/metav/ - /v/ Meta Discussion

it's not a bad idea
anti-weeb faggots should be banned too

>>4819
I've been suggesting this for a while but each time it's met with shitposting or shot down because "MUH COMMUNITY MODERATION!" or "Well if you didn't make shit threads!"

But yeah, I like the idea, go ahead and do it. but I wouldn't do more than maybe an hour ban for it and delete the post.

>>4819
>Acting like a cuck
>banning dubs
You are literally a gigantic faggot, mark. You don't own /v/, you faggot. You just run the board, you don't rule the fucking community, and you do a pretty shit job at just running the board. The less you do the better, and you faggots never do anything about garbage threads, you hardly do anything at all, banning self-moderation like a cuckchan mod is just going to make the board worse, and flood your report queue because people aren't going to stop checking post numbers because the fat jew told them to.

Moot never managed to stop /a/ from destroying naruto threads. Why do you think this will end any differently?

this thread on /v/:
>well I guess that kinda sucks but it was an issue so it's good to see it being resolved
this thread on /metav/:
>wow fag back to cuckchan you're clearly joot 2.0 I'm done with /v/

/metav/ is just people banned for dubs in vidya thread trying to act like they're being civil to get /v/'s rules changed to defend their right to shitpost

>>>/baphomet/

>>4819
I'm in support, although you will see more reactions like the ones in this thread.

Just take it easy Mark. I've seen too many good people break under moderation stress.

finally

I'm tired of legit threads being spammed with dubs

>>4836
The mods need to make an example of dubsfags ruining every thread they come to. They are legit ruining the board, and only serve to detract from actual discussions going on.

>>4828
Because threads are for discussing the topic. not doing what countless other people have done before. Was that an Anton and Coolpecker thread I bet? You do know how many people each thread say the exact same shit despite dev threads not being against the rules?

>>4837
>>4836
>>4826
I wouldn't say this bans dubs. It doesn't mean they'll ban every instance of it. You can still spam console war and sales threads and get off without a slap on the wrist.

But seriously I'm fucking tired of people trying to discuss something and some asshat comes in and screams "DUBS!" because he doesn't like the game or because he thinks the OP is someone else.

>>4839
Dubs are already not allowed. I have no idea what measure of punishment is employed, but I assume it is a short ban.