>>9479
>It was pushed out of the DSM because people realized that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. It's a sexual preference.
If that is so, then how can you say
>Homosexuality isn't just what you want to fuck. It's who you fall in love with. It's who you identify with. It's not just in your dick. It's in your mind.
? How can someone fall in love with someone who they cannot reproduce with? If love and attraction is purely something of the mind, then how can it be healthy to love something or someone in that manner? Now this leads to a bunch of philosophical questions on what love really is, but if it is nothing more than some chemicals flying around in your brain, then what is the biological purpose for loving someone of the same sex?
>So all racial minorities should get skin surgery to look white too, Adolf?
If a race is a minority in a country, they should respect the laws and traditions of the majority. That doesn't mean they should get plastic surgery or anything crazy like that, but they shouldn't have the audacity to demand society change for them. If they do not like the idea of being a minority, then they should find some place where they aren't and leave everyone else in peace.
>Literally no you can't. You'll just be repressing it.
Yeah, you can. If you can't go out in public without talking about how much you love sucking cocks and making the fact that you are homosexual the most important thing in your life, then there is an issue. You don't have to be flamboyant, it is plenty possible to be modest. Unfortunately society as a whole is already far too revolved around sex so I don't see any of that changing anytime soon be it gay or straight. There is more to life than orgasms yet people can't see past that. But that is something else entirely.
>Promiscuous homosexual men. Ones who fuck in public bathrooms. That doesn't represent the majority.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/facts/
>You mean like dehumanizing an entire minority group, or several minority groups as you're doing? Can't imagine why that would upset someone.
You could say the minorities begging to change the way the majority functions is dehumanizing. Like I said before, if you are a minority somewhere, you should respect the systems and structures the majority has in place. I wouldn't expect India to change all of their signs to perfect English and have all of their TV shows to include white characters just because I feel I don't fit in if I decided to live there. I don't see why any other minority group would expect the same. Simply put, if they don't like being a minority, then find a place where they are a majority.
>If someone trying to make THEMSELVES comfortable and live their ow life offends you, here's a suggestion: mind your own fucking business and you won't be bothered by it. It has nothing to do with you, you selfish asshole.
They may not intend for it to have anything to do with me, but the fact of the matter is that it does bother me. If everyone simply minded their own business and did not watch over their fellow man like you advised, society would be pure, hedonistic chaos.
>But that blatantly IS hurting people. Having sex with a dead person is a violation of that person's body, and having sex with an animal is rape. Every single time. It's not a valid comparison. Consensual homosexual sex is neither rape nor violation of a body that can no longer consent due to not breathing. You're grasping at straws.
But what happens when someone argues that the dead body no longer has feelings or emotions and thus it is harmless? What if they say that it is no different than having sex with an inanimate object? Then what do you say?
>>9480
>What does this even mean?
That means you can be a homosexual, but it doesn't mean you should dress up in skimpy leather and walk down the street in it in a pride parade. Being a homosexual doesn't mean you can't be a decent person.
>You can't argue that bestiality is not hurting animals since they don't have the capability to consent to sex on a same level a normal human adult can. And necrophilia has to first get past the entire concept of where one would find a dead body to have sex with in the first place. And even in a dystopian SJW world I can't see anyone advocating for legalization of murdering people so they can have sex with their corpses.
Fair point about bestiality. I was wrong to say that. As for finding a dead body, it is surprisingly easy. Morgues exist. Grave yards are everywhere. I wasn't implying murdering people to have sex with them, but rather just finding dead bodies in general.
>>9481
Not socially.