>>2537
>If anything, you are the one who is 'bourgeois'; being that you consider the richest people of the world to be somehow revolutionary.
First of all, I'm a Filipino, so you're a fucking dumbass and a jackass. Identification with a class doesn't determine your actual class, you fuckwit; you can be a worker that thinks you own all the money in the world, but it doesn't matter as long as you still function as a member of a relation within social production.
Second of all, your "ad hominem" comment is nothing deflection from the fact that the M-TWism disregards the proletariat of the so-called First-world, thereby stifling the development of the international revolutionary movement as a whole. Marx and Engels during their time both regarded the English proletariat as benefiting from imperialism. Does that mean that both believed that they were bourgeois and incapable of communist revolution, that they too will not benefit from the emancipation of global exploitation? No.