d15dc9 No.4260
>permanently banned for arguing for free speech on /v/, making a joke about the obvious shilling that's happening.
I see Mark is back.
bdd2a4 No.4262
well im gonna steer clear of the gamergate thread
if my ban ever gets lifted
more cancerous that 4chan's /v/
df5db8 No.4263
Finally.
d15dc9 No.4265
d15dc9 No.4266
I come back and see the filter for ralph has been put back on
Jesus Christ.
>Mark's reasoning for this is:
>his strawpoll to filter ralph, which had something like 70 votes (very small amount)
>his change.org petition for the same purpose, which has around 60 votes (even smaller considering he wanted 250 to begin with)
>that one shitposter which he didn't ban who has it out for ralph, who he probably agrees with
I don't like ralph either, but it's not appropriate to filter him.
It's not like anyone posts his links, and if they do it's to piss off the autists who shit up the threads with "muh filters"
Let people choose what they click, we're not fucking babies like reddit.
>the shitposter literally thinks he'll be a mod
top lel
Congratulations on pissing off a good portion of your users. Anyone who wants /v/ to be free and open, like it used to be, will see this as a stupid move. But what are we to expect I suppose :^)
>le it's your board face xD!
Another step towards becoming cuckchan.
e7cd46 No.4267
>>4266I hate to do it, but I agree with you. 70 people is not the majority of /v/. Mark needs to get a hold of himself
f661fb No.4268
>>4267The bad part isn't even the low 70 votes, it's that he kept lowering the number of votes required because he couldn't get the numbers he wanted.
Anyway, the whole mod team is fuckawful now. It went from much better than 4/v/, to a bit better than 4/v/, to holy shit what the fuck 4/v/ is 100x better.
8d6552 No.4269
>>4268>>4268I give it 2 weeks until it becomes a hugbox of mods that just agree with Mark and never challenge him.
d15dc9 No.4271
>>4267>>4268>>4269and now mark'll probably just use
>MUH BAN EVASIONas an excuse to ban anyone with a dissenting opinion
hotwheels must really be itching to pull the trigger on mark
113fd8 No.4272
d15dc9 No.4273
4c6dce No.4274
>>4271>and now mark'll probably just use
>>MUH BAN EVASION
>as an excuse to ban anyone with a dissenting opinionhey, at least it's a breath of fresh air from the so-called "spam" he's been banning people he doesn't like for for the past two months.
6ebc1a No.4275
>>4274It was only a matter of time till the kike's true nature emerged
fad948 No.4291
But you ARE ban evading, I checked all of the post histories before I banned you.
aa6568 No.4294
8e2735 No.4301
File: 1424582328581.png (43.36 KB, 1871x505, 1871:505, ss (2015-02-22 at 02.17.02….png)
the ones I circled in red already have pending bans on /v/.
the ones in green are pretty obvious public well known proxies since they were used to spam shit in other boards.
all of this can be confirmed for yourself from the search bar in the public bans list.
222998 No.4302
>Permabanning for ANY reason other than for violating an instated law in the U.S.
Whatever mod did that should be permanently removed from his position and blacklisted from ever being a mod again.
d15dc9 No.4314
>>4301your image doesn't prove anything
>>4302this
f661fb No.4323
>>4301I checked all of these IDs, since you seemed to be OK with scrutiny.
>first guy>permabanned for "spamming/flooding">no post attached>then banned for ban evading on regular posts>second guy is an actual bot>third guy's first ban on /v/ was a permaban for ban evading even though there's NO RECORD OF HIM EVER HAVING HAD A BAN ON /v/ BEFORE THEN>4th guy was permabanned for spamming "ayy lmao", no evidence of actual spam>green one, again, first ban was a permaban for banevading even though he's never been banned on /v/ before then>6th is a bot>7th is the first legit one! CONGRATS! Unfortunately, he was ban evading mark's unlawful ban when he was butthurt he couldn't get his 100 signatures in the GG thread.>8th has no ban record on /v/ whatsoeverThis seems to indicate you're using an edited screenshot, yet you still manage to prove that you mods are DOING IT FOR FREE and are worse than 4/v/ mods.
>9th's first ban was for ban evading despite having no ban record on /v/ prior to that>10th as well>11th is a botYour hit rate is 3.5 in 14 and these are PERMABANS everywhere. 11 of these guys should be completely unbanned and the other one should have his ban duration set to no more than 1 day from now.
Thanks for proving once again that 4/v/ is currently miles better than you guys are.
Also, I have "show active bans only" unchecked, and I'm counting inactive bans when I say these people you permabanned never got banned here before. The count also skips over repeated IDs.
Inb4 permabanned for proving the mods need to be kicked out of 8ch.
09c374 No.4324
>>4323if only hotwheels could clone himself so he could be the mod of every board
he understands the mentality and values you need for an anonymous imageboard
19bed6 No.4326
>>4323how did you do this are you a mod somewhere else, mark has gone ban crazy recently
8e2735 No.4327
>>4323[26b670413e]
>first guy>permabanned for "spamming/flooding">no post attached>then banned for ban evading on regular postsfirst perma was 22 weeks ago, during the /sext/ flood. unless that user is the /sext/, which I highly doubt, that IP is a proxy.
[136ad1e274]
>second guy is an actual botit is
[dbd01e223c] (2x)
>third guy's first ban on /v/ was a permaban for ban evading even though there's NO RECORD OF HIM EVER HAVING HAD A BAN ON /v/ BEFORE THENit's weird for the same IP to keep posting after three bans, but I don't have the context for this post.
[fbda93c812]
>4th guy was permabanned for spamming "ayy lmao", no evidence of actual spamhttp://puu.sh/g7WMu/92a503c629.png19 weeks ago, so probably another /sext/ chimpout. /sext/ really did us a favor by exhausting every public proxy / vpn he could get his hands on with his autism raids.
[37e73f1288]
>green one, again, first ban was a permaban for banevading even though he's never been banned on /v/ before thenyeah I wasn't sure about this one. same IP used to bot spam /legion/ with "superhot".
[07925ae84f]
>6th is a botas you can see: it's a public proxy that was abused by a bot.
[9cd8a3bdd6]
>7th is the first legit one! CONGRATS! Unfortunately, he was ban evading mark's unlawful ban when he was butthurt he couldn't get his 100 signatures in the GG thread.[26b670413e]
>8th has no ban record on /v/ whatsoeverhttp://puu.sh/g7XoK/4775590b16.pnghttp://puu.sh/g7Xu2/0058122ce3.pngshows up fine for me from the public bans list. please actually check before you accuse me of editing.
[dbd01e223c]
>9th's first ban was for ban evading despite having no ban record on /v/ prior to thatsame as #3
[f8ccb62692]
>10th as wellyeah i don't know much about the context here. is 8ab000 from this thread:
http://8archive.moe/v/thread/2328888/pretty much the same language as the guy that continues to spam /v/ until it's "burned down" but I wouldn't make that call. I think this one is a little shakey but I can't really tell since there's no way to access post history this far back.
[94d9fca051]
>11th is a botthat is so.
Here's the thing: If we see confirmed public proxies popping up with no previous threads saying the exact same shit, we're going to assume it's ban evasion.
note: i wasn't here when these bans happened. I'm re piecing what I have from 8archive and ban history.
>>4326all bans are public on /v/.
9d1aea No.4329
LOL you people are pathetic. Thanks for shitting up the GG threads on /v/ faggots.
MAYBE IF YOU WOULDN'T SHITPOST, MARK WOULDN'T HAVE TO BAN YOU.
09c374 No.4331
>>4329>muh markhi markpolio
b38904 No.4332
>>4262I reported that post for ban evasion because you seemed to be ban-evading. You were the guy that kept spamming the thread under several different IDs saying that /v/ was filtering "right-wingers" and that Milo was being filtered after the "test period" was over and arguing with yourself. If you weren't that guy it was probably a bad idea to make your first and only post repeating misinformation being spammed by a ban-evader.
09c374 No.4333
>>4332how is anything in his post "misinformation"?
8e2735 No.4334
>>4327heres my tripcode for confirmation.
19bed6 No.4335
>>4334I though hotwheels incourged proxy and vpns so banning is kinda against that, they have tor which you can't ban anyway
8e2735 No.4336
lol at how f8ccb62692 is in this thread right now under two IDs.
>>4335>I though hotwheels incourged proxy and vpns so banning is kinda against that, they have tor which you can't ban anywayHe said he thought permabans on proxies were ineffective at combating spam. He told me he's setting a max length of 3 months on all bans soon.
As for TOR, we will not be disabling or banning TOR. I don't believe Tor users should be punished collectively for one assholes spamming.
19bed6 No.4337
>>4336but banning a vpn or proxie is the same punishment, you just said you banned people cause the proxy was used during the sext thing months ago
09c374 No.4338
>>4336Yes I am, because when mark bans me for "shitposting" or "ban evasion" permanently, I have to switch my IP so I can post on /v/ again
my ban is
[f8ccb62692]
>10th as wellyeah i don't know much about the context here. is 8ab000 from this thread:
http://8archive.moe/v/thread/2328888/pretty much the same language as the guy that continues to spam /v/ until it's "burned down" but I wouldn't make that call. I think this one is a little shakey but I can't really tell since there's no way to access post history this far back.
>I think this one is a little shakeyno shit it's "shakey"; I wasn't that guy talking about "right ringers", I was making fun of him in that thread for fucks sake. I was also arguing against that autist who seemed to hate ralph and wanted him filtered.
This is not how things are done on /v/, and if you think it is you are worse than cuckchan cancer.
09c374 No.4339
>>4338oh and keep up the permabans, youll have to ban over half of england to get rid of me, you useless, lifeless, fat, overweight, hotpocketeering FALs.
19bed6 No.4340
>>4338He plans to an ip ranges go he moght get you for good
09c374 No.4341
>>4340and that will be the point hotwheels steps in and we can finally have the /v/ we deserve
8e2735 No.4342
>>4337there are an infinite amount of vpns and proxies out there, so i can't cry when they're banned.
1. poster straight up says they're using proxies to spam /v/
2. proxies proceed to spam /v/
3. original poster and his proxies get banned
4. posts by confirmed proxies pop up immediately after saying the exact same thing as the original poster, not even trying to hide that they're the same guy
what do you suppose we do?
>>4339>oh and keep up the permabans, youll have to ban over half of england to get rid of me, you useless, lifeless, fat, overweight, hotpocketeering FALs.well ok then.
09c374 No.4343
>>4342fantastic response from the neo /v/ mod team, I wouldn't expect anything less
09c374 No.4344
>>4342how asshurt and pathetic can you get, banning somebody for saying something in another board that you didn't like.
Confirmed /v/ mod cancer:
>Mark>Pink>RadicalPolio 19bed6 No.4345
>>4342Ban for a week, lots of people don't want to connect to 8chan direct, permanent ban of proxies and vpn's hurt way more then the one spammer
8e2735 No.4346
>>4344well you pretty much just admitted that you were guilty, so there you go.
3554f2 No.4347
>>4344Nigga you literally admitted you won't stop that shit.
8e2735 No.4348
>>4345anyone concerned about safety/privacy ect should be using Tor, or other services, not public proxies, which are very unsafe, since the operator isn't doing the service for free.
All bans will be three months capped soon.
b38904 No.4349
>>4338As evidence of your innocence you link a thread of you talking like the spammer and saying the mods "learnt their lesson" because they had unfiltered Ralph in response to the spam?
>>4333He would post about how happy he was that "Mark is banning rightwingers to fix GG's public image" and then respond with another ID saying that "banning right-wingers makes us just like SJWs" and shit like that. He was the only one saying "right-wing", not even actual Ralph apologists think politics have anything to do with it. Maybe it's some random idiot that happened to parrot the same bullshit the ban-evader was saying, you'd need the ip history to get a better idea.
The ban-evader made the same misspelling too:
http://8archive.moe/v/thread/2328888/#q2330231>Mark gave in to the right ring /pol/ fucks 09c374 No.4350
>>4346>using the "LE BAN EVASION xD" excusefor free
switching my IP takes a matter of seconds, watching you get increasingly paranoid about which poster is me makes it worth it
>>4347hi mark
>>4349>talking like a spammerayy lmao
>mods learnt their lessonthey never will
I know it's pretty much hopeless because we can't get rid of Mark and his faggot cronies (yet).
19bed6 No.4351
>>4350The paranoia is crazy, they are banning for think you are someone
8e2735 No.4352
spams on the menu tonight.
3554f2 No.4354
>>4350SO do you have any other actual counterpoint, or yre you just lashing out pointlessly. You "asked" why they did it, it was answered, after that you got even more butthurt and now you don't or can't even form an arguement as of to why they should let you "back in". You are saying about how xyz cant take an arguement, yet when presented with one you quickly deflect. Way to be hypocritical m8.
09c374 No.4355
>>4354>let "back in"What are you talking about?
A counterpoint to what? shitty volunteers who can't do their only job properly?
Who perma ban me from a board for "ban evasion" that I never did in the first place, then ban me again for switching IPs to be able to post?
top lel markpinkpolio, I hear they pay their janitors at 4chan now, you'd fit in better there.
3554f2 No.4357
>>4355>>let "back in">What are you talking about?Nigga, do you even read your own posts?
>>Who perma ban me from a board for "ban evasion" that I never did in the first place, then ban me again for switching IPs to be able to post?>switching IPs to be able to post?
>A counterpoint to what? shitty volunteers who can't do their only job properly?Even if they fucked up, you already started ban evading, and even flat out admitting it, m8. Even if the first one is "void", your current shit won't be.
>Who perma ban me from a board for "ban evasion" that I never did in the first place, then ban me again for switching IPs to be able to post?For your sake let's go with your words, and let's say that your permaban was the mod's fault. Your current "behaviour" pretty much validates a ban for real, so you aren't really helping yourself by lashing out.
top lel markpinkpolio, I hear they pay their janitors at 4chan now, you'd fit in better there.
Nice fallacy. Since you claimed that i am surely markpinkpolio, have a single fact to back that up? You know, burden of proof and all. Also, you are still trying to deflect, and to deliver an ad hominem. You are reeking of butthurt though. You know just to be fair and square.
09c374 No.4358
>>4357>m8>>>/reddit/
>your "behaviour" warrants a ban for realyep, you are fresh out of reddit
I bet you're that russian shitposter I was arguing with yesterday
Luckily the mods are even more retarded than you.
3554f2 No.4360
>>4358So now you employ even more ad hominem. What can't reply? I know, i'll send him to reddit, that will totally discredit his arguement!
>I bet you're that russian shitposter I was arguing with yesterday>>4350>watching you get increasingly paranoid about which poster is me makes it worth it 09c374 No.4361
3554f2 No.4362
>>4361And how is this relevant? Oh, wait you still can't reply, and you still can't proove that i'm mark. Contain your butthurt
m8 09c374 No.4363
>>4362good luck with becoming a volunteer on /v/, you've got the required number of chromosomes to fit right in.
And you're a russian weeb. Desu~ ^_^
3554f2 No.4364
>>4363>good luck with becoming a volunteer on /v/, you've got the required number of chromosomes to fit right in.>Still trying to bait with ad hominem>implying i'm retarded>while he can't even reply with anything else than ad hominems.You do know that anyone who comes into this thread can see just how much butthurt you are, right,
m80?
And you're a russian weeb. Desu~ ^_^
>>4360>watching you get increasingly paranoid about which poster is me makes it worth it 09c374 No.4365
>>4364>somebody can see my "butthurt" posts on an anonymous imageboardoh shit, oh fuck, oh shit.
>he cant even quote my posts properlyspend some more time on r/4chan to learn the ropes pal x^)
519cc5 No.4366
>>4271>muh ban evasionBut how is that invalid? That's the reason for these bans, you were ban evading. Without any evidence for what the original, first bans were, it's difficult to judge whether or not that's fair.
3554f2 No.4367
>>4365>>somebody can see my "butthurt" posts on an anonymous imageboard>oh shit, oh fuck, oh shit.if you do not realise that this wasn't to "destroy" your ego, rather than that anyone can see that you are full of bullshit, and can't come back with anything other than ad hominems. Your call.
>>he cant even quote my posts properly>spend some more time on r/4chan to learn the ropes pal x^)>That will surely show him! Never mind i still didn't answer >>4357Funny how i jump from redditor to russian shitposter, don't you think? Oh wait, you claimed those too. Proof?
09c374 No.4369
>>4366>Without any evidence for what the original, first bans were, it's difficult to judge whether or not that's fair.You just answered your own question.
>>4367http://www.reddit.com/user/HashibaIsen
>posting in gamerghazibig shill
3554f2 No.4370
>>4369Any proof about that m8, or did you just pick your favourite poster there?
09c374 No.4371
>>4370It was a twitter image you posted in the thread yesterday
oh and
>sick burn xD!!!If I could upvote and gild your post I would
519cc5 No.4372
>>4369>You just answered your own question.I don't think I did. Being banned for ban evasion is fair if the user is just shitposting. Be banned for ban evasion if the original ban was unjust is not. It's OP's prerogative to provide evidence for the original ban.
3554f2 No.4373
>>4371>twitter image you posted yesterday>watching you get increasingly paranoid about which poster is me makes it worth itYou are literally just guessing at this point, grasping at straws don't you?
09c374 No.4374
>>4372There was no original ban, and shitposting is not a bannable offence.
Spamming is.
09c374 No.4375
>>4373>grasping at straws don't youno I don't really care that much, I just think it's funny to make some pseudo intellectual little russian cunt butt flustered
519cc5 No.4377
>>4374>There was no original banI just doublechecked through OP's posts and there's no mention of this. Could you point out where you're seeing this?
09c374 No.4378
>>4377OP's ban (who is me) is for ban evasion, however I hadn't evaded any bans prior to the one that was handed out.
3554f2 No.4380
>>4375>no I don't really care that much, I just think it's funny to make some pseudo intellectual little russian cunt butt flustered
>I totally don't care guise, just lemme play it off cool.Do i have to quote you from the point that you claimed that i was the russian guy? Also, please doN't project your own butthurt to me. But, while we are there, mind showing where i was oh so booty blasted by you? Show me m8. I can show where you were butthurt if you want it, plenty of that.
19bed6 No.4381
>>4378If you where on a vpn, you might be evading the ban you did not know about
519cc5 No.4382
09c374 No.4383
>>4380Your twitter feed and shitty broken English makes it sound like you are mentally unstable.
Take a break chum.
www.theralphretort.com>>4381Not using a VPN
3554f2 No.4385
>>4383ou are still to prove that i am: mark, a russian shitposter, a "redditor", and you still didn't reply to
>>4357 with actual points. You are just deflecting, and trying to scurry away at this point. But let me quote your totally not caring" posts. Let's ignore the part where you state that i'm mark without and proof.
>>4358>>4361>>4363>>4365>>4369>>4371>>4375Now that's a lot of not caring. It's as if someone's butthurt. Oh wait there's more no caring AFTER admitting he doesn't care.
>>4383I wonder what will be next.
f661fb No.4386
>>4342Did you forget that we can actually see some of the posts permabanned, and the posts that triggered the permabans look perfectly legitimate? Stop trying to cover your and other mods' asses. You fucked up, OWN up to it.
09c374 No.4387
>>4385You seem to be really invested in this argument at this point :^)
Please just chill and read the latest article on
http://www.theralphretort.comI know he's your favourite ;)
f661fb No.4388
>>4327Also,
>26b… == 2428…Nice try, retard.
3554f2 No.4390
>>4387>still ad hominems.>You seem to be really invested in this argument at this pointCould it be that you have legit autism?
>I can show where you were butthurt if you want it, plenty of that.But i asked you to show me where i was butthurt, bus alas, to no avail.
>>4387You seem to be really invested in thinking i'm a russian shitposter at this point :^)
Also mind pointing out where have i said or even implied that i read raplhretort? Oh right you still can't so you'll resort to ad hominems, right forgot about that.
>I know he's your favourite ;Proof? 09c374 No.4391
>>4390>replying to the same post twicesee the image in
>>4266Just chill out Hashiba Isen, I think you're cute anyway :3
Nice cat too x'3
3554f2 No.4392
>>4391>He still thinks i'm a russian.>he still thinks that i will be somehow "intimidated".Yeah, i get that otherwise your "arguement" wouldn't stand. You know they call ad hominems the "ragequit of arguements" right? You quit pretty early on. Hypocrites will be hypocrites, i guess. Also when your only thing in life is "if he doesn't agree with me it must be that damn russian redditor" is pretty paranoid m8.
09c374 No.4394
>>4392>"intimidated"Who said anything about intimidation? Are you feeling intimidated, Hashiba? :^)
>Only thing in lifePlease don't project. just because in Russia the only thing you have to do is kick the vodka bottle out of the gulag doesn't mean you have to be mean on the internet. Especially to your favorite journalist Ralph.
3554f2 No.4395
>>4394So you'd say that your only retort for my arguement is that i'm a russian. If Your precicious hashiba is so important to you that you assume he somehow is there for you to always disagree, then feel free to off that faggot, or get his info.But it is sad that you can't bring any other thing up, only that i'm somehow a russian redditor who shitpost (just for you) because i disagree with you. You know what?
Let's go with your version. I'm actually hashiba. Now, answer my arguement without resorting to ad hominems. You can't, can you? So you "admit" that you can't answer or prove your statements. C'mon, i'd love to see you try.
09c374 No.4397
>>4395>le ad hominem facewell my only RETORT (upvote this btw) to you is
http://www.theralphretort.com 3554f2 No.4399
>>4397he thinks he'll somehow lessen or make calling out his fallacy void by trying to present it as a dank meme.
There we go, was that hard? So you can't answer whenever i'm your "nemesis" russian guy or not.
09c374 No.4400
>>4399>dank memewhat the hell is wrong with russians