>>8698>>8699The question to ask here is "Why be happy" but rather "Why not be happy?"
>I think that assuming that we can in fact find true happiness is a huge assumption that is not necessarily actually true. Personally, I think a much simpler explanation is that it is just evolutionarily advantageous for a species to always be unsatisfied and to always be searching for more food, more sex and more territory. On the contrary, happiness is the reward for finding such things. For humans it is a bit different since we are actually able to think in depth and question our nature, but happiness is basically a reward chemical. I'm not a biologist, but that is the way I have heard it summed up.
Sadness, disappointment, despair. All of that seems like something to remind us of the price of failure. I see such negative things as responses to evolutionary failure as opposed to a drive to do good. The problem here is also that these emotions are 'addicting' in a crude sense as they affect your logical thought process and make you think as if there is no point in getting out of it.
>Also, there is the question of why should one strive to be happy in the first place? Many people dedicate themselves to causes that bring them material pain. Why shouldn't others dedicate themselves to causes that cause them mental trauma as well? Why should one strive to be satisfied with one's actions?The people who subject themselves to physical pain, I assume you are talking about people who practice self harm(there is also asceticism, but I don't think that is what you are implying), do it because they hate themselves at first but bleeding can actually release endorphins causing a temporary 'feel-good' mental state. Mental trauma could cause physical pleasure but not emotional pleasure, if that makes sense. In any sense, it isn't necessarily a good thing as it is purely decadent. It is called self 'harm' for a reason. As for why should one be satisfied, I ask you again; why shouldn't they?
>Also, is obtaining true happiness a good thing? If one obtains true happiness might one then stop trying to change the world around him to be a better place?They might, but not if making the world a better place is what makes them happy. And, as surprising as it may seem, a lot of people find making a difference to be great thing to give their life meaning.
>Is true happiness actually something important to value over other motives such as justice or is it something that's only a nice to have and not really that important in the grand scheme of things?What motivates justice? A sense of right and wrong, correct? Bringing justice makes those who agree with the right decision happy. If there was no happiness in such decisions, the idea of justice would be obsolete. Almost everything people do stems from both emotion and reasoning, sometimes one side being more influential than the other.
It seems that you are looking at things in a one-sided worldview. Have you ever taken a moment to consider alternatives to this sort of outlook you have? I'm not talking glance over them, be actually greatly consider other alternatives. Those alternatives have to exist for a reason, if they didn't, that would just be silly would it not.
Besides, the fact that you are talking with someone who has found meaning, kind of disproves the idea that everyone is lying to themselves if they claim to have found meaning. Do you think me a liar? Do you think I would go to such lengths to defend a lie? Think about these things.
To summarize my thoughts: Why "not" be happy?