I'm answering the repeated recruitment threads on /b/, and I'd like to ask a few questions of everyone here to determine your political slants or lack thereof.1) What is the ideal balance of power between people, government, and corporations? Must gove

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1453883118701.gif (997.83 KB, 500x372, 125:93, 1438970756578.gif)

Anonymous 01/27/16 (Wed) 08:25:18 No.755

I'm answering the repeated recruitment threads on /b/, and I'd like to ask a few questions of everyone here to determine your political slants or lack thereof.

1) What is the ideal balance of power between people, government, and corporations? Must governments and/or corporations exist to serve the people, or are they allowed to use and abuse the public to their own ends?

2) What do you think of identity politics? What is the ideal immigration policy for a Western nation? What do you think of affirmative action? What do you think of white guilt? Should freedom of speech be limitless to the point of legitimate public endangerment or should it be suspended to spare people's feelings?

Answer as many or as few as you like, I just want to gauge what kind of people inhabit this board.

Anonymous 01/27/16 (Wed) 12:31:51 No.758

File: 1453897912475.jpg (230.1 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 148833333148814881488.jpg)

>>755

>1) What is the ideal balance of power between people, government, and corporations? Must governments and/or corporations exist to serve the people, or are they allowed to use and abuse the public to their own ends?

They don't serve "the people" they serve the shareholders.

That kind of corruption should be eliminated. By force if necessary.

>>755

>2) What do you think of identity politics? What is the ideal immigration policy for a Western nation? What do you think of affirmative action? What do you think of white guilt? Should freedom of speech be limitless to the point of legitimate public endangerment or should it be suspended to spare people's feelings?

Politics can not exist if it is not about identity. Class is identity. Ideal immigration policy for any western COUNTRY is none except temporary work visas in severe restrictions and tourism when possible. A country is a border with a flag and a government. A nation is a group of people related usually by blood and also by culture. Affirmative action is racism. Guilt is for idiots. If the public are retards let them be retards. 1st and 2nd are the only things America does right anymore.

>Answer as many or as few as you like, I just want to gauge what kind of people inhabit this board.

Men of virtue.

Anonymous 01/30/16 (Sat) 21:47:30 No.770

>>755

These are a lot of questions, but I will make an attempt

>What is the ideal balance of power between people, government, and corporations?

The industrial revolution put the power into the hands of corporations. The power should be in the hands of intelligent leaders who do not abuse their power and have society in their best interests. Arguably most people want stable society so that would be priority

>Must governments and/or corporations exist to serve the people, or are they allowed to use and abuse the public to their own ends?

Government serves the people, Corporations serve themselves

>What do you think of identity politics?

Stupid

>What is the ideal immigration policy for a Western nation?

It needs to be under control: not too harsh but not too free.

>What do you think of affirmative action?

Stupid

>What do you think of white guilt?

The past is the past, get over it

>Should freedom of speech be limitless to the point of legitimate public endangerment or should it be suspended to spare people's feelings?

My rights don't end where your feelings begin.

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 01:38:00 No.778

The ideal balance of power is a truly free and open market without massive regulations that restrict the ability of small buisness owners to prosper. Governments are to be at the will of the people and to only be governed by the rules the people select. Corporations are the exact opposite and other than legally speaking theyre only upholden to the shareholders.

Identity politics are shit and draw more nonexistent divisions that continues to weaken the people through separation. I can't for all the western world but specifically the American immigration policy needs to be slightly restructured to restrict the influx Latin and jew infiltration. Certain region of land here might as well be foreign, the Jews and Latinos refuse to assimilate and that erks the shit out of me. Affirmative action in most situations is not ideal and places those of who that receive it in a place that there not supposed to be. Almost in every situation a merit based society will be better than one that's not, not to generalize. If you're a white and you feel guilty you should be, if not that's good to, I'm not white soo idk how to answer this. Free speech as of right now isn't limitless you can't tell fire in a crowded theater, nor can you have calls for violence as you will be prosecuted for both of those activities. The speech laws of America are perfect in there current form.