No.336429
http://archive.is/uDP8x
> A number of sexual fetishes considered anomalous in psychiatry are actually common in the general population, a study has found.
> According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), sexual interests fall into two categories: normal (normophilic) and anomalous (paraphilic).
> Researchers asked 1,040 Quebec residents, representative of the general population, about their experiences of sexual behaviour considered abnormal by the DSM-5.
> The study, published in The Journal of Sex Research, found that of the eight types of anomalous behaviour listed in the DSM-5, four were found to be neither rare or unusual among the experiences and desires reported by men and women.
> "Overall, nearly half (45.6%) of the sample subjects were interested in at least one type of sexual behaviour that is considered anomalous, whereas one third (33%) had experienced the behaviour at least once," Professor Christian Joyal, one of the study's authors, explained.
> These facts suggest that we need to know what normal sexual practices are before we label a legal sexual interest as anomalous.
> "Some paraphilic interests are more common than people might think, not only in terms of fantasies but also in terms of desire and behavior."
> Of the sample, 35 per cent said they were interested in voyeurism, 26 per cent in fetishism, another 26 per cent in frotteurism and 19 per cent in masochism.
> They also found levels of fetishism and masochism were not significantly different between men and women.
> Masochism was also found to be significantly associated with more diverse sexual interests and linked with higher sex life satisfaction.
> The researchers also found people were more likely to acknowledge their interests in fetishes in an online, rather than telephone, survey.
> Professor Joyal concluded: "In general, it is true that men are more interested in paraphilic behaviors than women.
> "However, this doesn't mean that women don't have these interests at all. In fact, women who report an interest in sexual submission have more varied sexual interests and report greater satisfaction with their sex lives.
> "Sexual submission is therefore not an abnormal interest."
> He added: "We have reasons to believe that this study's results which are based on Quebec's population can be applied to the population of North America and Europe as well".
No.336441
Vore, inflation, diapers, and babyfuck is inexcusable though.
No.336455
>>336441
stop hating on /pol/
No.336460
>ctrl+f
>supernormal stimulus
>0 results
Trash
No.336467
No.336470
>normalfags are secretly degenerates
WHO WOULD HAVE FUCKING THOUGHT?
Normalfags aren't normalfags because they are "normal" they're normalfags because they pretend to be normal. There isn't a single person who is actually normal, there are only those who pretend to be(normalfags) and those who don't'(full on degenerates, like most of us).
>>336441
NTR and cucking as well.
No.336476
So this guy will find true love after all?
No.336478
>normie fetishes
This study didn't cover 8chans fetishes though >>336441
No.336482
>>336429
>Quebec residents
>representative of the general population
Pick one. Everyone knows the frogs are perverts.
No.336508
I didn't think those fetishes were abnormal anyway.
>omen who report an interest in sexual submission have more varied sexual interests and report greater satisfaction with their sex lives
No shit but it's good having scientific backing that women prefer being sexually submissive. Wonder where the feminist outcry is.
No.336509
>>336429
>Quebec residents
No.336512
I thought that when the DSM talks of paraphilia, it's talking about something that causes distress to you or others, not just fantasies.
>>336508
>Wonder where the feminist outcry is.
Anything is empowering as long as it's a woman.
https://niggerslaveforwhitemen.tumblr.com/
No.336515
>>336508
There isn't. Feminists are fine being submissive, as long as you look like the guy from 50 Shades of Gray.
No.336525
Isn't it only a fetish when you are sexually attracted to objects? Like finding women in boots sexy is not a fetish, but finding boots themselves sexy is. At least that's how I understood it.
No.336531
>>336525
It's considered a fetish when you like something outside the norm of society and it's for pure sexual gratification. However, in recent years, even a preference or a legitimate attraction to something is now a fetish.
In other words, thanks to liberal double-speak, we've devalued what the word actually means.
No.336540
>>336525
I always thought of it as being unusually attracted to something that wasn't consensual sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation, be it an action (pissing) or an object (long socks).
fe•tish
►
n.
An object that is believed to have magical or spiritual powers, especially such an object associated with animistic or shamanistic religious practices.
n.
An object of unreasonably excessive attention or reverence: made a fetish of punctuality.
n.
Something, such as a material object or a nonsexual part of the body, that arouses sexual desire and may become necessary for sexual gratification.
from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition
No.336543
>>336525
Not exactly. A fetish is something you need to get off. Both looking at a woman in sexy boots and being attracted to the boots by themselves are a fetish if you NEED them to get off. This is kind of confusing because what most people call a fetish is actually a kink. Kinks are just a flavor of your sexual appetite that you might get off to one day and not the next.
No.336546
>>336540
Oh good to know I don't have a fetish then. Going to save this post for the next time someone says I do so I can shove it in their fucking face.
No.336551
>>336543
So when do we cross the line of "I find Woman A attractive because she has features XYZ" and "Feature XYZ are fetishes"? Cause I'll be honest, a woman without features XYZ wouldn't be attractive to me.
No.336554
>>336546
Tell me anon, what's your shit?
>>336551
It's just semantics really. Calling it a fetish has some strong implications and connotations that aren't always the case. You could just call it a strong sexual preference is you'd rather.
No.336560
>>336554
>Tell me anon, what's your shit?
Strong sexual preference for chubbier women.
No.336563
>>336560
That's not a fetish, that's just being normal.
No.336565
>>336551
It has more to do with sexuality than attraction. If you can't get off useless a woman has XYZ feature then that is a fetish. For example there are guys that can only get off to Asian women. If they dated a girl of a different race then they would be unable to get off. That's different from a guy that just prefers Asian women but can date and have normal sexual relations with any race.
No.336566
>>336563
Unfortunately, most people immediately group you in with the degenerates, such as those who get off to feeding a woman (feeders).
No.336569
>>336566
>such as those who get off to feeding a woman (feeders).
>tfw feeder
>tfw lactation fetish
I'll never find love.
No.336572
>>336560
>>336563
I'd say being attracted to skellies and fatties are the real fetishes. Being into girls in the thin to chubby range is normal.
No.336574
>>336565
Which is funny, I don't view those who only date Asian women as fucked up or anything.
I personally don't think fetish is a bad word, but it seems that overtime it has become a negative word. Granted, I think there are some pretty fucked up things that people need to get help for (Scat, vore, diapers), but it seems the word brings out a lot of disgust within people.
No.336575
>>336569
>gf into hypnosis
>gf into bondage
>gf into lactation, and wants me to buy pumps
You too can find your freak, anon.
No.336579
>>336569
I should mention, not all you feeders are degenerates, there are people in all fetishes that make the fetish as a whole look bad.
You'll find love though, there's plenty of women looking for a feeder.
No.336581
>>336575
>wants me to buy pumps
How and where the fuck did you find this woman?
No.336584
>>336566
>Unfortunately, most people immediately group you in with the degenerates
Perhaps the same *could* be said about all fetishes.
No.336585
>>336574
I agree with you. Most fetishes are not fucked up. They're usually plenty benign like flat chests or skinny girls or chubby girls. I think the majority of the really fucked up sexual items are kinks more than fetishes. If you get off to toddler con diaper scat one time in your life then yeah that's pretty fucked up but it's no where near as bad as not being able to get off unless you shit the diaper you're wearing while pretending to be a toddler. Honestly I'm a degenerate so most fetishes I think are not that big off a deal. The only ones that put me over the edge of "Well I'm not into it but that's fine if you are" to "Get the fuck out of here" type reaction are gore, crushing, and necrophilia. I can't even relate to it.
No.336587
>>336429
I've been noticing a lot of popularity for vore lately.
I do not know why but it's peaking its head in some odd places. Just the other day I was watching a Twitch stream, and when something slightly related happened, 1/3 of the chat referenced it, or flat out typed "VORE". It's even growing in youtube comments.
No.336588
>>336581
Supposedly the BDSM community is very friendly and welcoming. You could probably find people with a wide range of fetishes there.
No.336591
>>336585
>I agree with you. Most fetishes are not fucked up. They're usually plenty benign like flat chests or skinny girls or chubby girls. I think the majority of the really fucked up sexual items are kinks more than fetishes.
So in other words, we can agree that there are different levels/classes of fetishes: Regular fetishes everyone has and define attraction with, and kinks that are nothing more than to derive sexual pleasure: IE: A guy who likes fatties (Fetish), and a guy who likes fatties only because he wants to feed them (Kink).
Now if we could actually educate people, but I doubt that will ever happen.
>If you get off to toddler con diaper scat one time in your life then yeah that's pretty fucked up.
I would imagine that if you asked people, they have done at least one fucked up thing in their life. It happens with maturity IMO.
> but it's no where near as bad as not being able to get off unless you shit the diaper you're wearing while pretending to be a toddler.
Agreed. It's like a stunted sexual development, or something along the lines of that.
> The only ones that put me over the edge of "Well I'm not into it but that's fine if you are"
I'm this way too. For a lot of things, I'm okay if people want to be into it, it's not my thing and I want no part in it, and then the are the ones where it's over the line.
> reaction are gore, crushing, and necrophilia.
I don't get these ones at all either. I suspect trauma though at a young age might cause this.
No.336592
Hey guis remember when spanking was taboo?
The only thing taboo now is double rectum rimming.
No.336594
>>336592
>
>Hey guis remember when spanking was taboo?
Never?
Even the Victorians seemed to be into spanking.
No.336601
>>336591
>So in other words, we can agree that there are different levels/classes of fetishes: Regular fetishes everyone has and define attraction with, and kinks that are nothing more than to derive sexual pleasure: IE: A guy who likes fatties (Fetish), and a guy who likes fatties only because he wants to feed them (Kink).
Not exactly. For example a guy could have a fetish for skinny girls meaning he can only get off to them but also have a kink for feeding skinny girls. If he feeds them to chubbiness in his eyes he can no longer get off to her anymore so he would have to look elsewhere to fulfill his fetish. The reverse can also be true. He could have a preference for skinny girls but only gets off after he's fed them. It boils down to what he would NEED to maintain an erection and orgasm to it.
No.336608
>>336601
Okay makes sense.
So then three classes:
Preference - Doesn't have to be present, completely optional. If present, then it's an added bonus.
Fetish - What the actual Attraction and Sexual Interest depends on it.
And
Kink - Something extra that some individuals require to satisfy their sexual needs.
Feel free to expand upon it, you're better at it than I am.
No.336626
>>336608
The Kink and Fetish are backwards.
If I were to put it into levels it would go
Preference: something someone sexually likes. A bonus.
Kink: something someone really likes. Expect to have it once in a while to often.
Fetish: something someone needs. It would be impossible to have sex or masturbate with out.
Attraction is based on these things. For example I have a thing for redheads imprinted on me because my first serious relationship was with a redhead. That's a preference. I have a kink for titty fucking. I have a fetish for blowjobs. I literally can't get off unless I see it in porn or experience it. That gears my attraction to redheads with big tits and succulent lips. Not that I can not get off to say a blond with small tits and thin lips but if I'm watching porn you typically wouldn't see that kind of girl on the screen.
No.336628
>>336429
This just in: pseduo-science isn't based on actual reality just the biases of the pseduo-scientists.
I mean for fucks sake the very definition of normal is of/belonging to the norm.
Psychiatry is bullshit.
No.336634
>>336626
saved for possible pervy GURPS splatbook.
No.336635
>>336626
Makes sense to me. This was a great discussion anon!
No.336640
>>336634
I expect 5% of the profits.
>>336635
I enjoyed it too. I don't get to talk about this much but it is an interest of mine.
No.336643
>1040
>Quebec Residents
Fucking dropped
No.336646
>>336588
Depends on your BDSM community, it's been notorious for being invaded by retarded radfems and their pube-bearded orbiters who mistake the whole "based on mutual respect and equal partnership" thing for "i stomp ur nutz cuz i indepent wombyn".
No.336648
>>336646
I didn't think of that but yeah, that would be a problem. Guess you'd have to scout the place out first.
No.336650
>>336648
For people who kick and stomp and screech about "no means no" and "my body my rules" they don't quite grasp the whole part where he's your husband afterwards and that you're stomping on his nuts because he wants you to.
No.336651
>>336626
Okay, so attraction is based Preferences, Kinks, and Fetishes.
Then I'm not too sure what attracts me to chubbier–or in some cases, fatter–women. I have no sexual fetish or kink that depends on a woman being fat, just that I'm not attracted to fatter women.
If I had to take a stab at this, my guess is I have some sort of tactile kink or fetish that I'm not aware of that must fuel my attraction towards them.
No.336655
>>336640
Same here, it's an interesting topic that's hard to discuss IRL.
No.336663
>>336651
You probably were imprinted with the preference at an early age. Maybe your mother was chubby. I'm not going to get Freudian well I guess I kind of just did but your mother is typically your role model for how you see women. Maybe it was an early sexual experience like with my first major girlfriend. Maybe you found some chubby porn or a crush on a chubby girl early into adolescence or even earlier. Check this out :
http://www.livescience.com/9834-hourglass-figures-affect-men-brains-drug.html
http://archive.is/Wd2vt
No.336674
pro tip from a psychologist
The DSM is arbitrary bullshit with countless flaws. Also there is no such thing as normal, you can't define it, every definition of "normal" has serious problems
No.336676
>>336663
Ah, so it could be any of the above.
Could it also be a baby sitter? I (according to my mom) did have a Chubby Baby sitter that I absolutely loved when I was 2/3. My mom wasn't chubby until she hit 40.
I guess in reality, I'll never know what started it, because I also did have a crush on a chubby girl in middle school as well.
No.336683
>>336676
Even during early childhood imprinting can happen. Having multiple similar experiences is only going to make the imprint stronger. So your babysitter in a motherly role could have led to your crush which could have led to your general preference for chubby girls. Experiences tend to accumulate. You probably won't ever know for sure what caused it but I think you're on the right track.
No.336687
>lots of people like taboo and kinky sex
>but aren't open about it
Shocking.
No.336688
>>336683
Interesting stuff. This has cleared up a lot of questions I have. Thanks anon!
No.336689
>>336688
My pleasure, anon.
No.336699
>>336687
Basically, chan people IRL in a nutshell.
No.336705
>26 per cent in frotteurism
what is?
No.336726
>>336705
>frotteurism
"Frotteurism is a paraphilic interest in rubbing, usually one's pelvic area or erect penis, against a non-consenting person for sexual pleasure. It may involve touching any part of the body, including the genital area"
- Wikipedia
No.336738
>>336429
>>336509
trashman beat me to it
No.336753
>>336587
I've been into vore since the second grade, I didn't know what it was then, but the thought of being swallowed would make me feel tingly
No.336789
Yeah can we do the same 'study' before everybody was watching internet porn?
No.336800
>>336579
I won't believe your lies, anon.
No.336838
>>336789
Yeah, this study doesn't take into account those who look at porn, and those who don't. Most people who look at porn tend to get into more and more degenerate shit because it acts like a drug.
No.336987
>>336429
So, furries were actually normal all along?
No.337002
>>336515
Feminists were submissive until fathers became too cucked to tell their "little princesses" no.
Deep down, they all know what they want.
No.337010
>>336429
> 26 per cent in fetishism
what the fuck is fetishism?
is there really a sexual fetish that's simply called "fetish?"
No.337014
File: 1457852162381.jpg (Spoiler Image, 483.48 KB, 707x1000, 707:1000, 50548420_p6_master1200.jpg)
Is girls wearing men's underwear normal?
No.337016
>>337014
It's pretty tame as far as kinks go.
No.337018
>>336692
They're really upset about Bernie. The shitposting is getting abstract.
No.337029
No.337039
>>336441
What's wrong with watching videos of things being eaten whole
still struggling
watching the last terrified effort to remain alive before they vanish
>>337029
/n/ pls go and stay go
inb4: I know, I just don't fucking care
Crab is love
No.337040
On a scale from 2 to 10 how bad is me fucking women's shoes? My sister has lots of girl friends coming over ( which is good because I like variety) so this fetish doesn't seem to go away. The dirty plastic sandals and recently used sneakers are the best.
No.337056
>>337014
reverse traps are best traps
No.337093
>"Abnormality is normality" say Jewish psychologists
Why am I not surprised.
No.337153
>>337093
Good news, Anon - your Jew fetish is perfectly normal! No need to repress it any more.
No.337206
>>337040
My guess is, foot fetishes come from the fact that if women take care of their feet, they usually take care of the rest of their body. I don't know, I don't have one.
>>337039
Sounds like some sort of bizzaro power play.
No.337212
>>337206
>My guess is, foot fetishes come from the fact that if women take care of their feet, they usually take care of the rest of their body.
Actual soft foot fetishist (feet kink?) here. For me, it stems from the fact that they are a sensible zone that can be massaged or tickled for pleasure.
It may also come from the fact that girls only take their shoes off when they are extremely comfortable; they are some sort of "shield" that would leave you vulnerable to all sorts of potentially harmful shit in the soil were you not wearing them, so logically you would only take them off if you were sure that you can't be hurt. The opposite, taking shoes off in a "dangerous" soil, also turns me on, for some reason. I deduce that it turns me on because the subtle irregularities in the soil may act as tickling/massaging factors, but it may also come from the fact that it could show that said girl is fairly daring.
No.337216
>tfw into spanking now because parents threatened to hit me daily but they never actually did
No.337221
Phew, thought I was some sort of sexual deviant there for a second!
No.337222
great, so I don't have to feel ashamed of loving Guro?
No.337223
>>336467
>Quebec
>Representing Canada
No.337224
No.337226
>>336441
Babyfuck as in.. Fucking babies or pretending to be a baby while being fucked?
If the former, then yes, it's inexcusable. Latter is your prerogative, though.
>>336470
>WHO WOULD HAVE FUCKING THOUGHT?
That's exactly what I thought. We all have a kink, we just don't all confess it, because it's rarely anyone's business to know.
No.337233
>>337018
Upset about what?
No.337239
>>336429
Fuck, I'm pretty average then. As far as my fetishes go, I'm pretty basic.
No.337243
>>337226
It's a little easier talking about it on anonymous message boards though because it's not face to face and there's no identity to be compromised. I do watch a vlogger on youtube though that is pretty open about being kinky. It's kind of refreshing to see someone so open about it. She even linked her fetlife when she "came out" as kinky. To be honest about it I'm more open to you guys about this than I'd ever be with friends.
No.337247
>>337226
>We all have a kink
Haven't masturbated since ~September, and I'm no longer attracted to horses because of it. Not everyone has a kink. Just degenerates.
>>336470
Fucking idiot, they're normies because they are the norm, failed normans included.
E.g. Neo-liberalism is the normal ideology for Whites in the [Current Year]. Are you saying SJWs and ilk are secretly /pol/acks?
No.337265
>>337212
>>337212
> for some reason. I deduce that it turns me on because the subtle irregularities in the soil may act as tickling/massaging factors, but it may also come from the fact that it could show that said girl is fairly daring.
So acts of confidence? I think the next question would be, do you like confident women who know what they are doing, and how to get what they want?
No.337267
>>337243
>It's a little easier talking about it on anonymous message boards though because it's not face to face and there's no identity to be compromised.
Oh of course. And not just with sexual things, but with any subject. Probably 85% of things I write online I'd never say in public. I love image boards specifically because no one gives a fuck. & I can say how I really feel.
No.337271
>>336441
HATING babyfuck is inexcusable.
Come at me, bro!
No.337279
>>337039
This.
Vore is awesome
No.337283
>>337265
Of course. I am not sure if it can even be called "soft femdom", but "assertive" and "happy sex" are two of my favourite Danbooru tags. I'm not really into consensual-sex-but-with-rape-cries, which is a shame because most hentai is like that.
No.337299
>>336429
old news. Already read about this 10 years ago.
only around 50% of straight men prefer their hands to masturbate with.
The other 50% use other things. Neither me nor my brother used ours hands.
No.337308
>>337299
Hands free fapping?
No.337310
>>337308
>>337308
Kek. So he's one of those hands free douche bags that uses hands free phone sets.
No.337333
>>337308
Have you heard of bed humping?
No.337346
>>337333
You mean frotteurism? Actually I was unfamiliar to the concept having a name until the posting of this article.
Hands free fapping is an old 4chan meme by the way. It would get you banned for the the mere mentioning of it. I'm just memespouting to get my own jollies. I apologize.
No.337385
TRUMP WILL END /LEFTYPOL/ SURVEILLANCE
No.337393
>>337299
Yeah, I prefer to use a vagina for fapping myself, but they're rarely ever available.
No.337398
>>337346
>I'm just memespouting to get my own jollies
That's ok, anon, everyone has their fetish.
No.337402
>>337333
I hear you can bend you dick permanently by doing that.
No.337403
>>337398
I have never masturbated to memes but I find the idea pretty funny. I would be interested to know if any other anon needs rare Pepes in order to get off though.
No.337421
Can't get into fatties or huge tits, like normal weight or skinny girls and medium or small tits. Cute girls are best, can't fuck a girl with an unattractive face. Tom girls and cute lesbians with short hair turn are nice. Like blowjobs, like vaginal, like anal. Actually I really like blowjobs. I have a big dick and like going deep and "dominating". Like soft biting, having my back scratched, any position is good.
Fairly normal or should I kill myself?
No.337444
>>337421
> Like blowjobs, like vaginal, like anal. Actually I really like blowjobs.
That part is really really really normal.
No.337450
>>337421
Fairly normal. A lot of guys subscribe to the more than a handful is too much philosophy. I'm more of a the bigger the better kind of guy but to each their own. Short hair is a little different. Long hair is a phenotype from western culture that basically means health and beauty as well as availability. Married women used to put their hair up where as maidens were known to wear their hair down. Just a hypothesis but do you or did you listen to a lot of punk rock? The thing about rough sex biologically is that pain during sexual arousal is given the same reaction as pleasure. In extreme forms this is BDSM with striking involved. Scratching and biting fulfill a lower level of psychological inclinations but still provide that primal experience. It's two fold. You are getting psychological stimulated as well as physically. All in all you're pretty normal but you have you kinks. If there is anything that you need in order to experience orgasm then you would have a fetish but for the most part you have a normal level of kinks.
No.337468
No.337502
>>336429
>women who report an interest in sexual submission have more varied sexual interests and report greater satisfaction with their sex lives
>women who report an interest in sexual submission report greater satisfaction with their sex lives
why am I not surprised
No.337504
>>336429
>"Weird" sexual fetishes are actually very "normal"
FTFY
No.337505
>>337502
Yeah, they're telling it like it's a surprise. This is what you get when biology goes out of fashion.
No.337511
>>336476
oh anon, do you happen to have the State fetish thread's screencap?
No.337516
>>337247
>I'm no longer attracted to horses
Which one? The actual horse or the cartoon horse?
No.337524
>>336429
>Masochism was also found to be significantly associated with more diverse sexual interests and linked with higher sex life satisfaction.
That statistic reminded me of a similar article, although not a survey conducted by the people that work at the DSM, it basically stated that one of the surprising facts about female submissives is that often the sort of female “Type A” personalities that have Masochistic practices exhibit high self esteems and are well educated.
It was also shown that the majority of men that were masochistic (M), populated the middle- and upper-middle-class with a high education.
No.337538
>>336581
8chong tbh fam. Making friends and meeting up can pay off.
No.337621
>>337421
>Tom girls
Here I thought this was just some made up term by a retarded Lolcow, but Google informs me that this is a real thing, and that there is even a movie about "Tomgirls".
No.337652
>>337621
how did you not know what a tomgirl was? how did you miss best personality entirely?
No.337659
>>337652
Enjoy your Tomgirls.
No.337661
>>337659
I was waiting for /cow/ to show up.
No.337677
>tfw you have a fart fetish
>tfw you know you're underground as shit
>tfw this study doesn't apply to you
No.337691
women find 80% of men unattractive.
No.337704
>>337691
While men find 80% of women attractive.
No.337707
>>337691
>>337704
There's an 80/20 rule in this somewhere.
No.337744
>>337403
Actually, you can masturbate to memes. They made a porn out baneposting and suggestions they got from cuckchan's /tv/
http://www.brazzers.com/scenes/view/id/9470/meme-lover-parody/
No.337754
>>336575
>my gf is super short
>looks like a loli
>she's into incest and ageplay
I win
No.337758
>>337621
Are you American or just younger? Tomboy was a term used often when I was younger(I'm 29). I was called one when younger. I liked it because I didn't like anything girly. I hated wearing dresses, loved sports & wore only t-shirts & shorts. I remember the worst thing a friend could call me was "prissy", lol. I got in lots of fights over that. :)
This all changed when I hit puberty, though. But I still love sports.
No.337770
>>337677
>fart fetish
>underground
Way more people have it than you think. You're not alone.
No.337896
>>336509
Why does this guy look on every picture as if he has outsmarted the person who stares at him?
No.337902
Let me know when England unbans loli.
No.337945
>Asked 1050 canadians about their sexual habits
>Discovered degeneracy is rampant
No.338073
>>337935
nice board favourites faggot
>[ bane / r9k / pone / monster / intl / fit / kind / wx / homosuck / sp ]
No.338074
>>338073
just in case he deletes it
No.338080
File: 1457966954915.jpg (221.59 KB, 1240x786, 620:393, trashman this is your home….jpg)
No.338091
>>338074
>>337935
>>337770
It's hard to believe there are people who find something so gross and disgusting a turn on. Meanwhile you've put me off sex for the day.
No.338095
>>338086
What is mindbreak?
When I Googled, I got Magic the gathering references.
Also, nice Gondola :) I don't have that one yet.
No.338097
>>338095
>Training / turning someone mentally into a sexual slave.
Basically anything like that, including moral degeneration
No.338103
>>338097
Oh, I see. Definitely can see the interest there. I'd think you could find a good amount of girls to indulge that. Some might say they're not into it, but trust me, there's appeal there. Shows a dominant man.
>Lmao, unicorn kitty is not pleased
No.338124
>>337039
>/n/ pls go and stay go
nigger, do you know where you are?
No.338227
Of course they are, the very notion of "muh degenerucy" is for petulant children.
No.338333
>>337677
Listen to >>337770
More people are into than you think. However, despite how harmless it actually is, it's somehow considered very taboo so people like us keep it under wraps because most people are like >>338091
No.338372
>>336441
There's absolutely nothing wrong with babyfuck, asshole.
No.338378
>>336585
>be me
>be in elementary school
>have somewhat younger friend
>friend is weird, but whatever
>be at home
>she wants me to sit on her
>what
>"what"
>she wants to lie down on the couch and have me sit on her back, then switch
>something is very off about this
>do it anyway because she keeps bothering me
>this happens at least twice when we hang out together
>don't like it
>stop hanging out with her
>be today
>she's a lesbian
>learn from 8chan that crushing is a fetish
>realize she was using you as fetish fuel
JUST
No.338380
>>338372
Jesus fucking Christ, spoil that shit.
No.338381
I know 8ch isn't a good example of "normal," but where do I fall on the kink scale with loving gentle femdom, mind control, a tiny bit of futa, and symbiosis?
No.338403
>>336441
>Hating babyfuck.
People like you don't belong here.
No.338419
>>336429
yeah no
PSYOPS aside ( >>>/killcen/ >>>/realnews/ >>>/32/ )
liking feet, anal, or light choking slapping scratching is NOT the same as scat, under 13 pedo, any age play, furry, or outright cutting/burning/mutilation
pol is always right — its Jews again
No.338426
>>338381
Not too bad relatively. Gentle femdom means you're just a submissive that doesn't like pain play. Depends on who's doing the mind control whether or not you're a submissive or a switch. You may be a little bi curious with futa though definitely toward the straight end of the spectrum. I'm unfamiliar with symbiosis and looking it up just links to the natural process of two animals benefitting each other.
No.338435
>>338426
as far as symbiosis goes, it's kind of along the lines of "becoming one" with my partner
the best example that comes to my head is http://monstergirlencyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Shoggoth
No.338439
>>338426
as far as symbiosis goes, it's kind of along the lines of "becoming one" with my partner
the best example that comes to my head is http://monstergirlencyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Shoggoth
No.338440
No.338446
>>338372
You can fantasize whatever you want & no one can stop you. But put that into action & anyone would be right to put a bullet in your head.
No.338450
>>338435
So you want to become an incubus? There's nothing wrong with that. MGE straddles the line between vanilla and weird. Becoming an incubus that is forever a semen pump for your semen demon can be a form of pet play. It's a little weird but only because of the effort that goes into it. It is very committed. What's your thoughts on the Jubjub?
No.338456
>>338450
I want to kind of withdraw from the world, not really trek around with a puffball on my dick the Jubjub's gimmick is kind of tacky in my opinion. I just want to escape reality, as quite frankly, it is bleak as of the CURRENT YEAR
I'm antisocial in all situations except one-on-one, whether it be with friends or loved ones, so I can kind of see myself being with a motherly or maid-esque demeanor
No.338469
>>338456
Yep you're a submissive through and through. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be taken care of especially in your fantasies. It kind of would be impractical in a real life relationship especially since females are mostly submissive not dominant. There's hope for you in finding a real relationship but there's nothing wrong with continuing with 2D fantasies.
No.338497
I never understood hardcore fetishes. Who has time for this shit?
Seems like they're either getting too much sex or not enough, and are trying to fill a void.
No.338573
>>337516
Cartoon horses are forgivable because they don't actually exist
but like any furshit if you allow yourself to go full degenerate, please kill yourself before attempting to abuse actual animals.
No.338590
>>338573
Thank goodness it's the mare in heat trapping me to the stable wall with her back end.
It would be abuse not to satisfy her needs.
No.338983
>>337421
>Has a fairly big dick
>likes blowjobs and going deep
Calling BS, depends what your definition of big is (maybe you're just thin but long) but I can't fit down a human throat, so any woman that blows me can get about 2-3inches down my shaft.
I hate blowjobs.
No.338987
I liked to tie up my ex and blind fold her.
I also liked commanding her to tell me she loved it.
How vanilla am I?
No.339147
>>338987
Pretty standard dom. Did you tie her up all over like shibari or just the hands and feet?
No.339157
>>337758
No, I know what a Tomboy is, but he said Tomgirl, which I thought was made up.
No.339158
>>337744
You can do the same with trolling. When I was younger I'd troll and get people mad just to jerk off to how powerless they were to stop being mad at the shit I said.
May be why trolling is so common today and isn't exactly "quality" and is just cheap "ur a faget XD :^)" type shit, because it's only for sexual gratification and most people aren't gonna try hard just to get off.
No.339159
>>336651
Nothing wrong with liking Fatties/Chubbies/BBWs. It's much more normal than /fit/ and /pol/ would have you think.
No.339179
File: 1458051205246.jpg (133.31 KB, 736x981, 736:981, e514b1a946928823a06b3b548a….jpg)
So what exactly is wrong with diapers?
It's basically just a sissy/Lolita fetish on steroids. It has nothing to do with actual children and everything to do with feminizing and adults.
If you're a daddy to an ABDL girl, that's actually a very reactionary fetish since it portrays women as gentle, meek, dependent and cute, and the daddy as a sublime but loving masculine keeper.
No.339195
>>339179
I think that most people find the infantalization a little off putting. It's the varying levels of being attracted to teenagers, children, and babies. The role play is valid because you're not really sexualizing a baby just a person who is acting like one. Still I think the idea hits too close to revulsion to most people because of the closeness to pedophilia even though it's not. Not my cup of tea but I'm not silently judging it.
No.339289
>>339147
Just hand and feet. Rope is actually pretty expensive.
No.339338
>>339289
Light bondage and dom. You're not that out there. Not vanilla but not far away.
No.339391
So my furfaggotry is excusable now
huh.
i don't feel like living anymore
No.340211
>>336429
A New Study indicates that all you dumb normalfags don't understand that this is a just a journal published study and not validated. Citing the sewage flow of journal articles that universities pump out in quantity-over-quality volume to justify their funding as scientifically correct information without cross examination is RETARED.
A NEW STUDY INDICATES THAT DUMB PEOPLE DON'T READ STUDIES BUT DO BELIEVE THEY INDICATE
the sample size is 1,040. you are taking some joke major's survey they handed out for two hours on a Quebec college campus as demographically accurate.
you're looking for validation and you've found it. if you want to fit in go hang out at the student union in some dumbfuck college in Quebec.
No.340212
>>336429
A NEW STUDY INDICATES THAT DUMB PEOPLE DON'T READ STUDIES BUT DO BELIEVE THEY INDICATE
A New Study indicates that all you dumb normalfags don't understand that this is a just a journal published study and not validated. Citing the sewage flow of journal articles that universities pump out in quantity-over-quality volume to justify their funding as scientifically correct information is RETARED.
the sample size is 1,040. you are taking some joke major's survey they handed out for two hours on a Quebec college campus as demographically accurate.
you're looking for validation and you've found it. if you want to fit in go hang out at the student union in some dumbfuck college in Quebec.
No.340225
>>337421
>Tomgirls
Mmmmm… yeah. I hab da same desire for a boyfriend free tomgirl. I hunger for the tom tom.
No.340227
>>337659
What does Ben Franklin have to do with tomgirls?
No.340231
>>340227
Lmaoo
If I had been drinking I would've spattered it everywhere.