I identify as a pro-Ukrainian but recently i talked to a Russian who fought with the rebels and he told me that the Ukrainians have used phosphorous and chemical weapons on the rebels. I didn't believe him at first but he showed me pictures of them using i

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1414959493839.jpg (95.59 KB, 606x893, 606:893, 1389320163032.jpg)

Anonymous 11/02/14 (Sun) 20:18:13 No.1250

I identify as a pro-Ukrainian but recently i talked to a Russian who fought with the rebels and he told me that the Ukrainians have used phosphorous and chemical weapons on the rebels. I didn't believe him at first but he showed me pictures of them using it.

Not 100% sure they were legit but it made me think. Anyone have any evidence that this is true or false?

Anonymous 11/03/14 (Mon) 04:44:30 No.1253

When you say pro-Ukranian do you mean pro EU and NATO? That's what the side opposing the rebels is as far as I know.

Anonymous 11/03/14 (Mon) 13:32:24 No.1257

Also, I'm fairly sure that white phosphorous is a chemical weapon they call a smokescreen to avoid violating international laws when using it. I think NATO forces use it, but I'm not so sure. so probably.

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 06:57:54 No.1382

>>1257
>I'm not sure. So probably.

The mental faculties of a marxist at work.

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 09:01:51 No.1384

File: 1415869311659.jpg (113.69 KB, 960x719, 960:719, 1412468726813.jpg)

>>1382
Definitely > Probably > Likely > Maybe > Unlikely > Maybe not > Definitely not

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 09:29:08 No.1385

>>1384
Didn't marx predict that all people would "definitely" rise up in the event of a war and there would be a glorious revolution for all people?

How'd that turn out? Hue.

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 09:57:46 No.1386

>>1385

It's still building up. Every moment brings us closer.

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 13:35:29 No.1392

>>1385
Their ostensible vanguards (the social-democratic parties of the Second International) threw their internationalist platforms and declarations made before 1914 overboard in favor of collaborating with the bourgeois states in endorsing fratricidal warfare.

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 13:38:27 No.1393

>>1392
Not to mention that as World War I continued workers increasingly found on their own, having been abandoned by the social-democrats, that it was not in their class interest, hence the rise of the soviets in Russia, Germany, Hungary and elsewhere which were supported by the non-opportunist communists who eventually established the Third International.