Well how would you define "libertarian Marxism"?
You use a photo of the Zapatistas. The EZLN don't claim to be Marxists, and they're not exactly in a position to lead the Mexican working-class to overthrow the exploitation of man by man. Their struggle for indigenous rights is noble, but it is not sufficient.
And it does not help that the EZLN's non-Marxist ideology leads them into silly positions. For example, "In 1994, it was reported that the leader of the Zapatista rebels in Mexico, Subcommander Marcos said that 'he expects the United States to support the Zapatistas once US intelligence agencies are convinced the movement is not influenced by Cubans or Russians.' 'Finally,' Marcos said, 'they are going to conclude that this is a Mexican problem, with just and true causes.' Yet for many years, the United States has been providing the Mexican military with all the training and tools needed to kill Marcos' followers and, most likely, before long, Marcos himself."
Post last edited at