[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/n/ - News

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


8chan News Board Ring: /pn/ - Politics and News - /politics/ - Politics

File: 1457955800873.jpg (65.06 KB, 590x331, 590:331, fukushima.jpg)

 No.338002

https://archive.is/qwr1A

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, which began on March 11, 2011, uprooted thousands of Japanese people, set the worldwide nuclear power industry back a decade, and caused a run on potassium iodide (said to help ward off thyroid cancer). What it didn’t do was kill anyone from radioactive fallout.

That was the conclusion of the six-volume Report on the Fukushima Daiichi Accident, released in August 2015 by the International Atomic Energy Agency. About 1,600 people died in the evacuation of the surrounding area, however—many of them elderly and infirm hospital patients and residents of nursing homes. That would seem to indicate that the response to the accident was more deadly than the accident itself.

A Greenpeace report released this week, “Nuclear Scars: The Lasting Legacies of Chernobyl and Fukushima,” takes a harsher view, saying that “the health consequences of the Chernobyl and Fukushima catastrophes are extensive.” But most of the report dwells on Chernobyl, and it notes that the primary effects of Fukushima were “mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.” Put another way: fear and panic resulting from the accident (and from the loss of homes and livelihoods) were more dangerous than the radiation.

To be sure, diagnoses of thyroid cancer have gone up among children exposed to radiation from Fukushima; but that’s almost certainly due to increased screening, as this Wired analysis details. Heightened screening led to higher detection, resulting in “an epidemic of diagnosis,” according to H. Gilbert Welch, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.

One lasting effect of the accident has been a potentially catastrophic shift in Japan’s energy policy. All Japan’s nuclear reactors were shut down in the wake of Fukushima, and although the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is moving to reopen selected plants, public opposition is widespread. The result: Japan now plans to build as many as 47 new coal plants in the coming years, which would eliminate any chance of meeting the country’s emissions reduction targets under the Paris climate accord.

If they get built, the health and environmental effects of those plants will far outweigh any of the damage from the nuclear accident itself.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601011/the-effects-of-fukushima-linger-after-five-years-but-not-from-radiation/

 No.338032

File: 1457961781184.jpg (31.06 KB, 680x349, 680:349, shitwave.jpg)

At least it's not as bad as the poo pollution India spew out into the ocean


 No.339741

>>338032

So India is raging fecal war on Africa and that is why that continent is so undeveloped?

INDIANS really are Aryans!


 No.339748

>>338032

LePOOria


 No.339899

>>338032

fish love to eat poo though


 No.339936

damn… an ocean of shit… who would have thought….


 No.339954

File: 1458088921059.jpg (75.54 KB, 321x348, 107:116, 1433787102753.jpg)

>One lasting effect of the accident has been a potentially catastrophic shift in Japan’s energy policy. All Japan’s nuclear reactors were shut down in the wake of Fukushima, and although the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is moving to reopen selected plants, public opposition is widespread. The result: Japan now plans to build as many as 47 new coal plants in the coming years, which would eliminate any chance of meeting the country’s emissions reduction targets under the Paris climate accord.

This is why I hate "environmentalists."


 No.339981

File: 1458091052816.gif (1.99 MB, 458x227, 458:227, tmp_7815-1457459326706-1-1….gif)

>>339954

Scientists are starting to get pissed too, it used to be we just ignored the larger groups of idiots post hippie era. But im noticing thats becoming harder, more people have been brainwashed into hating nuclear energy due to bogus media coverage.

Also to be fair nuclear energy isnt as safe as a lot of people say it is. But thats mostly due to human error. Like that one time a us plant almost blew off a death cloud because the camera the engineers used to take a group photo had a flash that set it off.


 No.339991

>>338002

>shills and liars that will be crippled in eternity

You're a deadbeat moron if you believe any of that shit. From mutated plants to two-headed whales that are washing up, Fukushima is the worst disaster ever. Even that talk show host died of acute onset leukemia after eating that food on a whim (I guess). He proved a point, all right.

It's so radioactive, that IT KILLED THEIR ROBOTS.

Repeat: SO RADIOACTIVE IT KILLED ROBOTS


 No.340019

>>338002

There was no nuclear accident. Not a single victim of nuclear radiation, no death, no contamination. You can buy the region's produce on market places normally, test it and see that there is not significant level of radiation.

There was a massive Earthquake (tectonic plates slide was 50m !) immediately followed by a formidable tsunami. nearly 16000 dead (mostly drowned) and still 2500 missing. That was the real catastrophe. Not the phony "nuclear accident" fabricated by anti-nuclear power leftist hype.


 No.340163

>>340019

i really wonder. i bet a person could travel to japan and ask an inhabitant of Honshu island if they have heard of problems at fukushima. hell, they may have never heard of fukushima,lol. scary stuff.


 No.340819

>>340019

you know, there is an unwritten rule in all the internet forums around the web.

that rule is; Puff, Puff, Pass.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]