[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/mental/ - Mental Health, Illnesses and Disorders

An anonymous virtual psychiatric hospital where the inmates run the asylum.

Catalog

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


This board will not take the place of a mental healthcare professional and should not be used as one.

Any and all posts asking for a diagnosis, advice on medication, or anything else that only your doctor is qualified to make judgments on will be locked immediately.

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 1-800-273-8255

England Samaritans Hotline: 08457 909090

Mental Health Matters UK: 0800 107 0160

File: 1454925288462.jpg (43.85 KB, 720x720, 1:1, 1453334827354.jpg)

 No.12700

So I was researching the negative effects of social isolation, and I noticed that a lot of articles liked to act like social isolation is exclusively involuntary (such as prison or experiments) or the symptom of an anxiety related mental disorder.

I'm socially isolated, and I'm neither in prison, nor do I have any anxiety disorders, and I felt like writing why I choose to be alone before I go to bed. And i thought it'd be funny to share it with all of you and see what you think.

I'm probably going to crosspost this on other boards.

"reasons for my voluntary social isolation

i cannot relate to normies' simplistic philosophies and general motives for doing what they do. normies hand-wave philosophical issues off by conveniently pointing at their Christianity (even though they neither attend church or open the bible, ever) or answer grand questions with simple answers, such as "because tradition". This leads me to believe that normies don't engage in deep thought and have no individualism, and disgusts me.

normies do not desire deep interpersonal connections that i do, and are in fact disturbed at the idea. as a result, normies are unwilling to share any details of their personal lives, ensuring no one in their social circle will ever go beyond an acquaintance

normies have never shown me any genuine emotional response to anything ever, leading me to believe their emotions are quite dulled and also further supporting the "no desire for interpersonal connections" theory

if normies do not desire interpersonal connections and are not emotionally responsive, then what do they crave in a relationship?

They crave hand-outs and someone to kill the time with. They use everyone near for pathetic indulgences; when they are bored of staring at their television sets, that is when they will call someone up to give them a ride to do [something].

I have no desire to be their plaything. I would be their friend but they don't want a friend, they want an alternative to the telly; mindless passage of the time. I am not the answer to their boredom.

i cannot financially afford to be a "friend". "friend"-having requires a lot of cash. normies cannot be sated with conversation, because again, they don't want friends. they want a bullshit partner to join them at the casino or wherever, in part because it is not "socially acceptable" to do anything out of the house solo, not even to eat.

normies have little to no interest in anything beyond fads. which, even then their knowledge of fads is slim on average. they may play whatever video game is hip for that year or watch whatever television series is popular that season, but should you question them on the subject of the recent fad they are a part of, you will get no answers.

normies do not pursue hobbies. they only consume and forget and move on to the next fad.

their lack of interests, combined with their refusal to speak about so-called private matters, and seeming incapacity to think of greater meaning through philosophy, equals zero conversational topics.

normies have no desire for self-improvement and would actively impede my own.

apart from the very rare exercise addict normie, normies do not strive for physical perfection by any means, nor do they educate themselves (and actually laugh at the idea of pursuing knowledge outside of school).

no, their thrill seeking indulgent lifestyles have no time to waste dieting or reading something longer than a tweet. Maybe this entry will change if body building somehow becomes the next mainstream fad.

on a greater scale, normies are uncaring towards their long-term physical condition. if something poses little immediate negative effects to their well-being, they will do it. this includes smoking, driving wrecklessly, over-drinking, overeating, juvenile heroics (fighting, showing off), etcetera, etcetera.

in conclusion, being friends with a normie isn't only impossible, it's also hazardous to your health and your wallet should you choose to waste time with them."

 No.12702

File: 1454949747529.jpg (146.81 KB, 726x590, 363:295, wut.jpg)

Damn son, you think like I did when I was 14.

Rationalize it however you want. Truth of the matter is that you are the defect here, not them. Wouldn't be called a disorder if you weren't now would it? Best advice is to come to terms with that and cope in whatever way suits you best and if you wish to isolate yourself, that's fine(Personally, I can't stand the idea of living with someone and modern civilization drives me nuts so somewhere alone and quiet is desirable), but this kind of arrogant high and mighty snark will only worsen things for you.

In my experience, the best medicine for constantly being upset with everyone else is learning to forgive them when they are wrong and learn to forgive yourself when you are wrong. If you hold onto this bitter attitude towards everyone, it isn't gonna make things any easier or better for you.

>normies do not desire deep interpersonal connections that i do, and are in fact disturbed at the idea. as a result, normies are unwilling to share any details of their personal lives, ensuring no one in their social circle will ever go beyond an acquaintance

There's a time and place for everything in a conversation. It's simply taboo to meet someone just yesterday and then come up to them and tell them your whole life story. Building a friendship with someone is just that: building. It takes time and tactics. Easier for most people as most have social tact as an instinct rather than having to learn parts of it(or even the whole deal) manually. Often those who have to learn the hard way will end up having to fake things, but if the ends are desirable than the means of faking are justifiable.

>normies have never shown me any genuine emotional response to anything ever, leading me to believe their emotions are quite dulled and also further supporting the "no desire for interpersonal connections" theory

How can you know they aren't genuine? You're making assumptions just to fit your own rationale. Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. You can't know unless you know every single in and out about human social behaviors…and most folks don't.

>i cannot financially afford to be a "friend". "friend"-having requires a lot of cash. normies cannot be sated with conversation, because again, they don't want friends. they want a bullshit partner to join them at the casino or wherever, in part because it is not "socially acceptable" to do anything out of the house solo, not even to eat.

This right here tells me you really haven't met all that many people. What's that phrase, again? That you should never judge a book by its cover. All these things you say play off to me like that of someone watching from the outside without truly knowing what's going on. People like to have fun with eachother and sometimes that entails forking out some cash. Not always, though. For instance, you can play a game of DnD with only some pencils and paper. The most fun weekends I've had were simple ones like that and guess what? "shocker!" these were all friends, some more well known than others, but I knew them. And here's another shocker: They work 9-5 blue collar jobs, they went to school or are going to a university, they get up in the morning and go to bed at night and they have responsibilities. What's that sound like to you? Is that a 'normie?'

On the outside, if I never knew these people, they'd be as plain as day as anyone else. But getting to know them has allowed me to see that such an appearance is only a cover and they are all rather different and hardly boring.

To put things short, your view of the world is heavily flawed. Yes, there are materialistic assholes out there. Yes, most average people will seem boring on the outside. Yes, many will likely shun you in some way if you open up too much with them. But on the other side of things, if you have patience, if you learn to know the people you want to know, and if you have a good understanding of how social circles work even if it doesn't come to you naturally, you will find that there are many interesting and agreeable people out there. The common denominator is you and the sooner you come to accept that, the sooner you can work towards making things better for yourself. Learning all this isn't gonna be an overnight thing and neither should you study it scrupulously, you just have to come to know it slowly.


 No.12705

>>12702

OP and you aren't wrong or right. There are a lot of shitty normalfags out there.


 No.12736

>normies do not desire deep interpersonal connections that i do, and are in fact disturbed at the idea. as a result, normies are unwilling to share any details of their personal lives, ensuring no one in their social circle will ever go beyond an acquaintance

Stopped reading there. If someone pukes a whining like this, I immediately recognise them as selfish self-proclaimed pseudointellectuals who only want others to take interest in them and their "deep inner worlds", and they don't give a crap about others' deepest thoughts and emotions.

Also, your perspective of "normies" indicates of narrowmindenss and smugness.


 No.12752

You must keep in mind OP, that everyone seems stupid to everyone else especially if you are not very social and have bad social skills.

The normies are stupid, sure, because they have been conditioned to be that way by society and education and TV, but not every social person has to be necessarily like them.

You just seem like a big, self-absorbed fedora wearing hobosexual OP, no offense, but that is the truth.


 No.12759

File: 1456642868401.png (36.43 KB, 300x241, 300:241, image.png)

>>12700

Did you have real friends in the past? Sadly I think I had more real friends in middle school through early high school. People would open up to you about their feelings, and we all had creative streaks. We would get together with a camcorder to make stupid skits, we would read each others' fiction, we we would read the same science fiction, and we would go on camping trips and outings together while making lots of jokes.

Then I got older. I'm nearly thirty now and my friends are gone, or have turned into people I don't recognize or want much to do with. We don't sleep over at each others' houses, or play pretend for sport because we're playing pretend when we talk. Our conversations are, "How've you been? How's the wife? The job?"

No one seems alive, no one seems worth knowing. No one reads, no one draws, no one talks about their inner worlds because they probably don't have them anymore. My so-called friends have been bitten by zombies, and the worse part is I feel myself becoming just as boring as them. If my more vibrant younger self met me today, he wouldn't want anything to do with me. So how can I call myself superior to the other drones?

I can't help you, but I think it's part of growing up. Either you make friends with younger people who can make you feel alive, and who can share the innane teenage drama you won't even care about, or you accept that aging means losing your old sense of humor and identity and becoming as cranky as grandpa when he talks about taxes and surgery.


 No.12798

>>12759

good post


 No.12808

>>12702

>Truth of the matter is that you are the defect here, not them. Wouldn't be called a disorder if you weren't now would it?

I'm not OP but that's a pretty stupid thing to say. Being different, abnormal doesn't necessarily mean you are a defect! And the only reason to care about a so-called disorder is if it negatively affects your quality of life. If you're happy, why should you give a shit that you have a disorder? Who decides what's a disorder anyway?


 No.12809

>>12808

>Who decides what's a disorder anyway?

Trained professionals. I'd put more stock in their opinion than some person who's just cranky with life and trying to cast the blame upon everyone else when they are the common denominator.

>Being different, abnormal doesn't necessarily mean you are a defect!

If a screw doesn't fit in a machine its intended to fit into, it's defective. Likewise, if a person can't really exist as people are generally expected to, they are defective(or, as psychologists call it, disordered.)

Being 'different' is perfectly fine so long as you can still function normally when needed. Much how you can paint a car to your liking, but that doesn't hinder its function. If you decided to replace the snow tires on the car with slicks in winter because you 'like it that way', then there is a problem.

No, there is something definitely wrong with OP's view of the world and it is indeed unhealthy upon them and potentially others.

>And the only reason to care about a so-called disorder is if it negatively affects your quality of life.

And if it affects those around you. Caring solely about what makes you happy without thinking of long term consequences upon everyone else is selfish and egotistic. And honestly, I'd think that anyone who claims to have a disorder and 'love having it' is merely faking it for a dumblr-tier special snowflake status. Some come with odd benefits, but more often than not they are awful and wreak havoc on the sufferer and/or everyone else around them.


 No.12814

>>12702

The irony of this post is that by assuming the position of moral superiority, it is you who looks like a smug asshole, not OP.

>>12809

>muh profeshunuls!!!

>considers divorcing, accruing debt, and throwing ones health down the drain to be the gold standard of behavior, by which all other behaviors are judged.

I really dislike you.


 No.12815

File: 1458181583629.jpg (76.73 KB, 403x498, 403:498, 1412636841670.jpg)

>>12814

>The irony of this post is that by assuming the position of moral superiority, it is you who looks like a smug asshole, not OP.

That's fine. Go on, be a rebel, but don't whine when you're staring down the grave you made for yourself.

>>muh profeshunuls!!!

That's a lovely and convenient way of rejecting things that disagree with your outlook because you don't like them.

>I really dislike you.

I didn't expect any less from someone who holds such opinions. Typical. Frankly, I really dislike the people who think of mental disorders as nothing more than quirkiness or out-of-the ordinary behavior that makes one a snowflake rather than the terrible and debilitating things they really are. They shouldn't be something to be proud of, that's like being proud of being an amputee because you have one less limb than most everyone else even though in reality, you're at a disadvantage.

Again, feel free to try and push that boulder over a hill, Sisyphus, but don't complain when the same results happen over and over. Go against the grain and the grain will go against you. If that's what you find satisfaction in, then I see no reason to complain other than out of hypocrisy. If it isn't, then it is you who is the problem, not everyone else. Is it always the case that someone is to blame for their problems? No as it can be involuntary as is the case with mental disorders, but that doesn't make it any less disorderly and neither is it a sort of 'get out of jail free' card.


 No.12817

>>12815

Thats a mighty lot of verbiage you've got going on, shame you forgot to address the meat of my argument.

>Go against the grain and the grain will go against you.

Good! Resistance is thrilling. Society is shaped and moulded by people who aren't afraid to go against the grain, in case you aren't aware. A person isn't automatically defective just because they don't fit into the shit sandwich machine known as modern society.

Maybe I'll replace dislike with pity. It must be a miserable existence, being a consensus based 'thinker'. I wake up every day thankful I don't have to derive my happiness from the approval of others.


 No.12818

File: 1458194567271.jpg (189.21 KB, 750x601, 750:601, KjMlTIu.jpg)

>>12817

>Society is shaped and moulded by people who aren't afraid to go against the grain, in case you aren't aware.

I'd say it's destroyed. I'd say that such a line of thought is the very thing that leads to chaos, disorganization, and turns man back into a beast. But whatever.

>It must be a miserable existence

Actually, having a solid foundation with no compromise, a life with structure, is quite satisfying. Much more satisfying than the days when I was constantly trying to be something I'm not just for the sake of feeling like I mattered. I care very little for frivolity. I don't need your pity because I don't value it and there is nothing from that lifestyle which I find desirable.

You think you're different for being a rebel? You think you're unique for pushing against? lol the world is filled with people like you and because of that, one could even say that you aren't the rebellious ones at all anymore.

Enjoy this mindset while you can, because it can and will bite you in the ass someday.


 No.12820

>>12809

>Trained professionals.

Trained professionals who once thought homosexuality was a mental illness but then changed their mind when it became more socially acceptable to be gay. Trained professionals who diagnose vivacious boys with attention deficit disorder and give them medication that fucks their brain chemistry up. Their opinion is worthless.

>If a screw doesn't fit in a machine its intended to fit into, it's defective.

The screw is fine, it's the machine that's defective.

>Likewise, if a person can't really exist like people are generally expected to, they are defective(or, as psychologists call it, disordered.)

That's just the point of view of society, which is not even an actual entity. Only the individual is real. Most people can't exist as how people expect them to, so according to your logic, most people are defective, but then if that's the norm, it invalidates the premise.

>Being 'different' is perfectly fine so long as you can still function normally when needed.

Human beings are not tools that only exist to serve some vague function required of them by society.

>And if it affects those around you. Caring solely about what makes you happy without thinking of long term consequences upon everyone else is selfish and egotistic.

Nobody thinks about how his behaviour is going to affect others in the long term.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]