[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/n/ - News

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


8chan News Board Ring: /pn/ - Politics and News - /politics/ - Politics

File: 1458105350373.jpg (27.69 KB, 640x426, 320:213, 10-researcherst.jpg)

 No.340198

Imagine a world with little or no concrete. Would that even be possible? After all, concrete is everywhere—on our roads, our driveways, in our homes, bridges and buildings. For the past 200 years, it's been the very foundation of much of our planet.

But the production of cement, which when mixed with water forms the binding agent in concrete, is also one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, about 5 percent of the planet's greenhouse gas emissions comes from concrete.

An even larger source of carbon dioxide emissions is flue gas emitted from smokestacks at power plants around the world. Carbon emissions from those plants are the largest source of harmful global greenhouse gas in the world.

A team of interdisciplinary researchers at UCLA has been working on a unique solution that may help eliminate these sources of greenhouse gases. Their plan would be to create a closed-loop process: capturing carbon from power plant smokestacks and using it to create a new building material—CO2NCRETE—that would be fabricated using 3D printers. That's "upcycling."

"What this technology does is take something that we have viewed as a nuisance—carbon dioxide that's emitted from smokestacks—and turn it into something valuable," said J.R. DeShazo, professor of public policy at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs and director of the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation.

http://phys.org/news/2016-03-carbon-dioxide-sustainable-concrete.html

 No.340273

>>340198

What happens when we lack CO2 for plants?


 No.340281

>>340273

Burn more fossil fuels


 No.340297

i have my suspicions about the ancient pyramid cultures using this type of technology, it would certainly explain their "extraordinary" precision in many cases.

present day, sounds like a great idea if they can add rebar, tension cables, and/or earthquake relief fittings. rock-on UCLA!


 No.340300

>>340297

Sorry to burst your bubble, anon, but the Egyptians were just autists who knew how to use trigonometry to its utmost.


 No.340301

>>340297

WE WUZ KANGZ N SHIET


 No.340306

>>340198

>For the past 200 years

Forms of concrete have existed before recorded history.


 No.340307

>>340300

oh boy anon… giza was a mah-cheen anon. MUH-CHEEN!

nourishment for you anon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS8fPje0mwU

he has many works out there, you should indulge yourself.


 No.340319

Keep in mind that they only did this on lab-scale as a proof of concept. A different question is if it can be done cheaply enough. Even if this works on plant-scale, which I hope, this might result in a few plants for PR purposes which have no impact on the big picture.

>>340273

There are many factors which can limit plant growth (Temperature, Humidity, Light, Water, nutrition, Oxygen levels, pH, interaction with other living species / herbivores / microorganisms), whereas some of them are neither constant nor ideal for most plants in a natural environment. I can neither confirm nor deny that CO2 might be the one limiting factor for most natural plants at any point of time because that's not my field, and looking up in the internet turned up blank for me. Which means that, unless someone knows a study of plant growth in natural environments (CO2 can be the limiting factor in gardening which implies that other factors are somewhat optimised) I will remain careful with asserting any effect or absence thereof.


 No.340321

>>340273

it's not like we'll stop burning fossil fuels anytime soon so I wouldn't worry about that. but if you need to know it usually involves an ice age


 No.340336

>>340300

This.

Only faggots with the religious gene set to maximum and have dumped conventional religions to feel superior, start falling for EGIPSHUNZ WER ALEEYENZZ!!!!!!!!


 No.340370

>>340336

there is something very incorrect about the accepted mainstream chronological dating of the "now" Egyptian structures. it is looking like the Egyptian dynasties could have very well inherited those structures from an even earlier pre-history empire-of-earth, to which there is no record, other than the structures themselves. the little information from the 1st dynasties is extremely limited… at best. til recently, the pyramids were dated to 3-4 thousand B.C. since, geologists have come forward BLASTING that shitty theory apart, to bits!. now a speculation suggests that the empire was built upon a chronological period related to the precession of the equinox, which may date the mighty Sphinx to a mind-blowing… 26,000 years ago.

about the only thing that can be said is, something very special happened on earth, a very long time ago. and it was very sophisticated.


 No.340395

File: 1458130139754.png (2.92 MB, 1600x1080, 40:27, idf101.png)

>>340370

Okay Ben Carson.


 No.340407

>>340395

Why are you calling him Ben Carson? Surely he never said anything about ancient Egyptian civilizations–especially tinfoil versions of their history.


 No.340410

>>340370

Here is a crackpot theory for you: the bible is correct, but details got lost in translations. Humanity are actually aliens who had an intergalactic empire and Noah's Ark was actually a spaceship that was evacuating a nation from a universe-wide cataclysm. The survivors crash-landed on earth where they tried to build a interdimensional gate called the Tower of Babel to take heaven back by force, but God wiped out their knowledge, causing it all to be lost and humanity was thrown back into the stone age.

For bonus points: The race you belong to is the original human race and all other races have been genetically engineered by your ancestors to be servants.


 No.340426

>>340410

i don't know about all that. what i would say, is that the bible is more or less centralized around the Mediterranean region. these pyramid structures occur across the world, that may also have an astronomical importance. and i am not to keen on your use of "stone-age", i know it is a metaphor that is open to definition.

literary discussions are ok, but generally, the books are written by the people with money. so they are a little whimsical and/or one-sided from time-2-time.

i am not sure there is an "original" human race. i thought i had seen a scientific finding that said "we" humans possessed like 12, or 13 different mitochondrial origins. but i don't much about the topic you are hinting at.


 No.340439

File: 1458134460884.jpg (Spoiler Image, 37.45 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault (1).jpg)

>>340407

[spoiler]:^)[/spoiler


 No.341056

>>340426

I was just joking around with my crackpot theory :) that said, I would not rule out that there is an older covilisation that came before the Egyptians, it's an interesting idea to entertain.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]