File: 1424111245925.png (84.76 KB, 855x471, 285:157, 2015-02-16 16_21_50-_v_ - ….png)
4de981 No.3481[Last 50 Posts]
There's a clear difference between complain about /v/'s moderations (not even specifically about /v/'s moderation) and openly criticizing /v/'s moderation. That's one unnecessary ban, and if that's how you're rolling, you're no different from half chan's moderation.
https://8ch.net/v/res/2246937.html 4de981 No.3484
Also, your volunteer made a really good job of not letting me warn people on that thread about this one.
and, for disclosure, I'm not the one that was banned on /v/
265844 No.3485
>>3484send people where nobody will cause any uproar just like how plebbit admins/mods do it.
Seriously needs hotwheels attention.
7d8a1d No.3486
>>3481>>3484>don't like a game that's being discussed>sage it and cry about shills nonstop>wonder why the board quality is so shit now.Go back to cuckchan, you're clearly a second exodus faggot that just wants to shitpost.
bd7857 No.3487
This is beginning to reek of deflection and really needs a better solution. I wholeheartedly agree with OP.
218568 No.3488
>>3485>needs hotwheels attentionthats not how 8chan works.
4de981 No.3489
>>3486what the fuck you're talking about?
71afd2 No.3490
I feel like the faggots who keep crying that fullchan is gonna become le reddit or halfchan are likely just the dregs of this fucking board. The most autistic, angry, lonely faggots that this board has to offer, they've been banned from everywhere else on the Internet and this is their last haven, and they hate 8chan taking steps to cull their shitposting habits.
Basically, fuck off forever, faggot.
027e18 No.3491
>>3489Guess what: nobody fucking cares about 8chan, nobody is being paid to shill here. You're just a faggot who reports games he doesn't like, gets banned, and goes WHY THE FUCK DID I GET BANNED I KNOW I'LL POST IT AGAIN
bd7857 No.3492
>>3485The Emperor does not interfere in the affairs of individual boards. Not even to save them from themselves.
The solution, assuming no secession board is founded (rather premature in my opinion), will need to come from Mark, or possibly another Volunteer with more authority.
71afd2 No.3494
>>3492The board is headed in a good direction. Shitposters are being dealt with and faggots like OP are whining. It's a good sign.
7d8a1d No.3495
>>3489>post pic of getting banned because you're contributing to the MUH SHILLS persecution complex that arrived with second exodus stormkikes, that same kind of process that has effectively destroyed discussion on /pol/>can't be bothered to do what the first fucking post on the board says, which is to hide threads you don't like>complain that the board is shitYou are the reason why /v/ has turned to shit.
Now call me a shill and be done with it, cunt. That's the only retort your Shitposting kind ever has.
9d3b0d No.3496
I have no problem with Blue banning stupid faggots who don't read the rules, nor with their threads getting locked or deleted. If you don't like it, make your own board with your own rules.
265844 No.3497
>>3494>good sign cause muh hugbox is being created 902c41 No.3498
>>3496>Don't like it, make your own board!Yeah nah, you're a dense cunt.
bd7857 No.3499
>>3491Bullshit. Globalization makes it trivially easy to hire a veritable army of people from around the world for a day and turn them loose.
8776fc No.3500
>>3498>i don't wanna shitpost in my own board 7d8a1d No.3501
>>3497>b-b-b-but I'm not shitposting I swear!Try harder. Tell me why you can't be bothered to hide threads you don't like and instead report posts that don't break any rules simply because they're posting about games you don't like.
bd7857 No.3502
>>3494This specific time, it was not headed in a good direction. Overall? I can't ague with you, I don't have enough data, even anecdotally.
71afd2 No.3503
>>3497Good sign because people whose only purpose is to derail discussion and jerk off about things that aren't vidya are being DEALT WITH.
Stay mad you butthurt faggot, I hope you get perma'd the next time you post some dumb shit.
265844 No.3504
>>3496>make well established board>go on a power trip and ban shit you don't like>tell people who don't "listen and believe" to make their own board when it will probably get cleaned up later for no posts. 8776fc No.3505
>>3501>>3503you forgot your sage
7d8a1d No.3506
>>3504>being this buttmad that they have to resort to strawman tactics 265844 No.3507
>>3503>not vidya related>not realizing this is the same excuse plebbit ahd cuckchat mods use for censorship.Stay loving those do it for free mods for hotpockets.
265844 No.3508
fd58a6 No.3509
>>3504>no postsbecause you're the only one who's mad.
7d8a1d No.3510
>>3505Nah, I think that the world should see these kinds of cunts get completely BTFO, no need to sage.
5e5b5a No.3511
Can someone post pics or links to the posts that he reported for shilling?
71afd2 No.3512
>>3507You've just repeated "PLBBIT AND CUCKCHAN" over and over again, do you actually expect anyone to take you seriously?
>>3505Thanks anon, my bad.
bd7857 No.3513
File: 1424112303247.png (7.47 MB, 2559x1919, 2559:1919, A Key, A Rose, An Unfound ….png)
>>3507This bit is true as well.
4de981 No.3514
>>3495>>3491Here's the thing.I never ever, for a minute, thought about shills. I was only thinking about power hunger mods. And then you come here using the s-word, for no reason whatsoever.
It seems we have our own shills here. And they do a pretty poor job of hiding themselves. Why would you shill in the /v/ board, I have no fucking clue why youre doing this, but here we are.
265844 No.3515
O look the do it for free mods deleted criticism again.
7d8a1d No.3516
>>3508Yeses, Anita is here just to make you booty blasted! You've discovered their latest plan! Good job, anon! You should go tell the world by going to /v/ and saging vidya threads while screaming shill! That'll show them!
71afd2 No.3517
>>3514>I never ever... thought about shills>two sentences later>It seems we have our own shills here.Fuck, you can't write this shit.
027e18 No.3518
>>3512>You've just repeated "PLBBIT AND CUCKCHAN" over and over again, do you actually expect anyone to take you seriously? This should be a fucking /v/ banner.
fd58a6 No.3519
>>3511its the dota thread, i think.
8776fc No.3520
>>3515>criticism>deleted because you're shitposting on games you don't likejust fuck off
ba5d4b No.3521
>>3514People are assuming you're the guy who got banned, I think.
d44086 No.3522
I don't undertand why the people who like the heavy forum-like moderation and on-topic didn't just stay on halfchan which is the perfect place for them.
bd7857 No.3523
File: 1424112446894.png (548.23 KB, 1280x851, 1280:851, A Little Time-Lapse Magic ….png)
>>3519Nah, the Valve thread.
4de981 No.3524
Also, great job responding to this thread, Mark. You sure took your time to justify your censorship on /v/, but nothing about talking on the place it supposedly belongs.
71afd2 No.3525
>>3522Some people hate halfchan for other reasons, maybe? The captchas, Jewt, etc?
265844 No.3526
>mods delete discussion on main boards and direct to here
>mods and their boyfriends come on here and defend their shitty moderation
8776fc No.3527
>>3522you just keep repeating the same shit over and over
>y du peepuhl liek boards that delete shitposingbecause you're shitposting
bd7857 No.3528
>>3521Isn't he? Either way it's an issue I think needs to be addressed.
71afd2 No.3529
>>3526>i've been BTFO'd repeatedly by multiple different IDs>what do i do?!?!?>u guys are gay xD>i showed them :) 7d8a1d No.3530
>>3514>first thread showed the post you were banned for, even post it here>it's the same kind of incessant Shitposting about MUH SHILLS that's been running rampant on /v/ since second exodus cunts came by and couldn't read the fucking rules post>huuuurrrr why are you even talking bout dem shills?????>u must be a shill!!!Put some effort into it, stormkike.
d44086 No.3531
>>3527You just call it "shitposting" to make it seem bad. It's a known tactic.
7bc490 No.3532
>>3481You see, the difference it's that criticism in /v/ goes here, not on /v/ itself.
I don't know if you're dumb or something, but the rules are established.
dbf33e No.3533
>>3524>shitposting is just a buzzwordJesus christ.
Where are you faggots coming from?
7d8a1d No.3536
>>3533They're the same group that ruined cuckchan and then couldn't figure out there were alternatives until jewt cuckd them off of half/pol/.
bd7857 No.3537
>>3532But that just shunts it off into a side ally, almost surely to never be seen again (even by most of the Vols, if they don't feel like dealing with it). I think it a flawed solution, overall. A sticky would be much better.
7d8a1d No.3540
>>3539
>implying you don't use the exact same tactics as cucks from the second exodus
>implying you've even tried to reply to anything I've posted
>implying you haven't been making strawman this who,e thread to justify blatant Shitposting
:3
265844 No.3541
>>3533>>3536
>faggots like you love hugboxessay we are the ones from cuckchan. Very ironic
4de981 No.3542
>>3517You're either too stupid to know basic reading comprehension or you're intentionally missing the point.
>>3521>>3528No, I'm not. In the Op's pic thread, I was the one who warned people about this very thread. That's my ID.
>>3530>stormkikewhy are you calling me a stormfag? where did I posted anti-semite remarks? or you're just trying to demoralize me for no (apparent) reason?
>>3532The first OP's pic os not a criticism per say, its just someone trashtalking a mod. and if you're not prepared to get trashtalked in 8chan, you're not ready to be a mod on any *chan. The second one was a criticism, and that's why I started this thread.
265844 No.3543
say people are shitposting as your only argument.
>MUH strawman
Don't realize who is strawmaning here you fucktard.
8776fc No.3544
>>3531probably because you were fucking ruining a thread you didn't like
4de981 No.3545
Shill this, shill that.
Where is the fucking board owner?
b3fccf No.3547
>OP explicitly stated he wasn't the one that was banned.
>meta-faggots shit up the thread with "lol u mad cuz u banned" anyway
The trolling quality here makes /b/ look like a well organized and civil debate at times.
>/v/ volunteers in charge of quality control on ANY board, much less their own meta board
7d8a1d No.3548
>>3542It's because stormkikes are the ones that will cry shill nonstop like its a legitimate tactic while also denouncing kike tactics, not realizing that they're unironically using like tactics themselves, ergo, they are stormkikes and have ruined real natsoc discussion on /pol/.
If you don't want to be associated with such fools then you need to stop acting like them and using their tactics. It's that simple.
5e5b5a No.3550
>>3523I'm in that thread right now. Did he report those people for shilling, and request that they get banned, just because they were defending Valve?
7d8a1d No.3551
Stop, you've already been btfo by numerous IDs and you you haven't even bothered to reply to them, you're just embarrassing yourself now. :)
ba5d4b No.3552
mark/blue pls
bd7857 No.3553
>>3545Based on my considerably smaller experience with /v/ (second exodus fag here), he doesn't come to even /v/ all that often. Not as often as he should, at any rate.
He's also supposedly IRL friends with the Emperor, but you can't exactly expect Hotwheels to crawl in a bunker and avoid all social contact. So, nothing to be done about that, I suppose.
8776fc No.3554
>>3550even if you defend valve
there seriously no fucking reason in reporting, you'll just get btfo
bd7857 No.3557
>>3550Reported for shilling, not sure about the request of a ban, however.
To be fair, at least one was acting remarkably shill-like. I arrived in the thread after conversation was well under way. Forgive me, but I just don't have the free time to read threads already a hundred replies in before responding. The thread might be auto-saging before I'd get a word in edge-wise.
f33fac No.3558
>>3481OP, why didn't you post the ban time as well? You sat and spammed reports for everyone who disagreed with you. Your entire post history is literally 'Fuck off, shill' or "Shills are in this thread". If all you want to do is talk about how everyone is a shill, I think giving you a 30 minute ban to redirect you to /metav/ so that you can pinpoint the shill volunteer conspiracy that's facing /v/ was a fair thing to do.
Now you've got your conversation started and people are able to chime in. Do we have marketing shills on /v/? Yes, but only 1 out of 1000 threads is a legitimate "shill" marketer. Those threads are dealt with. There's a difference between a fan and a marketer and you know what, people are allowed to have different opinions on the games that they play or don't play.
Spamming the report queue everyday with 50 reports just saying "shill", doesn't mean those people are actually shills.
You got a 30 minute timeout so that you could come here and talk about this shit with me and the other users who frequent the board. Calm the fuck down.
0ef73a No.3559
>>3484>make meta bitching thread on the main board instead of the meta bitching board>bitch about it getting locked and getting redirected to the right boardholy autism, batman
d44086 No.3560
>>3558What about the chairs.
Why are gaming chairs not allowed.
95f548 No.3563
>>3560the chair thing is a completely different thread and person
d44086 No.3564
>>3563But it was still deleted because the mods didn't like it.
521ca9 No.3566
>>3558Regardless he's ban evading now and you and I both know that ban evading is a perma no matter what. He's probably some foolz idiot who wants to make the board hate 8chan.
>>3560Is that even a real thing? What's next, gaming gloves and gaming glasses?
521ca9 No.3568
>>3564No it was deleted because it was AGAINST THE RULES YOU DENSE FUCK
d44086 No.3569
ba5d4b No.3570
>>3568But was the day ban really necessary? I don't think the chair OP meant any harm by it.
f33fac No.3571
>>3560Personally I feel like battlestation threads are ontopic. However, Blue_ made the ban because the OP was apparently out of the /foolz/ book of copypasta. I can't confirm or tell you why it happened, but it's being discussed now.
521ca9 No.3572
>>3568Wait, I thought you were OP.
I don't know about the chair thing, but it should be fine.
f33fac No.3574
>>3568He's not ban evading from the 30 minute ban. There are multiple users posting meta threads on /v/ because of the 30 minute ban. I wouldn't permaban them, just redirect them here where we're having the conversation.
521ca9 No.3575
>>3569>>3570Sorry, I thought he was talking about OP.
basically what
>>3571 said, the foolz shilling is real.
521ca9 No.3576
>>3574It was in the OP tho, regardless I'll just ban em for an hour and redirect them here.
265844 No.3577
>>3568>citing terms and condition level rules you made upYou could literally put, if you post on /v/ you have to let me assfuck you.
bd7857 No.3578
>>3566Gaming chairs have been a "thing" for awhile now, Mark. You may think it's stupid (and I would prolly agree), but that isn't the point.
>>3568Calm down. I'm not getting a rageboner here and neither are the majority in this thread, by the looks of it.
You are among friends.
265844 No.3579
>>3566YOu probably think pc's are just for taxes am I right?
265844 No.3581
>>3578yup of course you are among friends, thats the fucking problem. You are creating a hugbox
7b868b No.3583
>>356810/10 moderation on /v/ here folks. Mark is clearly cut out for the job.
Maybe if you can't be mature about shit, don't respond at all. You're the moderator, you need to hold yourself to a higher standard.
71afd2 No.3584
>>3581>any place where i get called out as a retard for constantly crying "SHILL XD" is a hugboxYou're really, really fucking stupid.
4de981 No.3585
>>3548....so, let me get this straight.
You're saying that me cying "shill" is a stormfag tactic, and I should not use it ever because its a stormfag tactic, and I would be associated with them.
So. You don't want me to ever consider shills being on any 8chan board because it would make me look bad.
That's a suspicious behavior, huh? Like.. why would think about shills would make me look bad?
It's almost like I never brought "shills" before someone reminded me of shills. That's.. strange, huh.
>>3553That's the thing. After OP's pic thraed, someone opened another. And Mark responded to that specific thread, but he's not bothering to respond that one.
>>3558robek, interesting. You didn't read my posts on this thread at all. I'm not the one who was banned, and I did make it clear from the start, right here:
>>3484And I also pointed out how you can check my ID from the other thread:
>>3542I didn't even read the thread about dota. And, for disclosure, I didn't report anything on this thread, even if I saw quite a lot of probable shills.
Also, if you're complaining so much about someone reporting stupid shit, you should ban him because he was mass reporting.
>>3559I did not started any of threads complaining about you. The only thread I started was this one. On /vmeta/.
You doubt me? Call hotweels. I believe he's only one who can check IPs, right? Ask him to compare my IP with how started the other threads, or who submitted all those reports.
>holy fallacies, batman>>3571you should make that clear in the ban's page. There's no reason to do that.
>>3576Why did you took so long to acknowledge this thread?
265844 No.3587
>>3584I am not op you fucking retard. The only reason i agree with him is because I been seeing these bullshit bans on /v/ constantly.
d44086 No.3588
>>3581>You are creating a hugboxThat's how modern chans have to be, man. Imageboard users these days don't want conflict or jokes or any of that to get in the way of their Civil Discussion Experience. Gotta appeal to a larger audience and all.
ba5d4b No.3589
Is the original guy who got banned even in this thread?
521ca9 No.3591
>>3582>>3583>>3578The chair thing is fine, I didn't see what he was responding to. I thought he was saying that the /metav/ posts were deleted because we didn't like em. The chair thing should be fine.
4de981 No.3592
>>3581that's called "chan culture". that's why people should "lurk more" before posting shit.
265844 No.3593
>>3588there are so many tools to get rid of shitposters and shills that mods intervening is complete bullshit. Its a fucking chan, people can sage, dubs, whatever the fuck they want, the thread will get 404ed if nobody gives a fuck.
f33fac No.3595
>>3585I apologize for making the assumption that you were the guy I banned. Using the "You were banned for this post" led be to believe that it was you. The reason he was given the 30 minute warning was for spamming reports. The rest of my post applies, but I apologize for directing it at you.
Regarding Mark, There's a reason I'm Board Owner here. Blue_, Pink, and I are the push/pull force here on Mark. We're trying to keep him in line and the three of us check /metav/ pretty much every hour.
We WANT to have these discussions with you people, because we know everyone has the capacity of being a major faggot, users and volunteers alike.
Foolz spam is an issue and we're working on how to best address it, but adding it to the rules seems like a decent place to start.
7b868b No.3597
>>3591>I thought he was saying that the /metav/ posts were deleted because we didn't like em.And I'm saying that even if he was saying that, your little shitfit is pathetic and overblown.
Get rid of /metav/ and make a containment thread on main /v/. /metav/ is a fucking joke. You and your volunteers would be taken to task by full /v/ for your posts here if anyone actually bothered to look.
d44086 No.3603
>>3593That's what I think as well, but it seems to me that people nowadays, including the mods, haven't browsed chans for too long and they really don't know what chans are even about, so they try to run it like a forum or something, "keep it civil and on topic" and all. I find it rather boring, but what can we do? Most of the userbase likes the way things are.
I mean, we could make our own board in which we could take it easy and talk about shit only tangentially related to videogames, but we'd have to shill it real hard for it not to die.
f33fac No.3607
>>3597/metav/ has been apart of the rules and plastered on the front page of /v/ since September. A majority of the userbase asked for a place where they could get in touch and have discussions with the volunteers. They wanted a place to appeal bans and find reasons for other people's bans. They needed a place to post smugpepe and call us faggots. This thread has 22 users in it, which is probably a record as far as /metav/ threads go (except in the case of the SFT discussion a few months ago).
Most of /v/ didn't want the meta discussion on the board. We had stickies and discussions regarding this with the entire user base with the September exodus. This was the solution the majority wanted. People pop in here when they have an issue, you are always welcome to direct more people here and we'd like to see it as well. But we already tried the containment thread on /v/ and it was shit because it was just users bitching at users.
b3fccf No.3609
>>3591I'm less worried about the chair thing and more worried about the sperging out.
Is it so hard to fact check something
before you get indignant about it?
71afd2 No.3612
>>3609He called someone a dense fuck, it doesn't exactly qualify as "sperging out." Stop trying to shine the spotlight on him as a person rather than the topic at hand.
521ca9 No.3613
>>3609you're right, my apologies. I'll try to keep the sperg outs to a minimum.
027e18 No.3614
>>3609>Is it so hard to fact check something before you get indignant about it?Where do you think you are?
bd7857 No.3617
>>3607So this majority decision occurred around the second exodus, correct?
If so, you're right; 8chan had a plenty big enough userbase by then for majority decisions. I can't ague that.
0ef73a No.3620
>>3617Majority decision + hotwheels was SO FUCKING SICK AND TIRED of seeing /v/ meta threads shitting up /meta/. They seriously took up like half the posts on the board.
d7378e No.3621
>>3560>>3571I think this sort of discussion should go in battlestation threads, yes. Desks and chairs aren't particularly vidya-related.
Of course, if I had my druthers, all peripheral devices would go in the same thread, too. Mice, keyboards, headsets, gamepads, monitors, all that shit. In-depth discussion warranting a dedicated thread probably belongs more on /tech/.
4de981 No.3624
>>3595>>3595>Foolz spam is an issue and we're working on how to best address it, but adding it to the rules seems like a decent place to start.My personal suggestion is, be transparent about it. There's no reason we should know the reason for the ban. I don't really know how you should make and apply these new rules besides prohibiting spam, but you need to be clear about everything you do or don't. That's part of what led the first exodus, and a major problem of a lot of communities I took part of.
>>3607People opinions change. Maybe you should apply the gamergate rule and allow only one thread per board, and if mods are really doing their jobs well, there wouldn't be a reason to make a sticky, as that thread would not pop that often.
d44086 No.3625
>>3621Christ, why does everything have to be so organized.
7b868b No.3626
>>3607>/metav/ has been apart of the rules and plastered on the front page of /v/ since September.And it's been a bad idea since september.
>A majority of the userbase asked for a place where they could get in touch and have discussions with the volunteers. huh, like /v/? you know, the place all the volunteers moderate?
>This thread has 22 users in it, which is probably a record as far as /metav/ threads go (except in the case of the SFT discussion a few months ago). Only because you've banned and deleted probably four OPs this morning for bullshit reasons, and won't allow discussion on the main board.
>Most of /v/ didn't want the meta discussion on the board. Great evidence you have there. Did you determine it with strawpoll? Maybe a show of hands? No doubt it was infallible.
>we already tried the containment thread on /v/ and it was shit because it was just users bitching at users.definitely none of that here. your dicksucker brigade is in full force on /metav/.
7b868b No.3628
>>3620>hotwheels was SO FUCKING SICK AND TIRED of seeing /v/ meta threads shitting up /meta/. notice something? hotwheels doesn't have to deal with /meta/ any more. guess you should also get rid of this board now.
265844 No.3629
>>3628>not realizing that hotwheels was mad cause people getting unfairly banned were mainly from /v/ 7b868b No.3633
>>3629orly? sauce? all I remember is him getting mad at the autistic volunteers on /pol/.
ba5d4b No.3635
>>3624I've seen the one thread thing done on others boards besides /v/ and it's never nearly as neat as you would think it would be, trust me. It's difficult to follow for the mods, causes unnecessary friction with the users and shit never gets done.
f33fac No.3636
>>3628Since Hotwheels told us to make a /metav/. Alrighty, we'll make an /operatev/ for you guys so that we can replace /metav/.
dbf33e No.3638
>>3629>>3633I thought hotwheels got sick of /meta/ because of all the tripfags and the anons who hate them kept bitching, like swami.
4de981 No.3639
>>3620well, /v/ was the biggest board then. it was only natural.
>>3635I'm absolutely NOT talking about a "bitching general", just a "A MOD IS BEING A FAGGOT RIGHT NOW ABOUT THIS" thread. prolonged discussions should go to /metav/
Another possible option would be to open a thread here, inform the /v/ thread about the /vmeta/ thread and only them locking the thread.
>>3636what? no. Why would that be necessary? Its not like there's enough bitching about /v/ to even justify 2 boards. /vmeta/ IS important, but it should NOT be the only way to
faa589 No.3641
>>3636Should /operatev/ be the board for suggestions to imrove board quality and additions and /metav/ for swami and ban complaints?
dbf33e No.3644
>>3636>>3641Lets not split up the meta shit.
ba5d4b No.3645
>>3639I think a meta thread would be alright every once in a while, but not as a constant thing. Maybe as a weekly or monthly leave-it-up-for-a-day thing.Because I think a major drawback of meta boards is that while they're better for single bans, it's harder to suggest changes to the whole board because the majority don't come here.
4de981 No.3648
>>3645exactly. when I thought of a single thread, I was taking more about having multiple threads calling mods fags for the same reason.
dbf33e No.3649
>>3645Having a monthly meta thread while reminding anons about /metav/ would be nice.
Even if the thread gets shitposted, at least it will be contained.
d44086 No.3650
>>3649Why contain it?Seriously, if the front page was filled with people complaining about the mods, that's probably what people want to talk about. You can't go around forcing discussion topics on people and "containing" them.
dbf33e No.3653
>>3650I was more implying the monthly meta thread could improve relations between /v/irgins and mods.
Cuckchan mods were completely disconnected with the userbase and many even began to hate them, lets make sure /v/ doesn't go down that road.
faa589 No.3654
>>3650>>3650I know that the majority of the board doesnt like to make threads and instead just post on existing threads. I dont think they'll take too kindly some 8 people who are complaining about their bans on the first page.
fd58a6 No.3655
>>3650if you remember the three times a day 500 posts per thread "why is cuckchan so shit" threads period (late september to mid october), you'd know why meta shit isn't allowed on /v/.
Not to mention the "why is /v/ so shitty" meta threads that do nothing but float on the front page like a bloated corpse like a self fufilling prophecy.
71afd2 No.3656
>>3650That's a valid assumption, but it doesn't have much of a basis in reality. People post a lot more frequently when they're angry about something, so it wouldn't be an accurate representation.
d44086 No.3657
>>3654But if nobody cared about the complaints then those threads would quickly fall off the board. There's even a catalog to find other threads that might have been obscured by the complaints.
See, we have a whole system that works already, why are we messing with it?
0ef73a No.3658
>>3657i agree
why ARE we messing with the idea of deleting /metav/
d44086 No.3660
>>3658Because meta boards a stupid.
ba5d4b No.3661
>>3658I meant more the monthly meta thread would be in addition to /metav/, not replace it.
faa589 No.3663
>>3658We could try locking the ability to create threads on /metav/ for like 3 days to a week and see if the idea would actually work. Personally I see it would cause lots of complaints from the regular users of /v/ but I dont think it would hurt to try. But you have to be clear that its just a test and only tenporary otherwise it might cause a shitstorm.
faa589 No.3664
>>3663For the record, I dont thi k its a good idea, im just throwing out suggestions.
f33fac No.3673
For the sake of argument, we left a meta thread up on /v/ for a bit.
558 posts later, maybe you can see why we have /metav/
https://8ch.net/v/res/2249404.html f33fac No.3674
f33fac No.3677
And here's an archive of it, just so any of you who miss it can enjoy it.
https://archive.today/yUUfb 42a83d No.3678
>>3673>>3674>>3677that barely was a metav thread, it was more of making fun of that faggot that was mad.
b3fccf No.3701
>>3673That was a form of mad I've not seen in years.
Holy shit.
01d104 No.3702
theres been a ton of threads being deleted lately that arent breaking any rules.
you could argue that "some" of these deleted threads are duplicates but each and every time its the older thread that gets deleted. and plenty of continuation threads arent deleted anyways.
i like to see discretion being used and not following the rules to the t, duplicate threads have never been out of hand and theres plenty of room for every topic that people are interested in discussing.
there seems to be some heavy bias at play
the only time duplicate threads even come close to being out of hand is when theres some supposed happening that people want to talk about like the law n order episode or supposed smash bros rayman leak
4ish threads tops. some topics near the bottom of the catalog get bumped off that nobody was dicussing. never bothered me
for the most part the mods are doing great but let people have their fun
01d104 No.3704
heres an example of what i mean
http://8archive.moe/v/thread/2209860/is it related to any specific video game? no but its definitely a video game related discussion. potions are an extremely common element in video games
95f548 No.3705
>>3704>>3704that thread isnt deleted. deleted threads have a trash can next to their post
01d104 No.3706
>>3705is there any cure for retardation?
260717 No.3711
>>3706Suicide works I hear.
6614f3 No.3714
>>3571>>3575What the fuck are you talking about you stupid dense nigger
I made a thread about chairs you use for gaming
what the fuck are you even talking about with foolz? you stupid fucking shitter, chair threads are on topic kill yourself
6614f3 No.3715
HOW IS THIS OFF TOPIC
HOW ARE THREADS ABOUT PICCOLO DICK ALLOWED BUT THREADS ABOUT CHAIRS AREN'T
HOW ARE THREADS WHICH AREN'T EVEN RELATED TO VIDEO GAMES BUT ARE JUST 4CHAN SCREENCAP BITCHING THREADS ALLOWED
KILL
YOURSELVES
this is 4chan mod tier, resign or kill yourselves, your choice
chairs are fucking vidya just like gamepads are
71afd2 No.3716
>>3715Even people that agree with you are laughing at you, you're using all caps like a child and it makes you look absolutely retarded.
Not saying you don't have a valid complaint (i think your thread was shit but i would just sage it or hide it) but you talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded.
4de981 No.3717
>>3673>>3674>Open the thread>(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)>"It was not because of that post, even if was written, in red text, it was because of that post">amazing amount of shitposting>people rejoicing bans >OP was massively butthurtIf you were trying to prove /v/ shouldn't have threads complaining about mods, you've failed. That was an experience.
>>3716You write this if anyone on /v/ does not talk like a faggot.
71afd2 No.3718
>>3717True, but all caps is retarded. I remember doing it when I was a teenager, but eventually it got to the point where any time someone was all caps spamming at me i would just laugh at them and mock them, and I realized basically everyone that's not a teenager just goes lol u mad when they see some all caps rage.
f33fac No.3720
>>3717Sorry I'm half asleep, and my hotpockets are chilling in the fridge, but I just wanted to clarify OP wasn't banned until 550 posts, whenever the lock went up. I've got to say though, that was hall of fame worthy.
6614f3 No.3723
>>3716I don't care faggot
All I want to know is if I can post chair threads now or not
dbf33e No.3726
>>3715Sounds like you need to take your medication.
4de981 No.3736
>>3718who cares? Its just upper case letters
>>3720worth it, huh?
6c054c No.3741
>>3736All caps destroy what tiny amount of credibility an anon has in any argument.