No.2392
I do not understand the mentality behind you all.
Why is is that you try to rely on the opposition not knowing anything of the flawed ideology that is communism, and then twist it to be something it is not? If that then fails you resort to blatant narcissism, you try to arbitrarily call the opposition barbaric and backwards. You then attempt to change the subject, trying to dodge all efforts by your opponent to engage in real argument.
You wear out the opposition rather than try to convince it of anything. Even then, if all else fails, you simply try to backtrack anything you say and call the opposition a liar for mentioning anything you previously said.
You ignore everything that is factual about your ideology and try to make it something it isn't. You ignore that communism was thought of by someone who never worked a day in his life, yet proclaim that communism is for the workers. You ignore that communism has been directly funded by those same big banking Jews that you "hate". You ignore that communism has killed and oppressed millions all in the attempt to "unite the classes", yet proclaim that communism is peaceful and supports freedom. You blame capitalism for the world's evils rather than the real problem: the international banking Jew.
These Jews work for state-funded monopolistic business, not free-market capitalism. In a free-market, there would be the state and the market. The state would be overhead, not the other way around such as it is the current state with lobbying.
The issue with all of this is you are all the puppets of these Jews. Your founder was Jewish. Their sole intent is to create ideologies that further divide so that it is easier to conquer. Communism is this ideology. There is no "true" communism, there is only Jewish communism.
No.2393
>You ignore that communism was thought of by someone who never worked a day in his life, yet proclaim that communism is for the workers.
He was a political refugee who constantly busied himself not just with reading books and writing articles, but also with organizing the working-class in every country he was in as well as working to establish an international workers' organization (such as the First International.) Implying he was lazy betrays a total ignorance of his life.
The co-founder of scientific socialism, Engels, was even more active: he actually took up arms during the 1848-49 revolutions and was an authority on military affairs for his time. He also had to manage his family's business for a time.
>You ignore that communism has been directly funded by those same big banking Jews that you "hate".
However you want to interpret "Jews," the fact is that Marxists have been consistently opposed to chauvinism. Lenin's struggle against the Bund is a case in point. The idea that "the Jews" financed the Bolsheviks is silly and not even consistent with the fact that practically every sizable bourgeois regime (from those ostensibly "Jewish-controlled" countries like the USA and UK to anti-semitic Poland and a country where Jews had no influence like Japan) tried to drown the October Revolution in blood.
>You ignore that communism has killed and oppressed millions all in the attempt to "unite the classes"
Capitalism has killed and oppressed millions, not just in the sense that the system itself allows for this, but also in the sense that the bourgeois revolutionaries of prior centuries established class dictatorships first against feudal forces in alliance with peasants and the incipient workers, and later against these same peasants and workers.
It was Nazi Germany which carried out an utterly destructive war against the Soviet Union, both for the German people and, of course, for the Slavs who the Nazis regarded as subhuman.
>yet proclaim that communism is peaceful and supports freedom.
It is quite peaceful indeed. The October Revolution itself was carried out with little bloodshed. The first few months afterwards were remarkably peaceful. It was when the imperialists decided to back counter-revolution that the Bolsheviks were obliged to resort in kind to the white terror of the bourgeoisie.
>These Jews work for state-funded monopolistic business, not free-market capitalism. In a free-market, there would be the state and the market. The state would be overhead, not the other way around such as it is the current state with lobbying.
There is no such thing as a "free market." Furthermore state intervention in capitalist economies is done to bail out the bourgeoisie, not to control it. There is no bourgeoisie under socialism; state ownership assumes the form of social ownership.
>Your founder was Jewish.
So what? Give a single example of his "Jewishness" having to do with anything.
>Their sole intent is to create ideologies that further divide so that it is easier to conquer.
I must admit, both Hitler and Mussolini were praised by a dazzling array of conservatives and liberals back in the day. Von Mises and Keynes, FDR and Churchill, and innumerable other economists, politicians, and military officials knew the real class basis of fascism and praised it for "defending European civilization" from Bolshevism. It was only when the Nazis decided to first strike west instead of east that this admiration came to a belated end.
For all your claims, fascism is a variant of bourgeois ideology. In that sense it really does fulfill the role of "further divid[ing] so that it is easier to conquer."