[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/mgtow/ - Men Going Their Own Way

discussions about the MGTOW lifestyle

Catalog

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


board rules: https://www.8chan.co/mgtow/rules.html

File: 1453082007422.jpg (94.08 KB, 718x642, 359:321, Men Going Their Own Way.jpg)

d76556 No.3219

I created a MGTOW general thread on /pol/

Was banned for shitposting.

d41060 No.3220

/pol/ is heavily Christian and they worship women because they need to make babies for the neonazi uprising or some shit.

I'll never understand /pol/ so I don't even bother trying.


afa32c No.3222

/pol/ is comprised of tradcons and white nationalists. Don't waste time at /pol/.

The following groups of people are a waste of time talking to

1. Women

2. Male Feminists(Manginas)

3. Tradcons

4. Nationalists of any color(White, Black whatever)

5. Liberals, Socialists and Communists(These people are statists, they believe individuals must sacrifice for the greater good. Race Nationalists too have the same problem plus they want you to breed and support children with your money)

Lots of men are destined to find out the hard way - divorce courts, alimony, child custody battles, prison for not paying child support etc. Leave them to their fate and concentrate on YOUR life and any men willing to listen.


d76556 No.3223

>>3222

It was my first post on /pol/ here. i wanted to see if the mods were white nationalists and now I know.


80a0ae No.3224

>>3223

Ok. 8chan oldfags have known this for quite some time now. I gave up on /pol/ many months ago. Almost a year.

If you are new to 8chan as a whole or to this board, welcome.

This board is quite slow averaging about 5-10 posts a week. We have to put up with trolls like >>3221 but that mean that we have more freedom to speak our mind here.


912c10 No.3226

>>3221

This is true. Whenever I see fellow mgtows post on /pol/ I cringe and feel embarrassed for them. They really sound like frustrated betas who just resent women illogically. It's sad


8c46d0 No.3227

/pol/ will literally admit that they worship women.

their gripe with feminism has nothing to do with the abuse of children and the innocent, but everything to do with following the long broken life script of "marriage, children, career, die."

most men are scared to death to live freely.


f7035a No.3229

>>3222

/pol/ blames feminism for the modern women, /pol/ simply can't believe feminism merely removes the clouds from female nature, revealing the hell underneath, the hell that always was there.

/pol/ dreams of a world in which we go back to tradcon values, in which men work and the women stays home making babies (and sandwiches), and anyone that points of that that is a shit deal for men is a pussy.

Throughout all of human history women sacrificed direct power in exchange for protection and service by men, and hey if they could manipulate men well enough indirect power turns out to be better than direct power. Tribal women could yell at their men that they are not real men unless they kill the neighboring tribe, and get their way, we would die for women, in fact it is one thing women romance about, is the dream of a men willing to die for them! We men have always been the worker bees, and the women have competed amongst themselves to he highest queen bee. Evolution selected for women to be cute with boobs and ass, to be manipulative and conniving, and selected for us men to be the sex crazed brutes that do as the bitches command. /pol/ simply wants a return to what evolution designed for us, rather then to try to free ourselves from nature and natures horrible design.


6563b3 No.3230

>>3227

They do it because they care more about the future of the white race rather than their own freedom, so at least they have a bigger agenda.

Women in traditional marriages aren't exactly in power, unless it's with beta males. But sure, /pol/ doesn't understand that under current laws almost every married man is a beta, and the government is alpha.

I guess they still won't care, white babies got made and raised, even if marriage goes bust after a while?. Job well done.


242101 No.3236

>>3229

Good points.

I just wanted to say this about evolution. I don't think evolution is responsible for the gynocentric society. Sure, there are examples of gynocentric systems in nature such as bees, ants etc but I don't think humanity turned gynocentric until the establishment of agrarian societies. The point when humans ceased being nomadic and started to settle down is the point when it became gynocentric.

I think from an evolution point of view, men are a mixed bag. I think there is still a strong wild side to many men. They yearning to be independent and free.In fact, MGTOW is one of the manifestation of this true masculinity. All the various versions of statism that you see ranging from communism to nationalism to fascism to democracy are nothing more than attempts to curb the independence of man, his desire to be free and to live as he pleases.

Throughout history civilizations have had to cook up different versions of the same fraud.- "You as men, shouldn't live for yourself. Living for yourself is wrong. Freedom is wrong. You should give up your happiness, well being and life for X cause. And if you don't believe in X cause think of the women and children….blah blah blah". Democracy, Fascism, Communism, Nationalism are all different versions of the same con game. The attempt to subvert man against his own nature and his own self interest


623b96 No.3237

>>3236

Well said.


815681 No.3238

>>3236

Actually this applies not just to statists but any of the authoritarian forms of power and control ranging from religious to tribalistic structures. They all have the same theme like you outlined. Individual men sacrificing for the 'greater good' ie male disposability.


000000 No.3240

/pol/cucks can't accept that women's own in-group preference is higher than their racial in-group preference.


f7035a No.3245

>>3236

Probably not, we were tribal societies before, gynocentric is not the right word for there were multiple reproductive strategies in competitive balance with each other between the sexes. One involving male servitude the other involving male domination.

The ultimate male strategy was to rape and pillage, impregnate as many women as possible, forcibly if needed be. The problem was few women would survive and even fewer progeny would survive with this strategy, if you could collect women and keep them safe then reproductive success goes up. This is the beginning of alpha verse beta male strategies.

Women have evolved to want alphas, because alphas spread genes well, yet at the same time wanted a beta to take care of them, putting them in "want your cake and eat it too" paradox. Men were bred to want to be free, independent, self-actualizing, yet at the same time prone to enslavement to pussy, if a man was too enslavable by pussy the women would eventually see him as weak and cuckold him with an alpha, if the man was too free spirited his reproductive success would go down as he would not take care of any of the women he impregnated.

Women were selected for boobs and big ass and child like features that show high fertility and induce desires to protect in men, but over all the genetic success of women was twice that of man: an individual man has half th chance of breeding successfully as a woman did, those men that did breed, bred very well though. So evolutionary pressures have been twice as strong on us men as on women.

All of this has nothing to do with agriculture, agriculture did shake a lot of things up, but the reproductive bases still remains in most cases.


b142d2 No.3297

this is a good thread.

many valid points and civillized argumentation

>got banned from pol for posting mgtow topics

yes I know, back when I started this board in nov 14, pol was much better. For those of you who remember, this board was born out of pol's paranoia for mgtows. We had a thread (operation ouroboros) where we wanted to get blacks and feminists go against each other and at some point a pollack accused me of using VPNs in a debate with him. We somehow nearly derailed the thread and I decided to create this board so they don't have to be paranoid anymore. It did not work.

Back in the day, pol was balanced and it had natsocs, libertarians and paleoconservatives. I believe for /pol/ it is better to have a libertarian moderation that a natsoc one. On /pol/ we all saw each other as allies against our common enemies (feminism, SJWism, communism, leftism, political correctness).

Now you have threads on pol about how they want to gas libertarians just like jews.

I have no idea how /pol/ could go to shit in less than half a year but I think the raids in april made them go full paranoia…

daily reminder to not engage in mgtow discussions on pol. the pollacks still believe we are a jewish conspiracy and it will trigger them into banning you


2f504d No.3329

File: 1454498399010.png (3.69 KB, 514x514, 1:1, 1447129650655.png)

>>3297

>I have no idea how /pol/ could go to shit in less than half a year

I'm blaming it on Trump's cult of personality.

I don't like using the term "shill" anymore as it has lost it's meaning (now being "anyone who disagrees with the circlejerk")

But someone sure is paying for those Trump adds all over the website, and at any given moment there are 50 to 80 threads about him up.

/pol/ approving Trump's proposal of shutting down some mudslimes websites out of the internet was the tipping point, a board that only exist thanks to free speech and has always been the more zealous defender of it should never stand with censorship of ANY kind.

That reddit tier postcount bullshit isn't helping at all either.


c1c4ad No.3356

File: 1455355721792-0.png (11.97 KB, 580x434, 290:217, ted_20131108.png)

File: 1455355721799-1.png (117.68 KB, 500x374, 250:187, theylive.png)

>>3229

>>3236

In a way I get why nationalists despise the mgtow, because you cannot have nationalism without natalism. If the borders were closed and immigration was limited, the society needs to thrive on domestic families for a workforce and innovation.

However, what they don't get is the laws and current culture of entitlement have made marriage a nightmare. Unless they fix this, there is no way men should be willing chained to a system that benefits women should they decide to cash out.


4bc776 No.3359

OP Here, awnsering all threads

>>3220

I don't have much on White birth rates.

But until we can solve the issue of FemAutists shitting everything up, a Swedish White Birth is only fuel to the cuck flame.

>>3222

/pol/acks have their own code on how to properly post something. This is really special on 4chan.

We should post tits while talking about the decline of aryan Babies due to FemAutism.

That the most successful way to provoke an Anti-Feminist conversation.

>>3223

They are some Cucks too.

No wonder leftshits call /pol/ a bunch of Cuckservatives that pretend to Support White Birth Rates.

>>3224

MGTOW was a great board for voicing opinions. I primarily do political debates in Chatrooms over Imageboards.

8chan has a harsh no-shitposting policy.

The best time I had talking about a FemAutist is when on 4chan I was debating trump and I asked the OP for her weight and the thread died. It was trumparious and a lot of other /pol/acks came to post real women that aren't Jews with breasts.

>>3226

To me MGTOW seems like Newfags responding to Liberal Cuckholding and having special affairs with the Jews with Tits.

>>3227

/pol/ worships the idea of a Perfect woman. Basically a Woman that is a good dog and obeys the Aryan Race.

It's a hard pressed dream, but it is what gets attention to ADHD /pol/acks.

>>3229

FemAutism does have a lot to do with the Leftist Jew With Breasts.

However, /pol/ does not support Discussion at all

>>3230

Pretty much what I've said a few times over.

>>3236

My best guess for this case is that /pol/ wants to stay around Women just to get the idea of what pleases them or perhaps to get kicks out of annoying them.

>>3238

Depending on how much Men the said Jew with Breasts have. You could be a option D for that said woman.

>>3240

/pol/ Views FemAutism as a blip in the evolution and large White race.

>>3297

Hey Board Owner,

A lot of people on /pol/ still cannot get get over their lust for Women.

For me, I view MGTOW as Cuck Rehab.

It's where men can go to get out and relax from a garbage tier relationship.

Then again, a lot of /pol/acks still believe we are Beta Lonely fools who haven't worshiped the pussy yet or got enhanced to become Alpha Cuck Dogs.

>>3356

It almost feels like VagMen are a chain to society weighing it down.

These betas could be doing something with their lives, however they choose to worship the holy pussy.

While we here talk about Women while

On the other side Bitches get wet over us being so pissed about them.

To /pol/, if this results in a Increase in White Births rate. It sounds like a success.

I'm going to make a second MGTOW thread.


78053a No.3517

File: 1458229289650.png (213.94 KB, 453x283, 453:283, marriageisbullshit.PNG)

/pol/ is a circle jerk of Trump threads now.

They believe that they can enact change once Trump is president. Very naive.


fda31e No.3522

>>3359

>jews with tits

kek


8c46d0 No.3590

trump has been married like what, 4 times now?


8c46d0 No.3591

File: 1459501729752.jpg (171.21 KB, 1533x1875, 511:625, tmp_5146-FB_IMG_1459469592….jpg)




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]