Really there isn't that much different between those two sides,
but they're kind of telling about the general perspective of the waifuist.
One side is more willing to "believe" in their waifu in some vague metaphysical
or spiritual sense. The other is more accepting of "waifu doesn't real", and so,
fill that void with physical representations of the character.
When it comes to the base of it, both are the love for an idea and easily overlap.
Sound like a correct observation ?
I guess I'm stepping in both sides, but lean toward "classic".
Viewing representations of my waifu or attempting to create them myself are my main waifuist practices.
Followed by what I'd describe as meditating on my waifu. Less often, masturbating to her.
Replaying the source game if I have the time and desire.
My desires and beliefs related to waifuism are similar to deification and, Pygmalion with his Galatea.
Speaking of which, I think sex/waifubots are the ultimate deciding factor on which "side" of waifuism you really favor.
Myself, I see no issue with them.
As such, I think I fall more into "classic", or material waifuism.
To satisfy myself, I'd need to somehow be involved with the creation of
the bot, the more involved the better. So there is still some spiritual
side to it, where I must use the connection to give her form.
Which is the end game to waifuism and why; tulpa, robot, or neither ?