58a002 No.2162
Can we permaban Swami? She's worse than Quentin in every single way and she wastes dubs.
29ffff No.2163
just stop replying and he will go away.
i seriously cant understand why most of you are incapable of not replying to tripfags. They always use a name so it should be easy to completely disregard anything they say. Instead you feed them attention like as if thats going to make them go away.
e5e866 No.2164
861fe5 No.2165
swami is actually the most benign shitposter because he isnt very good at trolling in general. It's so unsubtle that only complete idiots (most of /v/) get baited. The worst shitposters are the ones that do shit like derail decent vidya threads with autistic /pol/ or anti/pol/ shit thats guarenteed to trigger someone and replies relentlessly to themselves, all while anonymous.
tripcode filter when, hotwheels?
5fe191 No.3277
>>2165>tripcode filter when, hotwheels?this
Swami should still be permabanned though
bf9b2f No.3286
You can't permaban someone from a chan. It's the easiest shit in the world to get a new IP and resume shitposting.
828e10 No.3310
>>2163>>2164/v/ has a really fucking bad problem with this. MetaV is the perfect indication with people defending sage bombing of certain threads because they say they're "Shit."
People really fucking need to learn to hide content that offends them to the point of shitposting.
db919b No.3315
Swami is the current board owner of /v/, so no, we can't.
d59431 No.3329
>Permabanning somebody simply because you A.) can't ignore them, and B.) you don't like them.
Wow OP, were you by any chance a mod over on this hip and trendy site called 4chan by any chance?
b7e6db No.3337
>>3329>defending a rampant shitposter>defending shitposting>defending swamiI can't begin to imagine how someone this monumentally fucking stupid, can remember to breathe.
8ae500 No.3371
>>3286Are there such things as banned names and shit like on halfchan? Because there was a time when putting "Klony" or any new variation that Klonies came up with, AND (if I recall correctly) his trip, would yield an instant ban. Sure, it didn't ban him, but he had to constantly come up with new names (and trips).
d59431 No.3376
>>3337I hope you never come into a position of power, unless of course it's on 4chan where the doit4frees like you belong.
dd91f9 No.3402
>>2162IDK man, I find it way easier to troll her, plus you can just post her nudes and she normally fucks off.
I'd fuck her if I knew she was cleanObviously it's a problem, but really it's quite minor, seriously we should be petitioning for support of features that /chlomo/ has.
https://www.chlomo.org/chan/chloe/index.htmlLook at that fucking place.
29ffff No.3403
>>3402>implying a literal exhibitionist cares about having nudes leaked b96d5f No.4509
>>3315I thought you were going to put Teridax in charge
I'm calling nintendo
80216a No.4510
as owner of /v/, owner of 8chan, and queen alpha bitch owner of /fem/
i declare this thread
BAD
e5e866 No.4511
>>4510I agree.
(ps, ban me swami if you're really board owner of /v/)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) cf45de No.4512
Is there a way to set a board to autoban people that reply to swami? It would be nice if she could work as a mobile retard filter.
80216a No.4513
>>4512uhhh, i'll message hotwheels on twitter to add recursive filtering and to remove stubs
i agree, it's really annoying when people derail when they reply to me
b96d5f No.4514
>>4510Give that role to teridax you bitch
he deserves it more
Unlike /fem/, /gg/ is avtually a great board with quality posts
I didn't vote for you
2209cb No.4515
>Swami
>Mod
I hope fucking not, I liked that texan living with his mother much better.
f37958 No.4527
You guys realize Swami is Bui right?
6311a4 No.4542
For the record, I have kinda grown to tolerate swami because she's so fucking harmless. The reason why threads derail is because they shitpost in response to her. Yes, tripfagging is bad form, but swami is entertaining.