/metatech/ - /tech/ Meta Discussion

There's quite a bit of cross site activity over on >>>/cyber/ here and lainchain. Some of the people running that site have come over here to respond to criticism.

They see the insane hostility here and they want none of it, it's normal. If they allow open discussion of racial issues they're going to get professional paid shitposters there trying to tear the community apart. It's a valid fear, free speech on the internet brings with it big issues.

This isn't really related to /tech/ though

>18 global rules

Not really

>Think, learn, listen, read.

>/all shows you popular threads, try out /random.

Aren't rules.

There's only about 5 actual rules.

>>693

>If they allow open discussion of racial issues they're going to get professional paid shitposters there trying to tear the community apart

Don't mean that, I mean the kind of retards you get around here who think "kike" = "/pol/tard spreading FUD".

I missed 4/n/, but I'm pretty sure that actual Stormfrontfags were never real. They sure as hell aren't here or on lainchan.

>>697

>There's only about 5 actual rules.

There's definitely more than that, even some of them are just other rules clarified or rephrased.

>>693

>>699

>If they allow open discussion of racial issues they're going to get professional paid shitposters there trying to tear the community apart. It's a valid fear, free speech on the internet brings with it big issues.

>implying they want open discussions of racial issues

>implying it's not a chan filled with anarchists who don't see racial issues

>>700

>taking that image seriously

Oh man, you've never been to half/pol/ or Stormfront have you?

Firstly, late 2012/2013 is went the stormfag maymay took off because of the Brievik trial and the attempts of SRS to take over 4chan (and get /pol/ deleted) via /q/; and secondly, Stormfront's moderation and userbase despise 4chan because of /b/ raids. Almost all of them are out of touch, and only a small minority of them actually came to /pol/, and only after /pol/ went to them. BUGSers (the mantra people) have never been active on 4chan.

>>703

that pic shows a lot more sources and proof than you atm.

>>704

It doesn't even date the threads themselves. If you're new and don't know that I'm telling the truth, that's fine, but you shouldn't be taking that at face value value when it's intentionally misrepresenting the truth.

Try out the thing at the bottom of the image yourself if you don't believe me. You'll see threads locked by mods, an understanding of 4chan that doesn't go beyond /b/, some /pol/acks going there and getting a harsh reception, and a very small amount of users announcing they're moving to /pol/ because Stormfront is a shit hole full of feds.

The allegation that BUGS has been active either here or on 4chan is utter nonsense, and has never been proven. You'd see a thread in the forum if that were the case.

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/f214/

>>699

Oddly enough they were real on 4/n/ back in the day but were a such a rare sight everybody was glad to have an open discussion with some of their younger members on the few occasions that they showed up and were able to bring their perspective about news articles pertaining to legal issues about holocaust denial/revisionism or freedom of speech laws on the internet, something they're at the forefront of generally. This was back when /n/ was about discussing current events and nothing more, their participation in the discussion was welcomed.

They aren't allowed to discuss holocaust denial/revisionism on Stormfront and never were by the way, they're very strict about following European laws when it comes to prohibited matter that gets posted there. It's the reason why that forum isn't banned in any European country asides from Italy. They've willingly made themselves unaccessible to German users to protect them from persecution from the government and some search indexes in France were forced to remove the site and some ISPs here and there block it but that's about it.

You can tell someone isn't from Stormfront if they use racial epithets or post inflammatory material like that happy merchant comic. It's not allowed on their site and never will be, anon imageboards they've always considered a crass and disgusting area of the internet that is filled with pornography and inhabited by the mentally ill, most of their members are old people that don't get image board culture at all. There are so few of these people who interact on other sites openly around that practically nobody that isn't heavily involved in internet culture will ever meet a real one.

>>706

Thanks, that's really interesting.

>>706

they don't use the merchant stuff and revisionist stuff on their forum because that would cause them trouble

they do use it on other sites.

don't try to claim they are not revisionist and they don't hate jews

>>706

they don't use the merchant stuff and revisionist stuff on their forum because that would cause them trouble

they do use it on other sites.

don't try to claim they are not revisionist and they don't hate jews

>>708

>they do use it on other sites.

Just give it up, they aren't here and they sure as hell didn't start merchant edits and the like.

>>710

He made it seem like they don't and that they are not revisionists, because citing their site-wide policy has no use unless you try to claim that their members adopt that policy, even when visiting other sites.

I just responded to that.

>>711

>He made it seem like they don't and that they are not revisionists, because citing their site-wide policy has no use unless you try to claim that their members adopt that policy, even when visiting other sites.

Personally, I've never seen much there except for "anti-racist is code for anti-white" and such.

Why do you care what they think about Jews and the Holocaust? They aren't here, and we're not there.

>>712

I don't, unless they try to manipulate us.

but I checked that swarmfront subforum and at first sight they don't seem to be very interested in us, so I don't care.

>>713

the fact that they have an entire subforum dedicated to 'swarming' public fora shows that shills are real and that it's not only coming from three letter agencies

anyways..

>>711

I said they were not allowed to discuss certain issues on that site for legal reasons, I never implied that they weren't revisionists or didn't discuss it elsewhere where it is allowed. I clearly mentioned that they were welcomed on /n/ and were able to have open and frank discussions about it so I have no idea where you got that.

When you take a truly neutral view of this issue it's crazy how quickly people will start putting words in your mouth because it doesn't fit their preconceived notions. You might be convinced that they enjoy going to other sites and causing trouble by standing out but everyone knows that it's generally trolls that do this. Those that try to spread pro-white propaganda don't waste their time either preaching to the choir or to people that will flat out reject their message when they use racial slurs or offensive images.

Kalyx is half-black, is anti-gun and a macfag.

What more do you want to know? What more do you need to know?

>>724

>anti-gun

source?

>>724

>anti-gun

I have never heard of this before.

Before IcanFLY went power crazy and they kicked him, kalyx went shooting with him at a range in Texas.

kalyx is half-black, but unless you are racist, does that really matter? Have you heard him speak? I have, because I use both Lainchan and 8chan. His voice is magnificent, and he sounds more cultured than any fuck. As for using a Mac, he does, but he also uses free software, and is willing to talk to people about why he uses a Mac, as long as they aren’t rude about it.

The downside to him is that he changes his mind on things sometimes.

>>732

>His voice is magnificent

wew

>>742

Ah, vola. Ok.

>he sounds normal

I beg to differ. As I may alluded to prior, I believe that he has a voice that is pleasing to hear.

I agree slightly on the guns thing. I asked him about it. It seems more complex than him being nogunz.

"i think its reasonable to have a shotgun in the house, or rifles on a farm, a pistol when traveling long distances or camping. I also think walking around with a gun on your hip to go grocery shopping is ridiculous and says more about the state of our culture than anything else."

>>746

>carrying guns to the grocery store is irresponsible

>pro-gun

pick one

>>748

he said its irresponsible, he never said your irresponsible choice should be restricted.

>>750

Neither pistols or grocery stores as we know them existed in what are considered the middle ages. Also, wearing pistols is cool because it makes us look like cowboys.

>>751

>Neither pistols or grocery stores as we know them existed in what are considered the middle ages.

Actually, now that I think of it further, restriction of weapons to nobility was a hallmark of the middle ages, with mass ownership of guns started as a direct rejection of that system. And grocery stores represent the shift to a thriving middle class that undermined the economics of feudalism.

So taking guns to the grocery stores is definitively a "beyond the middle ages" activity. We'd need to say we're beyond the ages that come immediately after the middle ages for the argument to make sense.

>spawn of a mudshark runs lainchan

lainchan is a perfect example of the festering and disgusting weakness of modern youth

it's better than any parody and I couldn't do a better job with it if I went full method on a character

what a disgusting decadent world

>>750

It isn't much difficult to understand what he meant once you actually read the whole discussion, with "reforming the system" he is talking about stuff unrelated to guns. Being for freedom means that you are for allowing stuff you disagree with and that your behaviour shouldn't be based on what society, through its laws, says is or isn't ok to do. That's why you have people fighting for your rights even if you are retards who can't even comprehend such basic statements.