, that is not cool. Not for you who will taste a delicious 10 years old pussy, but for the future children who will live their puberty and adolescence in a different (low) pace compared to girls.

I'd like for TRUE pedophilia to be treated like homosexuality. It is known, partially accepted, it is in fact "practiced", but ethically it is still put in doubt. So relationships are maintained inside doors, or in particular exclusive places.

I am into 2d. One night my curiosity got the better of me, and I looked up PureNudism. Absolutely nothing. I found it as erotic as watching someone's home movies. Anybody who says 2d is a slippery slope to 3d has gone full SJWtard.

Either way you slice it, societies approach to pedophilia is shit. You cannot hate something like pedophilia out of existance any more than you can hate terrorism or racism out of existance. Pedophilia is not going away and trying to ignore it or keep it underground has the exact opposite effect that people seem to want (which is less kids being harmed). Alternatives for them as well as possible therapy (REAL THERAPY) and reform on confidentiality laws are needed if society expects anything to happen.

But society really just wants pedophiles removed from existance and can't really get that since countries tend to get uppity and try and overthrow your government when you announce a planned genocide of a group.

>>7046

It happens, you just need to keep to lolicon/shotacon/toddlercon.

What we make virtually can look even more real than reality itself, better detail, lots of scenarios.

If you keep your fetish hidden in the physical world you have no risk of prison or vigilante/mob justice.

————————————–

A pedophile is one who is attracted to a prepubescent child or children. The definition does not mention drawn, digitally simulated, real, 2d, 3d.

So strictly by definition all lolicons, shotacons, and toddlercons are pedophiles. To be a pedophile is not an awful thing.

A person is a pedophile because of something inside them and while people may say it is bad or good it is simply what is.

Chances are if you have grown up in the US or in Canada or another country like it you may likely despise and hate yourself for your condition at least for a little while. We hear all growing up how it is evil, twisted, immoral.

In the midst of all this there is protected material. We have a god of lust named Eros who is in the form of a naked boy. We have Cupid shooting love arrows who is a boy with wings naked except for a diaper. We have pictures of naked children with wings we call faeries, we have poems and stories from famous authors in the past.

You cannot risk telling anyone.

Your family would never trust you around your nieces and nephews, second cousins, if you have a daughter or son you would prolly never be trusted around them.

Priests while they might understand might break the seal of confession because of mandatory reporting laws or a moral feeling. A Priest breaking the seal of confession under any circumstance risks their very soul. They also face automatic excommunication if found out by the Catholic church and only the Pope is supposed to be able to reverse that. They take oaths to protect the secrets of confession, secrets between you, the priest, and god. They are not allowed to break the seal even to save their own life or that/those of others.

Psychiatrists and therapists have a duty to report if they feel you pose any danger to a child.

If you do any of these you may as well have turned yourself in. If you turn yourself in or if you escaped jail time you would likely have a curfew and monitoring bracelet, you would have a sex offender registration, you would have police visits both scheduled and random, internet would be monitored if allowed.

Now for alot of us, especially those here, our preference is what is known as lolicon/shotacon/toddlercon, in other words virtual. We will read stories, look at drawn/digitally created images, readlook at mangas(got some fantranslated ones), watch digitally created videos, read/watch/play Visual Novels/Hentai Games(there are some that have been fantranslated into english). It harms nobody and is good for us.

i think that those people who are trying to destroy lolicon, shotacon, and toddlercon do not understand the danger that their success would bring about. If they get it illegal everywhere and managed to destroy all material do they think the fetish will just die? Because the urges will still be there and there would now be no alternative to real children. i think parents and families of children would rather have those with attraction to a child or children sate their lust with lolicon, shotacon, and toddlercon rather than to risk their child/children getting harmed.

>>21634

correction

*If you do any of these you may as well have turned yourself in. If you turn yourself in or if you escaped jail time or after you got out of jail you would likely have a curfew and monitoring bracelet, you would have a sex offender registration, you would have police visits both scheduled and random, internet would be monitored if allowed.*

How many people on this board have autopedophilia?

And by that, I mean fantasizing they were a small boy/girl again and having sex with an adult?

Just curious.

>>21826

I do. If anything the autopedophilia is slightly more prominent for me than the pedophilia.

Although my fantasies are less about sex and more about various fetishes such as diapers and bondage.

>>21826

sometimes I have such fantasies

usually framed as acquiring a perfect loli body/avatar in some sort of post-human future

note that I mean having a body that looks like a 2D anime-styled loli

>>21895

>acquiring a perfect loli body/avatar in some sort of post-human future

I have almost exactly the same kind of fantasies, although I would prefer a realistic human body. That said, I would want a few augmentations to give my adult carer/owner a bit more control over my basic bodily functions. Who doesn't want their loli to come with "orgasm" and "pee" buttons?

I think that kind of transhumanist artificial body manufacturing and mind-transfer is the long-term solution to both pedophilia and autopedophilia. The pedophiles can hook up with the autopedophiles and live out their fantasies together in fully consensual relationships.

>>7046 Just like watching fictional rape turns me on and actual rape has the opposite effect, I'm not attracted to the real thing.

>>18953

Ponyfag here. Clearly those images depict us and our pornography perfectly.

are you crazy? better to die a 1000 slow deaths than throw away everything for nothing. have the fantasy in your mind and choose to obey law and decency

https://archive.is/uIA4s

The BBC posted this today.

I'm surprised that they actually distinguished between a pedophile and a child molester.

That said, all the genocidal whackjobs came out of the woodwork on various forums and blogs.

Because, you know, having a sexual attraction to children and never acting on it is exactly the same as acting on it!

>>18925

I know this is a three month old post but you were right until your second paragraph.

>you're the same as one of those virginfags who never gets laid that faps to 2D girls, but would go limp and have a panic attack around any 3D girl.

Judging your reader with tangential stereotypes and ad hominem makes you look like a fool. In fact, that was so irrelevant that it made you look desperate to justify your statements.

>>23430

And saying no one can consent to sex until they're X years old is just as stupid, but people still think it's the best thing since sliced bread.

>>23768

It's not stupid. I've never understood the paedophiles' explanation for why it should be ok to fuck children.

>>23786

Not that anon, but now that you said that i would actually also like to ger a reasonable explanation why it should be ok.

>>23432

> But in general these treatments revolve around suppressing your pedo boner for children, their aim is to make you feel more guilty and miserable

Maybe. I'm not sure whether it's that simple. You see, if society doesn't tolerate adult-child sexual contacts, the only way of helping paedophiles is suppressing their urges, as those urges mustn't be acted out then. At least I only see this conflict, or dilemma, no solution to it.

I remember a Projekt Dunkelfeld doctor naming in a German television talk show that very dilemma, too. They do want to help paedophiles, but they don't really know what the best way to do so is. He employed an analogy in which an alcoholic gets invited to a cocktail party but declines, saying 'I have to be abstinent, I'm an alcoholic', the others commending him on his pertinacity; as opposed to a paedophile who gets asked to sit a neighbour's child but declines, saying 'I have to be abstinent, I'm a paedophile', the neighbour becoming scared of him thinking he's a weird and disgusting person. I think I'll leave this analogy uncommented.

> Now, psychology of adult porn is somewhat researched topic, but child pornography and pedophilia and how two of those relate is still a black hole.

Yes, unfortunately, but I think we've boxed ourselves into a corner with that: When child porn was still legal, no researcher thought of investigating that, and now that such research could be interesting, nobody is allowed to do it anymore.

As for your paragraph about what kinds of stuff are labelled child porn, you're right, but I think most of the special cases you describe, e.g. the girl taking lewd pictures of herself, are rather exceptional. The stereotypical child porn (if people actually do have a manifest stereotypical image of child porn) is a hand camera video in bad quality showing a little girl getting raped. (That's one reason why I don't want lolicon to be called child porn: because by calling it child porn it automatically gets connected to that kind of stuff.)

>>21460

That graph has to be bullshit

Personally I want to have rough sex IRL. Make girls cry, cum in their holes, beat the sluts….

>>25389

Mr. FBI, can you be a little bit more inventive in your baiting?

>>25433

I'm not FBI you retarded faggot. I hope you get raped by a pack of niggers and then they shot your dick off before they kill you. You dumb fucks think everyone is FBI, you are worthless paranoid shit head. Unless this forum did anything illegal why would the FBI give a fuck you retarded nigger?

I wish idiots like you would just kill yourself you disgusting failed abortion. Crawl back into your mother's Cunt.

>>25433

Ignore the retard edgyfag, he's been around for about two weeks spamming "rape" and "nigger" in every thread

>>25440

It's just a usual thing, some bored LEA start spamming really transgessive stuff to judge how potentially dangerous the forum is. That's why a lot of sadistic forums (the ones that are on clearnet) chose to ban underage discussion, so that they don't attract too much heat. If you're not one, sorry. But there is no reason to say "i want to beat up children" in a loli board, nobody here is that deviant. Surely you can find other places to talk to people about your ugres and fantasies.

>>25467

>>25467

WTF is Lea? And clearnet? I'm lost. Also I didn't start this thread I bumped it so go eat shit.

>>25447

I've only been here a week. I've seen old post that say nigger and faggots so please stop lying I'm not the only one who uses those words.

First I'm FBI now I'm edgy. Maybe you all should stop playing arm chair psychologist because you could never guess what I am and who I am.

>>25470

LEA stands for law enforcement agency

clearnet presumably means not darknet though i've never heard it called that

>>25470

You just proved me right, I just gave you the benefit of the doubt and said 2 weeks. You can find posts with it in there but you are painfully obvious in how much you go out of your way to spam edgy shit in every thread about rape and calling anyone who doesn't like rape a nigger that should be raped and killed by niggers. Also I said anything about the words "faggots" so learn to read edgyfag.

>>25474

Yes thank you. I don't get why people:

Take this place too seriously, your lively hood is not based on what happens in this place

Are paranoid that the FBI is watching.They have bigger issues and this is all legal.

>>26963

No reason to bump this thread over a 9 month old post.

I have zero attraction to the real thing and zero attraction to the younger loli stuff. My loli tastes are mostly in the teen-looking girls. Honestly, if 90% of hentai wasn't chicks with comically oversized asses and tits then I'd probably be into that but I prefer petite girls (in both anime and real life) and loli has more of that.

>>26987

You clearly are a pedophile.

>>26963

Who's this butterface?

>>26990

You clearly are a troll.

I tried to do an experiment with myself, and actually went to a park bench and watched kids play for a few hours ( broken up with reading newspaper, smoking, playing game son my cell… act natural ) and I didn't even get a lil aroused, and kids of varying ages outfits and genders strolled by. Nothing happened.

I don't even know how this shit works.

>>27017

It's best if you look at a girl who is playing with her clothes.

>>27017

I assume next you're going to go to a starbucks for a few hours and when none of the women arouse you because they aren't doing anything arousing you'll then say you must be gay?

Like what the fuck, do people legitimately think pedos sit in parks masturbating thinking "oh yeah use those monkey bars you little slut"

>>7085

But expect new laws would come out too and other ethical issues involved…

>>23786

Because without societies stigma sex is not so dangerous and complex a thing that children, assuming they at least have a sufficient grasp of language to understand the concepts, couldn't reasonably consent to it.

Furthermore the age of consent as a law actually flies in the face of what a fair legal system should be, as it in effect presumes guilty until proven innocent.

>>7046

>>26987

>>27017

I'm 21 and live real close to a middle school. I constantly see scantily clad girls from the ages 12-16 walking by my house. They wear low cut tops, makeup, colored wristbands/bracelets and tiny shorts that cut off a few inches above their knees. I have honestly never once thought to myself "Fuck, they're hot!" or even so much as equated them with sex, ever.

It just makes me feel incredibly bad for pedophiles because I understand how difficult it must be for them, especially with young girls looking and acting like they do nowadays. It's like locking a shark in an underwater cage and letting the blood from a big juicy dolphin steak leak through until it becomes frustrated and goes into a frenzy. Eventually it realizes it will never get the steak, accepts it and later dies of starvation.

Nothing can yet be done about the fact that a small minority of peoples brains are wired differently to others in certain areas, so there really is no solution to the "pedo problem" society faces. As long as there are children, there will be adults who are attracted to them sexually and I think this just needs to be realized and accepted. Whether this might be in 10 years or 1000 years, I seriously doubt we will see any hints of it in our lifetime. The only thing pedophiles need at the moment is control over their desires, as they always have.

To answer the OP, whilst I love lolicon I prefer older women IRL. As I've already stated, kids do absolutely nothing for me, regardless of their age or appearance.

>>27398

Good old parent logic; dress children like sluts and whores, then complain about people who sexualize children, pedophiles and/or child molesters.

Having children needs an IQ/common sense requirement.

>>27398

Well what you have seen does not arouse you, you can't really know unless you've seen material or been in situations that are overtly erotic.

I mean I'm a true blue pedo and when I see some scantily clad young girl walk past I don't really feel aroused at all I just think "oh she looks cute" and move on, because the mood just isn't right for it.

>>27398

Every time someone equates 12-16 y.o girls to pedophilia a child gets molested. Stop doing that. Puberty is gross and teenage whores belong in the trash.

>>27398

>Whether this might be in 10 years or 1000 years, I seriously doubt we will see any hints of it in our lifetime.

I bet 50 years ago nobody thought that somewhen lgbt will be considered normal and have all the civil rights. Ditto for 100 years and niggers and 200 years and women.

>>18794

>>18797

>>18927

Old comments, but I want to add to this with a different point of view on the fantasy vs reality topic.

I fap to MLP porn, but when watching the actual cartoon, I feel nothing. To me, the hyper-sexualized pony on my screen is pretty much a completely different character than the one on the television. It's all fantasy in my head. I feel no interest in fucking the cartoon horses on the television. They have simple designs, are underdeveloped sexually, and are not meant to look sexual. It takes a talented artist who is good at drawing sexual things to redesign that cookie-cut cartoon horse into something fuckable. And at that point, I'm not fapping to Pinkie Pie or something, but to a completely different character that exists in my head.

While it may not be 2D vs 3D, I think it's a decent example of fantasy vs "the real thing."

If cartoon horses trigger you, re-read this post with Poke'girls or Sonic, or whatever else tickles your fancy.

>>7067

>She's a real girl

>She doesn't love you

Girls are like kitty kats?

>I really love drawn loli stuff, and would love if they were real and cuddleable in three dimensions, but the fact is that every time I've accidentally stumbled across real child porn, I've felt a really viscerally negative reaction. Like sick and scared and then bummed out for a while.

You knew the man abandoned the girl. He didn't keep her as a bride, etc. There was no happily ever after.

Old religions had a solution: the man keeps the girl as a bride.

>>15687

Man was ment to mate with girl, not tree.

>- 3D grows old and dies, just like everything in the real world.

3D lasts longer than not4chan did

I am attracted to 2D and 3D (art)… not RL… RL just doesn't "fit the bill"… I find nothing attractive about under-educated and uninformed. Even when they are smart as hell and informed, they just don't have that "desire" I crave.

However, 2D and 3D (art) is nothing more than small adults, as in, "with a wide knowledge of sexual information and desire". Which, is appealing to me.

Honestly, I just hate tall and fat people, and strive to be reproducing offspring and loving thin and height-challenged individuals. However, they don't make art like that… Well, they do… Loli art.

I also love the expressions and attention to detail of the subjects and scenes. Though, isolated lolis are cute too. (Without some kind of subject, other than themselves, it is just nudity, which is not attractive, but still adorable.)

Plus… there is no other way to cram 30 dildos into one hole, 20 anal-beads, and have 7 men occupy enough space to please a RL person. But in loli-land… that is as easy to do as get raped by an alien octopus with balls.

i wonder if anyone else feels this way, but i am actually not attracted at all to young girls in person. to me its just masturbation material, maybe because not much does it for me anymore. i think it's just the matter that it is taboo that gets me off. that said, i am attracted to pubescent girls. age 13 is the lowest that i would say i'm attracted to in person. and the thing that sucks for me is the pubscent age is the most difficult thing to find on the internet. it's all either too old or way too young. there's only pre-teen models, hardly any young teen models.

They are the same. Look at the cp problem here .

>>32480

No they're not, SJW fag. YOu can't even see the difference in bot spam that only spreads virus' vs CP actually being posted. Now go drink a bottle of bleach.

I am not sexually attracted to prepubescent girls. That's gross.

No, real kids are disgusting and anoying

>>7046

There is no definitive answer. Some of us aren't attracted to real loli's, some are.

>>32480

>>32482

>>32491

>>32492

>>32510

Can you stupid faggots not revive this shitty thread?

>>32511

Bump. Just to piss this nigger loving fag off.

>>32513

And your point is?

The OP's question was whether or not the attraction is the same, not who/what - can/can't be harmed. I'm attracted to real girls. Doesn't mean I touch them.

At least not anymore

>>32511

The thread was already at the top of the front page when all of those people posted (including myself). It still is. Sage won't do shit you fag but here's your sage.

Also, anyone that tries to equate 2d with child porn is likely a moralfagging shitposter or agent provocateur, or a retarded sjw (counts as a moralfag). Either way, all need to fuck off.

>>32520

it's more than an American guilt culture, lad. the hate crimes against pedos are world wide.

pedophilia is a sexual orientation, like homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality.

once upon a time, you could be imprisoned for having gay sex or looking at gay porn. same thing. being gay was once labeled by the mental health profession as a sexual deviation, same as pedos are now.

stop the pedo witch hunt. stop hate crimes against pedos or MAPs (minor attracted adults)

btw, anyone who says they fap to loli and aren't attracted to real children are lying to us or to themselves.

>>32514

>And your point is?

Point is they aren't the fucking same by virtue of what they are. Both can exist independently of the other.

For example, I like vore, but if I saw someone consume someone else in one bite I would be fucking terrified, same thing with lolicon.

Shit like this gives validity to the position "hurr lolicon makes 3DPD pedos."

Stop trying to limit my fucking porn options because too retarded to know fantasy is reflected from reality, not the other way around.

>>32541

>Sees a 2D pic of adult licking little girl pussy - faps

>Sees a 3D pic of adult licking little girl pussy - shits his pants

>Thinks he's not actually attracted to thought of adult licking little girl pussy - in denial

Keep telling yourself you're not actually a pedo because they are drawings. Maybe someday you'll believe that.