[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/marx/ - Marxism

Now with 2% more Hoxha

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
Click here to find out if your antivirus software sucks!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1430352358580.png (269.35 KB, 468x600, 39:50, billy.png)

 No.2460

This thread:

>>>/leftypol/166351

And this get:

>>>/leftypol/166666

 No.2461

File: 1430365452489.jpg (73.96 KB, 359x342, 359:342, Hoxha smoking.jpg)

Juan Andrade, a leader of the POUM and no friend of "Stalinists": "The anarcho-syndicalist workers had made themselves the owners of everything they collectivized; the collectives were treated as private, not social, property. Socialization, as practised by CNT unions, was no more than trade union capitalism. 'Although it wasn't immediately apparent, the economy as run by the CNT was disaster. Had it gone on like that, there would have been enormous problems later, with great disparities of wages and new social classes being formed. We also wanted to collectivize, but quite differently, so that the country's resources were administered socially, not as individual property. The sort of mentality which believes that the revolution is for the immediate benefit of a particular sector of the working class, and not for the proletariat as a whole, always surfaces in a revolution, as I realized in the first days of the war in Madrid.'"


 No.2462

>>2461

As a Leninist I can relate to that assessment of the KEKALONIA situation. My only question is: must the proletariat revolution's success be assured at any cost? If the counter revolution is to be crushed, is mandatory participation in the army or the exploitation of the workers (for the cause) acceptable (see the period of war communism in Russia)?

I believe they are acceptable, and so far I've encountered only moralistic arguments against this position from anarchists.

What do you think?!




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]