/meta/ - 8chan Discussion

>>73292

working link to thread

>>>/boards/5573

drama :(

>caring about drama between ERP boards where the only posters are neckbeards in skirts and tutu's

lmao kidd

I like this female drama meme

This doesn't seem to prove anything. What are you on about OP and why should I care?

>>73319

They are division cucks with a hardon for screwing with boards.

There has been a lot of this hit recently, all over 8chan. They got told to fuck of on >>>/boards/ so dividecuck comes here to start shit.

SRS? On my 8chan? It's more likely than you think.

>>73319

Basically /beauty/ is pulling some SRS-style shit on this website. /beauty/ shat all over another board (/tradfem/) until the owner left and /beauty/ has taken ownership of /tradfem/ and changed it. They are likely involved in other subversive activity here too.

They made this thread on an outside chan

https://lolcow.farm/pt/res/51609.html

some choice quotes

>"I'm actually worried about other girl boards. They seem to be trying to drive off all girl boards in their quest to piss off Swami. The owners of /beauty/ haven't been around in a few days and I'm hoping these cunts haven't driven them off. They have two threads that seem like stabs at them."

>"If you open two tabs and put /tradfem/ in one and /beauty/ in the other in catalog view /tradfem/ is blatantly trying to rip off the board by creating the same topics but the only difference is that they make theirs pretentious and all about how wrong everyone else is for not being like them. The fuck is their problem? This board is like a hybrid of /cgl/, /beauty/, and /christian/."

>"yeah and she's kissing major ass in /beauty/. she acts like its her job to keep the board she doesn't own alive, shilled /tradfem/ CONSTANTLY just a little while ago and got bitchy when she was called out on it. bitch you dont own the board, you have your own and yet all you do is live on someone else's.

>why the fuck is she posting there anyway? she hates what the owners wanted /beauty/ to be about. she doesnt want to accept all women. bitch is fucking obsessive."

Just be aware that there are people manipulating the community here for some reason and it's not just the big boards. Screwing with girl boards is just an obvious segment of the community for SRS-types to start with. If you are familiar at all with SRS tactics this won't seem that foreign to you.

Some background:

The two owners of /beauty/ were tripfags on 4chan's girl board, /cgl/. They created /beauty/ on 8chan at the end of 2014.

Here are is lots of information on how SRS operates, through deflection and taking over online communities:

http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/search?q=%22take+over%22&restrict_sr=on

>SRS stands for ShitRedditSays and is the main subreddit of the "fempire" on Reddit. For those who don't know how that site works, Reddit is basically a collection of forums (subreddits) with a karma system that works across the entire site. SRS started as a place where people would post offensive or stupid quotes from the rest of Reddit, so that people could laugh, sigh or froth at them. It quickly became populated by overly sensitive social justice warriors, who proceeded to moderate the place in the draconian fashion you would expect from people with the Right Opinions. Disagreeing with the popular opinion, or defending quotes that were taken out of context or not that bad (breaking the jerk, as they call it) will net you a ban.

>That wouldn't really be so bad (people can run their sycophantic forums however they like, after all), except that SRS has a habit of going after the people who offend them. They regularly invade the threads that get quoted, shouting at and downvoting people they disagree with. This is technically against the rules of Reddit, but the admins seem reluctant to do anything about it. What you end up with is a constant, one-directional spray of shit.

>They also have a collection of other subreddits that they call the Fempire, like SRSDiscussion (which will STILL ban you for disagreeing with them), SRSFunny (which is anything but), SRSWomen (the place to go if you want to hear that you're always right) and SRSMen (the place to self-flagellate). They are also very aggressive about trying to take over other subreddits (like petitioning for moderation of abandoned subs). I'm not sure I buy that they're the ones who keep whining about /pol/ here on /q/, but I wouldn't put it past them.

from http://4chandata.org/q/What-is-SRS-a569604

Here is a post they made on /tradfem/ on a thread asking how ultra-feminists have started to ruin things (the premise of this board was a place for traditional femininity aka not a feminist glorifying circlejerk)

>No, I don't because contrary to what everyone who simply sits online and neglects to go outside believes, I barely run into SJWs or radfems or ultra lefts. In fact, the only place I see SJWs are at college (which is to be expected) and nobody likes them anyway. These people don't have power over you as an individual unless you allow them to do so. Maybe if people stopped with the goobergate propaganda they'd realize this.

So, you might not care about girl board politics but this is actually more insidious than some organic interboard drama. They had been creating the girl board drama themselves. Don't trust /beauty/- they are outsiders up to no good. If this is SRS at work, and it has the hallmarks of it, this type of subversion will continue until this place is SRS-infested.

If you are exceedingly curious or bored here are some chronicles of /beauty/'s campaign against /tradfem/ and to a lesser extent, /girltalk/. You'll see that initially they gave /tradfem/ a very warm welcome, this is part of the manipulation.

http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/3998/

http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/4201/

http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/68629/

>>73355

And to show a little more here is the thread about the "replacement board" for /tradfem/ they created during the interim 2 week period when the /tradfem/ owner left before board claims was possible.

http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/5658/

>>73353

>>73354

>>73355

>>73357

archived all links:

https://archive.is/x7JtJ - https://lolcow.farm/pt/res/51609.html

https://archive.is/6HN7l - http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/search?q=%22take+over%22&restrict_sr=on

https://archive.is/VPY8q - http://4chandata.org/q/What-is-SRS-a569604

https://archive.is/iU1bj - http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/3998/

https://archive.is/WpFN2 - http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/4201/

https://archive.is/YuZPq - http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/68629/

https://archive.is/2FDSc - http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/5658/

Also last night this thread was slid because you're not supposed to see it.

Right after these sage posts:

>>73319

>>77321

Nonsense oneliner posts in succession on this otherwise slow board:

>>73311

>>73313

>>73315

>>73317

>>73318

>>73320

>>73323

>>73325

>>73327

>>73330

>>73331

Check timestamps :^)

Here are some SRS tactics compiled by SRS monster boss troll Laurelai. To get a sense of the mentality of SRS.

https://archive.is/WQw8a / http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/comments/2tjeh5/47_hilarious_antitroll_tips_from_laurelai/

Interesting

Using this thread to respond to >>>/boards/7385 because I don't want to bloat up the thread there.

Oh, sure, that possibility definitely occurred to me. In fact, it's the first thing that occurred to me, what with the recently rekindled antagonizing that started in /tradfem/ (most notably in the old sticky that is now deleted) and /girltalk/ one day before this thread came up.

But the reality of the situation is, on a site like this one, their power is only dependent on how much we allow the fire to spread, as well as if we spread the fire ourselves. The old owner is gone, they succeeded in that. The only thing to gain now is from provoking people and perhaps convincing people that the previous owner was in fact trying to start shit. The latter doesn't mean much anymore. So they would essentially need us to act out. If people choose to do otherwise and the /tradfem/ board goes on as normal, then all they can do is laugh at the /tradfem/ community because they think lowly of them (which, speaking of, it's ridiculous what people consider to be lolcow material these days, they'll basically grasp at anything). And who would that speak more poorly on?

So the basic key is to just ignore people who are being overtly provocative and belligerent, regardless of what side they're on. After the owner left, I warned that whoever those people were who were causing trouble would begin to play on both sides because it would be easier to be found out if they didn't. In the thread about /orchid/, the board that sprung up after the /tradfem/ owner left, that's exactly what happened. At this point, they might even stoop to fighting with themselves.

And if they did take over /tradfem/ (or any other girl board, for that matter), it doesn't mean much. If the community is restored and is run in the same way it was before, there's nothing for them to gain unless if they decide to nuke the board in the future, which would just mean that the re-established community would migrate to another board. The same idea applies to if they try to change the board drastically and people don't like it. They'll just stop going to the board.

TL;DR: Don't worry too much. They only really have the upper hand if people react too passionately. But that's only under the circumstance that the new owners are trolls at all. There's still the possibility that they're not.

>>73380

Thought I should also add that I'm not entirely convinced that /beauty/ is behind all of the drama. Clearly there isn't enough to strongly suggest that they are so the fact that the idea keeps getting pushed is fishy.

And even if they were, it doesn't really matter. Everything I said in my previous post still applies.

>>73381

Thanks for your lucid thoughts on the matter. Everything you said is absolutely correct, except- I know for a fact that /beauty/ is behind this. And I know that they keep track/profile the posters on their board(s). So they will continue do the same on /tradfem/. Given that they seem to oppose the idea behind /tradfem/ I would be wary of posting anything even remotely personal on that board (or posting there at all, but that is up to everyone's own discretion).

Once again you are otherwise correct and very wise, and you can make what you will of the aforementioned information.

But the larger issue here is the fact that they are engaging in SRS-alike behavior as seen in other internet communities. Whether or not they truly are apart of SRS is unknown to me, but all the signs are pointing to yes. Whatever happens in the future on this chan, remember this thread and factor it into your considerations.

Found another instance of /beauty/ screwing with the female community, per the old BO:

>The new owner deleted 5 pages of threads on makeup and fashion and replaced them with her own threads on unrelated topics.

http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/69757/

Noticing a pattern here?

>>73386

And, as revealed in that thread, the two current /beauty/ owners actually took over /beauty/ after it had already been established... hmm... who else likes to take over online communities?

Anddd note the same reaction images used in both of these threads:

http://8archive.moe/boards/thread/5658/

http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/69757/

I like how convenient it is for female drama to come up when female boards start recovering. Seem so automatic, as if someone is constantly watching any kind of progress and suddenly smash it down.

Does anyone else see a pattern?

Anyone remember the pause of this shit from the first tradfem drama to this one?

>>73407

The only girl board this implicates is /beauty/. The other active girl boards aren't implicated in this whatsoever. /beauty/ is on the decline anyway, before any of this was exposed. It does look like SRS activity has been going on sourced from /beauty/ board administration.

The only patterns I see are /beauty/ chasing off, alienating, or funnelling the small girl population here towards their own board, through takeovers of other boards or bullying campaigns.

>>73408

My question is, why did it just happen out of the blue in the girltalk thread? Nothing was happening after the first meta post, then all of a sudden tradfem is under new ownership, then the drama starts again. This seem like someone is just watching for any moment to start drama.

>>73409

I had been active on both /beauty/ and /tradfem/ for several months. I saw the drama as it was going down and noticed strange things going on. When /tradfem/ got new ownership the new posts harkened back to the earlier shitflinging at /tradfem/ which just served to reinforce the idea that /beauty/ had been the source of the drama to begin with. Based on the evidence in this thread it looks like that was a correct hunch all along. But hey, participate in any board you want. I'm convinced that there is some weird subversive crap going on with /beauty/ admins though.

Known boards they've taken over and "revamped":

/beauty/

/femininity/

/tradfem/

They created /orchid/ to "replace" /tradfem/. Who knows what else they have been behind.

>>73410

I do see something off, but it's more about how this drama occurs. Nothing was happening to these boards before /fem/ started to decline in IP's. Part of the drama was swami's doing but at the same time others started getting involved in pointing fingers and erecting false flags (That /i/ screencap). Now, these board have sparse user bases and might as well be considered dead. Nothing arose until /tradfem/ got a new owner and what sparked in /girltalk/ thread on /boards/. Now we have a /meta/ thread, putting the snail pace board of /beauty/ on blast. It's too convenient to me.

>>73353

Here's a question no one has asked: So /beauty/ is run by ex 4chan /cgl/ posters who have talked mad shit about 4chan /cgl/ and its posters. How come that thread on lolcow, which is populated by 4chan /cgl/ posters, was so focused on insulting /tradfem/ and saying they talk shit about /cgl/ while /beauty/ does this regularly. /beauty/ does look suspicious here.

The lolcow thread in question https://archive.is/x7JtJ

Some of /beauty/ talking down on /cgl/

http://8archive.moe/beauty/thread/288/#928

http://8archive.moe/beauty/thread/288/#1276

>>73412

Never thought I'd say this but Swami looks more trustworthy than the /beauty/ trips. /Fem/ has been dead for over a month pretty sure. I don't think Swami is involved here, except he/she took a lot of heat during the drama which it's now looking like was misplaced.

>>73414

OK another really weird thing from that lolcow thread

This post

--------

>>56511

>try to post in no poo thread

>talking to op

>this tardfem bitch replying to me and >spamming every goddamned thread

Bitch can you not

--------

How do they know who the /tradfem/ owner is unless that is a /beauty/ board admin and they are keeping track of the /tradfem/ owner's ip hash? This is the no poo thread mentioned

http://8ch.net/beauty/res/760.html

That is fucking sketchy.

>>73414

I remember hearing that /cgl/ was really just a bunch of shallow whores when I use to post on 4chan /v/. I'm pretty sure if that was the case then everyone on /cgl would be talking shit at and with each other.

>>73415

>Never thought I'd say this but Swami looks more trustworthy than the /beauty/ trips.

Swami's shitposting on any board s/he felt like posting makes it impossible to see that as true. Misplaced at some points but like I said others got involved and it turned into a clouded mess.

>>73416

Small boards make it easy to notice certain posters even when you're not BO and even more so when there is flags enabled. From looking at the old posts, Netherlands was the tradfem poster.

>>73418

My point being that there isn't any mention of how /beauty/ are ex 4chan bitches or anything as petty as what was levelled at /tradfem/. They seem insulated from the insults for some strange reason.

>>73418

There could be several Netherlands posters though. How could it be known that that one was /tradfem/ owner?

Oh, weird, ponfarr is a lolcow regular

http://8archive.moe/beauty/thread/288/#1126

That is just truly shocking. If /beauty/ was as friendly towards /tradfem/ as they pretended to be and supportive of the grill board community why didn't they speak out against the shitflinging that they had to have seen at this other board they frequent?

Another thing is it appears that they didn't add /tradfem/ to the grill board ring until /tradfem/ specifically asked, despite adding other grill boards, and then removed it quickly when the owner abandoned it despite leaving on the long dead and abandoned /grills/. There is plenty of sketchy circumstantial evidence that /beauty/ has been working against /tradfem/ in weird petty ways.

To underscore all this it really doesn't matter about the particulars here, it just seems like FUCKING SRS IS IN OUR MIDST UNDETECTED.

>>73419

>They seem insulated from the insults for some strange reason.

There was one about them doormats near the end there, so I'm not sure they would be excused by this lolcow board for anything they do.

>There could be several Netherlands posters though.

She identified herself before it seems

>>73420

All femanons run away here don't they

Also

These two post are strange

http://8ch.net/beauty/res/288.html#q824

http://8ch.net/beauty/res/288.html#q821

Why was she deleting here posts about /tradfem/ and posting again?

>>73422

>There was one about them doormats

You're so right, that is definitely on the same tier as the rest of the thread. Silly me! Couldn't have been /beauty/ then.

>She identified herself before it seems

What's your point? only the board owners could know that it was the same poster. There could be multiple Netherlands posters as has already been pointed out.

>Why was she deleting here posts about /tradfem/ and posting again?

Are you serious? this is explained

>>>/beauty/826

She was correcting a post or something. Doesn't seem like a big fucking deal. Nice of /beauty/'s owners to let that dialogue go down without defending /tradfem/ though. And

>>>/beauty/824

looks like a friendly, quality post to me. What are you trying to say here? All I see is piss-poor moderation on /beauty/'s part, at best allowing another grill board to get shat on, at worst, doing the shitting themselves.

>>73423

>She was correcting a post or something. Doesn't seem like a big fucking deal. Nice of /beauty/'s owners to let that dialogue go down without defending /tradfem/ though. And

>looks like a friendly, quality post to me. What are you trying to say here? All I see is piss-poor moderation on /beauty/'s part, at best allowing another grill board to get shat on, at worst, doing the shitting themselves.

Shilling your board on someone's board constantly is rude you know?

>There could be multiple Netherlands posters as has already been pointed out.

How often do you see Netherlander post? What? Was a good portion of the users from Netherlands?

>You're so right, that is definitely on the same tier as the rest of the thread. Silly me! Couldn't have been /beauty/ then.

I'm just trying to take every detail in before a witch hunt starts, push more users off, then all of a sudden more drama occurs later on.

>>73424

>Shilling your board on someone's board constantly is rude you know?

Based on what you showed me it looks like it was mentioned on purpose two times. And the second time was within the context of this post which doesn't look particularly shill-y at all, and actually looks like positive crossboard community participation

>>>/beauty/821

And on a chan like this it makes sense to mention a related board. I don't see your point.

>How often do you see Netherlander post? What? Was a good portion of the users from Netherlands?

How the hell would I know? Only the /beauty/ board owners could know this. Do you?

>I'm just trying to take every detail in before a witch hunt starts

Yeah, a comment about the /beauty/ owners being doormats is some kind of backhanded compliment about how sweet they are, something that they would post about themselves trying to absolve possible blame, not surprising as they frequently seem to tripfag about not wanting drama which is exactly what they start on the down low. There is no witch hunt, /beauty/ has been screwing with the other grill boards and even posting on other chans to drum up drama.

It's already been pointed out that the takeover of /femininity/ reeked of SRS strategy here, and that /beauty/ owners didn't even create their board but TOOK IT OVER like SRS always does.

http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/69757/

>>73425

How odd, the rest of that thread

>>>/beauty/288

has posts mentioning lots of other boards, but only /tradfem/ posts are considered shilling. Oh my!

d640d0, are you trying to say that the bullying campaign against /tradfem/ was justified because /tradfem/ was mentioned on the board? Doesn't really hold up.

These petty details are boring; the important thing to walk away from this with is that

/beauty/ is SRS

or at least acts a whole lot like them!

>>73426

>meant to address 219a01, not myself

>>73425

>Based on what you showed me it looks like it was mentioned on purpose two times. And the second time was within the context of this post which doesn't look particularly shill-y at all, and actually looks like positive crossboard community participation

What's funny is that no one else on the board called out the Anon stating that /tradfem/ owner deletes then posts in the thread again and again. Why was there no response from any other user?

>There is no witch hunt, /beauty/ has been screwing with the other grill boards and even posting on other chans to drum up drama.

Sounds like you're calling them to be put to the torch very much, but your posts say you aren't even 100% sure.

>It's already been pointed out that the takeover of /femininity/ reeked of SRS strategy here, and that /beauty/ owners didn't even create their board but TOOK IT OVER like SRS always does.

So claiming boards is SRS?

>>73426

>has posts mentioning lots of other boards, but only /tradfem/ posts are considered shilling. Oh my!

/baph/ wanted to check on what was going on during the time and linked the thread talking about Swami.

/lgbt/ owner only identified him/herself to discuss about being in the threads you dismissed being on /cgl/ http://8ch.net/beauty/res/288.html#q943

The only board I see that wants users to come over is /tradfem/

>These petty details are boring

You really don't want to look into this fully, huh?

>>73429

I like how you just ignored me.

This looks important.

>>73463

It really isn't.

Looking at this wide awake now, it's just an internet catfight that of a few femanons that became a show for seagulls. If anything, they were trying to grab boards to get on each others nerves.

>>73497

I really like these abuse of ID's

>>73501

Please refer to

>>73497

>>73503

Please refer to these

d640d0

8f7519

e8b4f0

f2bab2

cfb41e

288dfc

>>73505

Those are IDs in this thread. ???

/beauty/ is SRS, long live girl anons

>>73506

They are ID's in this thread

All your ID's.

>/beauty/ is SRS, long live girl anons

Why are you trying to throw your argument now? You were doing good.

>>73507

My id is 219a01. Are you ignoring the information in this thread? You seem defensive and not at all impartial. Based on what I've seen /beauty/ has been employing SRS kinds of subterfuge. That's my opinion, you can have your own opinion too.

>>73508

Oh yeah, and 219a01

I forgot that one too :^)

Face it me, you just love to stir shit.

>>73509

"Face it me, you just love to stir shit

Weird that you are telling yourself this, freudian slip lol.

>>73510

Just having some fun in this femanon drama thread

>>73508

>Are you ignoring the information in this thread?

I haven't, I've been arguing with you since >>73407 you are just tagging on the SRS label on female board to explain what (in your argument) happened during the /fem/ drama time period. You switch between ID's to make it look like there are multiple anons discussing this when really it's just you. When you were 8f7519 you switched over to d640d0 to save your argument and continue the narrative that /beauty/ is an SRS board. You will soon soon change ID to argue this smear campaign more.

>That's my opinion, you can have your own opinion too.

Nice way of saying you're running out of things to say

>>73511

There is information in this thread, anons will read it and come to their own interpretations. You should probably talk about what is postulated here instead of trying to attack posters. It discredits your position.

It's mentioned in this thread

http://8archive.moe/meta/thread/69757/

how the behavior looked like SRS even back then, and by now the evidence has mounted even more so. Call it what you want.

/beauty/ looks particular strange in light of all this evidence. Other anons can make their own choices and post there, contribute there, this thread isn't calling for any kind of action that I can tell. It's just a compilation of information.

>>73514

>You should probably talk about what is postulated here instead of trying to attack posters

You mean discussion? Is it attacking when someone disagrees with an opinion?

>Other anons can make their own choices and post there, contribute there, this thread isn't calling for any kind of action that I can tell. It's just a compilation of information.

Except it is calling for action.

SRS isn't welcomed here, so the only reaction to come from this is to bring /beauty/ down and continue attacks until the owner leaves.

>>73516

Why are you talking to yourself?

>>73517

Why are you saging a discussion? Why are you saying that because SRS is not welcome, calling attention to SRS type behavior should not be allowed? Why are you claiming that everyone else is samefagging?

>>73518

>Why are you saging a discussion? Why are you saying that because SRS is not welcome, calling attention to SRS type behavior should not be allowed? Why are you claiming that everyone else is samefagging?

Because this whole thread stinks of a false flag. The more you post, the more I'm convinced that you're not a femanon that is concern about the female community.

>>73517

>>73519

It's typical of SRS to accuse others of doing just what they do. You should think about how transparent it would be if someone were to do this.

The facts are in this thread. Archives don't lie.

>>73520

>It's typical of SRS to accuse others of doing just what they do.

You're arguments falling apart

>You should think about how transparent it would be if someone were to do this

It's very transparent that you're cornering yourself

>>73521

I don't understand what you are trying to say. The well-meaning /girltalk/ and /tradfem/ owners were chased away by these trolls. Now you are saying that this thread, which is bringing attention to who these trolls were, was created to do that to /beauty/. That is deflection and twisting of the truth just like SRS would do and has done.

If you aren't bothered or suspicious of this,

>>73416

I find it very hard to believe that you are a neutral party.

And again, you are trying to discredit ME rather than the points I am making, which discredits you.

>>73382

Okay, okay.

Let's take what you're saying and roll with it. Let's assume that it's all true and /beauty/ is behind all of this, SRS even.

What can be done about it? Nothing. Can we chase out the /beauty/ owners? No. People could try to shit up /beauty/, but all that would happen is that they would catch wind of it and enable CAPTCHAs and post limits. Who is behind it exactly doesn't matter. So pointing fingers is meaningless and only inflates the problem. What could SRS do with a couple of girl boards that struggle to get anywhere over three posts a day, anyway?

I'm pretty sure at this point that you're just trying to spread the fire, as I suspected when you first responded to me in the /tradfem/ thread, but I figured this was a decent message to anyone just reading this stuff and is genuinely concerned. And switching ID's doesn't make it any more believable since no more than one or two people would sincerely waste their time with all of that information-gathering because it's boring shit.

>>73522

>>73521

I know that this whole situation is ridiculous, and I'm assuming you think so too, but this isn't helping. I'm sure you can find something more entertaining to do rather than bumping up this thread.

>>73523

It seems better to be acknowledge that subterfuge is going on than to ignore it, but okay anon.. Whatever the postulations here are, as someone who has posted on /beauty/ in the past I feel weird about this >>73416

>>73523

I just like to banter and was waiting for this guy to slip up.

>>73522

>And again, you are trying to discredit ME rather than the points I am making, which discredits you.

Double standard edge argument you have there.

>The well-meaning /girltalk/ and /tradfem/ owners were chased away by these trolls. Now you are saying that this thread, which is bringing attention to who these trolls were, was created to do that to /beauty/.

It really is by the whole

>LOOK LOOK, /beauty/ is SRS!

>but that's just my opinion

Again, people can read the archives earlier in the thread and form their own opinions. There is nothing here to suggest anyone wants a call to action. It's more to point out that the earlier drama was not between native femanons, but some kind of drama pushing group or individual, who went to great lengths to push out others, and overtake the ruins left behind. If you don't see why it's important to be aware of outside forces trying to manipulate an online community then I can't help you.

>>73525

Oh, my mistake. I figured you were both ID's and was trying to make a point or shit up the thread so that people would leave it alone. I misread. You saged all of your posts so you weren't actually bumping up the thread directly .

is there literally no consolidated female populace on the internet that isnt a bunch of insane pro-bullying rad-dykes?

>>73563

Just browse and form your own conclusions. If there actually is something bad going on, on these tiny boards, such is the structure of 8chan that you can move to a new board. At any rate I don't see a shred of conclusive evidence that /beauty/ is up to anything.

I'm starting to hate all of this shitty board drama. My opinion on it is it is bad for 8chan. It is just so easy to smear other boards. An easy way to damage a board for example is to spam an ad for it, reply with several IPs calling the board bad. Before long the board has a bad rep.

:(

SRS sounds like a gay place.

Trust a tripfag: not even once. The beauty board owners manipulated small boards and stalked users but how are they part of srs? They could just be crazy bitches. Don't make it a conspiracy when there isn't one. Hilarious that they got away with fucking with femanons for so long though.

>>>/beauty/928

So they left 4chan /cgl/ because of seagull drama and came to 8chan to powertrip and bring seagull bully culture here? For what purpose? How damaged can you be?

>>73416

>insane seagulls from 4/cgl/ go through all this effort to monopolize a subset of a mongolian cartoon image board and get caught

topkek

Holy shit this explains a lot about the girl board thread a while back and someone there claiming there shouldn't be more than 1 or 2 girl boards on 8chan. /Beauty/ wanted to keep a monopoly on girl posters like they can't post on multiple boards at once or something. You are why we can't have nice things.

Jesus wept, women are fucking toxic sometimes.

ITT: All me

>>73798 (same)

Disregard this.

>click on the IDs of every "user" posting in support of this bullshit

>see that they only post a few times each and never come back, and NEVER overlap with each other

>notice that every single one writes the same way too

You really are one sad sack of shit, OP. You are easily the most reaching, most pathetic, and most undeniably butthurt person I have ever come across in my time browsing the internet.

But keep posting these threads, please, keep doing damage control, keep making up shit, keep switching that IP. I'm sure someone will take the bait if you spam it enough. Meanwhile I'll be laughing at you along with everyone else.

>>73841

Anyone can plant "evidence" and then pin it on someone else later.

The reality is, not enough people buy this story for it to take off. When you keep "digging" for information and keep bringing it up even though it means almost nothing, you start to look obsessive and not credible. You can say that you're having fun trying to start a little drama but if this is your idea of fun, maybe you should get some therapy. Or just a real hobby.

>>73842

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>73809

There's been a general increase in SJW faggots lately so this is relevant to my interests.

Sit down and shut the fuck up.

>>73563

Functional women don't spend all day on the internet, so no. Traditional women are inherently disadvantaged in that regard.

>>73956

What about Lobitah?

>>73956

never stick your dick in /cgl/

>>73956

Got a link of derpqueen's camwhore page?

>>73292

Bitches couldn't leave well enough alone.

>>73292

Has anyone looked at their trip activity on cuckchan archives?

Women can be quite scary. Its like a catfight .

So that tripfag ponfarr who owns /beauty/ went ahead and did a boardwipe on >>>/tradfem/

Wasn't enough that they chased out the userbase and original owner and then took ownership

RIP

>>74188

word of advice, archive everything:

https://archive.is/VUGCD <-- index

https://archive.is/bRkRo <-- catalog

The only two threads that appear to be there:

https://archive.is/avWMl <-- #253

https://archive.is/INilB <-- #385

>>74188

/beauty/ itself just got nuked.

What would that mean?

>>74194

/beauty/ index:

https://archive.is/pfGJG

/beauty/ catalog:

https://archive.is/WbEdT

>>74195

I... don't think that helps much at the moment other than letting us know it's been nuked, anon.

>>74196

It will be preserved forever so that no one will be able to doubt.

>>74198

Well okay, but what I really want to know is, why NOW of all times was it nuked?

/beauty/ index (updated): https://archive.is/lgHSS

>>>/beauty/1734 https://archive.is/Q90mo

>>>/beauty/1732 https://archive.is/ScFm5

>>74201

Honey... please.

Goddamnit all I wanted was one fucking board to learn make-up, hair and some lifestyle tips from, and these fucking cows messed it up.

>>73296

>people get off from posting about being a girl going about her life

jesus christ how horrifying

Is this why the new mod of /girltalk/ is so ban happy? I got the impression the original BO wanted the place to be relatively unmoderated but the new mods ban for anything they perceive as rude. The moderation over there is hardly "chill" like it says in the sticky. They should probably just take that line out entirely.

>>74474

It's also interesting to me that /girltalk/ has not been involved in any of this drama since the original BO was chased out and it came under new ownership. I wonder if it's not being targeted for a smear campaign because SRS is already in control of it? Just an idea.

This is fucking retarded, the beauty board owners never caused any drama. In contrary the drama left them to leave the chans all together, not take over tradfem you retards

>>74486

The /beauty/ BO talked in her vocaroo when she left about how she suspected it was the tradfem owner causing the drama. I have nothing to substantiate this but with everyone pointing fingers, maybe it was an outside group or individual. Swami or SRS seem likely? Or maybe SRS has absolutely nothing to do with how any of the boards are actually run and they just started this thread and all the other drama threads to drive away even more female posters from 8chan so that this site will better reflect their narrative of being a woman-hating cesspool of misogyny.

>>74487

It definitely was /beauty/. I have my sources, and am grill on 8chan, so I was paying attention to the female boards while the shitstorm carried out. I don't think SRS or an outside group is involved. It boils down to an attention starved female who happens to go on 8chan skype and tox groups and try to build a social life around being an 8chan tripfag.

Look around at these posts on lolcow & here and decide for yourself

>>73353

>>73416

>>73420

At this point it really doesn't matter because Ponfarr destroyed both /beauty/ and /tradfem/ and had already killed /femininity/ dead months ago through a nuke there because I guess she felt that it would be competition for /beauty/ somehow. Even though she made posts on /beauty/ after nuking it to try and pull in some other posters besides herself, after playing the boardnuke drama/sympathy card and posting a 13 (!) minute whiny vocaroo on /monster/ (?) of all places, displaying her borderline personality disorder and continuing to whinge for attention. I guess she is getting what she wanted since she is still being talked about, though, and apparently is involved with other board owners to the extent of being able to convince them to leave their boards when she left her own.

Anyway, between all the boards she has fucked with (/fem/ included...), she has pretty much decimated the female community on 8chan, which at one time was actually a thing, and made the remaining girls pretty distrustful of boards designed for girls. This kind of behaviour from a dedicated and power hungry person is what kills the 8chan.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ THE INTERNET, LOL

>>74530

>she has pretty much decimated the female community on 8chan, which at one time was actually a thing, and made the remaining girls pretty distrustful of boards designed for girls.

/girltalk/ is still as active as it ever was, though. There just aren't any alternative/competitive boards anymore. It's a shame because more alternatives are always a good thing, but if the moderation gets too controlling for people to stand on /girltalk/ everyone will probably migrate somewhere else, like what happened the first time around on /fem/.

scroll down and see how much white space there is at the bottom

mfw SRS tried killing /fem/ with /i/ and /baphomet/ and you goys fell for it

shows how easily manipulated 'trolls' are :^(

>>76475

it was /intl/ all along

>>76475

>SRS killed swami's board

I am OK with this :^)

>>76475

>mfw your board is deeeeeeeeeead

:^)

ponfarr started a new board >>>/chanel/

beware the drama beast

>>76633

I thought she gave up on it all.

>>76476

>>76477

>>76501

>>76633

>>76634

mfw i came out on top

queen swami

queen alpha bitch swami

i own everything

i am a goddess

>>76901

you're the most talented shitposter I know tbh

>>76901

I haven't seen onne of your posts inm ages, good to see that you're still here

>>74530

> I have my sources

At least SAY what your sources are if you're gonna go that route, jesus.

/tradfem/ and /beauty/ are back up

never forget faggots