>>2721
No he is not a "Stalinist." He likes using imagery of Stalin, but only to annoy stupid people (i.e. generic anti-communists.)
"[In a 1989 compilation of works on Yugoslavia] Žižek asserts that in fact the very radicalization of the Slovene model of pluralism and its spread to other republics would save the part of the Tito legacy that actually has 'world historical significance.' By this he means the legacy of having stood up to Stalin in the Cominform dispute of 1948 and then having renounced the leading role of the party in society."
(Cox, John K. Slovenia: Evolving Loyalties. New York: Routledge. 2005. p. 64.)